ライフサイエンスコーパス: grading

1 dard clinical techniques (LFP, clinical cell grading).

2 clinical practice outcomes (OSCE and mentor grading).

3 nactive uveitis status according to clinical grading.

4 We used ITSS number for SWI grading.

5 ful information for preoperative glial tumor grading.

6 perfusion MR technique in preoperative tumor grading.

7 e of the best noninvasive methods for glioma grading.

8 ROP are most easily detected early by image grading.

9 orrelation between both pathological and SWI grading.

10 o acid used in PET for tumor delineation and grading.

11 intraocular pressure, and trends in scleral grading.

12 ercentage of CNP-pixels and also with manual grading.

13 ion, cell and crypt segmentation, and cancer grading.

14 on the Clavien-Dindo surgical complications grading.

15 annual masked centralized fundus photograph grading.

16 ctively, followed by masked segmentation and grading.

17 ore objective testing strategy than clinical grading.

18 ues ranged from 0.88 to 1.00 for qualitative grading.

19 fraction, and lens nuclear opalescence (NOP) grading.

20 ore and practice outcomes measured by mentor grading.

21 Based on results of TR gradings, a computerized algorithm determined whether re

22 troscopy, conventionally adopted for quality grading according to the ISO Normative 3632.

23 ure search, critical appraisal, and evidence grading according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidel

24 alidation sets yielded similar results, with grading accuracy of 88% (95% CI: 62, 98) with 1.5-T MR i

25 ed a level of evidence based on standardized grading adopted by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

26 For foveal avascular zone grading, agreement was good for the 3 x 3-mm scan (kappa

27 ly data-driven artificial intelligence-based grading algorithm can be used to screen fundus photograp

28 and GA, although including hemorrhage in the grading algorithm only minimally improved the sensitivit

29 American Heart Association Level of Evidence grading algorithm that was in place at the time of commi

30 e them cost-effective alternatives to manual grading alone.

31 Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grading also was mandated by the EMR.

32 ading and as a filter prior to primary human grading, although the latter approach was less cost-effe

33 is study, we demonstrate high reliability in grading among trained ophthalmologists, completing the v

34 est sets ranged from 0 to 3% for age and sex grading and 3% to 5% for Wolbachia infection diagnosis u

35 ding both as a replacement for initial human grading and as a filter prior to primary human grading,

36 tabolism and neovascularization activity for grading and characterization of isocitrate dehydrogenase

37 here were no differences between image-based grading and clinical examination in the ability to detec

38 e the intermodality agreement of morphologic grading and clinically relevant quantitative measurement

39 used to determine diagnostic performance for grading and detection of IDH gene mutation status.

40 indings of ROP between digital retinal image grading and examination results from the Telemedicine Ap

41 arization characterization may be useful for grading and IDH mutation detection of gliomas and requir

42 valuation including: clinical cell and flare grading and laser flare photometry (LFP).

43 plications were graded as per Clavien 5 tier grading and major morbidity (grade III b, grade IV grade

44 study investigated the effectiveness of ITSS grading and rCBV ratio in preoperative assessment.

45 OCT variables were derived from standardized grading and semiautomated segmentation, respectively, at

46 Standardized grading and staging histologic scoring systems, such as

47 y telemedicine system of remote fundus image grading and The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Reti

48 Optimal grading and treatment of pineal parenchymal tumours of i

49 This calculator may simplify SD OCT grading and with future validation has a promising role

50 efine the groups (PSA concentration, Gleason grading, and clinical stage) were then used to sub-strat

51 ternational Task Force Delphi Panel severity grading, and controls, documented baseline measures (inc

52 osis, including histological classification, grading, and molecular profiling, requires a surgical pr

53 ratio 1.26, P = 0.02), together with Ca19.9, grading, and N1.

54 corneal and conjunctival staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Surface Disease Index and SF-36v2 qu

55 s criteria exist for its diagnosis, severity grading, and prognosis.

56 ial in neuro-oncology for disease detection, grading, and tumor delineation to guide biopsy and resec

57 both methods were further used to validate a grading app for the optic nerves.

58 Although the existing classification and grading approach is of prognostic value, it harbours sho

59 ering high-risk histopathology and anaplasia grading as predictors of distant metastasis and death sh

60 categorized according to their worst-ever DR grading, as having "no DR" (no history of nonproliferati

61 ' distributions were assessed using a visual grading assessment score of the uptake in the axial skel

62 is difficult due to the subjective nature of grading assessment.

63 stent with clinical examination and/or image grading at the next session.

64 Retrospective cross-sectional study of DME grading based on monocular fundus photographs and OCT im

65 Agreement in grading between the 3 imaging methods was assessed by ka

66 d Retmarker saved costs compared with manual grading both as a replacement for initial human grading

67 Reliable EEG parameters for HE diagnosing/grading can be obtained from a cheap, commercial, wirele

68 , we propose here new, reliably identifiable grading categories that may be more suited for populatio

69 er operating characteristic (ROC) and visual grading characteristic analyses were performed.

70 Compared with WHO grading, classification by individual and combined methy

71 nd used retinal photographs and standardized grading classifications, were included.

72 h as ill-defined parameters for subtypes and grading criteria prone to arbitrary judgment.

73 evaluated, with two evaluators independently grading CVR and SOR.

74 irs, there were 161 instances in which image grading did not detect RW-ROP noted on clinical examinat

75 from comprehensive and advanced training in grading digital images is critical in studies using a re

76 T expression correlates with clinical cancer grading, duration of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) a

77 d studies with data on photographic-based DR grading, follow-up visits, and well-defined incident CVD

78 ernational Association for the Study of Pain grading for neuropathic pain, 100% had probable and 95.2

79 Clinical grading for ocular disease is currently used for evaluat

80 between the MLOPs and the ophthalmologist in grading fundus photographs for retinal hemorrhages and m

81 As a continuous score grading graft dysfunction, MEAF provides additional, gra

82 (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in grading hepatic steatosis and change in hepatic steatosi

83 Poor tumor grading, high American Joint Commission on Cancer tumor

84 Degeneration, quantified by Pfirrmann grading, improved in the MSC-treated patients and worsen

85 Image grading in 123 infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 24.8

86 CI, 41.6-51.6) and agree with trained reader grading in 70.0% of the 854 G+/E- cases (95% CI, 67.3-72

87 and establish threshold values for fibrosis grading in comparison or in combination with other nonin

88 tigation was a cross-sectional study of CSME grading in monoscopic images using a sectors approach.

89 Analysis of NET grading in patients with known histopathologic data reve

90 ia, hyperproliferation, and higher malignant grading in this 3D culture model of desmoplastic ICC.

91 ating IBD from irritable bowel syndrome, for grading inflammation, to describe the response to therap

92 Grading is based solely on histology, with an absence of

93 the case of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA), grading is partly determined by morphology and degree of

94 A constituent category in BR grading is tubule formation.

95 The types of defective materials regarded in grading legislation were divided into 13 classes, and we

96 ved PDFF is superior to CAP in detecting and grading liver steatosis in human NAFLD.

97 scular AMD (NVAMD), year of recruitment, AMD grading method, and continent were extracted.

98 ompared to assess the reproducibility of the grading methods.

99 arterial occlusions and different collateral grading methods.

100 was an insignificant difference in the bleb grading morphology regarding both groups (p = 0.35).

101 cient blood plasma samples and 97 had no CMI grading (none, incomplete, or ungradable MRI), leaving a

102 amination (G-/E+) and 854 instances in which grading noted RW-ROP when the examination did not (G+/E-

103 ited reading center using modified Wisconsin grading of 4-field mydriatic photographs.

104 Grading of anaplasia may be a useful adjunct to standard

105 e scans were imported into software enabling grading of areas in B-scans and computing of planimetric

106 Masked grading of capillary nonperfusion on 3-layer PR-OCTA det

107 included objective change assessed by masked grading of color fundus photography and Early Treatment

108 d incidence of macular edema as assessed via grading of color stereo film fundus photographs.

109 coronary anatomy and for early detection and grading of coronary lesions in non-diabetic patients.

110 be of clinical utility in the evaluation and grading of diabetic eye disease.

111 As a quantifiable measure, it may allow grading of disease activity, monitoring progress, and gu

112 Concordance between external and internal grading of external studies was improved when diagnostic

113 At 73 borders, grading of eye-tracked follow-up SD OCT line scans showe

114 To determine the symmetry on retinal image grading of fellow eyes for retinopathy of prematurity (R

115 ness measurements (r = 0.97, P < 0.0001) and grading of foci morphology (r = 0.97, P < 0.0001).

116 ar pseudodrusen (RPD) was assessed by masked grading of fundus images and was confirmed with optical

117 ual acuity, digital retinal photography, and grading of images at Moorfields Eye Hospital Reading Cen

118 performance of semi-quantitative ultrasound grading of knee femoral articular cartilage, osteophytes

119 as starting at the first clinician-reported grading of lesion inactivity.

120 Manual grading of lesions in retinal images is relevant to clin

121 Anterior chamber temperature during PPC and grading of ocular inflammation, corneal endothelial dama

122 Concordant grading of OMR severity with both techniques was observe

123 Glaucoma was diagnosed based on a masked grading of optic disc stereophotographs.

124 This validation study compared the grading of optic nerves from smartphone images with thos

125 Grading of other characteristics on optical coherence to

126 of this study may not be relevant to mosaic grading of other retinal vascular conditions.

127 f luminal water imaging in the detection and grading of PCa.

128 MR) imaging technique, for the detection and grading of prostate cancer (PCa).

129 ngth of recommendations were rated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Ev

130 recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Ev

131 The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Ev

132 ngth of recommendations were rated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and E

133 developed using the system developed by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and

134 y of evidence were assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

135 nd rated recommendations by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

136 ality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

137 ades the recommendations by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

138 he quality of the studies was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

139 ished by the BTS, the guideline has used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

140 uality of evidence was rated based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

141 grading system, which is based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

142 The results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

143 endations was based on the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

144 review was developed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

145 their quality was determined by using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

146 Evidence was graded according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

147 grading system, which is based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

148 s assessed evidence quality using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

149 ut initial treatment approaches by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

150 appraised the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

151 According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

152 was developed in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

153 The committee followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

154 The evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

155 Subcommittee members completed their Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

156 ew of the literature ranked according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

157 ssessed confidence in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

158 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

159 body of evidence was evaluated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

160 CDC used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

161 Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

162 ent, Development, and Evaluation system, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

163 vidence and recommendations using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

164 Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

165 lity-of-evidence assessment according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

166 ssessed confidence in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

167 high-quality evidence as examined using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and

168 m 2008 to 2017 and were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

169 rength of evidence was adjudicated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

170 reak of Ebola virus disease, we employed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

171 According to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

172 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

173 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

174 sion by an expert committee according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

175 then conducted a systematic review using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

176 determined the strength of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

177 A modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

178 nalyses of the relevant research and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

179 ulated, written, and graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

180 matic evidence syntheses, which followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

181 uality of each study was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

182 en formulated, written, and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

183 ce (i.e., the quality of evidence) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

184 ce (i.e., the quality of evidence) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

185 mary of the science and its quality based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

186 we developed an innovative adaptation of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development and

187 Using Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development and

188 eses were used to inform the formulation and grading of recommendations.

189 or diabetic retinopathy (DR) by expert human grading of retinal images is challenging.

190 PDFF, but not CAP, enabled the grading of steatosis (P < .0001).

191 ol), retinopathy level (determined by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs), and N

192 Semi-quantitative grading of tau-positive cellular lesions and neuronal lo

193 lts, previous gradings of both eyes, current grading of the fellow eye, and demographic data.

194 t a standard that enabled independent remote grading of the images comparable to those acquired using

195 cteristic can help in the classification and grading of these distinctive neoplasms.

196 assist in the diagnostic classification and grading of these distinctive neoplasms.Deep penetrating

197 is surpassed), e-ROP IMAGING (trained reader grading of type 1 or 2 ROP initiates diagnostic examinat

198 Grading of written descriptions for observational and de

199 ked to all eye examination results, previous gradings of both eyes, current grading of the fellow eye

200 The results of the 2 independent gradings of both FAF and OCT images were compared to ass

201 Comparison of the 2 masked gradings of the generated en face images of patients wit

202 ic marker that could be established as a new grading parameter for LSCC.

203 ed AC inflammatory indexes and LFP, clinical grading, participant category (active or inactive uveiti

204 moderate intraobserver agreement upon repeat grading (Pictor: kappa = 0.63 and 0.64, for graders 1 an

205 cal (including injection site reaction (ISR) grading), plasma pharmacokinetic (time-to-minimum-effect

206 steoarthritis Research Society International grading (progression in 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-, 4th-, 6th-, or

207 , analysed in an independent cohort with WHO grading, progression-free survival, and disease-specific

208 Incorporating IOH into the grading protocol minimally altered the sensitivity of th

209 corporating hemorrhage into the standardized grading protocol.

210 e purpose of this study was to develop image grading protocols suited to ultra-widefield imaging (UWF

211 interpretation of results, and a system for grading quality of test efforts.

212 re formulated, written, and graded using the Grading, Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Ev

213 002) and 0.116 (p=0.002) for OSCE and mentor grading respectively.

214 The compositional grading resulted in generation of internal bias field wh

215 as the potential to improve tumor detection, grading, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring o

216 a modified Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading Scale (a 6-level scale: 10, no AMD; 60, advanced

217 raded on MR images by using a modified Noyes grading scale (grade 0, intact; grade 1, fibrillations;

218 [95% CI, 1-7]; P = .01) and the SMC Severity Grading Scale (median score, 2 vs 2; Hodges-Lehmann medi

219 s developed as a simple clinical and imaging grading scale for acute prognosis in patients with PICH.

220 The HOUSE-classification is a novel grading scale for ERCP-complexity.

221 This study launches a new complexity grading scale for ERCP-the H.O.U.S.E.-classification.

222 Assessment of Materials (SAM) instrument, a grading scale used to evaluate suitability of health inf

223 ams were classified by the Chang Ototoxicity Grading Scale.

224 ed segmentation method or a validated visual grading scale.

225 Questionnaires, sign and symptom grading scales, tests, and potential biomarkers for OA a

226 teria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 grading schema.

227 upper range of the mild class in the 3-class grading scheme (ie, mild to moderate in the 5-class sche

228 is an essential element of a novel OCT-based grading scheme of ERMs that may influence visual prognos

229 A 5-class grading scheme to evaluate PVL was developed in concorda

230 umferential extent) following a standardized grading scheme.

231 ataract surgery (SICS) based on the LOCS III grading score.

232 s was revealed as measured by the histologic grading score.

233 NV activity, which was subjected to a second grading session by the 3 RSs.

234 performed based on intra- and inter-observer grading showed that proposed methodology detects HEs mor

235 Diagnostic accuracies of CAP and PDFF for grading steatosis were assessed with receiver operating

236 Prolonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading Stent-Induced Intimal Hyperplasia Study (PRODIGY

237 Clinical grading strongly correlates with the number of cells on

238 leb evaluation, according to Moorfields Bleb Grading System (MBGS); spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) bleb

239 hologists using the Mandard tumor regression grading system (TRG).

240 the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) grading system and multimodal imaging, we identified two

241 gic findings were evaluated with a validated grading system and standardized instrument, respectively

242 severity groups according to the Global Acne Grading System and were age matched to 100 male controls

243 ing to a standardized photographic scleritis grading system by 16 weeks in the study eye compared to

244 The proposed grading system can assist clinicians in decision-making

245 hagus should be defined using a standardized grading system documenting the circumferential and maxim

246 ationship between tissues beyond the Gleason grading system due to the tissue similarity scoring syst

247 This grading system facilitates decision making in the evalua

248 fferent endoscopic centers, a new complexity grading system for ERCP is warranted.

249 A grading system is presented to encourage uniformity in t

250 hereby CCI added information to the standard grading system of complications.

251 e, we propose a new computed tomography (CT) grading system of PAT to identify risk factors for allog

252 We propose a simple grading system of SC lesions based on SS-OCTA and fundus

253 Conclusion The CCS grading system semiquantifies SOR.

254 masked manner using a modified Airlie House grading system to assess presence and severity of DR.

255 ciety of Interventional Radiology collateral grading system) were assessed by a blinded core laborato

256 ned using the American College of Physicians grading system, and recommendations were discussed until

257 Despite the confirmed value of the WHO grading system, results of a multitude of studies and pr

258 Methods: Using the ACP grading system, the committee based these recommendation

259 Using the ACP grading system, the committee based these recommendation

260 Using the ACP grading system, the committee based these recommendation

261 vidence and recommendations by using the ACP grading system, which is based on the GRADE (Grading of

262 vidence and recommendations by using the ACP grading system, which is based on the GRADE (Grading of

263 rventional Radiology (SIR) collateral vessel grading system, while reperfusion was assessed by using

264 ERMs were classified according to a 4-stage grading system.

265 r, using the Age-Related Eye Disease Study-2 grading system.

266 s for a risk-adapted approach to WM, using a grading system.

267 ons using ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system.

268 e modified Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System.

269 ct was assessed using the Wisconsin Cataract Grading system.

270 ter, using the Age-Related Eye Disease Study grading system.

271 tographs were graded using the Wisconsin AMD grading system.

272 using the Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System.

273 concomitantly graded according to the Cotton grading system.

274 a modified Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System.

275 ntions, including those focused on pass/fail grading systems (n = 3; mean MERSQI score, 12.0), mental

276 ERCP (GallRiks) and correlations between the grading systems and procedure related variables as well

277 rity criteria, lack of consistent scoring or grading systems for primary and safety outcomes, and lac

278 The results from grading the conventional images and the SS-OCT en face i

279 The ASP score was calculated by grading the measured angle of attenuation from grades 0

280 Guidelines and the rationale for grading the strength of each recommendation are included

281 reatment selection, which is not possible by grading the Wnt-beta-catenin over activity present in mo

282 Average grading time per image was 187 s and 297 s for the conce

283 s, and VF data were combined with optic disc grading to determine "disc plus field defined glaucoma."

284 Indeed, by up-grading treatment plants to factories in which the incom

285 An objective grading using computer algorithms will be more consisten

286 c retinopathy was based on fundus photograph grading, using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy

287 were associated with improved concordance in grading valvular heart disease.

288 On testing the RS grading versus the NOA, the accuracy was 91% (95% confid

289 Optic disc grading was available for 25,289 (93 %) eyes of 13,081 (

290 A detailed protocol for grading was developed.

291 The reproducibility of DR grading was evaluated throughout study and showed modera

292 Intra and inter-observer grading was performed for determining percentage area of

293 pectively in 48 of 52 cases once the overall grading was unmasked and the graders reevaluated the con

294 ICC for these gradings was 0.991.

295 lass correlation coefficient (ICC) for these gradings was 0.996.

296 licitly trained for performing automated AMD grading were compared with an alternate deep learning me

297 ween SWI grade, rCBV ratio, and pathological grading were evaluated.

298 e mean preserved EZ areas from 2 independent gradings were 2.746 +/- 2.319 mm(2) and 2.858 +/- 2.446

299 The mean PAF areas from 2 independent gradings were 3.720 +/- 3.340 mm(2) and 3.692 +/- 3.253

300 is of AOSLO images typically requires manual grading, which is time consuming, and subjective; thus,