ライフサイエンスコーパス: glomerular filtration rate

1 698 outcomes of >/= 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate.

2 for age, sex, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

3 expression, which correlated with declining glomerular filtration rate.

4 and renal function, as assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate.

5 ts and sudden death in patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate.

6 atified by HbA1c, BMI, region, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

7 l function, regardless of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate.

8 e drugs modified according to bodyweight and glomerular filtration rate.

9 topathies and its expression correlates with glomerular filtration rate.

10 oking, elevated triglycerides, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

11 , including the entire spectrum of estimated glomerular filtration rates.

12 LK and LAT patients had comparable estimated glomerular filtration rates.

13 tinine clearance (median change in estimated glomerular filtration rate -1.8 mL/min [IQR -7.8 to 6.0]

14 0.80; interquartile range, 0.70-1.01 mg/dL; glomerular filtration rate, 102+/-23; median, 106; inter

15 outpatients with type 2 diabetes (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 15 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and

16 ut cirrhosis and with CKD stage 4 (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 15-30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) or s

17 +/-0.7 vs. 1.0+/-0.9; P=0.003) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (49.5+/-17.4 vs. 60.6+/-19.1

18 all, 1461 (10%) had CKD (mean [SD] estimated glomerular filtration rate, 49 [10] mL/min/1.73 m2).

19 oup had the highest average 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (62 mL/min/1.73 kg/m(2)) and

20 sma glucose, high total cholesterol, and low glomerular filtration rate; 72.4%, 95% UI 70.2-73.5) and

21 censored for primary nonfunction, estimated glomerular filtration rates after 1 year and 5 years wer

22 showed a 1.5-fold higher level of estimated glomerular filtration rate and a fourfold lower level of

23 redictors of BTP levels are quinolinic acid, glomerular filtration rate and age.

24 We tested the hypothesis that decreased glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria have differen

25 Changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria were also ana

26 Glomerular filtration rate and blood creatinine were not

27 ransplant outcomes included 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate and death-censored graft surv

28 f >50% reduction in their baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and end stage kidney disease

29 Black veterans with normal estimated glomerular filtration rate and equal access to healthcar

30 d in those with higher BMI, higher estimated glomerular filtration rate and lower creatinine.

31 ates, cf-PWV and AI were associated with the glomerular filtration rate and osteonecrosis.

32 The glomerular filtration rate and plasma renin, noradrenali

33 Estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria are predictor

34 Patients with both low estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria had highest r

35 rimary care, serum creatinine with estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria measurements

36 an arterial pressure was 15 mm Hg higher and glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow were app

37 proximately 17 mm Hg in both groups, whereas glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow were dec

38 rogressive reduction in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate and showed evidence of renal

39 nificant association between eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) and serum sclerostin levels

40 (n = 50) matched for age, sex, and estimated glomerular filtration rate, and 23 renal transplant reci

41 term follow-up, 1 had a normalized estimated glomerular filtration rate, and 3 (4%) had persistent CK

42 contrast, blood pressure lowering, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and albuminuric effects are

43 d urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and blood chemistry variable

44 10) who were matched for age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and date of MR imaging exami

45 ment should have serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and electrolytes measurement

46 nger, with higher body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and forced expiratory volume

47 but a higher rate of porcelain aorta, lower glomerular filtration rate, and higher mean Society of T

48 Patients with lower blood pressure, lower glomerular filtration rate, and more severe heart failur

49 fibroblast growth factor 23 level, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and proteinuria, the hazard

50 albumin, high-density lipoprotein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and QTc interval.

51 ni-x and sham sheep, mean arterial pressure, glomerular filtration rate, and renal blood flow were me

52 ulatory support, natriuretic peptide decile, glomerular filtration rate, and total bilirubin level we

53 urinary protein, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and/or pyuria were correlate

54 omparable serum creatinine levels, estimated glomerular filtration rates, and daily urine output at d

55 h-density lipoprotein cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate, antihypertensive therapy, di

56 function imaging, where blood velocities and glomerular filtration rates are simultaneously measured,

57 ents on belatacept has demonstrated superior glomerular filtration rates as compared with CNIs, albei

58 llograft fibrosis and with reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months after transplant

59 t function had significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months postbiopsy and a

60 chronic rejection, or in the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 15 years.

61 The changes in serum potassium and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours.

62 a significant benefit for graft survival and glomerular filtration rate at 5 years (P < 0.0001).

63 ave significantly reduced graft survival and glomerular filtration rate at 5 years, especially TMA.

64 h delayed graft function and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at end follow-up.

65 at least 100 x 10(9) platelets per L, and a glomerular filtration rate at least 60 mL/min.

66 atients had significantly worse (P < 0.0001) glomerular filtration rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years post

67 In this subpopulation, estimated glomerular filtration rates at randomization were higher

68 failure by ICD9 code or laboratory-confirmed glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min.

69 (beta, 0.70; P < .001), and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (beta, 0.03; P = .02).

70 al function decline (>20% decrease estimated glomerular filtration rate between 6 months and last fol

71 and 30, there was no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate between the RF study group an

72 ons in dietary Na(+) intake do not alter the glomerular filtration rate but alter the total and cell-

73 acute, dose-dependent reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate by approximately 5 mL.min(-1)

74 , respectively) and similar across estimated glomerular filtration rate categories but was significan

75 with creatine clearance, 0.54 with estimated glomerular filtration rate-Cockcroft-Gault).

76 ession, administration of SRT3025 attenuated glomerular filtration rate decline and proteinuria witho

77 APOL1-associated estimated glomerular filtration rate decline was observed starting

78 ysis, transplantation, and/or >60% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, or mortality) outcom

79 ndomization to month 36, mean (SD) estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased by 7.0 (31.3) mL/mi

80 Reduced glomerular filtration rate defines chronic kidney diseas

81 Age and basal glomerular filtration rate did not differ between groups

82 of lithium maintenance therapy on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eFGR) in patients with affec

83 tinine ratio >/=300 mg/g), reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), an

84 lished cardiovascular disease, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >/=30 mL.min(-1).1.73

85 D Among 3 570 865 US veterans with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >/=60 mL min(-1) 1.73

86 served kidney function (defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 mL/minute/1.73 m(2

87 CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/per 1.73 m(

88 whereas positively associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (all P < 0.05).

89 I: 1.99-4.80), moderately impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.

90 inine level and cystatin C-derived estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and assessment of prot

91 e effects of MRP inhibitors on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proximal tubular f

92 ociated with future decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and with incident chro

93 core was used to predict recipient estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year.

94 t survival, whereas one-year graft estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) correlated with donor

95 sed to estimate the annual rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, comparing men

96 Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has been reported to b

97 is of kidney function based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 110,517 European an

98 PM2.5 exposure was associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in a cohort of older m

99 The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased over the 7-y

100 ebrovascular disease and preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is not established.

101 Individuals with >/=2 estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements after 1 F

102 (stages 3 and 4) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.7

103 compensated cirrhosis, and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 40 mL/min or greate

104 compensated cirrhosis, and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 40 mL/min or greate

105 6662 participants with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 60 mL/min/

106 oncentrations and risk of incident estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 mL/min

107 patients with a prehospitalization estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of more than 45 mL/min

108 t of 3,376,187 US veterans with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of more than 60 mL/min

109 etween the AMS and post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using mixed models, co

110 of 6 y, we assessed kidney volume, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using serum creatinine

111 166 (73.1%) had diabetes, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 33.9 +/- 15.8 ml/m

112 Median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in DCD-ECD r

113 The change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with off-treatment nuc

114 y the association of pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with PPCs in laparosco

115 ividuals from four ancestries, for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a measure of kidney f

116 nal hazard model adjusted for age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and cardiovascular co

117 ion/primary nonfunction (DGF/PNF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and graft-survival at

118 bin, total white cell count (WCC), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and liver function en

119 ecipient's SCr and calculations of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), based on recipient ag

120 enome-wide association studies for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), combining data across

121 renal outcomes: >/=30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), doubling of the serum

122 y function, as measured by reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), has been associated w

123 comes were HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), incident microalbumin

124 inverse correlation between CI and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), such that higher CI w

125 Albuminuria, but not estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), was associated with i

126 ) US veterans with normal baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), we examined the assoc

127 is session for predicting 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

128 of coffee and tea consumption with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

129 albuminuria) and rate of change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

130 relation to kidney function, as assessed by glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

131 y relevant decline (>/=25%) in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

132 mal renal function, as measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

133 d cystatin C-based measures of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

134 ation by body mass index (BMI) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

135 isease (CKD) is defined by reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

136 rectly associated with declines in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

137 Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, a marker of kidney fun

138 nd without hypertension and normal estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) during 2005 and 2006,

139 he absence of diagnostic criteria (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] >60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and

140 ts with baseline renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] </= 60 mL/min) and pai

141 disease (CKD, defined as confirmed estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] </= 60 ml/min/1.73 m2)

142 ed prevalence of renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73m2), al

143 c kidney disease (serum creatinine estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 or

144 easures of chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] and albuminuria) with

145 ed in grams] and a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of <5 ml per minute pe

146 1-2 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], >/= 60 mL/min/1.73 m(

147 y and postdonation renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) of the remaining kidne

148 abetes mellitus and inversely with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcreatcysC)(all P < 0.001

149 Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGRF) was inversely correlat

150 gh-sensitivity C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, elevated TMAO levels remaine

151 n should reflect ongoing baseline, discharge glomerular filtration rate estimated from creatinine con

152 when estimated from cystatin C compared with glomerular filtration rate estimated from creatinine, 44

153 atinine consistently overestimated follow-up glomerular filtration rate estimated from creatinine, wh

154 mated from creatinine, whereas ICU discharge glomerular filtration rate estimated from cystatin C wel

155 Median 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate for DBD donor kidneys was low

156 The adjusted change in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to month 6 (Nan

157 ificant for death, 25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline, major adverse

158 (95% CI 0.003-0.02; p < 0.005) in estimated glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine, 0.01 g

159 acid (PUA) levels are associated with lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and higher blood pressu

160 lized changes from baseline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and measured GFR were -

161 as conducted to determine if TRPC6 regulates glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the contractile fun

162 udy of the effects of dietary salt intake on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and tubular Na(+) reabs

163 The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assesses the function o

164 There was no significant change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) before or after therapy

165 dney volume and the decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) but also caused more el

166 rfiltration is a risk factor for accelerated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline and nephropathy

167 The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased in both group

168 plasma flow (RPF), renocortical volume, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) early after the procedu

169 ch the addition of serum cystatin C improves glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation and mortalit

170 Purpose The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for carbop

171 nd renal outcome, with a mean improvement in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 6.1 mL/min/year amon

172 dition as decreased kidney function shown by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 60 mL/min

173 Changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) the year before and aft

174 late ion transport in response to changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to maintain glomerulotu

175 pulation and determined the best theoretical glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to use in this estimati

176 Mean preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 75.1 +/- 14.9 mL/mi

177 The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was directly measured (

178 Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured annually.

179 g measures of pregnancy physiology (albumin, glomerular filtration rate (GFR)), with log-transformed

180 inaccuracy of creatinine-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), UK and international g

181 This association could be attributable to glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which is related to PF

182 nt differences between "true" and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

183 tagonists may be associated with a decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

184 lization stratified by tertiles of estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

185 Multiple equations exist to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR); however, there is no c

186 This study examines the change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR, mL/min per m) in the fi

187 Cr levels and glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) were grouped accordin

188 dney transplantation patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than 90 have worse ou

189 5 525 white patients with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate >/= 60 mL.min(-)(1).1.73 m(-)

190 percent of the participants had an estimated glomerular filtration rate >30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2).

191 We selected adult subjects with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73m(2), an outpa

192 ents with normal or impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate >80 mL/min or between 80 and

193 higher in the presence of a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher albuminuria, hyperten

194 lder age, diabetes mellitus, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher heart rate, prior myo

195 wer systolic blood pressure, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher N-terminal pro-B-type

196 001) or biliary cancer (HR 12.7, P < 0.001), glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.89, P = 0.002), hyperte

197 ould be used for the evaluation of estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with stabilized s

198 whereas positively associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients.

199 at 3 years posttransplant (loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate in the chemoprophylaxis cohor

200 st histological predictor for posttransplant glomerular filtration rate in the LAT group was the exte

201 olic blood pressure decreased, and estimated glomerular filtration rate increased (P=0.003) more in t

202 In association, the glomerular filtration rate increased significantly excep

203 rapy discontinuation when baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate is above 44 mL/min/1.73 m.

204 ood pressure, BMI, smoking status, estimated glomerular filtration rate, LDL-cholesterol concentratio

205 ards models adjusted for age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular ejection fr

206 holesterol, antihypertensive medication use, glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular mass index,

207 daily blocks walked, diuretic use, estimated glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular mass, eject

208 Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m or

209 defined as a return to dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m.

210 th end-stage nonrenal disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min per 1.73

211 Patients with mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m we

212 rtension, 32% had LVH, and 38% had estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min per 1.73

213 discharge, almost twice as many patients had glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m wh

214 0 mg/dL, cystatin C >/=1.11 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m, a

215 with type 2 diabetes and CKD (with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2),

216 onic kidney disease was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2,

217 me was incident CKD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

218 Forty (1%) had measured glomerular filtration rate less than 80 mL/min; 32 (1%)

219 , progression of retinopathy, changes in the glomerular filtration rate, lipid levels, and measures o

220 fter adjusting for age, race, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, liver volume, and total kidn

221 sidered if chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) or pro

222 ey disease (serum creatinine level >3 mg/dL; glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min; acute kidney inju

223 , >1 g proteinuria, heart failure, estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 mL.min(-1).1.73 m(-2), or

224 proteinuria daily, heart failure, estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 ml/min/1.73 m(2), or rece

225 se, renal death, development of an estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73m(2), or d

226 Among 1512 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m(2), 35.4% fi

227 ndicated AHM use for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m(2).

228 oup had borderline renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and hep

229 ients with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL.min(-1).1.73 m(-2)).

230 ification of Diet in Renal Disease-estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL.min(-1).1.73 m(-2)).

231 pants with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) or u

232 ng within 1 year in ACHD included: estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (hazard

233 t hoc analysis of subjects with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), a first

234 in patients with RD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and com

235 pnea, and any of the following: 1) estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2); 2) hypo

236 pants with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) receiving

237 e main outcome was CKD, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) (usin

238 with and without renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60mL/min/1.73m(2)).

239 Low estimated glomerular filtration rate (<40 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and pr

240 5-30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) or stage 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate, <15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or requ

241 p in 521 stable subjects with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate, <60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)).

242 itions characterized by a sudden decrease in glomerular filtration rate, manifested by an increase in

243 Cystatin C (CysC) is a better glomerular filtration rate marker than serum creatinine

244 th active/acute ABMR had a 3-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (median,: 43 mL/min) lower th

245 Microalbuminuria, glomerular filtration rate, mesangial cell expansion, an

246 w-density lipoprotein cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate, metabolic syndrome, and the

247 des and uric acid levels, and worse measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR).

248 We tested if measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR, by chrome-ethylenediam

249 ssure, lipid profile, retinopathy, estimated glomerular filtration rate, (micro)albuminuria, the use

250 red) renal allograft survival with estimated glomerular filtration rates (mL/min per 1.73 m) of 43 to

251 ction or severe graft dysfunction: estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Rena

252 Estimated glomerular filtration rates (Modification of Diet in Ren

253 All of the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate more than 60 mL/min/1.73 m at

254 l class, diastolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriu

255 t after 1 January 2007; CKD was defined as a glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).

256 history of coronary heart disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate of 20 to 59 ml/min/1.73 m(2),

257 ort study recruited adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 20 to 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 fr

258 inine ratio [UACR] 100-3000 mg/g), estimated glomerular filtration rate of 25 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) or

259 95% CI, 1.05-1.51) and decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30% or more (11,045 events

260 bling of creatinine or decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30% or more.

261 V-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 50 mL per min or greater,

262 , lamivudine, and abacavir; and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 50 mL/min or more.

263 function was excellent with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 54 mL per min after 1 year

264 e of graft function (difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate of 9.6 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) a

265 those with type 1 diabetes with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 or highe

266 tients with type 2 diabetes and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 30 ml per minute

267 V-1 RNA >/=500 copies per mL) with estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 30 mL/min.

268 of at least 100 cells per muL, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 90 mL/min per 1.7

269 nts of at least 200 cells per muL, estimated glomerular filtration rates of at least 70 mL per min, a

270 a reduction of 50% or more in the estimated glomerular filtration rate or end-stage graft failure.

271 o significant difference in 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate or graft failure between grou

272 rhosis and ascites; rifaximin did not affect glomerular filtration rate or levels of vasoactive hormo

273 ompared with those with either low estimated glomerular filtration rate or proteinuria (18.7%) and th

274 ient or graft survival, rejection, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or other adverse events was

275 thickness, other cardiovascular markers, the glomerular filtration rate, or progression of retinopath

276 min creatinine ratio (P < 0.01), the fall in glomerular filtration rate (P < 0.001), and improved ren

277 mass index (p = 0.001), and had a lower mean glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.001).

278 ysis, serum uric acid (P = 0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.027), and VCAM (P = 0.

279 No effects on the glomerular filtration rate, P = 0.14, or vasoactive horm

280 ratios; 95% CIs) were age (1.13; 1.06-1.20), glomerular filtration rate per 5-U increments (0.93; 0.9

281 r SD increase; OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.21), glomerular filtration rate (per SD increase; OR, 0.67; 9

282 d to be negatively correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (R = -0.47, P < .001).

283 Estimated glomerular filtration rate remained lower in group II co

284 renal composite (40% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate, renal replacement therapy, o

285 YHA functional class (III vs. II), estimated glomerular filtration rate, responders to chemotherapy,

286 in cholesterol, hemoglobin A1c, albuminuria, glomerular filtration rate, smoking, and exercise.

287 f a sustained 40% reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, the need for renal-replaceme

288 .0044), while the routinely used parameters (glomerular filtration rate, urine albumin-to-creatinine

289 7 y, 52% were female, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 31 +/- 9 mL . min(-1) . 1

290 ncrease in spherical equivalent or estimated glomerular filtration rate was associated with a 0.70-mi

291 Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Modi

292 Glomerular filtration rate was lowest at 1 month (65.6 +

293 No change in estimated glomerular filtration rate was noted after the procedure

294 treatment, a 16-mL/min decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed in patients from

295 months, a progressively declining estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed more frequently

296 Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was the only one predictor of

297 ent's weight, BMI, creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 81.9 kg, 35.1 kg/m, 0.79

298 aft and patient survival, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate were also comparable between

299 mortality, and >/= 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate were examined using Cox propo

300 terstitial inflammation score, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly worse in u