ライフサイエンスコーパス: glycemic load

1 ed dietary carbohydrate, glycemic index, and glycemic load.

2 for 26 wk a diet with either a high or a low glycemic load.

3 ercentage of calories from carbohydrates, or glycemic load.

4 ose response, which can be quantified by the glycemic load.

5 one to the adverse effects of a high dietary glycemic load.

6 ry lifestyle, obesity, and increased dietary glycemic load.

7 ohydrate and sugar, glycemic index (GI), and glycemic load.

8 ancer risk has been directly associated with glycemic load.

9 A similar pattern was found for glycemic load.

10 istics, with the greatest contrasts seen for glycemic load.

11 index and among those of healthy weight for glycemic load.

12 -77] kcal/d; overall P = .03; P for trend by glycemic load = .009).

13 ectin was significantly inversely related to glycemic load (-1.3 mg/L per 1-SD increase; P = 0.02) an

14 aracteristics of ancestral hominin diets: 1) glycemic load, 2) fatty acid composition, 3) macronutrie

15 A low-glycemic load (40% carbohydrate and 35% fat) vs low-fat

16 pared with the lowest quintile were 1.50 for glycemic load (95% CI: 1.32-1.71, P for trend < .0001) a

17 bohydrates, which is characterized by a high glycemic load (a measure of carbohydrate quality and qua

18 On stepwise multiple regression analysis, glycemic load accounted for 21.1% of the variation in HD

19 The glycemic load (an indicator of a global dietary insulin

20 upport the hypothesis that diets with a high glycemic load and a low cereal fiber content increase ri

21 The combination of a high glycemic load and a low cereal fiber intake further incr

22 Glycemic load and added sugars were not significantly as

23 The association between dietary glycemic load and CHD risk was most evident among women

24 jective was to examine the impact of dietary glycemic load and energy density on total gestational we

25 timate the associations between quartiles of glycemic load and energy density with total gestational

26 Despite expectations that increasing glycemic load and glycemic index would increase the risk

27 95% CI, 1.14-5.51) when compared with a low glycemic load and high cereal fiber intake.

28 Diets low in glycemic load and high in whole grains may have a protec

29 The protective effects of low glycemic load and high whole grains on systemic inflamma

30 vely examine the association between dietary glycemic load and incident age-related cataract.

31 Lowering the dietary glycemic load and increasing protein intake may be advan

32 we evaluated the association between dietary glycemic load and plasma hs-CRP after adjusting for age;

33 ificant positive association between dietary glycemic load and plasma hs-CRP.

34 miological studies on the effects of dietary glycemic load and whole grain foods on systemic inflamma

35 40% from fat, and 20% from protein; moderate glycemic load), and very low-carbohydrate diet (10% from

36 lycemic index, 0.99 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.10) for glycemic load, and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.11) for fiber.

37 or dietary carbohydrates, glycemic index and glycemic load, and breast cancer risk.

38 Dietary fructose, glycemic load, and carbohydrate intake were assessed wit

39 ssessed the association of dietary fructose, glycemic load, and carbohydrate intake with fasting C-pe

40 mine the association between glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber and the risk of type 2

41 on of dietary carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber with breast cancer risk

42 hat a higher intake of carbohydrate, dietary glycemic load, and glycemic index may enhance risk of ch

43 nvestigate the relations between dietary GI, glycemic load, and other carbohydrate measures (added su

44 analyzed associations among glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of cancer in women and men in th

45 Glycemic load appears to be an important independent pre

46 Among GI studies, observed reductions in glycemic load are most often not solely due to substitut

47 ese findings suggest that glycemic index and glycemic load are not strong predictors of cancer incide

48 d suggest that high carbohydrate intakes and glycemic loads are protective against endometrial cancer

49 lly dietary sugar, fiber, glycemic index, or glycemic load, are associated with adiposity and insulin

50 composition, the role of glycemic index and glycemic load, as well as long-term outcomes.

51 as likely attributable to differences in the glycemic load between orange juice and milk and yogurt.

52 vegetables, and reducing the intake of high glycemic load beverages may offer a simple strategy for

53 87 (95% confidence interval: 1.00, 3.53) for glycemic load (both P for trend = 0.03).

54 , current smoking and pack-years of smoking, glycemic load, cholesterol intake, systolic blood pressu

55 Results for glycemic load closely mirrored those for carbohydrate.

56 rate, fat, saturated fat, dietary fiber, and glycemic load derived from self-report of dietary intake

57 ietary glycemic index (DGI) and high dietary glycemic load (DGL) increased the risk of NTDs in nondia

58 A low-glycemic load diet (LGD) has been proposed as an effecti

59 Regardless of insulin secretion, a low-glycemic load diet has beneficial effects on high-densit

60 An ad libitum low-glycemic load diet may be more efficacious than a conven

61 he median (57.5 microIU/mL; n = 28), the low-glycemic load diet produced a greater decrease in weight

62 Participants receiving the low-glycemic load diet reported less hunger than those recei

63 ergy expenditure decreased less with the low-glycemic load diet than with the low-fat diet, expressed

64 ride concentrations improved more on the low-glycemic load diet, whereas low-density lipoprotein chol

65 P < 0.001) more on the high- than on the low-glycemic load diet, whereas normoglycemic individuals re

66 o evaluate the efficacy of an ad libitum low-glycemic load diet, without strict limitation on carbohy

67 ic and diastolic) improved more with the low-glycemic load diet.

68 etary glycemic measures [adherence to a high-glycemic-load diet (HGLDiet) pattern, intakes of sugar a

69 rt Study to investigate associations between glycemic load, dietary carbohydrates, sucrose, fructose,

70 High-glycemic-load diets may increase colorectal cancer risk

71 study to determine whether persons with high-glycemic-load diets would be at an increased risk of dis

72 It is possible that high-glycemic-load diets, through their hyperinsulinemic effe

73 regard to estimated glycemic index (eGI) and glycemic load (eGL).

74 We calculated dietary glycemic load from data reported on multiple validated f

75 idemiologic data suggest that a high dietary glycemic load from refined carbohydrates increases the r

76 known about the association between dietary glycemic load (GL) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), prospectiv

77 nces under which the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are derived do not reflect real-world

78 men, dietary glycemic index (GI) and dietary glycemic load (GL) have been associated with cardiovascu

79 er a diet with a high glycemic index (GI) or glycemic load (GL) is associated with greater oxidative

80 In epidemiologic studies, dietary glycemic load (GL) is positively associated with risk of

81 s with a high glycemic index (GI) and a high glycemic load (GL) may influence cancer risk via hyperin

82 High dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) may promote tumorigenesis by increasi

83 was the only one eliciting low GI of 50 and glycemic load (GL) of 13 while the rest exhibited GI ran

84 Alcohol consumption and the glycemic load (GL) of a meal interact to influence both

85 Reducing the glycemic load (GL) of the diet may benefit appetite cont

86 s on meal or dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) value determinations has remained par

87 lycemic response and glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) value determinations remains unclear.

88 whether the dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) were associated with the risk of type

89 intake, starch, sugar, fiber intake, GI, and glycemic load (GL) were correlated with intake of differ

90 s of dietary glycemic index (GI) and dietary glycemic load (GL) with many chronic diseases have been

91 ions between dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) with psychological disorders remain u

92 ociations of dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) an

93 sociation of dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) with T2D risk.

94 int association between glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), and alcohol intake with type 2 diabe

95 he aim was to compare average dietary GI and glycemic load (GL), and contributing carbohydrate foods,

96 te the relation between glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), and total carbohydrate intake with B

97 he risk of colorectal cancer associated with glycemic load (GL), carbohydrate, and sucrose and to asc

98 2D associated with TCF7L2 is modified by the glycemic load (GL), glycemic index (GI), cereal fiber co

99 ures associated with glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL).

100 carbohydrate-rich foods varying in quality [glycemic load (GL)].

101 The authors investigated the associations of glycemic load, glycemic index, and carbohydrate intake w

102 e model, subjects in the highest quintile of glycemic load had 14.1% (P for trend = 0.09) and 16.1% (

103 Increased glycemic load has been implicated in the aetiology of di

104 served in the 90th versus 10th percentile of glycemic load (hazards ratio (HR) = 1.45, 95% confidence

105 ciations between intakes of high-GI and high-glycemic load (high-GL) diets, carbohydrate, and the mai

106 mmendations to consume a reduced-energy, low-glycemic load, high-fiber diet with behavioral change ed

107 intake (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.96), and glycemic load (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.84) when women

108 20-48 y, consumed meals with a high or a low glycemic load in a crossover fashion.

109 staple grains as well as glycemic index and glycemic load in relation to CHD among 117,366 Chinese w

110 Future studies should examine the effect of glycemic load in subjects who have a hyperlipemic respon

111 ive correlations between HDL cholesterol and glycemic load (in relation to white bread), percentage c

112 ate, 60% from fat, and 30% from protein; low glycemic load) in random order, each for 4 weeks.

113 d absorbed carbohydrates with a high dietary glycemic load is associated with an increased risk of is

114 whereas a carbohydrate-rich diet with a high glycemic load is associated with lower adiponectin conce

115 Assessment of glycemic load is not usually included in a standard diet

116 Dietary glycemic load is significantly and positively associated

117 potassium and have a high glycemic index and glycemic load, is associated with the risk of cardiovasc

118 e (high body mass, high red meat intake) and glycemic load (low legume intake), a synergism that, if

119 We aimed to examine the effects of a low-glycemic load (low-GL) diet in overweight and obese preg

120 ydrate, 20% from fat, 20% from protein; high glycemic load), low-glycemic index diet (40% from carboh

121 spectively; overall P = .003; P for trend by glycemic load < .001).

122 Reduction in glycemic load may aid in the prevention or treatment of

123 h carbohydrate intake and a diet with a high glycemic load may be associated with breast cancer risk

124 Reducing glycemic load may be especially important to achieve wei

125 ttention to a possible resulting increase in glycemic load may result in an unfavorable influence on

126 We hypothesize that a high-glycemic load meal activates inflammatory cells, and tha

127 ocytes can be activated by both high-and low-glycemic load meals.

128 expressing TNF-alpha with both high-and low-glycemic load meals.

129 ality and quantity, such as whole grains and glycemic load, might interact with transcription factor

130 mption patterns including glycemic index and glycemic load, novel assessments of gluten quantificatio

131 The glycemic load of a single meal did not have a significan

132 The glycemic load of the meal did not influence circulating

133 ts of a hypocaloric diet with an LGI and low glycemic load on anthropometric and metabolic variables,

134 ul effect of high glycemic index and dietary glycemic load on cancer.

135 on on the potential effect of a high dietary glycemic load on the incidence of age-related cataract.

136 c carcinogenesis, studies that have examined glycemic load or individual dietary components that infl

137 ceived an energy-restricted diet, either low-glycemic load or low-fat.

138 erweight patients consuming diets with a low glycemic load or with large amounts of fiber and whole g

139 and maintenance through diets with different glycemic loads or different fiber and whole-grain conten

140 ated microsimulation of caloric consumption, glycemic load, overweight/obesity prevalence, and type 2

141 Compared with the LFD, the LGD decreased the glycemic load per kilocalories of reported food intakes

142 t support the hypothesis that a high dietary glycemic load, primarily a result of consumption of refi

143 Glycemic load reduction by >17 g glucose equivalents/d w

144 valuate the effects of an ad libitum reduced-glycemic-load (RGL) diet on body weight, body compositio

145 ion to body weight reduction related more to glycemic load than to GI.

146 gic studies, both the glycemic index and the glycemic load (the glycemic index multiplied by the amou

147 r magnesium intake, cereal fiber intake, and glycemic load, the association between whole grains and

148 there was no significant relation of dietary glycemic load to risk of cataract extraction (P for tren

149 ween carbohydrate intake, glycemic index and glycemic load, total dietary fiber intake, and breast ca

150 the manner in which high glycemic index and glycemic load track with overall diet and lifestyle patt

151 ght change compared with lower-fiber, higher-glycemic-load vegetables (p < 0.0001).

152 the highest and lowest quintiles of dietary glycemic load was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.11; P for hetero

153 entration for the lowest quintile of dietary glycemic load was 1.9 mg/L and for the highest quintile

154 ndex was 81.7 (standard deviation, 5.5), and glycemic load was 197.8 (standard deviation, 105.2).

155 Among studies reporting on GI, variation in glycemic load was approximately equally explained by var

156 We examined whether a high dietary glycemic load was associated with elevated hs-CRP concen

157 Each participant's dietary glycemic load was calculated as a function of glycemic i

158 Glycemic load was calculated by multiplying the glycemic

159 Dietary glycemic load was directly associated with risk of CHD a

160 Dietary glycemic load was inversely associated in men with visce

161 Glycemic load was not associated with total gestational

162 Glycemic load was not significantly associated with risk

163 Likewise, dietary glycemic load was positively associated with total strok

164 A higher glycemic load was strongly associated with an increased

165 A higher dietary glycemic load was strongly associated with an increased

166 In a multivariate regression analysis, the glycemic load was the only significant dietary predictor

167 sugar intake, rather than glycemic index or glycemic load, was associated with higher adiposity meas

168 isks from the lowest to highest quintiles of glycemic load were 1.00, 1.01, 1.25, 1.51, and 1.98 (95%

169 hydrates with high glycemic indexes (GI) and glycemic load were linked to risk of coronary heart dise

170 egetables having both higher fiber and lower glycemic load were more strongly inversely associated wi

171 Dietary fiber, glycemic index, and glycemic load were not significantly correlated with adi

172 fractions, carbohydrate, glycemic index, and glycemic load were prospectively assessed five times ove

173 ures (sugar intake, carbohydrate intake, and glycemic load) were also positively associated with glob

174 d)=0.217) and 1.04 (P(trend)=0.012) and, for glycemic load, were 0.90 (P(trend)=0.024) and 0.93 (P(tr

175 polyunsaturated fat and low in trans fat and glycemic load (which reflects the effect of diet on the

176 er risk of pancreatic cancer, a high dietary glycemic load, which is based on an empirical measure of

177 d to saturated fat, and low in trans fat and glycemic load, which reflects the extent to which diet r

178 of carbohydrate intake, glycemic index, and glycemic load with endometrial cancer risk in the US Pro

179 e associations of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load with predictors of type 2 diabetes in olde

180 of dietary carbohydrate, glycemic index, and glycemic load with stroke risk were examined among 78,77

181 ern, intakes of sugar and carbohydrates, and glycemic load] with cerebral amyloid burden (measured by

182 We hypothesized that higher dietary GI and glycemic load would be associated with greater odds of t

183 etables with a higher fiber content or lower glycemic load would be more strongly associated with a h