ライフサイエンスコーパス: genotype frequency

1 (P <0.05) in their allelic distribution and genotype frequency.

2 tionship between nodule numbers and N-fixing genotype frequency.

3 lection can result in stable oscillations of genotype frequencies.

4 control subjects also was used to determine genotype frequencies.

5 uating selection require time series data on genotype frequencies.

6 , or cytogenetics revealed no differences in genotype frequencies.

7 An analysis of genotype frequencies (896 AA vs. AG and GG) demonstrated

8 (GWAS), often involves statistical models of genotype frequencies across individuals.

9 his gene, rs2736100, varied substantially in genotype frequency across major continental regions.

10 CFLP analysis-derived HCV genotype frequencies also concurred with the national es

11 Genotype frequencies also differ markedly between cases

12 To compare the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 allele and genotype frequencies among 260 Ashkenazi (AJ) and 80 Sep

13 We then compared genotype frequencies among the invasive and in situ grou

14 We derived genotype frequencies and effect sizes from published GWA

15 MBL genotype frequencies and MBL serum concentrations did no

16 The projected RDA ranges were based on TT genotype frequencies and on different effect sizes (5-50

17 t to test the association between allele and genotype frequencies and the severity of gingivitis.

18 between PSMB single nucleotide polymorphism genotype frequency and clinical response to bortezomib o

19 An interaction between genotype frequency and spawning density determines how s

20 e frequencies respond to changes in pathogen genotype frequencies, and vice versa.

21 .5 and Hardy-Weinberg proportions, the three genotype frequencies are often assumed to be 0.25, 0.50,

22 or in fine-mapping applications, allele and genotype frequencies are often assumed to be known when,

23 ctly observing changes in Chlorella vulgaris genotype frequencies as the abundances of these algae an

24 The genotype frequencies assigned by the CFLP method were 44

25 r exact test) was observed regarding the p53 genotype frequencies at codon 72 between the PVR cases a

26 m in this case relies on the assumption that genotype frequencies at each locus are in Hardy-Weinberg

27 n testing for deviations from Hardy-Weinberg genotype frequencies at each site, we analyze the entire

28 Genotype frequencies at eight microsatellite loci showed

29 s of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) based on genotype frequencies at one or more marker loci.

30 PIC)--for differences in clinical course and genotype frequency at IL10 and TNF loci, known to be ass

31 ample, significant differences were found in genotype frequencies between cases (RR, 30.59%; RP, 43.2

32 t an analysis method that is used to compare genotype frequencies between cases and controls, accordi

33 mary test of association was a comparison of genotype frequencies between cases and controls, and a t

34 Significantly different genotype frequencies between HPC probands and unaffected

35 vely; there were no differences in allele or genotype frequencies between patients and control subjec

36 onents of the immune system, we compared MHC genotype frequencies between pups and adults in the grey

37 al analysis showed significant difference in genotype frequencies between the 'higher' (>150 mg/day)

38 The difference in genotype frequencies between the clinical subgroups was

39 Similar field-based manipulations of genotype frequencies could provide a powerful approach t

40 iations were found with the A locus: DR3/DR4 genotype frequency decreases with age of onset in this d

41 chi2 Analysis was used to determine whether genotype frequencies deviated significantly from Hardy-W

42 AW with invasive breast cancer (P < 0.0001); genotype frequencies did not differ significantly betwee

43 Genotype frequency did not differ between patients with

44 n the homologous recombination (HR) pathway, genotype frequencies differed between cases and controls

45 Genotype frequencies differed markedly in the four count

46 Allele and genotype frequencies differed significantly between the

47 Allele and genotype frequencies differed significantly between the

48 d, 12 located in 10 genes showed allelic and genotype frequency differences between hypertriglyceride

49 Unexpectedly, we noted significant genotype frequency differences between male and female c

50 Allele and genotype frequency distributions were not significantly

51 uncertainties in population incidence rates, genotype frequency, effect sizes, and models of joint ef

52 ked loci only if selection is so strong that genotype frequencies evolve deterministically.

53 Allele and genotype frequencies for 16 SNPs in DNA repair genes ERC

54 tudy (864 AA and 650 EA women) we found that genotype frequencies for 35 of 42 tested SNPs (18 candid

55 Genotype frequencies for all of the polymorphisms show m

56 -control population study and the allele and genotype frequencies for polymorphism rs11671784 in miR-

57 between cases and controls in allele and/or genotype frequencies for six SNPs in Block I and two SNP

58 gn of the slope between absolute fitness and genotype frequency for the genotype that was the weaker

59 ethnicity and either allelic distribution or genotype frequency for the tumor necrosis factor-alpha o

60 uid of patients with Lyme arthritis, and the genotype frequencies found in joints reflected those in

61 ach that assess differences in covariance of genotype frequencies from single nucleotide polymorphism

62 ic variant was investigated by comparison of genotype frequencies in a registry of 66 cases with defi

63 ignificant (p <or= 0.05) differences between genotype frequencies in aggressive and controls (IL-1B +

64 The set of possible postselection genotype frequencies in an infinite, randomly mating pop

65 Genotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared

66 Genotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared

67 When MTHFR C677T genotype frequencies in MSS CRC cases were compared to c

68 We compared the genotype frequencies in patients and controls and also c

69 Genotype frequencies in patients were compared with heal

70 We compared genotype frequencies in subjects with type 2 diabetes wi

71 Analysis of the genotype frequencies in the separated T. b. brucei and T

72 Importantly, the F304S genotype frequency in 55 CDG-Ia patients classified as m

73 We determined the Arg6Trp genotype frequency in a healthy population and its effec

74 n genotype- and age-specific HPV prevalence, genotype frequency in precancer and cancer, and age-spec

75 m Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) of marker-genotype frequencies is a crucial first step in almost a

76 ered the slopes between absolute fitness and genotype frequency more negative for the stronger compet

77 The genotype frequencies of each variant were determined in

78 keup of mixed populations, using cytonuclear genotype frequencies of first- and second-generation off

79 To test this hypothesis, we compared the genotype frequencies of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) cl

80 Genotype frequencies of p.D19H were established using MA

81 ses and 73.2% in controls (p=0.045), and the genotype frequencies of p53 Arg/Arg, Arg/Pro, and Pro/Pr

82 morphims (SNPs) in ARHGEF11 and compared the genotype frequencies of subjects with type 2 diabetes (n

83 There were no differences in the allele and genotype frequencies of the APOE gene between PD groups

84 d not observe any significant differences in genotype frequencies of the SHMT1 and RFC polymorphisms

85 The APOE genotype frequencies of the study population were approx

86 It is noteworthy that no differences in genotype frequencies of the VDBP polymorphisms were asso

87 Next, typical genotype frequencies of those polymorphisms in the gener

88 We found that the genotype frequency of two sequence variants (11657A/G an

89 o or more biogeographic provinces, shifts in genotype frequencies often align with biogeographic boun

90 clusters and, instead, calculating expected genotype frequencies on the basis of inbreeding or selfi

91 No significant differences in genotype frequency or allele frequency were observed bet

92 lleles at each of n loci is described by 22n genotype frequencies, or equivalently, by allele frequen

93 nificant differences in either the allele or genotype frequencies, or haplotype frequencies, between

94 We analyzed HLA class II genotype frequencies over time in two large populations

95 e effect burden was associated with L(A)L(A) genotype frequency (P = .03) or L(A) allele frequency (P

96 ffect burden in the entire sample (P = .004 [genotype frequency]; P < .001 [allele frequency]).

97 The ratio of genotype frequencies provides a measure of genetic varia

98 virulence are genotype specific so that host genotype frequencies respond to changes in pathogen geno

99 The differences in allele and genotype frequencies seen in the Asian APS patients were

100 Observed genotype frequencies strongly reflect the directional as

101 The only germline genotype frequency that differed between the two cluster

102 imates of power over the distribution of the genotype frequencies to calculate the true estimate of p

103 timates are based on fitting the equilibrium genotype frequencies under continent-island models of pl

104 The TT genotype frequency varied from 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7, 2.0) i

105 Genotype frequencies vary by geography and race.

106 significant difference in MTHFR 677 and 1298 genotype frequencies was observed between 237 cases and

107 The genotype frequency was arg/arg (54%), arg/pro (33%), and

108 y ethnicity, a significant difference in KIR genotype frequency was demonstrated in Hispanic cases (3

109 DD genotype frequency was increased in the patients with AR

110 KIR A/A genotype frequency was significantly increased in cases

111 The AA genotype frequency was significantly reduced in black ca

112 Genotype frequencies were 37.8% for -/-, 47.8% for +/-,

113 Allele and genotype frequencies were compared between the 120 parti

114 Allele and genotype frequencies were compared between the cases and

115 Genotype frequencies were compared by 2 x 2 contingency

116 Allele and genotype frequencies were compared using Fisher's exact

117 Genotype frequencies were consistent with other populati

118 Allele and genotype frequencies were evaluated for association with

119 E3/2 and E4/4 genotype frequencies were higher in patients with hyperl

120 All observed genotype frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

121 trated significant associations, though some genotype frequencies were low.

122 Observed and expected genotype frequencies were not significantly different, a

123 Genotype frequencies were RR 62.5%, RW 34.0%, and WW 3.5

124 No significant differences in allele or genotype frequencies were seen in comparisons of the Cau

125 PPARA genotype frequencies were significantly different betwee

126 Genotype frequencies were similar to those previously ob

127 Genotype frequencies were: AA 89.9%, AG 9.7%, and GG 0.4

128 r sets out methods for estimating multilocus genotype frequencies which are appropriate for unlinked

129 encies, and 8 were associated when comparing genotype frequencies with a dominant model.

130 lculated in two ways: first, from population genotype frequencies, with account being taken of the no

131 ng genetics, focusing on changes in gene and genotype frequencies within populations and the fixation

132 irst is that experimental inbreeding changes genotype frequencies without changing allele frequencies