戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                           Gene expression of gingival adhesion molecules in periodontitis is regulate
2  expression in human gingiva and skin and in gingival and hypertrophic-like scar-forming skin wound h
3 ntal tissues; histopathologic examination of gingival and liver tissues; immunohistochemistry to cell
4                                         Both gingival and PDL fibroblasts displayed reduced cell viab
5 al grafts (DGG) placed for non-root coverage gingival augmentation by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF).
6 periodontal conditions of sites treated with gingival augmentation procedures (GAPs) and untreated ho
7                                              Gingival augmentation procedures around natural teeth an
8 e GR defects not treated by root coverage or gingival augmentation procedures were considered eligibl
9  movement in thin biotype is high to justify gingival augmentation when the dimension of gingiva is i
10                                 CsA-enhanced gingival beta-catenin stability may be involved in gene
11                         Wound fluid (WF) and gingival biopsies were analyzed for protein levels and g
12            Thirty healthy patients with thin gingival biotype (<1 mm) and history of periodontal dise
13                                          The gingival biotype also showed a thick biotype in 9 sites
14  of keratinized tissue, and thickness of the gingival biotype.
15 h of keratinized tissue and thickness of the gingival biotype.
16  = 0.07), and also had an indirect effect on gingival bleeding (beta = 0.011; P = 0.05).
17 was positively associated with the extent of gingival bleeding (beta = 0.24; P = 0.01).
18 affects estimates of the association between gingival bleeding (GB) and oral health-related quality o
19 al parameters of visible plaque index (VPI), gingival bleeding index (GBI), probing depth (PD), and b
20     The following parameters were evaluated: gingival bleeding index (GBI), probing depth (PD), myelo
21 by probing depth, clinical attachment level, gingival bleeding index, and the presence of calculus.
22  who maintain excellent oral hygiene and low gingival bleeding scores.
23 e oral hygiene (beta = -0.101; P = 0.01) and gingival bleeding status (beta = -0.024; P = 0.01).
24 ng had a deleterious effect on the extent of gingival bleeding via a worse oral hygiene status of chi
25                                Prevalence of gingival bleeding was 92.4%.
26 rrence of periodontitis, visible plaque, and gingival bleeding was significantly higher among crack u
27                               High levels of gingival bleeding were associated with the genera Prevot
28 so important for predicting oral hygiene and gingival bleeding.
29                                              Gingival blood perfusion after postextraction bone regen
30 nants, this prospective case series assesses gingival blood perfusion and tissue molecular responses
31                                              Gingival blood perfusion was measured by laser Doppler f
32 efit in using photometric analysis to assess gingival changes after therapy.
33 s (P <0.05) and maintenance of the amount of gingival collagen fibers.
34 ) mice demonstrate greater susceptibility to gingival colonization/infection, with severe gingival in
35 etric method is introduced for assessment of gingival condition and changes after periodontal therapy
36 ittle clinical significance, was observed in gingival conditions between the two groups, probably due
37  the precise effect of collagen glycation on gingival connective tissue biology is not fully understo
38 static balance and wound-healing response of gingival connective tissues affected by diabetes mellitu
39 al glycocalyx (ECG) in images of the healthy gingival crevice (GC).
40 pth (PD) and local inflammatory mediators in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) among patients with untr
41 vels in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF)/gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and a selection of subgi
42 onal flap surgery on growth factor levels in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and periodontal healing.
43 im of this study is to investigate levels of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and plasma TGM-2 and oxi
44 6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and serum samples betwee
45                                              Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and subgingival plaque w
46 e present study are to: 1) determine whether gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) chemerin is a novel pred
47 Aims of the study are to determine serum and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) endocan levels in the pa
48  platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) from localized intrabony
49 m human gingival fibroblasts in vitro and in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in a randomized controll
50 he clinical parameters of disease and on the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) inflammatory mediator in
51 ssessing clinical periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) levels of interleukin (I
52                           Serum, saliva, and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) levels of interleukin (I
53                                    Different gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) matrix metalloproteinase
54 pare them with their corresponding levels in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) obtained from the same p
55 study is to determine visfatin levels in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of healthy individuals a
56 l index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), PD, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volume, and total amount
57       Clinical evaluation was performed, and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was collected for select
58                                The volume of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was quantified, and inte
59                                              Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was sampled for the anal
60         The aim of this study is to evaluate gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), saliva, and plasma leve
61  MMP-9, and TIMP-1 levels were determined in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), saliva, and serum by im
62                                              Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), serum, and saliva sampl
63 s with data on microbial plaque composition, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)-interleukin (IL)-1beta l
64 ential amino acid, enters the oral cavity in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF).
65 unstimulated whole-mouth salivary flow rate, gingival crevicular fluid biomarkers).
66 rs could be used for measuring ions from the gingival crevicular fluid directly into the peri-odontal
67  pathogens) and local inflammatory response (gingival crevicular fluid IL-1beta) and derive periodont
68 ts in response to a major human salivary and gingival crevicular fluid LPA species, 18:1, and that th
69                                 In addition, gingival crevicular fluid was analyzed for an inflammati
70 ns of the genera of bacteria compatible with gingival disease.
71                              The CsA-induced gingival EMT is dependent or at least partially dependen
72  confirm the notion that EMT occurs in human gingival epithelial (hGE) cells after CsA treatment and
73  (eATP)/P2X7-receptor mediated cell death in gingival epithelial cells (GECs) via eATP hydrolysis.
74 ssion, which was confirmed in cultured human gingival epithelial cells (HGECs).
75                In the case of periodontitis, gingival epithelial cells form the first line of defense
76 xpression of inflammatory cytokines in human gingival epithelial cells in response to microbial infec
77                                  Then, human gingival epithelial cells were seeded on the modified ti
78 to lipopolysaccharide stimulation in primary gingival epithelial cells, which is in the same directio
79  and fibrosis were regulated by phenytoin in gingival epithelial tissues and in connective tissues si
80   Wnt5a and sFRP5 protein colocalized in the gingival epithelium, suggesting epithelial cell expressi
81 one loss was significantly decreased and the gingival expression of IL-1beta, tumor necrosis factor a
82 23 axis, with a decreasing effect on ABL and gingival expressions of IL-17 and RORgammat.
83 ystemic T helper 17 (Th17) cell response; 2) gingival expressions of interleukin (IL)-17 and retinoic
84 and blocking Cx43 function in cultured human gingival fibroblasts (GFBLs) strongly regulated the expr
85 s with a profibrotic phenotype distinct from gingival fibroblasts (GFBLs).
86 and IL-8 on epithelial cells (ECs) and human gingival fibroblasts (GFs) in vitro.
87 s was used to test the hypothesis that human gingival fibroblasts (GFs) would show significant change
88 periodontal pathogenesis using primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) and human periodontal ligame
89 eciphered the overall host response of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) to two featured isoforms of
90 ence of apoptosis, was demonstrated in human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).
91  properties and remodeling capacity of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).
92 ractions on the cytokine profiles from human gingival fibroblasts in vitro and in gingival crevicular
93 d motility of periodontal ligament (PDL) and gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
94  deleterious to the function of both PDL and gingival fibroblasts than STE.
95                                      PDL and gingival fibroblasts were exposed to various concentrati
96 ear to be more sensitive to CSE and STE than gingival fibroblasts.
97  sensitive to both CSE and STE compared with gingival fibroblasts.
98                                   Hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF) is the most common genetic f
99 iciency associated with maternally inherited gingival fibromatosis is an allelic disorder with cardia
100 sis (HGF) is the most common genetic form of gingival fibromatosis that develops as a slowly progress
101  hormone deficiency and maternally inherited gingival fibromatosis.
102 Since many pathways are shared, the study of gingival fibrosis and comparisons with characteristics a
103       The increased expression of markers of gingival fibrosis, particularly CCN2 [also known as conn
104 nd tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha) in the gingival fluid among individuals with and without period
105                        Is a thick autogenous gingival graft more effective than a thin autogenous gin
106 ting from the de-epithelialization of a free gingival graft.
107 ure to predictably gain KT is the autogenous gingival graft.
108  graft more effective than a thin autogenous gingival graft?
109   3) What are the alternatives to autogenous gingival grafting to increase the zone of attached gingi
110 the early healing period of deepithelialized gingival grafts (DGG) placed for non-root coverage gingi
111 dontal dimensions of teeth treated with free gingival grafts (FGGs) compared with adjacent/untreated
112 re treated with marginal or submarginal free gingival grafts.
113 differential expression of these regulons in gingival health versus disease with a type 1 error betwe
114 iated mast cell degranulation contributes to gingival homeostasis but that sustained inflammation due
115 iated with Amelogenesis Imperfecta (AI) with gingival hyperplasia and nephrocalcinosis, while FAM20C
116  P = .34), nodal involvement ( P = .94), and gingival hypertrophy ( P = .24), was associated with a s
117                                              Gingival IL-10 mRNA expression was significantly increas
118 nd K2 alone or in combination did not affect gingival IL-1beta and IL-10, serum B-ALP and TRAP-5b lev
119 rmed at baseline and after 6 months were: 1) gingival index (GI), 2) probing depth (PD), 3) clinical
120  whole-mouth periodontal probing depth (PD), gingival index (GI), and plaque index (PI) were monitore
121     Outcome measures were plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), PD, ging
122 rs were recorded, such as plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), clinical attach
123  bleeding on probing, plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI).
124                     1) Plaque index (PI); 2) gingival index (GI); 3) oral hygiene index-simplified (O
125 chment level (CAL); 3) plaque index (PI); 4) gingival index (GI); 5) CRP; and 6) complete blood count
126 e reduction in both Plaque Index (TMQHI) and Gingival Index (mean MGI) at Day 3, Day 11 and Day 27 wa
127  sampled-site clinical attachment level, and gingival index (P <0.05).
128 data (probing depth [PD], plaque index [PI], gingival index [GI], bleeding on probing [BOP], and clin
129 probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing, and gingival index change after treatment.
130 d a greater reduction than placebo in PD and gingival index, along with increased gain in CAL.
131  depth, bleeding on probing, tooth mobility, gingival index, and plaque index was performed on the me
132             If complete examinations (plaque/gingival index, probing depth [PD], vertical clinical at
133 ng the simplified oral hygiene index and the gingival index, respectively.
134         Clinical parameters of plaque index, gingival index, vertical recession (VR), probing depth,
135 clinical attachment level, plaque index, and gingival index.
136 ere recorded, including: 1) plaque index; 2) gingival index; 3) bleeding on probing (BOP); 4) probing
137 nt and change in clinical parameters (plaque/gingival indices, unstimulated whole-mouth salivary flow
138 bial biofilm-induced inflammatory osteolytic gingival infection that results in orofacial implant fai
139 laque (HR = 3.30, [95% CI: 1.76-6.17]), high gingival inflammation (HR = 2.86, [95% CI: 1.71-4.79]),
140 and/or filled adult teeth [DMF-T] index); 2) gingival inflammation (papillary bleeding index [PBI]);
141 The present findings emphasize that PCOS and gingival inflammation are associated with each other, as
142                rhTSG-6 reduced postoperative gingival inflammation by reducing levels of proinflammat
143 outcome was the progression of the extent of gingival inflammation in children over time.
144 rtality risk were raised with dental plaque, gingival inflammation, >10 missing teeth and functional
145 gingival colonization/infection, with severe gingival inflammation, apical migration of the junctiona
146                              The presence of gingival inflammation, calculus, and infectious dental d
147 positively associated with dental plaque and gingival inflammation.
148 e levels were both associated with increased gingival inflammation.
149 to assess dental plaque, dental calculus and gingival inflammation.
150 a positive effect on plaque accumulation and gingival inflammatory parameters after refraining from o
151 ne surface was significantly decreased after gingival injection of CD40L and CpG.
152 (+) cells were significantly increased after gingival injection of CD40L and CpG.
153 ed transcriptional regulatory network of the gingival interactome was subsequently interrogated with
154 ith various periodontal states (five biofilm-gingival interface [BGI] groups) abstained from oral hyg
155  Prevalence of severe periodontitis (biofilm-gingival interface P3 classification) was positively ass
156 eria on neutrophil location across the tooth/gingival interface.
157  therapy (scaling and root planing [SRP]) on gingival interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-10, serum bone al
158 elium-derived, telomerase-immortalized human gingival keratinocytes (TIGKs) to microbial infection.
159       Weighted mean difference of mid-buccal gingival level (WDBGL), papilla index score (WDPIS), and
160                                   Mid-buccal gingival level (WDBGL, 0.07 mm; 95% confidence interval
161 = -0.44 to 0.59; P = 0.12) and interproximal gingival level did not significantly change after IMITG
162     Mid-buccal gingival level, interproximal gingival level, facial gingival thickness, gingival ridg
163                                   Mid-buccal gingival level, interproximal gingival level, facial gin
164                     Treated sites ended with gingival margin (GM) 1.7 mm (P = 0.01) more coronal and
165     The aim of this study is to evaluate the gingival margin (GM) stability with the use of an oscill
166 CAL); 3) probing depth (PD); and 4) level of gingival margin (LGM).
167 lative clinical attachment level (rCAL), and gingival margin level (GML) at baseline and 9 months aft
168 ically detectable apical displacement of the gingival margin, and an increase in gingival width and t
169 ive clinical attachment level (rCAL); and 5) gingival marginal level were recorded at baseline before
170 h (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival marginal level, included as parameters for clin
171                                          The gingival morphology after CsA treatment was evaluated by
172                                          The gingival mRNA and protein expression profiles for genes
173                          In PDSG and PDCimG, gingival mucosa exhibited few collagen fibers among nume
174  MMP-1, and MMP-9-immunolabeled cells in the gingival mucosa were quantified.
175 ction of IL-6 immunolabeling in the inflamed gingival mucosa.
176  for the induction of Th17 cells at the oral/gingival mucosal barrier.
177 enrollment; at day 0, after reinstitution of gingival/mucosal health; at days 7, 14, and 21, during s
178                          TRPV1 activation in gingival nerves induced production of the neuropeptide,
179 zontal cracks; Type II - vertically (occluso-gingival) oriented cracks; and Type III - hybrid or comp
180 arkers (OSMs) in cyclosporin A (CsA)-induced gingival overgrowth (GO).
181 mouse model to mimic human phenytoin-induced gingival overgrowth and assess the ability of a drug to
182                                 Drug-induced gingival overgrowth is caused by the antiseizure medicat
183 prevent or attenuate phenytoin-induced human gingival overgrowth, although specific human studies are
184                                              Gingival pain was more often reported by individuals in
185                                          Sub-gingival paper-point samples were taken at initial and r
186  and N. sicca, N. mucosa and N. elongata the gingival plaque.
187                       Treatment also reduced gingival production of inflammatory mediators augmented
188  buccal SFA may support the stability of the gingival profile.
189 t the Lig + CsA group had significantly less gingival protein expression of gelatinases and EMMPRIN t
190 to limit the post-surgery increase in buccal gingival recession (bREC), effect of a connective tissue
191 ogous sites (control group), with or without gingival recession (GR) and with attached gingiva, were
192 d amount of attached gingiva associated with gingival recession (GR) at baseline were treated with FG
193 inical outcomes after treatment of localized gingival recession (GR) by a coronally advanced flap (CA
194 t patients presenting with 21 Miller Class I gingival recession (GR) defects (isolated or adjacent mu
195 s the long-term outcomes of untreated buccal gingival recession (GR) defects and the associated repor
196 TG) associated with LLLT in the treatment of gingival recession (GR) defects.
197                                              Gingival recession (GR) might be associated with patient
198 hip between toothbrushing and development of gingival recession (GR), but relevant GR data for the mu
199                Overall, data from 325 single gingival recession defects revealed a statistically sign
200                                Management of gingival recession defects, a common periodontal conditi
201 duals with at least one Miller Class I or II gingival recession underwent a surgical root coverage pr
202 th at least one site of Miller Class I or II gingival recession were treated by a coronally advanced
203 y prevent the development and progression of gingival recession, especially when restorative margins
204 , despite many advantages, carries a risk of gingival recession, papilla loss, collapse of ridge cont
205 omes of clinical treatments in patients with gingival recession.
206 nship; 3) previous orthodontic treatment; 4) gingival recession; and 5) band of keratinized gingiva f
207 urface area (AERSA) as a prognostic test for gingival recessions (GRs) and to compare the predictive
208 ntal attachment apparatus when used to treat gingival recessions (GRs).
209 the RC, KMW, or CAL of Miller Class I and II gingival recessions compared with the other treatment mo
210 als in the treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions.
211  advanced flap (CAF) procedures in localized gingival recessions.
212                                        After gingival resection in 120 Sprague-Dawley rats, 2 microg
213                Facial gingival thickness and gingival ridge dimension could be increased after IMITG.
214 l gingival level, facial gingival thickness, gingival ridge dimension, and width of keratinized gingi
215 ) mRNA were differentially expressed between gingival samples harvested from human healthy and chroni
216 (n = 70) or periodontitis-affected (n = 243) gingival sites.
217    For instance, tooth surfaces close to the gingival sulcus contact serum proteins that emanate via
218 nctional potential from microbes in the oral gingival sulcus of two bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops tru
219 indigenous oral spirochete that inhabits the gingival sulcus or periodontal pocket.
220 he tooth, leading to formation of a deepened gingival sulcus that is highly prone to pathologic chang
221 t numbers of serum proteins emanate from the gingival sulcus, their ability to participate in dental
222 calculus that enables the enlargement of the gingival sulcus.
223 nt promise as an anti-inflammatory agent for gingival surgery.
224 ctor T cell function, promoting increases in gingival Th17 cell numbers.
225 12 in the ECM group who completed the study, gingival thickness (GT) increased from 0.1 to 0.2 mm for
226                                       Facial gingival thickness and gingival ridge dimension could be
227               For the primary objective, the gingival thickness that best corresponded with probe inv
228                                          The gingival thickness that most closely corresponded with p
229 this study is to determine at what objective gingival thickness the probe becomes invisible through t
230               The study failed to identify a gingival thickness threshold that can discriminate relia
231                                              Gingival thickness was measured via transgingival soundi
232  level, interproximal gingival level, facial gingival thickness, gingival ridge dimension, and width
233 f CRC; however, the addition of CM increases gingival thickness.
234 s induced by LPS (1 mg/mL) injected into the gingival tissue (GT) of maxillary and mandibular first m
235 t abundant innate immune cell present in the gingival tissue and function to constrain the oral micro
236 olume of only PBS solution was injected into gingival tissue approximating the surgical wound.
237                 Total RNA was extracted from gingival tissue biopsies collected from normal weight an
238                                              Gingival tissue biopsies from 23 patients with GAgP and
239 r-alpha, interleukin-1beta, and RANKL in the gingival tissue compared with the control site without l
240  differences in the transcriptome of healthy gingival tissue from edentulous sites from GAgP when com
241 study evaluated the transcriptome of healthy gingival tissue from edentulous sites in patients with a
242                                      Healthy gingival tissue from edentulous sites was taken from GAg
243                   The expression of IL-33 in gingival tissue from healthy controls (n = 10) and patie
244 nd gene expression of leptin and visfatin in gingival tissue from patients with chronic periodontitis
245 ed amounts of tropoelastin were confirmed in gingival tissue from PD patients.
246  mini virus, named TTMV-222, was detected in gingival tissue from periodontitis patients using a vira
247             Lovastatin attenuated epithelial gingival tissue growth in phenytoin-treated mice and alt
248 yeloperoxidase activities were determined in gingival tissue homogenates, and ABL was evaluated with
249    Myeloperoxidase levels were determined in gingival tissue homogenates, and receptor activator of n
250 s in microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles of gingival tissue in periodontitis when obesity is present
251 lial desquamation, erythema, and erosions on gingival tissue is usually described in the literature a
252                                          The gingival tissue miRNA profile of obese patients, compare
253 vels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-12 in gingival tissue of patients with the chronic inflammator
254  large gene expression profile data set (313 gingival tissue samples from a cross-sectional study of
255 lysis of secretions of adhesion molecules in gingival tissue samples from patients with periodontitis
256 ution of immature (im) and mature (m) DCs in gingival tissue samples obtained from patients diagnosed
257                                              Gingival tissue samples obtained from patients with: 1)
258  periodontitis (GAgP) are investigated using gingival tissue samples through omics-based whole-genome
259 n of IL-1beta, IL-17, TNF-alpha, and PAR2 in gingival tissue samples.
260 cally, A20 was modestly upregulated in human gingival tissue specimens from chronic periodontitis pat
261                                          The gingival tissue was used to quantify the myeloperoxidase
262 -STAMP gene expression is upregulated in the gingival tissue with periodontitis, its pathophysiologic
263  will prolong neutrophil traffic time in the gingival tissue, and subsequent degranulation will contr
264                                              Gingival tissue, hemimandibles, and oral biofilm were co
265 by direct injections of LPS into the palatal gingival tissues adjacent to the maxillary first molars
266 by direct injections of LPS into the palatal gingival tissues adjacent to the upper first molars 3 ti
267  nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL) in the gingival tissues and T lymphocytes expressing RANKL in t
268 of TLR signaling, in ligated TLR9(-/-) mouse gingival tissues compared to its expression in the WT.
269 ced expression of Tnf, Il6, and Il1b mRNA in gingival tissues compared with wild-type mice.
270 ysis of IFI16 and AIM2 protein expression in gingival tissues from healthy individuals (n = 2) and in
271                                              Gingival tissues from patients with CP and T2DM had a si
272                The expression of Tnf mRNA in gingival tissues of Kit(W-sh/W-sh) mice was elevated fol
273                                              Gingival tissues of maxillary molars were subjected to r
274 y higher in recovered mononuclear cells from gingival tissues of the CD1d(hi) CD5(+) B cell transfer
275       Consistent with the disease phenotype, gingival tissues showed significantly more inflammatory
276     Expression of leptin and visfatin in the gingival tissues suggests a possible role for these adip
277 hronic inflammatory disease that affects the gingival tissues supporting the tooth.
278                                              Gingival tissues surrounding mandibular molars were coll
279    Moreover, reduction of LTB4 levels in the gingival tissues was associated with a significant decre
280        Moreover, reduction of LTB4 levels in gingival tissues was associated with a significant decre
281    Leptin and visfatin protein expression in gingival tissues was determined using enzyme-linked immu
282  expression levels of IL-17 and RORgammat in gingival tissues were evaluated immunohistochemically.
283                We combined RNA-seq data from gingival tissues with quantitative trait loci (QTLs) tha
284 sponse genes are differentially expressed in gingival tissues, comparing samples from experimental gi
285 ssion was observed in multiple cell types of gingival tissues, including inflammatory cells.
286                                              Gingival tissues, periodontal probing, and tooth mobilit
287 linically healthy and periodontitis-affected gingival tissues, we used miRNA inhibitors (sponges) in
288  performed according to Th cell responses in gingival tissues.
289 tor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-12, and IL-10 in gingival tissues.
290 t cells contributed to the Tnf transcript in gingival tissues.
291 ficantly reduced TNF and IL-12 levels in the gingival tissues.
292 ignificantly reduced TNF and IL-12 levels in gingival tissues.
293 LISAs quantified TNF, IL-12 and IL-10 in the gingival tissues.
294                                          The gingival transcriptome was evaluated by RNA sequencing o
295          Changes in diameter of the selected gingival venule were measured by vital microscopy combin
296 eceptor type 2 (VEGFR2) in the regulation of gingival venules in a rat model of experimental diabetes
297 t of the gingival margin, and an increase in gingival width and thickness.
298  HC function could promote fast and scarless gingival wound healing.
299 was strongly reduced in fibroblasts of human gingival wounds, and blocking Cx43 function in cultured
300 sitive cells were present in the regenerated gingival wounds.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top