ライフサイエンスコーパス: glass transition

1 2 continues until it is terminated by a FCS2-glass transition.

2 us on the fundamental principle that governs glass transition.

3 mperatures more than 100 K below its thermal glass transition.

4 plasm behaves as a soft colloid undergoing a glass transition.

5 eories that challenge the idea of an 'ideal' glass transition.

6 ctural glasses based on the scenario of spin glass transition.

7 increase of relaxation time approaching the glass transition.

8 isprove, the validity of the theories of the glass transition.

9 for the sluggish dynamics that appear at the glass transition.

10 random first order transition theory of the glass transition.

11 s as they become more crowded and approach a glass transition.

12 tions are also intriguingly reminiscent of a glass transition.

13 colloidal and molecular fluids approaching a glass transition.

14 otential existence of an ideal thermodynamic glass transition.

15 y limiting their utility in the study of the glass transition.

16 ann entropy catastrophe and associated ideal glass transition.

17 efore provided considerable insight into the glass transition.

18 diffusive dynamics accompanying the protein glass transition.

19 binary polymer blend in the vicinity of its glass transition.

20 at is observed at all temperatures above the glass transition.

21 ein relaxation takes place above the solvent glass transition.

22 of 54% w/w, an indication of the approaching glass transition.

23 re global modes of mobility activated at the glass transition.

24 onal diffusion of solvent molecules near the glass transition.

25 indole compounds is sensitive to the matrix glass transition.

26 ooling of three-dimensional liquids toward a glass transition.

27 rge temperature range extending to below the glass transition.

28 in simulations, even beyond the experimental glass transition.

29 and realizes a novel, topologically induced, glass transition.

30 ooling/heating cycle is performed across the glass transition.

31 oride systems undergoing a thermally induced glass transition.

32 also drives the reversible character of the glass transition.

33 hous ice as signatures of these two distinct glass transitions.

34 a fundamental distinction between 2D and 3D glass transitions.

35 andesite lapilli from temperatures below the glass transition ( 690 degrees C) to above inferred erup

36 Above 200 K (or the glass transition), a single phase-memory time and predom

37 random first-order transition theory of the glass transition along with an extended mode-coupling th

38 ing volume fraction, ultimately undergoing a glass transition and becoming a solid.

39 nger, reduces dynamical heterogeneity at the glass transition and broadens the loss spectra asymmetri

40 hough inorganic zeolites collapse around the glass transition and melt at higher temperatures, the re

41 hold the key to understanding the nature of glass transition and relaxation phenomena, including the

42 However, the nature of both the glass transition and the high-to-low-density transition

43 become heterogeneous on cooling towards the glass transition, and that there may be consequent heter

44 a metallic glass are established around the glass transition, and the configurational properties alo

45 insights into the role of confinement on the glass transition, and we conclude that the mere presence

46 The glass transition appears even for the 85Al alloy where t

47 Among these, glass-glass transitions are rare to be found, especially at am

48 If, as has been proposed, the jamming and glass transitions are related, our observation of a stru

49 Crystal-to-glass transitions are similarly accomplished via phototh

50 This glass transition arises from the freezing out of collect

51 ng as a model hard-sphere glass, we show the glass transition as a thermodynamic phase transition wit

52 Magnetic susceptibility revealed a spin-glass transition at 24 K that is due to competing ferrom

53 laws characteristic of an approach toward a glass transition at alpha-crystallin volume fractions ne

54 In glycerol/water these bands reflect the glass transition at approximately 160 K.

55 interpreted as the approach to a colloidlike glass transition at approximately 60% w/w.

56 ye lens alpha-crystallin solutions exhibit a glass transition at high concentrations that is similar

57 bient pressure shows a distinct calorimetric glass transitions at 116 K and present evidence that thi

58 udy colloidal systems as they approach their glass transitions at high concentrations and find differ

59 Here we introduce a model of the glass transition based on the assumption that particles

60 heory can predict the existence of reentrant glass transitions based on the statistics of localized d

61 rmined that correlate with the dynamical (or glass) transition behavior of the protein, as manifested

62 and dynamic lengthscales on approaching the glass transition, but this is highly controversial.

63 ness was also determined and explained using glass transition concept and microstructure analysis.

64 The alpha-crystallin glass transition could have implications for the molecul

65 ent fluctuation profiles that overlap onto a glass transition curve that is quasi-universal over a ra

66 , when in a glycerol-water mixture below the glass transition, display heterogeneity in spin-echo pha

67 Supercooled liquids near the glass transition exhibit the phenomenon of heterogeneous

68 suggesting that the processes underlying the glass transition first appear in the high temperature li

69 n theory pinning particles leads to an ideal glass transition for a critical fraction c = c(K)(T) eve

70 potato starch undergoing a thermally induced glass transition has been studied using dynamic mechanic

71 Here, an intriguing glass transition in (La,Pr,Ca)MnO3 is imaged using a var

72 , we provide evidence of a spontaneous glass-glass transition in a colloidal clay.

73 llizing nanoconfined water indicate that the glass transition in ambient-pressure water is qualitativ

74 We do not, however, observe a true glass transition in any system studied.

75 This appears to be analogous to the glass transition in colloidal hard spheres.

76 At the same time, the nature of the glass transition in polymeric systems is also not well u

77 rities between the packing of chains and the glass transition in polymers.

78 In this work, we study a novel glass transition in systems made of circular polymers by

79 hanges at ~ 180-190 K that we ascribe to the glass transition in the hydrated protein.

80 These results strongly suggest that the glass transition in two dimensions is different than in

81 t quenching of the parent liquid through the glass transition, in the absence of any additional type

82 Glass transition, in which viscosity of liquids increase

83 t scattering at a volume fraction beyond the glass transition indicates formation of an arrested stat

84 Finally, we explain why the glass transition induced by freezing particles provides

85 On heating, the glass transition into the supercooled liquid is shown by

86 116 K and present evidence that this second glass transition involves liquid-like translational mobi

87 The microscopic origin of the glass transition is a low-dimensional, slow manifold con

88 localization of particles on approaching the glass transition is absent in two dimensions, whereas it

89 Glass transition is accompanied by a rapid growth of the

90 bbs (extended "Scherer-Hodge") model for the glass transition is applied to enthalpy relaxation data

91 iscous properties of the liquid phase as the glass transition is approached (that is, whether the gla

92 hree dimensions have similar behavior as the glass transition is approached, showing that the long-wa

93 ltimately, our work demonstrates that as the glass transition is approached, the sample can no longer

94 We find that as the colloidal glass transition is approached, translational and rotati

95 sudden and the jump of specific heat at the glass transition is generally larger in fragile liquids

96 d the morphology of the nanoscale blend, the glass transition is measured as a function of assembly p

97 The calorimetric signature of the second glass transition is much less feeble, with a heat capaci

98 andom first-order transition scenario of the glass transition is qualitatively supported here and non

99 o our understanding of solidification in the glass transition is that it is accompanied by little app

100 The glass transition is the freezing of a liquid into a soli

101 The dynamical glass transition is typically taken to be the temperatur

102 , but the influence of dimensionality on the glass transition is unresolved.

103 In contrast, the glass transition is usually assumed to have similar char

104 actively debated issues in the study of the glass transition is whether a mean-field description is

105 We argue that the so-called "glass transition" is a manifestation of low action tails

106 decreasing temperature, the so-called "spin glass transition," is understood relatively better.

107 supercooled liquid 'freezes' to a glass--the glass transition--is a central issue in condensed matter

108 hopping is found to supersede the dynamical glass transition, it nonetheless leaves a sizable part o

109 itic transformation into a continuous strain glass transition, leading to continued formation and con

110 xhibits unprecedented gas sorption behavior, glass-transition-like phase transition under cryogenic c

111 Although the mean-field theory of the glass transition--like that of other statistical systems

112 characterized colloids, revealed a reentrant glass transition line.

113 In addition, we show how the glass transition may also be tailored by up to 10 degree

114 as well as its relaxation above the solvent glass transition, mimics the kinetics of CO binding to m

115 Glass transition occurred between RH 54% and 75% at room

116 of relaxation processes, is reminiscent of a glass transition of colloidal suspensions, but only when

117 The occurrence of water's calorimetric glass transition of low-density amorphous ice at 136 K h

118 relatively slowly for temperatures below the glass transition of OTP (Tg = 243 K), and (1)H enhanceme

119 phase separation upon freezing followed by a glass transition of the organic material that can preser

120 system explains the extreme weakness of the glass transition of water as well as the consequent conf

121 ns can be interrupted to form gels either by glass transition or by crystallization.

122 Glass transitions, or the mechanical counterpart alpha r

123 Glass transition phenomenon was observed for condensed p

124 ral and molecular relaxation identified as a glass transition phenomenon.

125 derstanding of the fundamental nature of the glass-transition phenomenon itself.

126 m eventually moves out of equilibrium at the glass transition, phi(g) approximately 0.58, where parti

127 t liquids led to the conceptual shift of the glass transition physics toward theories not predicting

128 s a high-temperature analogue of the dynamic glass transition predicted by theory.

129 ce of a similar structural difference at the glass transition--presumably too subtle for conventional

130 Rather, we conjecture that the glass-transition process requires that the interphase re

131 w collective modes of motion freeze out in a glass-transition process.

132 The mechanical manifestation of the glass transition region and glassy state for atmospheric

133 e similarity between spin and the structural glass transition remains an elusive subject.

134 Within our theoretical framework, the glass transition results in an avoided phase transition.

135 ragility' constitutes a central point of the glass transition science serving as the 'universal' metr

136 is over a range of temperatures covering the glass transition shows that the abrupt slowdown of motio

137 ork as evidenced by the disappearance of the glass transition signature as the solvent is removed and

138 ery state of the polymer heated to above its glass transition, stable electrically-induced actuation

139 However, the nature of the liquid-glass transition still remains one of the great unsolved

140 Quantitative mean-field descriptions of the glass transition, such as mode-coupling theory, density

141 se systems just above or below the dynamical glass transition, such as viscosity, can change by many

142 or when made viscous upon cooling toward the glass transition, suggesting a common theoretical basis.

143 Below the solvent glass transition (T(g) approximately 180 K), the average

144 Identification of glass transition (T(g)) behavior in Leonardite humic aci

145 reased hydrodynamic radius (in solution) and glass transition temperature (in bulk materials) were ob

146 ich in glass-forming systems implies a lower glass transition temperature (T g ), is considered a uni

147 ystem mobility as described by viscosity and glass transition temperature (T'g) was also studied.

148 The physical modification of glass transition temperature (T(g)) and properties of ma

149 ooling rate merely modifies the value of the glass transition temperature (T(g)) by a few degrees.

150 Above the bulk glass transition temperature (T(g)) of 3MP (77 K), the i

151 nt plasticiser leading to a reduction in the glass transition temperature (T(g)) of the pectin networ

152 C/min to -110 degrees C, which was below the glass transition temperature (T(g)) of the solution.

153 as a function of temperature in several low glass transition temperature (T(g)) polymer hosts includ

154 rease in the viscosity when cooled below the glass transition temperature (T(g)).

155 otoexpansion upon illumination far below the glass transition temperature (T(g)).

156 rmined by TOF-SIMS is related to the surface glass transition temperature (Tg(S)) measured by other t

157 own to increase upon both compression at the glass transition temperature (Tg) and ambient pressure s

158 ior at temperatures above and just below the glass transition temperature (Tg) at 28 degrees C.

159 ure sorption, deliquescence point (RH0), and glass transition temperature (Tg) behaviours were invest

160 calorimetry (DSC) analysis revealed a single glass transition temperature (Tg) between 16 and 31 degr

161 The glass transition temperature (Tg) for all of the powders

162 Devising strategies to assess the glass transition temperature (Tg) of polyelectrolyte ass

163 proximately 30 degrees C lower than the bulk glass transition temperature (Tg) of that PS.

164 ambient temperatures, up to 60 K below their glass transition temperature (Tg), by subjecting them to

165 r activity (aw), solubility, hygroscopicity, glass transition temperature (Tg), particle size, and mi

166 reversible upon annealing below the ambient glass transition temperature (Tg).

167 D-NMR) were applied to analyse microcapsules glass transition temperature (Tg).

168 form a rubbery film when heated above their glass transition temperature (Tg).

169 her supercooled liquids stop flowing below a glass transition temperature [Formula: see text] or whet

170 um to GLS glass generally results in a lower glass transition temperature and an extended transmissio

171 hanical behavior (including rubbery modulus, glass transition temperature and failure strain which is

172 is occurs in amorphous materials above their glass transition temperature and that crystalline polyme

173 ility of the gelatin film, by increasing the glass transition temperature and the degradation tempera

174 s, allowing for substantial variation of the glass transition temperature and the fragility of glass

175 Annealing at the glass transition temperature at ambient pressure reverse

176 This occurs well above the classical glass transition temperature at which microscopic mobili

177 essure at room temperature (RT) and near the glass transition temperature by synchrotron X-ray diffra

178 while tensile strength, Young's modulus and glass transition temperature decreased, when the moistur

179 heory producing disparate predictions of the glass transition temperature for the two types of polyme

180 Up to the glass transition temperature in bulk, T(g,bulk), probe m

181 d photon generates an event in which a local glass transition temperature is exceeded, enabling colle

182 h only ~0.2 wt% carbon nanotube loading, the glass transition temperature is increased by ~20 degrees

183 rylate), adsorbed on nanoparticles and a low-glass transition temperature miscible matrix, poly(ethyl

184 A poly(ionic liquid) with a rather low glass transition temperature of -57 degrees C was synthe

185 0 degrees C), is liquid at room temperature (glass transition temperature of -58.4 degrees C), and ex

186 characteristics of an amorphous state with a glass transition temperature of ?22 degrees C.

187 nds even at T(g,DSC) - 25 K (T(g,DSC) is the glass transition temperature of bulk polystyrene).

188 ral stability even at temperatures above the glass transition temperature of Cu-based BMGs.

189 dition of starch at all levels increased the glass transition temperature of films.

190 Glass transition temperature of IMF powder, determined b

191 An unprecedented shift in glass transition temperature of over 40 degrees C is obt

192 impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to estimate the glass transition temperature of planar polyelectrolyte b

193 cm(-3) , even at a temperature close to the glass transition temperature of polymer (i.e., 217 degre

194 hloride affected the mechanical strength and glass transition temperature of polymeric systems.

195 hloride affected the mechanical strength and glass transition temperature of polymeric systems.

196 ind a pronounced thickness dependence of the glass transition temperature of ternary polymer/fulleren

197 lloidal particle, which, in turn, lowers the glass transition temperature of the polymer inside the p

198 fluorescence quantum yield upon reaching the glass transition temperature of the solvent.

199 e synthetic polymer research to pinpoint the glass transition temperature of the system.

200 ally asymmetric interphases formed by a high-glass transition temperature polymer, poly(methyl methac

201 approach readily provides crosslinked, high glass transition temperature polymers that incorporate t

202 red down to 180 K, approaching the suggested glass transition temperature T(g) approximately equals 1

203 effect in the structural relaxation and the glass transition temperature Tg of water.

204 'nose temperature' T(*) located between the glass transition temperature Tg, and the crystal melting

205 of starch in the glassy state and shifts the glass transition temperature to a higher value.

206 The effect of segregation preference on the glass transition temperature was studied using different

207 temperature of 0.84 T(g) (where T(g) is the glass transition temperature) and a deposition rate of 0

208 mperature and in hot-compression (e.g., near glass transition temperature) are common in nature.

209 onate) is an amorphous material with a T(g) (glass transition temperature) of 44 degrees C, while its

210 can be transformed into a rubbery (i.e., low glass transition temperature) polymer.

211 uid water just below T(H) and well above its glass transition temperature, 136 K.

212 thickness) at various temperatures below the glass transition temperature, [Formula: see text], of al

213 t parameters (thermal expansion coefficient, glass transition temperature, and activation enthalpy).

214 The addition of thymol decreased the PLA glass transition temperature, as the result of the polym

215 t that the molecules' mobility, and thus the glass transition temperature, correlates with their stru

216 When heated to a temperature close to glass transition temperature, metallic glasses (MGs) beg

217 ealing at a temperature>the hydrated polymer glass transition temperature, respectively.

218 c electrolyte salt is an ionic liquid with a glass transition temperature, T(g), of -18.5 degrees C.

219 operate at different stress levels below the glass transition temperature, Tg.

220 eta changes little with cooling towards the glass transition temperature, Tg.

221 t infinite temperature (etao) to that at the glass transition temperature, Tg.

222 the vibrations of the mosaic depends on the glass transition temperature, the Debye frequency, and t

223 for cross-linked polymer networks below the glass transition temperature, we propose that collagen I

224 eratures [associated with a polymer "surface glass transition temperature," or T(g)(s)].

225 controlled by Tsubstrate/Tg, where Tg is the glass transition temperature.

226 tic polymer research to yield the mechanical glass transition temperature.

227 into an amorphous solid, upon passing their glass transition temperature.

228 nge of temperatures both above and below the glass transition temperature.

229 se transition when they take place above the glass transition temperature.

230 polymer research to pinpoint the mechanical glass transition temperature.

231 lass-forming materials far below the nominal glass transition temperature.

232 ature of complex fluids disappears below the glass transition temperature.

233 cells to these high concentrations above the glass transition temperature.

234 astic materials, typically polymers with low glass transition temperature.

235 xplains the very small excess entropy at the glass transition temperature.

236 a temperature of 50 K below the conventional glass transition temperature.

237 ver which surfaces and interfaces affect the glass transition temperature.

238 ain, at a temperature well below the bulk PS glass transition temperature.

239 the ratio of the folding temperature to the glass transition temperature.

240 s of the host polymer segments and lower the glass transition temperature.

241 lization is about 100 K higher than the bulk glass transition temperature.

242 the percolating cluster becomes rigid at the glass transition temperature.

243 be utilized in any material that exhibits a glass-transition temperature (T g ) and a rubbery platea

244 hiral polymers exhibit an enhancement of the glass-transition temperature (T(g)) of 15 degrees C comp

245 tudy of the effect of nanoconfinement on the glass-transition temperature (T(g)) of amorphous materia

246 ealed reproducibly at temperatures above the glass-transition temperature (T(g)) of the films, with h

247 th no isolated domains observed and a single glass-transition temperature (T(g)).

248 SEs possess good thermal stability and a low glass-transition temperature (Tg approximately -67 degre

249 We compare the dependence of the glass-transition temperature (Tg) and physical ageing on

250 s, 100% head-to-tail regioselectivity, and a glass-transition temperature (Tg) of 37 degrees C.

251 ning exhibited by a BMG as it approaches its glass-transition temperature and decouples the rapid coo

252 static magnetic configuration seen below the glass-transition temperature arises from the cooperative

253 s the counterpart in granular systems to the glass-transition temperature in liquids.

254 ory is in agreement with measurements of the glass-transition temperature of thin polymer films, and

255 onformations are less populated in the lower glass-transition temperature solvent.

256 ology, solubility, dispersibility and higher glass-transition temperature values.

257 We show that the changes in glass-transition temperature with decreasing interpartic

258 ble glasses have, far below the conventional glass-transition temperature, the properties expected fo

259 films at intermediate temperatures above the glass-transition temperature.

260 teps could only occur close to or above the "glass transition" temperature of proteins, suggesting th

261 are known to exhibit substantially depressed glass transition temperatures (Lg's) as compared to the

262 stable amorphous films with relatively high glass transition temperatures (T(g) = 203-228 degrees C)

263 Both the glass transition temperatures (T(g)) and onset of degrad

264 s observed at temperatures far exceeding the glass transition temperatures (T(g)) of both components.

265 results in amorphous polyesters that exhibit glass transition temperatures (Tg ) of up to 109 degrees

266 The Gordon-Taylor equation modelled well the glass transition temperatures (Tg) of HEW and DEW.

267 (SMP) fibers - digital SMPs - with different glass transition temperatures (Tg) to control the transf

268 work, two polymer substrates with different glass transition temperatures (Tg), polyetherimide (PEI)

269 ctrics at temperatures well-below their bulk glass transition temperatures [T(g)(b)] exhibit morpholo

270 d that agLDL-VSMC tropoelastin has decreased glass transition temperatures and distinct chain dynamic

271 heir amorphous character and relatively high glass transition temperatures as determined by X-ray dif

272 We developed a method to estimate glass transition temperatures based on the molar mass an

273 mics in glassy liquids above their dynamical glass transition temperatures by introducing a scalar fi

274 The glass transition temperatures of these amorphous solids

275 weights of up to 7100 Da, with corresponding glass transition temperatures of up to 134 degrees C, th

276 e condensed state but also displayed tunable glass transition temperatures ranging from -0.3 to 113 d

277 rediction of the calorimetric and mechanical glass transition temperatures that demarcate the passage

278 ously have high melting temperatures and low glass transition temperatures, and therefore they mainta

279 Glass transition temperatures, Tg, were measured using d

280 n, the densities, magnetic susceptibilities, glass transition temperatures, thermal decomposition tem

281 freedom of the ILs and their melting points/glass transition temperatures.

282 opically-confined thin polymer films exhibit glass-transition temperatures that deviate substantially

283 talline end-blocks and mid-segments with low glass-transition temperatures, show significant potentia

284 shaped protein, apoferritin, approaching the glass transition Tg in a freeze-concentrated buffer (Tri

285 Above the solvent glass transition (Tg approximately 180 K), the rebinding

286 main challenge will be the designing of high glass transition (Tg) functional materials, which also e

287 from studies of glass formation in seeds at glass transition (Tg).

288 ation, resulting in a slower approach to the glass transition than a hard sphere system.

289 This includes a so-called protein glass transition that is universally observed in systems

290 Owing to the kinetic nature of the glass transition, the ability to significantly alter the

291 ears down one of the cornerstones of several glass transition theories: the dynamical divergence.

292 Thus, we connect the glass transition to a true phase transition, offering th

293 rods at sufficiently high density exhibit a glass transition toward a disordered state characterized

294 t apply ideas from critical phenomena to the glass transition, we have simulated an atomistic model o

295 g/mol for PtBA and 23 000 g/mol for PS, two glass transitions were observed in the differential scan

296 .7Ta-2Zr-1.2O (at%) alloy undergoes a strain glass transition, where martensitic nano-domains are fro

297 The glass transition, where the system falls out of equilibr

298 vides a major thermodynamic signature of the glass transition, which is experimentally accessible.

299 there are important distinctions between the glass transition, which is related to the onset of noner

300 hat the third subT(c) transition is a dopant glass transition, which is remarkably similar to topolog