ライフサイエンスコーパス: geriatric

1 therapy, ophthalmology, neuropsychology, and geriatrics.

2 f the screening score of undernourished were geriatrics (38%), oncology (33%), gastroenterology (27%)

3 Many have been validated for use with geriatric adults and patients with cancer; however, data

4 ival rate was slightly higher in the younger geriatric age group but was not statistically significan

5 leading indication for surgery in both super-geriatric and younger geriatric patients.

6 ch questions will support the integration of geriatrics and nephrology and thus improve care for olde

7 reserve initially described and validated in geriatrics and recently associated with early KT outcome

8 was most prevalent in emergency departments, geriatric, and psychiatric facilities.

9 from practices in general internal medicine, geriatrics, and family medicine, received annual follow-

10 An expert panel of physicians in surgery, geriatrics, anesthesia, critical care, internal, and reh

11 Baseline abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment (aCGA), including the Mini-Mental S

12 art failure, a poor score on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is associated with worse prog

13 Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is recommended to assess the

14 was performed in all patients, as well as a geriatric assessment (GA) evaluating social situation, f

15 describe the implementation of preoperative geriatric assessment (GA) in patients undergoing major c

16 We investigated the predictive value of geriatric assessment (GA) on overall survival (OS) for o

17 ata, we find that pretreatment comprehensive geriatric assessment accurately predicts survival and tr

18 Geriatric assessment can facilitate risk-stratification

19 Factors captured in a geriatric assessment can predict morbidity and mortality

20 At diagnosis, a geriatric assessment had been performed.

21 re considerations and the potential role for geriatric assessment in facilitating decision making for

22 or hematologic malignancies and underwent a geriatric assessment in one of two French teaching hospi

23 The geriatric assessment is a fundamental tool for the evalu

24 ligatory integration of a comparable form of geriatric assessment is recommended in future studies, a

25 Geriatric assessment markers for frailty, disability and

26 (1) Determine the relationship of geriatric assessment markers to 6-month postoperative mo

27 prehabilitation, coupled with comprehensive geriatric assessment may be important future strategies

28 Geriatric assessment may help identify older patients at

29 ol therapy, consisting of valid and reliable geriatric assessment measures which are primarily self-a

30 rking Group (IMWG), that detailed systematic geriatric assessment of elderly myeloma patients might b

31 At baseline, we completed a comprehensive geriatric assessment of enrolled patients; survival and

32 The geriatric assessment questionnaire was completed by 245

33 ty was developed (N = 500) that consisted of geriatric assessment questions and other clinical variab

34 The relationship between distress and geriatric assessment scores was examined.

35 determine physiologic age is a comprehensive geriatric assessment to be performed in all individuals

36 They completed a geriatric assessment tool before initiation of protocol

37 To determine whether a geriatric assessment tool can be implemented in a preope

38 This study evaluated the implementation of a geriatric assessment tool in the cooperative group setti

39 This brief, primarily self-administered geriatric assessment tool met the protocol specified cri

40 The median time to complete the geriatric assessment tool was 22 minutes, 87% of patient

41 Novel instruments such as geriatric assessment tools may facilitate these aims.

42 Geriatric assessment variables independently predicted t

43 o 5 toxicity was developed that consisted of geriatric assessment variables, laboratory test values,

44 assessment and treatment (eg, comprehensive geriatric assessment), calcium supplementation, and vita

45 from pretreatment abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment, including ADL, Instrumental ADL (I

46 Using tools, such as the geriatric assessment, may help to elucidate the physiolo

47 h ovarian cancer should include expertise in geriatric assessment, should carefully identify medical

48 igh; and were fit according to comprehensive geriatric assessment.

49 merging data on the use of the comprehensive geriatric assessment.

50 Preoperative geriatric assessments included: Mini-Cog Test (cognition

51 h is needed to determine relevant aspects of geriatric assessments, identify effective intervention s

52 were excluded if they dealt with pediatrics, geriatrics, burn injuries, isolated hand injuries, chron

53 of validation evidence of these measures in geriatric cancer populations.

54 We present a rationale and vision for geriatric cardiology as a melding of primary cardiovascu

55 Geriatric cardiology melds cardiovascular perspectives w

56 s, we randomly assigned 198 to comprehensive geriatric care and 199 to orthopaedic care.

57 months were 5.12 (SE 0.20) for comprehensive geriatric care and 4.38 (SE 0.20) for orthopaedic care (

58 , 174 patients remained in the comprehensive geriatric care group and 170 in the orthopaedic care gro

59 eness of giving these patients comprehensive geriatric care in a dedicated geriatric ward versus the

60 or more with a hip fracture to comprehensive geriatric care in a dedicated ward improved mobility at

61 Interventions derived from widely available geriatric care models in use outside of the ICU, which a

62 fore their fracture, to either comprehensive geriatric care or orthopaedic care in the emergency depa

63 milar to those found in normal controls in a geriatric cohort.

64 A total of 131 of 740 patients had geriatric complications, and 114 of 740 patients had sur

65 Postoperative surgical and geriatric complications.

66 associated with increased risk of so-called geriatric conditions (injurious falls, low body mass ind

67 ilization, yet few studies have examined how geriatric conditions affect the long-term risk for hospi

68 Geriatric conditions are common after severe sepsis.

69 Geriatric conditions are important, and potentially modi

70 Geriatric conditions are strongly and independently asso

71 Geriatric conditions assessed were slow gait, muscle wea

72 treatments on traditional complications and geriatric conditions associated with diabetes, no consen

73 as well as aging physiology, and coexisting geriatric conditions can combine to result in these poor

74 assess an association of severe sepsis with geriatric conditions in survivors: the prevalence in the

75 Geriatric conditions may be associated with adverse surg

76 Geriatric conditions may influence outcomes among patien

77 A review of studies relating geriatric conditions such as functional and cognitive im

78 aging of the population with heart failure, geriatric conditions such as slow gait and muscle weakne

79 to assess the incremental benefit of adding geriatric conditions to a model containing traditional r

80 The net reclassification improvement when geriatric conditions were added to traditional factors w

81 failure diagnosis, and to determine whether geriatric conditions would emerge as independent risk fa

82 ted with increased rates of only a subset of geriatric conditions, not all.

83 rt failure (HF) hospitalization that include geriatric conditions, specifically mobility disability a

84 have focused on the prognostic importance of geriatric conditions.

85 d other clinicians who diagnose these common geriatric conditions.

86 The posttest geriatric consultation (GC) group (n = 85) was prospecti

87 The GTCS is a proactive geriatric consultation model aimed at preventing and man

88 A proactive geriatric consultation model for elderly trauma patients

89 omenclature and principles, examines several geriatric consultation models from other subspecialties,

90 d not only hospital rehabilitation, but also geriatric consultation, discharge planning, and 4-month

91 Although better than geriatric DDRTx recipients, these results were not equal

92 Executive dysfunction (ED) in geriatric depression (GD) is common, predicts poor clini

93 ociated with poor antidepressant response of geriatric depression and may represent a neuroanatomical

94 Research in geriatric depression has always had a multidisciplinary

95 Geriatric depression has been associated with a heteroge

96 ed double-blind placebo-controlled trial for geriatric depression in 143 older outpatients diagnosed

97 depression in older adults demonstrate that geriatric depression is a serious medical condition that

98 mination score of 24 to 27 received 1 point; Geriatric Depression Scale >4, prior stroke/transient is

99 e factors were MMSE </= 27/30 (OR, 4.56) and Geriatric Depression Scale </= 2 (OR, 5.52).

100 come was treatment response according to the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and Beck Depression Inv

101 All patients had Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) questionnaires and visu

102 y Test, Trail Making Test Parts A and B, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores.

103 evaluated at years 3 and 5 with the 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).

104 s Depression Scale (CESD-10) and the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) thereafter.

105 g (IADL), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15), and comorbidities in

106 (MNA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15), and Timed Get Up and

107 hiatric Inventory-Questionnaire, the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale and the Clinical Dementia Rat

108 were defined by a score >/=6 on the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale and/or use of antidepressant

109 ; nfvPPA-CBD, 0 [0-4]; P = .02), depression (Geriatric Depression Scale median [IQR] score: nfvPPA-PS

110 r Disease Assessment Scales (ADASs), and the Geriatric Depression Scale over time were similar in AD

111 nation executive function and memory scores, Geriatric Depression Scale score and three or more cardi

112 e of self-rated depression more severe (mean Geriatric Depression Scale score of 2.8 versus 1.4, P =

113 ere qualitatively similar when change in the Geriatric Depression Scale score over time was used as t

114 ng for age, sex, educational attainment, and Geriatric Depression Scale score.

115 MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Geriatric Depression Scale short form (score range, 0-15

116 e and severity of depressive symptoms on the Geriatric Depression Scale using generalized linear regr

117 sion in Dementia, and in the ADNI cohort the Geriatric Depression Scale was applied.

118 ving (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.009-1.16 per point Geriatric Depression Scale).

119 0001), less frequent symptoms of depression (Geriatric Depression Scale, adjusted P=0.01), and lower

120 ep Behavior Disorder Single-Question Screen, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Montreal Cognitive Asses

121 ur Disorder Screening Questionnaire [RBDSQ], Geriatric Depression Scale, and Movement Disorder Societ

122 The Geriatric Depression Scale, Telephone Interview for Cogn

123 The Geriatric Depression Scale, Telephone Interview for Cogn

124 ome was number of depressive symptoms on the geriatric depression scale-15 (GDS-15).

125 for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale-15, Hospital Anxiety and Depr

126 tandardised Apathy Evaluation Scale, and the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form.

127 Depressive symptoms were evaluated with the Geriatric Depression Scale.

128 ation score, abnormal serum albumin, and the Geriatric Depression Scale.

129 ity-based computerized cognitive remediation-geriatric depression treatment (nCCR-GD) to target ED in

130 s recent progress in the characterization of geriatric depression using a variety of methodologies.

131 ortions of the posterior cingulate cortex in geriatric depression.

132 ortico-striato-limbic networks implicated in geriatric depression.

133 uld provide useful diagnostic information in geriatric depression.

134 mbined with venlafaxine for the treatment of geriatric depression.

135 ar whether there is also an association with geriatric depression.

136 y predispose, precipitate or perpetuate some geriatric depressive syndromes.

137 ow that IGF-1 expression is also silenced in geriatric dermis in vivo.

138 e the occurrence of senescent fibroblasts in geriatric dermis, increase the dermal expression of IGF-

139 s been problematic for several reasons: Many geriatric disorders have multiple risk factors, interven

140 and explored the incremental contribution of geriatric domains to model performance.

141 ation, however, there has been no definitive geriatric dose recommended in the package inserts made a

142 SETTINGS: Data collection took place in Geriatric, Emergency and Surgical intensive care units.

143 igher risk and may benefit from preoperative geriatric evaluation and optimization.

144 Patient selection and geriatric evaluation are critical for appropriate drug s

145 cteristics, those patients who experienced a geriatric event had a greater likelihood of concurrent c

146 receive cancer-directed surgery experience a geriatric event, particularly those who undergo major ab

147 o assess the prevalence and ramifications of geriatric events during major surgery for cancer.

148 From these observations, we identified geriatric events that included delirium, dehydration, fa

149 Geriatric events were most common among patients age >/=

150 diagnoses (geriatric mental state-automated geriatric examination for computer assisted taxonomy), w

151 Geriatric factors (MMSE and IADL) are predictive of seve

152 Evaluation of geriatric factors may help evaluate a patient's health s

153 process for the preparation of pediatric and geriatric formulations as well as fast dissolving tablet

154 d relevant key points regarding care for the geriatric frail surgical patient.

155 A key determinant of geriatric frailty is sarcopenia, the age-associated loss

156 buse and neglect is a current controversy in geriatrics, fueled by the lack of evidence on valid and

157 ropose elements of a new research agenda for geriatric hematology: the exchange of age limits for rig

158 ion of the Clinical Information Rating Scale-Geriatrics; high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging w

159 tted to tertiary level, district general, or geriatric hospitals (mean 33 049 total admissions per mo

160 g that similar histopathologies may exist in geriatric humans as well.

161 decision making about cancer treatments and geriatric interventions and/or in stratifying older pati

162 hysicians in selecting cancer treatments and geriatric interventions.

163 stracted data included demographics, type of geriatric issues addressed, rate of adherence to recomme

164 Geriatric issues in cancer are becoming prominent.

165 Moreover, few studies have addressed geriatric issues in transplant patient selection or mana

166 questions will facilitate the integration of geriatric issues into future mechanistic and clinical st

167 t clinical studies have been slow to address geriatric issues or the heterogeneity in etiologies, out

168 ored outcomes were similar between adult and geriatric LDRTx recipients.

169 We then propose adaptations from the geriatrics literature to better predict both short and l

170 (2) Create a clinical prediction rule using geriatric markers from preoperative assessment.

171 morbidities (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics), MAX2 index, and baseline biologic and clini

172 ed to obtain data for algorithmic diagnoses (geriatric mental state-automated geriatric examination f

173 In geriatric mice, resting satellite cells lose reversible

174 f Wisconsin Hartford Center of Excellence in Geriatrics, National Institutes of Health.

175 This article introduces basic geriatric nomenclature and principles, examines several

176 ications: Balducci, International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) 1, SIOG2, and a latent class t

177 In 2010, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) developed treatment guidelines

178 A total of 248 patients received a geriatric oncology assessment between January 2011 and J

179 n with cancer has given rise to the field of geriatric oncology in general, and has generated an incr

180 rforming GA; findings from a GA performed in geriatric oncology patients; ability of GA to predict on

181 SIOG composed a panel with expertise in geriatric oncology to develop consensus statements after

182 g effort to advance research in the field of geriatric oncology, the Cancer and Aging Research Group

183 For geriatrics, oncology, gastroenterology, and internal med

184 ions; 187 of 740 patients (25.3%) had either geriatric or surgical complications.

185 17 younger adults vs 71.7 [7.8] years in 142 geriatric participants).

186 al intensive care unit is beneficial for the geriatric patient.

187 compared with medication alone in depressed geriatric patients after a successful course of ECT (pha

188 kin cancer is a disease primarily afflicting geriatric patients as evidenced by the fact that 80% of

189 Geriatric patients had the smallest drug-placebo differe

190 Preoperative assessment of older geriatric patients is feasible in the general preoperati

191 bes the effects of aging on the responses of geriatric patients to anesthetic and analgesic drugs use

192 ignificant predictive factor for outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing surgery.

193 Geriatric patients were defined as those 65 years or old

194 for use of common depression instruments in geriatric patients with cancer is lacking.

195 health care spending and resource use among geriatric patients with cancer within The University of

196 may not assess common depressive symptoms in geriatric patients with cancer, questions the adequacy o

197 ssion instruments are appropriate for use in geriatric patients with cancer.

198 date, there is no validation information for geriatric patients with cancer.

199 entify many symptoms signaling depression in geriatric patients with cancer.

200 been limited and without positive trials in geriatric patients with major depression (MD) with psych

201 devise a proper pain management regimen for geriatric patients with rib fractures to decrease the mo

202 t 6 weeks were analyzed for 2635 adults, 960 geriatric patients, and 708 youths receiving fluoxetine

203 timates help individualize goals of care for geriatric patients, but life tables fail to account for

204 hly effective treatment option for depressed geriatric patients, with excellent safety and tolerabili

205 d with higher odds of major complications in geriatric patients.

206 is a known predictor of adverse outcomes in geriatric patients.

207 surgery in both super-geriatric and younger geriatric patients.

208 h more so in youths and adults compared with geriatric patients.

209 nd the limitations in applying guidelines to geriatric patients.

210 necessitate reconstructive surgery occur in geriatric patients.

211 association between ambient temperature and geriatric pneumonia and to assess the disease burden att

212 es data on emergency hospital admissions for geriatric pneumonia, mean temperature, relative humidity

213 Renal transplantation (RTx) in the geriatric population (age >65 years) accounts for 14% of

214 ure to evaluate trends in CRC surgery in the geriatric population and the outcomes of surgical treatm

215 erdiagnosed and undertreated diseases in the geriatric population.

216 veloped as a novel therapy for sepsis in the geriatric population.

217 k are a serious problem, particularly in the geriatric population.

218 of graft loss, and cold ischemic time in the geriatric population.

219 re often not suitable for the paediatric and geriatric populations due to either swallowing difficult

220 on Depression Rating Scale scores (adult and geriatric populations), and estimated response and remis

221 d in internal medicine, family practice, and geriatrics practices.

222 Geriatric principles can help meet this new challenge, a

223 unity agencies of Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry and were randomly assigned to 12 we

224 ical trial at the Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry from April 1, 2006, to September 31

225 nstitute of Mental Health, UPMC Endowment in Geriatric Psychiatry, Taylor Family Institute for Innova

226 In contrast, 6 of 19 geriatrics, radiology, and rehabilitation journals reque

227 Geriatric recipients of DDRTx demonstrated 83.0%, 74.1%,

228 DDRTx geriatric recipients of each group showed similar uncens

229 aft survivals were similar between adult and geriatric recipients of LDRTx (P=0.28).

230 Geriatric recipients of LDRTx demonstrated 1-year, 3-yea

231 nt outcomes of RTx in appropriately selected geriatric recipients.

232 LDRTx had better outcomes than DDRTx in geriatric recipients.

233 They investigated inpatient geriatric rehabilitation, ICU follow-up clinic, outpatie

234 tional Institutes of Health AG027472 and the Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC

235 the efficiency of complex primary care--the Geriatric Resources for Assessment and Care of Elders (G

236 on, time to surgery (63 vs. 71%) and time to geriatric review (86 vs. 91%).

237 with cancer for identifying patients with a geriatric risk profile and have a strong prognostic valu

238 e (61.3% to 63.4%) to detect patients with a geriatric risk profile.

239 Here we report that geriatric satellite cells are incapable of maintaining t

240 p16(INK4a) silencing in geriatric satellite cells restores quiescence and muscle

241 As p16(INK4a) is dysregulated in human geriatric satellite cells, these findings provide the ba

242 The geriatric score was calculated in 123 patients (44%).

243 cipating in the geriatric substudy completed geriatric screening tools to perform prognostic factor a

244 Both geriatric screening tools, G8 and fTRST, are simple and

245 Geriatric screening with G8 and fTRST (cutoff >/= 1 [fTR

246 who received preoperative evaluation by the Geriatrics Service between September 1, 2010, and Decemb

247 The Geriatrics Service evaluates patients for postoperative

248 y as a melding of primary cardiovascular and geriatrics skills, thereby infusing cardiology practice

249 The diminished IGF-1 expression in geriatric skin correlates with an inappropriate UVB resp

250 nd imply that reduced expression of IGF-1 in geriatric skin could be an important component in the de

251 Given that keratinocytes in geriatric skin display reduced activation of the insulin

252 the appropriate UVB response is restored in geriatric skin in vivo through pretreatment with exogeno

253 s and skin carcinogenesis in IGF-1-deficient geriatric skin may be caused by defects in multiple cell

254 As such, geriatric skin responds to cancer-inducing UVB irradiati

255 propriate UVB response observed in untreated geriatric skin.

256 he American Cancer Society, and the American Geriatrics Society recommend colorectal cancer screening

257 American Society of Nephrology, the American Geriatrics Society, the National Institute on Aging, and

258 ologists, imaging specialists, neurologists, geriatric specialists, and clinical trialists), the US F

259 revention; however, even a small increase in geriatric-specific adverse effects could offset the card

260 herence to recommendations made by the GTCS, geriatric-specific clinical outcomes, trauma quality ind

261 The preoperative presence of > or =4 geriatric-specific markers has high sensitivity and spec

262 Preoperative assessment using geriatric-specific markers is a substantial paradigm shi

263 ugh various life stages from in utero to the geriatric state, nutrient requirements change along with

264 nclude in utero, the neonate, and the senior/geriatric state.

265 Sites participating in the geriatric substudy completed geriatric screening tools t

266 Geriatric surgery patients have unique physiologic vulne

267 ational Surgical Quality Improvement Program Geriatric Surgery Pilot Project.

268 Geriatric surgical patients have unique vulnerabilities

269 Urinary incontinence is a common geriatric syndrome that affects at least 1 in 3 older wo

270 Frailty is a geriatric syndrome that diminishes the potential for fun

271 icant comorbidity, 26% were unfit, 17% had a geriatric syndrome, and 13% had loss of activities of da

272 V infection on the risk of frailty, a common geriatric syndrome, and mortality in older women.

273 the causal relationships between cancer and geriatric syndromes are necessary.

274 hose with cancer, 60.3% reported one or more geriatric syndromes as compared with 53.2% of those with

275 Differences in prevalence of geriatric syndromes between those with and without cance

276 th conditions; however, the manifestation of geriatric syndromes during surgical cancer treatment is

277 ith cancer experience a higher prevalence of geriatric syndromes than those without cancer.

278 dress providing preventive care, identifying geriatric syndromes, and helping him cope with the psych

279 account data obtained from the evaluation of geriatric syndromes, such as frailty, functional and cog

280 atus and support, nutrition, and presence of geriatric syndromes.

281 her cancer was independently associated with geriatric syndromes.

282 workforce of cancer care providers who have geriatrics training or who are working within multidisci

283 rescue were associated with lower volumes of geriatric trauma care and paradoxically with higher volu

284 It included 39 431 eligible geriatric trauma patients (aged >65 years) in the Pennsy

285 Between 2001 and 2010, 39 431 geriatric trauma patients and 105 046 nongeriatric patie

286 sefulness of the FI as an outcome measure in geriatric trauma patients is unknown.

287 ly introduction of multidisciplinary care in geriatric trauma patients warrants further investigation

288 Larger volumes of geriatric trauma patients were significantly associated

289 ved with differentiated pathways of care for geriatric trauma patients.

290 We prospectively measured frailty in all geriatric trauma patients.

291 cations and adverse discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients.

292 Based on studies of acute geriatric units, we describe interventions hospitals and

293 ting covariate, especially age for pediatric-geriatric use, and altered physiological states.

294 oss secondary to death was twice as great in geriatric versus adult recipients (P<0.01).

295 Geriatric volunteers were treated with fractionated lase

296 elates with an inappropriate UVB response in geriatric volunteers.

297 comprehensive geriatric care in a dedicated geriatric ward versus the usual orthopaedic care.

298 idities index (Cumulative Index Rating Scale-Geriatric), was carried out.

299 In 2005, the USPSTF convened a geriatrics workgroup to refine USPSTF methodology and pr

300 cidence peaks during the pediatric and adult/geriatric years were observed for BL.