ライフサイエンスコーパス: glans

1 3%): 24% from the penile shaft, 16% from the glans, 28% from the foreskin, 17% from the scrotum, and

2 Self-collected glans and rectal swab specimens from men who have sex wi

3 Swab specimens from the glans and shaft of the penis were collected from men enr

4 g men with high-viral load infections in the glans at baseline was lower in the circumcision arm, com

5 he closure defects of the distal urethra and glans can be attributed to a loss of apoptosis in the ur

6 of the prepuce and glans penis in males and glans clitoris in females, was severely affected in male

7 The rRBV in the glans clitoris of seven of 10 subjects and in the clitor

8 al (glans partly covered), or uncircumcised (glans completely covered).

9 e effect of circumcision was stronger at the glans/corona (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37-0.60) and urethra (

10 The prevalence of any HPV infection in the glans/corona was significantly higher in uncircumcised m

11 he urethra, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.23-0.82) for the glans/corona, and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.28-0.99) for the penil

12 ective against HPV infection of the urethra, glans/corona, and penile shaft.

13 foreskin (44%) was comparable to that in the glans/corona, and type-specific positivity was observed

14 oncogenic HPV, specifically localized to the glans/corona, possibly because of its proximity to the f

15 the scrotum (41.2% and 46.2%, P = 0.43), the glans/coronal sulcus (31.9% and 33.1%, P = 0.84), and th

16 liated penile cells from 2 anatomical sites (glans/coronal sulcus and shaft) at baseline.

17 tion with oncogenic types, was slower in the glans/coronal sulcus of the penis of uncircumcised men t

18 % CI, 1.8%-5.6%] among men with HPV-negative glans/coronal sulcus specimens (P = .01).

19 or HIV infection among men with HPV-positive glans/coronal sulcus specimens was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1-2.9)

20 [CI], 3.6%-7.9%) among men with HPV-positive glans/coronal sulcus specimens, versus 3.7% [95% CI, 1.8

21 .1-2.9), compared with men with HPV-negative glans/coronal sulcus specimens.

22 The median duration of HPV infection of the glans/coronal sulcus was significantly longer in uncircu

23 cron swabs were used to obtain penile shaft, glans, foreskin, and scrotum samples from 318 male unive

24 We found that penile (glans, foreskin, coronal sulcus) T cells and, to a lesse

25 nce of high-HPV viral load infections in the glans in men.

26 pulation of immune cells in the foreskin and glans of normal RMs, although B cells were less common t

27 In the foreskin and glans of SIV-infected RMs, although B cells were less co

28 ncy virus (HIV) infection in the foreskin or glans of the human penis, although this is a key tissue

29 in nerve fibers and mechanoreceptors in the glans of the penis.

30 on and reconstructive procedures to preserve glans or phallus length have also been developed.

31 mplete (glans penis fully exposed), partial (glans partly covered), or uncircumcised (glans completel

32 rates did not differ by genital site (i.e., glans, penile shaft, or scrotum) of initial detection (P

33 HPV prevalence in the glans penis and coronal sulcus, penile shaft, scrotum, s

34 rineal abrasion and focal paresthesia of the glans penis each occurred in one patient.

35 ircumcision status was recorded as complete (glans penis fully exposed), partial (glans partly covere

36 tubercle (GT), the anlage of the prepuce and glans penis in males and glans clitoris in females, was

37 ole for Hoxa13 in the vascularization of the glans penis is also identified.

38 Pigmented macules of the glans penis, delayed motor development and neonatal or i

39 Specimens from the coronal sulcus, glans penis, shaft, and scrotum were obtained for the as

40 mcision reduces anaerobe colonisation on the glans penis.

41 f a small piece of the lateral aspect of the glans penis.

42 nerve of the penis primarily innervated the glans penis.

43 e poor growth and closure of the urethra and glans penis.

44 ithelial tissue of the mouth, preputium, and glans penis.

45 men with complete sampling), followed by the glans penis/coronal sulcus (35.8% and 32.8%) and scrotum

46 At a minimum, the penile shaft and the glans penis/coronal sulcus should be sampled in heterose

47 Urethral, glans penis/coronal sulcus, penile shaft/prepuce, scrota

48 d by SDA), or a positive result for a single glans specimen confirmed by an alternate amplification m

49 ve result for FCU, positive results for both glans specimens (one tested by AC2 and one tested by SDA

50 For the glans swab specimen, subjects enrolled early in the stud

51 Self-collected glans swab specimens may not be appropriate for the dete

52 testing, the sensitivities of the tests with glans swab specimens were disappointing except for those

53 Mixed results were obtained with the glans swab: N. gonorrhoeae detection by AC2 and SDA (met

54 sum cells; and (iv) in situ hybridization of glans tissue from the human and rat penis reveal MC4R ex

55 A glans TP result was defined as a positive result for FCU

56 /scrotum and glans/urine vs shaft/scrotum or glans/urine only) were positively associated with type-s

57 ing and infection site(s) (shaft/scrotum and glans/urine vs shaft/scrotum or glans/urine only) were p

58 isition of high-viral load infections in the glans was lower in the circumcision arm, compared with t