ライフサイエンスコーパス: gesture

1 red or tested for their ability to use human gestures) .

2 nt degrees of optionality, existence of beat gestures).

3 of new technology to study sign language and gesture.

4 systems used for understanding nonlinguistic gesture.

5 s must differentiate between sign/speech and gesture.

6 ck does not correspond to the intended motor gesture.

7 le, and similar to spoken language co-speech gesture.

8 When speakers talk, they gesture.

9 t the concatenation of actions into a larger gesture.

10 tion by changing views of what constitutes a gesture.

11 at von Pettenkofer was more than this futile gesture.

12 ntial character of the human manual pointing gesture.

13 lone but should be compared with speech-plus-gesture.

14 these criteria for distinguishing sign from gesture.

15 SD display distinctive qualities in sign and gesture.

16 riteria by which to distinguish language and gesture.

17 etter calibrate the borders between sign and gesture.

18 s of sign, and speech takes on properties of gesture.

19 in calibrating the borders between sign and gesture.

20 ssumption that gradient aspects of signs are gesture.

21 es is fixed or varies across different vocal gestures.

22 lack of evidence for semantic content in ape gestures.

23 y the examiner, and imitation of meaningless gestures.

24 approach to encode rapid sequences of vocal gestures.

25 vocalizations and their accompanying facial gestures.

26 was assessed during the observation of hand gestures.

27 that are implicated with decoding of others' gestures.

28 sion areas to determine the meaning of those gestures.

29 the idea of semantic-level processing of the gestures.

30 similar to the nonlinguistic, non-meaningful gestures.

31 c, and nonlinguistic, non-meaningful made-up gestures.

32 were the most different compared to the ASL gestures.

33 al-level processing of speech sounds) of the gestures.

34 h ape species, yet the same did not apply to gestures.

35 activate in response to communicative facial gestures.

36 and use of profanity in dialogue, lyrics, or gestures.

37 locks of emotionally neutral meaningful body gestures.

38 es between (discrete) signs and (continuous) gestures.

39 ent of a neural matching mechanism for these gestures.

40 wer rates of auditory long-range and tactile gestures.

41 d tactile gestures and lower rates of visual gestures.

42 speech sounds are processed as articulatory gestures.

43 learn and produce complex sequences of vocal gestures.

44 d to couple self- and other-generated facial gestures.

45 from visual gestures to tactile and auditory gestures.

46 n activity is tightly organized around motor gestures.

47 her (such as invasion of privacy or menacing gestures) (5.3% [CI, 4.4% to 6.4%]), physical (5.2% [CI,

48 nfant macaques (N = 126) imitate lipsmacking gestures (a macaque affiliative expression) performed by

49 formed two tasks while viewing videos of the gestures: a visuo-spatial (identity) discrimination task

50 Results suggest that when gestures accompany speech, the motor system works with l

51 ions according to principles not observed in gestures accompanying speech in the surrounding language

52 o be able to recognize finger movement, hand gestures, acoustic vibrations, and real-time pulse wave.

53 rstand the neural bases of the processing of gestures along such a continuum.

54 xplained by differences in the processing of gestures along the semantic dimension.

55 Both produce imagistic gestures along with more categorical signs or words.

56 tion of surgeon's musculo-skeletal model for gesture analysis in laparoscopy, thereby providing a com

57 blind to the tight temporal coordination of gesture and affiliated talk.

58 ed by the lack of clear criteria to define a gesture and by studying gestures separately from other c

59 generalization depends on the type of vocal gesture and its sequential context relative to other ges

60 Gesture and sign form an integrated communication system

61 collection and automatic analysis of natural gesture and sign language are discussed.

62 One key question is whether speech-plus-gesture and sign-with-iconicity really display the same

63 states, which are reflected by mismatches in gesture and speech or sign.

64 rm an integrated communication system, as do gesture and speech.

65 the way that information can be conveyed via gesture and vocalization is present in infancy.

66 ommunicative functions, and the emergence of gesture and/or sign as potential communicative acts in n

67 The study distinguished 31 manual gestures and 18 facial/vocal signals.

68 verdoses caused by abuse, misuse, or suicide gestures and attempts.

69 was temporally locked to distinctive facial gestures and close inspection of time lags revealed acti

70 when there is a discrepancy between produced gestures and co-occurring speech.

71 ical for communicating with others, learning gestures and even acquiring language.

72 eive what others are doing and to infer from gestures and expressions what others may be intending to

73 timodal communication (i.e., combinations of gestures and facial/vocal signals) added to behavioral i

74 s a potential evolutionary link between hand gestures and language and it suggests a role in speech p

75 nds had higher rates of auditory and tactile gestures and lower rates of visual gestures.

76 and its sequential context relative to other gestures and may reflect an advantageous strategy for vo

77 Generally, gestures and multi-modal combinations were more flexibly

78 the outputs they drive, which include motor gestures and sequential cognitive processes.

79 ntent, a fundamental difference versus human gestures and spoken language [1, 5] that suggests these

80 The relationship between these gestures and spoken language remains unclear.

81 posterior temporal regions in which symbolic gestures and spoken words may be mapped onto common, cor

82 sed dynamic movies consisting of both facial gestures and the accompanying vocalizations.

83 e, adaptive creatures must understand social gestures and the consequences when shared expectations a

84 uggest molecular mechanisms underlying vocal gestures and the emergence of human language.

85 mblems were most similar to those of the ASL gestures and those of the pseudo-ASL were most similar t

86 Gestures and visual orienting were used socially and ref

87 The integration of facial gestures and vocal signals is an essential process in hu

88 Although all gestures and vocalisations were part of the species-typi

89 ruent or incongruent species-specific facial gestures and vocalizations as well as their unimodal com

90 ity of domestic dogs to use human body cues (gestures) and equivalent-sized nonhuman cues to find hid

91 onset, the premotor cortex integrated gaze, gesture, and emotion displayed by a congener.

92 ceptual cues, including gaze direction, body gesture, and facial expressions.

93 a different distribution of forces within a gesture, and gesture kinematics were faster and larger,

94 forts to consider the linkages between sign, gesture, and language.

95 questions, new criteria for what counts as a gesture, and new data and populations to study.

96 idate the relationships among sign language, gesture, and spoken language.

97 social dominance status, reduced aggressive gestures, and enhanced fearful reactions to social cues

98 nd spontaneous emotion expressions, coverbal gestures, and smiles).

99 eous emotional expression, smiling, coverbal gestures, and verbal output.

100 In addition, conciliatory gestures appeared to accelerate forgiveness and reduce r

101 ements by helping to select elementary motor gestures appropriate to a given behavioral context.

102 amine how the emotional valence of sound and gesture are integrated when perceiving an emotion.

103 that appear on the surface to be similar to gesture are processed within the left-lateralized fronta

104 s produce when they speak, as these cospeech gestures are a potential source of input to homesigners,

105 tructure and temporal position of individual gestures are adjustable, the number of possible motor tr

106 a neuroconstructivist framework, those early gestures are also far from being considered as imitative

107 gest that norms used in perception of social gestures are pathologically perturbed or missing altoget

108 Physical gestures are prominent features of many species' multimo

109 ports and complements their view of sign and gesture as a unified system.

110 pport for the conceptualization of different gestures as belonging to a continuum and the variance in

111 o object-directed movements or communicative gestures, as non-object directed actions of the upper li

112 ing oxytocin administration, infants' facial gesturing at a human caregiver increased, and infants' s

113 e studies have sparked a renewed interest in gesture-based theories of speech perception.

114 et optimal performance requires that a given gesture be modified appropriately depending on the seque

115 it is difficult to tell where sign stops and gesture begins, we suggest that sign should not be compa

116 the processing of meaningful to meaningless gestures (both relative to rest), the Deaf participants,

117 ly as skillful as dog puppies in using human gestures but are also more skilled than fox kits from a

118 aces not only sign/speech and co-sign/speech gesture, but also indicative gestures irrespective of mo

119 g proximity bonds had higher rates of visual gestures, but lower rates of auditory long-range and tac

120 ous article, "Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates." Their central conclusion, t

121 sing of emblematic gestures with meaningless gestures by pre-lingually Deaf and hearing participants.

122 These deaf individuals develop their own gestures, called homesigns, to communicate.

123 (b) Gesture can change speakers' thoughts.

124 Gesture can play a role in communication and thought at

125 Encouraging speakers to gesture can thus provide another route for teachers, cli

126 linguistic (words or signs) with imagistic (gestures) components.

127 to viewed tools, imitation of tool-specific gestures demonstrated by the examiner, and imitation of

128 s, suggesting that the brain uses a complex, gesture-dependent control scheme to regulate vocal outpu

129 Here we focus on homesign, gestures developed by deaf individuals who cannot acquir

130 l command and imitation, as well as impaired gesture discrimination.

131 In contrast, cospeech gestures display semantic information relevant to the in

132 Great apes frequently produce gestures during social interactions to communicate in fl

133 s of vocal sounds are transformed into motor gestures during the sensitive period for song learning.

134 or differences between co-speech and co-sign gesture (e.g., different degrees of optionality, existen

135 tionship partner, we found that conciliatory gestures (e.g., apologies, offers of compensation) were

136 sual ability for reading human communicative gestures (e.g., pointing) in comparison to either nonhum

137 The number of facial coverbal gestures (facial expressions that are tied to speech) an

138 e results strongly suggest that conciliatory gestures facilitate forgiveness and reduce anger by modi

139 sture may resolve one important objection to gesture-first theories of language evolution.

140 ilable adult, convey ignorance via nonverbal gestures (flips/shrugs), and increasingly produce verbal

141 lity is predominantly in the use of multiple gestures for a specific meaning.

142 ensors to record the movement kinematics and gesture forces made by 37 children 3-6 years old with au

143 c communication (including both language and gesture) from those specifically engaged by linguistical

144 Wild chimpanzees have a large repertoire of gestures, from visual gestures to tactile and auditory g

145 nonlinguistic symbolic communicative system-gesture-further allows us to investigate where the bound

146 r-corrective learning on pitch-shifted vocal gestures generalized to the same gestures produced in ot

147 dence that newborn babies can imitate facial gestures, hand movements or vocalisations.

148 ld study [1, 2], and natural use of specific gestures has been analyzed [3-5].

149 Outside humans, referential gestures have only been attributed to great apes and, mo

150 Individual gestures have specific meanings, independently of signal

151 Thus, differences in early gesture help to explain the disparities in vocabulary th

152 ged by the presence of abstract diagrammatic gestures, here points and lines, that represent point-li

153 .24-7.08; P = .01), any suicidal ideation or gesture (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.28-4.66; P = .007), and poo

154 eaning with symbols whether these are words, gestures, images, sounds, or objects.

155 Facial gesture imitation in the first week of life predicted ga

156 well as abnormal and delayed acquisition of gestures important for socialization and communication.

157 previously undescribed human-like beckoning gesture in bonobos that has potentially both deictic and

158 t evidence shows that one such communicative gesture in macaque monkeys, lip-smacking, has motor para

159 tween emoticons in textual communication and gesture in signed language with respect to the interdepe

160 s in textual communication resembles that of gesture in speech.

161 nd acting can help us understand the role of gesture in spoken/sign language.

162 l cortex to their corresponding articulatory gestures in motor cortex.

163 tor skills depend on the reuse of individual gestures in multiple sequential contexts (e.g., a single

164 Panzee also elaborates her gestures in relation to the experimenter's pointing, whi

165 , as they were just as likely to produce the gestures in response to control models as they were to m

166 forward' model, representing the sequence of gestures in song to make predictions on expected behavio

167 cialized to process and integrate speech and gestures in the human brain.

168 (G-M&B) argue that, for sign language users, gesture - in contrast to linguistic sign - is iconic, hi

169 dynamics, described as trajectories (motor 'gestures') in a space of syringeal pressure and tension.

170 In humans, referential gestures intentionally draw the attention of a partner t

171 gest that the imitation and matching of hand gestures involve the left inferior parietal lobe (IPL).

172 co-sign/speech gesture, but also indicative gestures irrespective of modality, and locations along w

173 se that the distinction between language and gesture is a categorization problem.

174 distinguishing between sign (or speech) and gesture is essential to predict certain types of learnin

175 alizing from those findings, we propose that gesture is likely characterized by a nuanced interdepend

176 The claim that gesture is primarily imagistic, analog, and holistic is

177 We tested whether gesture is the more flexible form of communication by me

178 whether newborns' capacity to imitate facial gestures is a valid predictive marker for the emergence

179 nguage comprehension accompanied by cospeech gestures is associated with tuning of and strong functio

180 sis that maternal mirroring of infant facial gestures is central to the development of a neural match

181 Research into nonhuman primates' gestures is often limited by the lack of clear criteria

182 e attributes proposed to infer a referential gesture: it is directed towards an object, mechanically

183 We conclude that signers gesture just as speakers do.

184 distribution of forces within a gesture, and gesture kinematics were faster and larger, with more dis

185 (DHA) was associated with improved CDI total gestures (language development) but was significantly ad

186 sponsor the experiment similarly endowed the gesturing logo of the company with the capacity to bias

187 affiliative behaviors (d = 0.64), including gesturing, looking, and proximity to familiar and unfami

188 s to investigate the contribution that these gestures make to how we communicate and think.

189 Before and after tDCS, subjects performed a gesture matching task and a person discrimination task f

190 ticle's emphasis on distinguishing sign from gesture may resolve one important objection to gesture-f

191 These results suggest that visual gestures may be an efficient way to communicate with a s

192 tion partners, but that tactile and auditory gestures may be more effective at communicating with lar

193 e to vocalizations with corresponding facial gestures may change the way in which we view the process

194 ing to Keven & Akins (K&A), infant orofacial gestures may not reflect imitative responses.

195 res, to their spoken glosses (expressing the gestures' meaning in English), and to visually and acous

196 Moreover, when novel strings of articulatory gestures must be produced in response to nonword stimuli

197 nt a case study of a paradigmatic orofacial "gesture," namely tongue protrusion and retraction (TP/R)

198 tion of biomechanical parameters of surgical gesture not only in kinematic terms but also includes an

199 at "sign should be compared with speech-plus-gesture, not speech alone" (sect.

200 Manual gestures occur on a continuum from co-speech gesticulati

201 control the order in which individual motor gestures of a learned behavior are generated, and the sp

202 rceive speech by simulating the articulatory gestures of the speaker [5, 6].

203 constrained in the temporal domain, with the gestures of the two hands tightly synchronized.

204 How does sign language compare with gesture, on the one hand, and spoken language on the oth

205 ve when the individual performs a particular gesture or observes a similar gesture performed by anoth

206 information from interlocutors via nonverbal gestures or verbal questions and display a heightened te

207 that sign languages of deaf people are "just gestures," or that sign languages are "just like spoken

208 with social deficit severity, imitation, and gesture performance scores.

209 are involved in tool-related and pantomimed gesture performance, but the role of these regions in sp

210 s a particular gesture or observes a similar gesture performed by another individual.

211 havioral mimicry--the automatic imitation of gestures, postures, mannerisms, and other motor movement

212 Gesture processing deficits constitute a key symptom of

213 neurorehabilitation of apraxic patients with gesture processing deficits.

214 e investigate the effect of parietal tDCS on gesture processing in healthy human subjects.

215 confirm the pivotal role of the left IPL in gesture processing.

216 hat lip-smacking, a distinct multimodal oral gesture produced during grooming, coordinated this activ

217 ed that adaptive error correction of a vocal gesture produced in one sequence would generalize to the

218 in one sequence would generalize to the same gesture produced in other sequences.

219 ifted vocal gestures generalized to the same gestures produced in other sequential contexts.

220 neural substrates of three types of actions: gestures produced in response to viewed tools, imitation

221 ifted syllables, with greater adaptation for gestures produced near to the pitch-shifted syllable.

222 iversal characteristics of Subjects in their gesture productions, despite the fact that their communi

223 (c) Gesture provides building blocks that can be used to con

224 ications ranging from autonomous vehicles to gesture recognition and virtual reality.

225 pe recognition system (reading by eye) and a gesture recognition system (reading by hand), are simila

226 emonstrated that performance in the semantic gesture recognition task was predicted by per cent damag

227 posterior temporal lobe, whereas the spatial gesture recognition task was predicted by per cent damag

228 ysis suggested that the semantic and spatial gesture recognition tasks were associated with lesioned

229 Pantomime and gesture recognition tasks were more sensitive in differe

230 ements, a relatively circumscribed aspect of gesture recognition.

231 (a) Gesture reflects speakers' thoughts, often their unspoke

232 his prevents furthering our understanding of gesture-related learning.

233 participants while processing both types of gestures relative to rest.

234 during the observation of a transitive hand gesture (relative to observation of a static hand) (p <

235 e human speech, is a series of learned vocal gestures resulting from the coordination of vocal and re

236 We explore, in turn, gesture's contribution to how language is produced and u

237 criteria to define a gesture and by studying gestures separately from other communicative means.

238 Understanding the relationship between gesture, sign, and speech offers a valuable tool for inv

239 erception to process communicative, symbolic gestures, signers instead engage parts of the language-p

240 disorder, ASD - may further illuminate sign/gesture similarities and differences and lead to a deepe

241 stica) to create sensory errors during vocal gestures (song syllables) produced in particular sequenc

242 We find that the gestures speakers produce when they talk are integral to

243 target article as it stresses an integrated gesture-speech system that can nevertheless consist of c

244 Findings about great ape gestures spurred interest in a potential common ancestra

245 standing for several stops, or made an overt gesture such as waving his hand toward the seat?

246 Symbolic gestures, such as pantomimes that signify actions (e.g.,

247 ction of single muscles differs across vocal gestures, suggesting that the brain uses a complex, gest

248 ttata), produced as rapid sequences of vocal gestures (syllables), are encoded by the cortical premot

249 We examined the gesture systems that three isolated deaf Nicaraguans (ag

250 us to understand the conditions under which gesture takes on properties of sign, and speech takes on

251 ance on the kinematic component of all three gesture tasks was significantly associated with lesions

252 sture component for both of the tool-related gesture tasks.

253 st 50 years, but also at how the spontaneous gestures that accompany speech have been studied.

254 ems are meaningful, culturally-specific hand gestures that are analogous to words.

255 We contrast homesign with (a) gestures that hearing individuals produce when they spea

256 o make coordinated sequences of articulatory gestures that underlie speech.

257 heir social properties, their relations with gestures, their lateralization, and their neurofunctiona

258 Encouraging gesture thus has the potential to change how students, p

259 According to one authoritative view, ape gestures thus do not have any specific referential, icon

260 ldren from high-SES families frequently used gesture to communicate at 14 months, a relation that was

261 m simple requests associated with just a few gestures to broader social negotiation associated with a

262 We show that homesigners use gestures to communicate about number.

263 led compelling evidence that chimpanzees use gestures to communicate in a flexible, goal-oriented, an

264 ined chimpanzees effectively use intentional gestures to coordinate with an experimentally naive huma

265 he question of what chimpanzees intend their gestures to mean; surprisingly, the matter of what the i

266 ial function of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) gestures to obtain food.

267 a large repertoire of gestures, from visual gestures to tactile and auditory gestures.

268 ns are particularly necessary for pantomimed gestures to the sight of tools, and both capacities info

269 may lie at the boundary between language and gesture); to determine whether we could dissociate the b

270 Responses to symbolic gestures, to their spoken glosses (expressing the gestur

271 he production of transitive and intransitive gestures-to-verbal command and imitation, as well as imp

272 lliseconds of the extreme time points of the gesture trajectories.

273 the brain caused failure to thrive, hunched gesture, tremor, ataxia, and slow cognitive and motor mo

274 Thus, two of the three gesture types were tool-related, and two of the three we

275 negotiation associated with a wider range of gesture types.

276 Both within and between species gesture usage varied enormously.

277 ths, a relation that was explained by parent gesture use (with speech controlled).

278 ies at 54 months was explained by children's gesture use at 14 months.

279 Thus, referential gesture use is not restricted to large-brained vertebrat

280 "Gesture," used in the target article, is shown to be vag

281 the function of single muscles varies across gestures using three complementary approaches.

282 We studied four types of gestures, varying along linguistic and semantic dimensio

283 Chimpanzees' use of gesture was described in the first detailed field study

284 of a salient visual boundary at the end of a gesture was sufficient to elicit telic interpretations,

285 e was varied and when the ostensive pointing gesture was visually subtle, suggesting that they unders

286 Matching of hand gestures was specifically facilitated by anodal tDCS app

287 le) to blur the distinction between sign and gesture, we argue that distinguishing between sign (or s

288 Gestures were scored separately for postural (hand/arm p

289 tterns for the nonlinguistic, non-meaningful gestures were the most different compared to the ASL ges

290 rectional cues (gaze direction with pointing gesture) were combined at approximately 190 ms in the pa

291 Sherman) increase the rate of non-indicative gestures when the experimenter approaches the location o

292 n the simulation of contralateral hand-based gestures, when viewing smoking versus control scenes.

293 the fundamental frequency of different vocal gestures, whereas a context-dependent scheme would requi

294 n visual and motor representations of facial gestures, which increases infant neural sensitivity to p

295 origins, especially because apes frequently gesture with limbs and hands, a mode of communication th

296 , we contrasted the processing of emblematic gestures with meaningless gestures by pre-lingually Deaf

297 resent study aimed to contrast brachiomanual gestures with orofacial movements and vocalizations in t

298 unicative task (describing an event by using gesture without speech) and a noncommunicative task (rec

299 d as nothing more than a system of pictorial gestures without linguistic structure.

300 ow & Brentari (G-M&B) that sign, speech, and gesture work together to create a single proposition, il