ライフサイエンスコーパス: global change

1 ole in governing bee population responses to global change.

2 ironmental patterns and processes, including global change.

3 N availability on ecosystem C cycling under global change.

4 ith different ecological challenges posed by global change.

5 sity, which may, or may not, be connected to global change.

6 redicting population dynamics in the face of global change.

7 urces in the surface oceans is shifting with global change.

8 ybrid genomes are unlikely to be affected by global change.

9 ead to erroneous conclusions on responses to global change.

10 ersity and ecosystem function in the face of global change.

11 ferent directions by different components of global change.

12 s cycles may represent an emerging threat of global change.

13 rhaps all, of the most important elements of global change.

14 work for predicting mycorrhizal responses to global change.

15 ty sites for conservation in the presence of global change.

16 reasingly important due to recent and future global change.

17 ay shape local and regional vulnerability to global change.

18 itical to anticipating ecosystem response to global change.

19 , though frequently overlooked, mechanism of global change.

20 redicting terrestrial ecosystem responses to global change.

21 rive increased mortality in the framework of global change.

22 the temporal stability of an ecosystem under global change.

23 getation changes in response to 21st century global change.

24 tected, potentially buffering the effects of global change.

25 gical processes and patterns will respond to global change.

26 ive basis for assessing sublethal effects of global change.

27 sed to predict eco-evolutionary responses to global change.

28 l soil carbon stock and the most relevant to global change.

29 gement for cereal aphids and armyworms under global change.

30 minant of species' resilience in the face of global change.

31 predictions about evolutionary responses to global change.

32 mains unpredictable and complicated by rapid global change.

33 ding of biodiversity and varied responses to global change.

34 termites may help stabilize ecosystems under global change.

35 seful for characterizing forest responses to global change.

36 t other shifts in organic-C burial driven by global change.

37 ompetition and more responsive to signals of global change.

38 lands, are exceptional ecological sensors of global change.

39 Southern Ocean freshwater hosing can trigger global change.

40 redicting large-scale biosphere responses to global change.

41 TBMs) is essential for robust projections of global change.

42 nding of how these forests are responding to global change.

43 tory animals are threatened by human-induced global change.

44 tigate how plants and soils might respond to global change.

45 be critical to understanding plant-mediated global change.

46 lenge for forecasting biosphere responses to global change.

47 severe transformations due to pressures from global change.

48 responses of ecologically similar species to global change.

49 model predictions of grassland responses to global change.

50 ndicate continuing and accelerating rates of global changes.

51 otential response and feedback of forests to global changes.

52 bal carbon efflux and nutrient cycling under global changes.

53 ory(8,9) explaining C4 savannah responses to global change(10,11), and research to increase C3 crop p

54 modelling carbon cycling and the impacts of global change(3).

55 methods rely on the assumption that observed global changes across samples are due to unwanted techni

56 bject to strong influences from regional and global change agents including, among others, climate wa

57 nisms, to investigate the impacts of various global change agents, and to quantify their contribution

58 results show that hyperexcitability is not a global change among all the MNs, although mutant SOD1 is

59 ate understanding of the multiple effects of global change and aid in the development of future resea

60 Predicting the relationships between global change and native faunas requires a quantitative

61 arly respond to these specific dimensions of global change and thus introduce health hazards into new

62 Global changes and associated droughts, heat waves, logg

63 e identities of winners and losers of future global change, and also reveal which environmental varia

64 of soil microbes and ecosystem processes to global change, and demonstrate the existence of general

65 ver, severe drought is only one component of global change, and ecological effects of drought may be

66 pecies is one of the most pervasive forms of global change, and few ecosystems remain uninvaded by no

67 Biological invasions are a key component of global change, and understanding the drivers of global i

68 ge manipulations, and (v) C:N:P responses to global change are strongly affected by ecosystem type, l

69 r results demonstrate that current trends of global changes are likely to be consistent with forest o

70 freight sector's role is examined using the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM) for a range of cli

71 hemselves attributes are of limited value in global change attribution since they do not measure the

72 s attributes and environmental variables for global change attribution.

73 a major factor driving animals' responses to global change because it largely determines how animals

74 f populations under climate change is one of global change biology's foremost challenges.

75 hus represents a quintessential challenge in global change biology.

76 , management decisions, and understanding of global change biology.

77 major challenge in ecology, conservation and global-change biology is to understand why biodiversity

78 tant significance for understanding the past global change but are still a controversial subject.

79 range expansions are commonly attributed to global change, but could alternatively be driven by rapi

80 Here we illustrate how global change can facilitate the breakdown of reproducti

81 systems play an important role in regulating global changes caused by greenhouse gas emissions.

82 oth Thaumetopoea pityocampa has responded to global change (climate warming and increased global trad

83 Controlled experiments have shown that global changes decouple the biogeochemical cycles of car

84 tion should be used in the interpretation of global changes derived from the four long-term LAI produ

85 e that the default mode system imparts large global change despite being highly constrained by struct

86 s is crucial for understanding land use as a global change driver across large regional scales.

87 rect human disturbance, constituting a major global change driver.

88 n warming, (ii) combined effects of pairs of global change drivers (e.g., N addition + elevated CO2 ,

89 nthesis to assess whether the effect size of global change drivers (elevated CO2, N deposition, and w

90 ically examined the effects of each of three global change drivers [i.e., nitrogen (N) deposition, wa

91 for integrating additive effects of multiple global change drivers into future assessments of the C s

92 e report on the interactive effects of these global change drivers on pre- and postfire grassland com

93 individual vs. combined effects of the three global change drivers on terrestrial C:N:P ratios using

94 The interactive effects of multiple global change drivers on terrestrial carbon (C) storage

95 ity structure were highly resistant to these global change drivers prior to the fire.

96 g vegetation changes and attributing them to global change drivers that incorporates multiple lines o

97 trast, little is known about how other major global change drivers, such as ocean acidification (OA),

98 ill help to reduce the pressure on land from global change drivers.

99 uence C storage under combined anthropogenic global change drivers.

100 rse environmental impacts arising from these global change drivers.

101 (N) deposition are two of the most important global change drivers.

102 individual vs. combined effects of the three global change drivers.

103 Our study further implies that abiotic global-change drivers may mediate ecosystem functioning

104 res and nutrient enrichment are co-occurring global-change drivers that stimulate microbial respirati

105 anges in protein abundance into two sources: global changes due to physiological alterations and gene

106 Global change ecology will benefit from further explorin

107 microbes was positively associated with the global change effect size on ecosystem functioning, and

108 For N deposition and warming, the global change effect size on soil microbes was positivel

109 er biodiversity loss is a major component of global change effects on multifunctionality in real-worl

110 tions) or whether they are more sensitive to global change effects that are local (e.g., more rain in

111 However, other global changes-especially climate change and elevated at

112 that allows, for the first time, to quantify global changes expected in rangelands under future clima

113 The study was conducted at the Jasper Ridge Global Change Experiment (JRGCE), California where manip

114 006, we established a long-term, multifactor global change experiment to determine the interactive ef

115 t-running, best-replicated, most-multifactor global-change experiment at the ecosystem scale-a 17-y s

116 The next generation of global change experiments should be designed at multiple

117 Selectivity patterns during ancient global change extinctions confirm the hypothesis that hi

118 Permian to Jurassic periods) containing four global change extinctions, including the end-Permian and

119 the need to simultaneously consider multiple global change factors (e.g. exotic species invasions and

120 However, the different combinations of global change factors (e.g., EN, NW, EW, IW) indicated t

121 As such, when global change factors alleviate the bottom-up limitation

122 The combination of global change factors alleviated the bottom-up limitatio

123 n the response of other soil EEAs to various global change factors and their implications for ecosyst

124 rature are expected to be the most important global change factors impacting production agriculture.

125 ally active period in conjunction with other global change factors might exacerbate resource limitati

126 elihood of negative impacts from interacting global change factors on a key global commodity crop in

127 examine the main and interactive effects of global change factors on Rs and its two components.

128 Although the effects of interacting global change factors on soil microbial activity have be

129 all negative interactive effect of these two global change factors on the sum of above and belowgroun

130 ictive ecosystem models under a multitude of global change factors that alter soil N availability.

131 xposure to the longer-duration anthropogenic global change factors, influenced the dynamics of C cycl

132 nd heterotrophic (Rh) respiration] to single global change factors, the interactive effects of the mu

133 Most global change factors, vegetation types, and treatment m

134 This process is sensitive to global change factors, which can drive carbon cycle-clim

135 going diversity loss in response to multiple global change factors.

136 driving plant responses to [CO2 ] and other global change factors.

137 d how those influences might be moderated by global change factors.

138 and extract NPP as a continuous function of global-change factors.

139 stry is therefore essential to understanding global change feedbacks.

140 r (SOM) are major concerns in the context of global change for carbon sequestration and soil health.

141 Biological invasions are a major driver of global change, for which models can attribute causes, as

142 ghlight the need to understand future marine global change from a community perspective.

143 Global change has made it important to understand the fa

144 P cycling (multifunctionality resistance) to global change has never been assessed globally in natura

145 Recent patterns of global change have highlighted the importance of underst

146 growing, but empirical studies and models of global change have only begun to address this issue in d

147 of soil C-N-P and stoichiometry to long-term global changes have occurred across the whole soil depth

148 etter quantify the ecosystem consequences of global change impacts on soil biodiversity.

149 such as C residence time and attribution of global change impacts to relevant processes.

150 derstanding ecosystem sensitivity to predict global-change impacts, it is necessary to design new exp

151 en an increase in research to understand how global changes' impacts on soil biota translate into alt

152 mmunity composition for buffering effects of global change in drylands worldwide.

153 We hypothesized that such global change in neutralization sensitivity results from

154 hysical Activity Scale for the Elderly), and global change in pain and function (Likert scales).

155 The global change in protein abundance in colorectal cancer

156 In this study, we sought to analyze a global change in ubiquitin-like (Ubl) modifications, wit

157 of TP53 in regulating miRNA-AGO2 loading and global changes in AGO2 binding to its gene targets in re

158 ate and adaptive immune systems, resulted in global changes in blood cell gene expression to patterns

159 By contrast, no significant global changes in CG- and CHG-context methylation occur

160 d on opposite channel faces, consistent with global changes in channel structure.

161 While distinct stem cell phenotypes follow global changes in chromatin marks, single-cell chromatin

162 t, Hdac3(Delta/-) progenitor cells displayed global changes in chromatin structure that likely hinder

163 reforestation, and shifting fire regimes to global changes in climate, atmosphere, and the Early Ant

164 Global changes in climate, atmospheric composition, and

165 These On-Off dynamics, reflecting global changes in cortical state, were also modulated at

166 ce of kinematic stages that are modulated by global changes in cytoskeletal dynamics.

167 Ancestral TBT exposure induces global changes in DNA methylation and altered expression

168 We have examined impacts of global changes in DNA methylation on the Arabidopsis imm

169 Here we report global changes in gene expression as well as associated

170 racterized by endothelial dysregulation, but global changes in gene expression have not been related

171 results show the existence of growth-related global changes in gene expression noise and suggest thei

172 The mechanisms that orchestrate the global changes in gene expression that are required for

173 These global changes in gene expression were accompanied by a

174 Neat1 loss provokes global changes in gene expression, suggesting a mechanis

175 by depriving cells of nutrients and inducing global changes in gene expression.

176 Patient fibroblasts do not show global changes in histone methylation but we identify se

177 downregulation of SUZ12 and ZNF198 mediated global changes in histone modifications.

178 PM6 or inactivation of its kinase results in global changes in histone S/T phosphorylation and change

179 osynaptic tracing, we mapped cocaine-induced global changes in inputs onto neurons in the ventral teg

180 the molecular level within the CNS to create global changes in larval host biology.

181 gh no significant differences were found for global changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (co

182 The overall correlation between global changes in levels of mRNA and their encoding prot

183 y surrounds that reduce their sensitivity to global changes in light in favor of responses to spatial

184 ning domain of band 3 in intact cells causes global changes in membrane properties, including (i) dis

185 a and how overproliferating tissues adapt to global changes in metabolism.

186 n to monitoring morphological parameters and global changes in microglia density, nearest neighbour d

187 We examined the global changes in mRNA abundance in healthy lung and lun

188 wever, the response of soil stoichiometry to global changes in natural ecosystems with different soil

189 th during homeostatic scaling in response to global changes in neural activity.

190 hese substances orchestrate state-dependent, global changes in neuronal activity.

191 ct of warming may be altered by regional and global changes in nitrogen (N) and rainfall levels, but

192 This model predicts non-monotonic global changes in noise at different growth rates as wel

193 glucose intolerance that are associated with global changes in peripheral glucose, lipid, and amino a

194 Global changes in PKA phosphorylation patterns are not a

195 To better understand global changes in protein expression after radiation, we

196 as cellular redox homeostasis, resulting in global changes in protein glycosylation, expression and

197 ults reveal how a single adaptor can command global changes in proteome composition through priming o

198 Thus, our study identifies global changes in RNA-protein interactions during verteb

199 rrays, we show that RTR1 deletion results in global changes in RNAPII Ser5-P levels on genes with dif

200 at critical period visual experience induces global changes in spontaneous ISA relationships, both wi

201 y open and (multiple) closed states involves global changes in structure of the pore-forming domains

202 se high throughput sequencing to compare the global changes in T cell receptor beta chain complementa

203 reduction in Scn5a transcript, Notch induces global changes in the atrial action potential, including

204 tinction in the cascade of events leading to global changes in the biosphere.

205 ence that awareness is associated with truly global changes in the brain's functional connectivity.

206 Proteomic analyses revealed that VCs promote global changes in the expression of proteins involved in

207 r results identify PLIN2 as a determinant of global changes in the hepatic lipidome and suggest the h

208 PP1R15-PP1-G-actin complex was responsive to global changes in the polymeric status of actin, as was

209 namic connectivity states is associated with global changes in the whole-brain functional connectome.

210 Here we show that global changes in transcription and RNA processing and t

211 e intermingling degree was more sensitive to global changes in transcription than to chromosome radia

212 ation was further correlated with HS-induced global changes in transcription using GRO-seq and RNA po

213 Here, global changes in transcriptomes and metabolites were in

214 effects of belief could not be explained by global changes in visual attention and were specific to

215 Anthropogenic drivers of global change include rising atmospheric concentrations

216 dynamics will be affected by key drivers of global change, including agricultural intensification, i

217 sponses to multiple, simultaneous drivers of global change, including climate warming and elevated nu

218 els forecasting plant community responses to global change incorporate shifting ecological niches, po

219 vironment, but whether and how adaptation to global change is altered by community diversity is not u

220 ounting evidence suggests that anthropogenic global change is altering plant species composition in t

221 An unintended consequence of global change is an increase in opportunities for hybrid

222 t distributional dynamics, susceptibility to global change is characterized by the loss of forested h

223 Global change is exerting a major effect on plant commun

224 Global change is expected to alter UV irradiance in terr

225 Global change is impacting forests worldwide, threatenin

226 cting biotic responses to present and future global change is understanding how environmental factors

227 tiple extinctions triggered by multistressor global change, is ideally suited for testing hypotheses

228 opulations shift their ranges in response to global change, local species assemblages can change, set

229 ng of how ecosystems might respond to future global change, long-term ecosystem-scale studies testing

230 crobial biomass shows high homeostasis under global change manipulations, and (v) C:N:P responses to

231 Under this rapid global change, maximizing conservation success requires

232 Although global change may ameliorate some of the barriers preven

233 ndation for attributing species responses to global change may be achieved by complementing an attrib

234 ls aimed at quantifying C cycle feedbacks to global change may be improved by treating N as a resourc

235 our results show that ecosystem responses to global change may hinge on the balance between rhizosphe

236 environmental challenges, as expected under global change, might collapse otherwise robust natural e

237 or considering regional climate histories in global change models.

238 These data indicate that SRSF3 affects a global change of gene expression to maintain cell homeos

239 We investigated the global changes of EHEC gene expression governed by GlmY

240 However, few studies have investigated the global changes of the entire organism with respect to an

241 asic and applied ecology about the effect of global change on current and future species distribution

242 To explore the impacts of global change on ecosystem C fluxes and the consequent c

243 Predicting the effects of global change on terrestrial plant communities is crucia

244 The effects of global change on the breeding grounds are characterized

245 till to be determined, the massive impact of global change on the dynamics and distribution of biodiv

246 The effects of global change on the non-breeding grounds is characteriz

247 ceptual framework to evaluate the effects of global change on the quality and spatiotemporal dynamics

248 termine the long-term, integrated effects of global changes on forest N cycling, we measured stable N

249 ing single-factor and interactive effects of global changes on key metrics such as net primary produc

250 We aimed to characterise global changes (or trends) in dietary patterns nationall

251 rstanding and predicting the consequences of global change over evolutionary and ecological timescale

252 rstanding and predicting the consequences of global change over evolutionary and ecological timescale

253 responses of the terrestrial carbon cycle to global change over the next century.

254 tomography (SDOCT) measurements and compared global change over time in advanced glaucoma eyes.

255 Global change over time in longitudinal eyes was -1.51 m

256 ry outcomes were knee pain, quality of life, global change (overall, pain, and functional status), ar

257 abitats with a refuge against the impacts of global change, particularly acting as natural filters ag

258 al mechanisms that allow species to adapt to global change, particularly for long-lived animals, wher

259 pollution has not achieved parity with other global change phenomena in the level of concern and inte

260 One of the main uncertainties in global change predictions lies in how the spatiotemporal

261 that account for intraspecific variation in global change predictions, and discuss new data that may

262 are experiencing multifaceted anthropogenic global change pressures including warming (average 0.61

263 the state-of-the-art understanding of these global change pressures on soils, identify knowledge gap

264 iority effects to persist in an era of rapid global change remains unclear.

265 luence populations' and species' response to global changes remains debated.

266 ighly mobile taxa such as migratory birds to global change requires information on geographic pattern

267 ificial light at night should be a focus for global change research in the 21st century.

268 Faunal global change research should address the spatially expl

269 changes describe an important phenomenon in global change research.

270 f area index (LAI) products is important for global change research.

271 studies as well as distribution modeling and global change research.

272 plications for ecosystem functioning under a global change scenario, a better understanding of desert

273 icy and land management decisions related to global change scenarios should consider how ANPP and BNP

274 evaluate the fate of marine ecosystems under global change scenarios.

275 into biogeochemical models simulating future global change scenarios.

276 tive ecosystems should figure prominently in global change science and policy.

277 t night have been a rapidly growing field of global change science in recent years.

278 on was assessed at 4 and 12 months to assess global change scores.

279 Interactions among global change stressors and their effects at large scale

280 ons, so on average may be less vulnerable to global change stressors than ancient counterparts.

281 e from the oceans are threatened by numerous global change stressors, one of which is ocean acidifica

282 that biodiversity is comparably important to global change stressors.

283 Past global change studies have identified changes in species

284 n enrichment within a long-term, field-based global change study.

285 how these processes will respond to emerging global changes such as climate warming, extreme weather

286 We ask whether primates are sensitive to global changes that are universal (e.g., higher temperat

287 nteractions are particularly important under global changes that may alter plant species composition

288 Earth is experiencing multiple global changes that will, together, determine the fate o

289 Multistressor global change, the combined influence of ocean warming,

290 f mutualistic networks and their response to global change, the mechanism and magnitude of interactio

291 Hotter, longer, and more frequent global change-type drought events may profoundly impact

292 animals to deal with two major components of global change: urbanization and biological invasions.

293 d the effects of decadal-scale anthropogenic global change - warming, increased nitrogen (N) depositi

294 lterations across 6% of the genome, no major global changes were detected in the poly-synthetic strai

295 ng is especially important in the context of global change where design criteria must consider how sp

296 Studying the impacts of global change, which comprises largely climate and lands

297 ation of landscapes are important drivers of global change, which in turn have direct impacts on loca

298 We thus speculate that global change will have a larger effect on eroding pre-z

299 al to understand how factors associated with global change will influence surface CO2 and CH4 fluxes.

300 Global change will likely affect savanna and forest stru