戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 otropy Index under the null hypothesis of no genotype-phenotype association.
2 alysis for pooling statistical support for a genotype-phenotype association.
3  locuswide SNP typing in TCRB for studies of genotype-phenotype association.
4  investigate prognostic image biomarkers and genotype-phenotype associations.
5                                              Genotype-phenotype associations.
6 etic variants is critical for characterizing genotype-phenotype associations.
7 ermits a more precise understanding of these genotype-phenotype associations.
8 g-resistance profiles), and an assessment of genotype-phenotype associations.
9 es prior knowledge such as gene networks and genotype-phenotype associations.
10 cted genic interactions such as pathways and genotype-phenotype associations.
11 as missense, null, or regulatory to identify genotype-phenotype associations.
12 me 2 to the BALB/c background to confirm the genotype-phenotype associations.
13 he newly identified mutations, and to assess genotype-phenotype associations.
14 t be queried to find potentially significant genotype-phenotype associations.
15 rse cohorts for discovery and replication of genotype-phenotype associations.
16 ping is a central problem in exploring human genotype-phenotype associations.
17 ative analyses aimed at identifying specific genotype-phenotype associations.
18                                We tested for genotype-phenotype associations across 156,154 genetic v
19                                     However, genotype-phenotype associations alone do not provide eno
20 e phenotype-associated SNPs than traditional genotype-phenotype association analysis under false posi
21   In 133 A. thaliana accessions, we test for genotype-phenotype associations and corroborate these fi
22 s on the horizon highlight the importance of genotype-phenotype associations and deep phenotyping of
23 d the molecular and cellular basis for these genotype-phenotype associations and found that the mutan
24 , identifying nearly all previously reported genotype-phenotype associations and providing strong sta
25  show our models to be accurate in detecting genotype-phenotype associations and robust for various f
26 t of gene prioritization, burden testing and genotype-phenotype association, and we discuss opportuni
27 me-wide analysis of quantitative trait loci, genotype-phenotype associations, and the products of exp
28                     Scarce data exist on the genotype-phenotype association as assessed by tomographi
29 with the most recent findings in the area of genotype-phenotype associations as well as the interacti
30 ble, with minor modifications, for revealing genotype-phenotype associations between naturally occurr
31    Our study thus indicates well represented genotype-phenotype associations between three subgroups
32 Results suggest that two previously detected genotype/phenotype associations between bristle number a
33        Large-scale genomic studies establish genotype-phenotype associations, but they use phenotypes
34  opportunity to enhance our understanding of genotype-phenotype associations by extending phenotypes
35                    We propose to investigate genotype-phenotype associations by methodical use of all
36 ilistic statements about the strength of any genotype-phenotype association can be made.
37 ne million medical records and show that 192 genotype-phenotype associations can be discovered with f
38  to 37 977 individuals identifying 71 robust genotype-phenotype associations clustered within 28 inde
39                         We also analyzed the genotype-phenotype associations discovered in the Caucas
40                                 However, the genotype-phenotype associations do not provide informati
41 NA biorepository can be used to detect known genotype-phenotype associations for five diseases.
42 asures will play a key role in understanding genotype/phenotype associations for OCD and related spec
43 s have not been thoroughly examined, and the genotype-phenotype association has not been established.
44 ibute to the phenotypic variability, and the genotype-phenotype association has not been established.
45                     However, these and other genotype-phenotype associations have rarely been causall
46 d short QT syndromes, emphasising the varied genotype-phenotype association in the ten different long
47 s of disease severity in an investigation of genotype-phenotype associations in 505 robust, clinicall
48                              Analysis of the genotype-phenotype associations in all 30 strains showed
49 come a widely accepted strategy for decoding genotype-phenotype associations in many species thanks t
50 ndings demonstrate the benefit of evaluating genotype-phenotype associations in multiple race/ethnici
51                                    That many genotype-phenotype associations involve variants under p
52                                  No specific genotype-phenotype association is evident based on the c
53                             Understanding of genotype-phenotype associations is important not only fo
54 ype-histologic subtype of thyroid cancer and genotype-phenotype associations observed.
55 ancestry in the models and the dependence of genotype-phenotype associations on background ancestry.
56  has important implications for interpreting genotype-phenotype associations, regulation of gene expr
57  induced gene variation and WGS to establish genotype-phenotype associations should be broadly applic
58 based on CgsSNP, emphasizing its utility for genotype-phenotype association studies but not for most
59                                  A number of genotype-phenotype association studies have been carried
60 , our observations strongly support previous genotype-phenotype association studies that proposed tha
61                                        Next, genotype-phenotype association studies were performed wi
62 s an estimate of overall disease severity in genotype-phenotype association studies, and the model pr
63 st evidence for population stratification on genotype-phenotype association studies, review methods t
64                                          For genotype-phenotype association studies, we determined th
65 protein sequence features (SFs) are used for genotype-phenotype association studies.
66 cost-effective genotyping and, subsequently, genotype-phenotype association studies.
67 is synthesizing evidence, studies evaluating genotype-phenotype associations, studies evaluating geno
68                               We conducted a genotype-phenotype association study in 470 Tanzanians,
69 computationally efficient approach to mining genotype-phenotype associations that scales to the size
70                                            A genotype-phenotype association was demonstrable between
71                             Furthermore, the genotype-phenotype association was evaluated in cultured
72                                A significant genotype/phenotype association was detected for rp2 P450
73 entification of a significant discordance in genotype-phenotype association, we have reexamined the r
74                                              Genotype-phenotype associations were characterized by me
75                                     Previous genotype-phenotype associations were replicated (p < 0.0
76 ve family history of AMD with rs3750846, all genotype-phenotype associations were significantly repli
77                                          The genotype-phenotype associations were similar whether ana
78 , giving us new opportunities to detect true genotype-phenotype associations while unveiling their as
79 d on a random sample of 7877 individuals and genotype-phenotype associations with education and disea

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。