ライフサイエンスコーパス: grading of

1 scores resulted in correct glaucoma severity grading of 32.5% of participants (p < 0.001).

2 ited reading center using modified Wisconsin grading of 4-field mydriatic photographs.

3 ed imaging, when compared with expert fundus grading of 468 patients and 2145 fundus images are: 98.6

4 ed clinical assessments (lesion counts), and grading of acne severity using standardized bilateral se

5 ssociation between citrulline levels and the grading of ACR to establish a cutoff point that accurate

6 ared with CTE, may improve the detection and grading of active inflammation in patients with Crohn di

7 In 98% of AMD eyes, SD-OCT grading of all characteristics was successful, detecting

8 Grading of anaplasia may be a useful adjunct to standard

9 s a moderate to high correlation between the grading of aniseikonia and the difference in central ret

10 d development of late AMD by central, masked grading of annual retinal photographs or by treatment hi

11 good correlations of VC-W with aortographic grading of AR (n=8, r=0.82, P=0.01), with the proximal f

12 e scans were imported into software enabling grading of areas in B-scans and computing of planimetric

13 The reproducibility of digital grading of AREDS2 images was assessed by reproducibility

14 SH imaging is accurate for the detection and grading of articular cartilage abnormalities of the pate

15 sion was correlated with the histopathologic grading of astrocytomas obtained from samples from stere

16 en criteria for the endoscopic diagnosis and grading of BE.

17 ked to all eye examination results, previous gradings of both eyes, current grading of the fellow eye

18 The results of the 2 independent gradings of both FAF and OCT images were compared to ass

19 Masked grading of capillary nonperfusion on 3-layer PR-OCTA det

20 nd filling pressures to augment angiographic grading of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV); however

21 1 of 43 samples) and good performance in the grading of cartilage damage (accuracy, 0.74; 32 of 43 sa

22 The value of DT imaging in the diagnosis and grading of cartilage damage was assessed with logistic r

23 y, subchondral bone thickness, or histologic grading of cartilage degeneration were seen between frac

24 s pathology of the femoral heads, histologic grading of cartilage slices, and biochemical analysis of

25 a cataract" to be considered in the clinical grading of cataracts in patients with this condition.

26 to risk groups and to form a basis for a new grading of cGVHD.

27 reproducible system is described for visual grading of characteristics of the primary tumor in patie

28 parvum in fetal and utero-placental tissues, grading of chorioamnionitis, and placental gene expressi

29 es of Health Consensus Criteria for improved grading of chronic GVHD.

30 Grading of CLD revealed significant differences in obser

31 The grading of clinical disease was consistent with histolog

32 ogical functional tests were scored daily by grading of clinical signs (score 0-5).

33 We evaluated inter-examiner reliability in grading of clinical variables associated with meibomian

34 Fluorescein angiographic grading of CNV closure 6 days after PDT showed a closure

35 included objective change assessed by masked grading of color fundus photography and Early Treatment

36 d incidence of macular edema as assessed via grading of color stereo film fundus photographs.

37 technical components of ERCP and an overall grading of competence as judged by the attending physici

38 ss the influence of the Rentrop angiographic grading of coronary collaterals on myocardial perfusion

39 coronary anatomy and for early detection and grading of coronary lesions in non-diabetic patients.

40 had a significantly higher mean pathological grading of cortical Lewy bodies than all other groupings

41 Agreement among investigators for grading of DD was poor (36% of CM patients).

42 Interreader agreement for qualitative grading of DE CT images was substantial (kappa=0.66).

43 Semiquantitative grading of deposit severity was performed.

44 be of clinical utility in the evaluation and grading of diabetic eye disease.

45 n current clinical practice, histology-based grading of diffuse infiltrative gliomas is the best pred

46 As a quantifiable measure, it may allow grading of disease activity, monitoring progress, and gu

47 illage using detection of chlamydial DNA and grading of disease severity indicated that 62% (33/53) o

48 t with dilated retinal biomicroscopy for the grading of DR.

49 for diagnosis, classification, and severity grading of dry eye disease.

50 ent symptoms influence dry eye diagnosis and grading of dry eye more than clinical test results.

51 The diagnosis and grading of dysplasia can be very challenging and should

52 ity of GGT-positive cells and the histologic grading of dysplasia.

53 be substantially mitigated by an appropriate grading of elastic modulus through the ceramic thickness

54 transplantation relies on histopathological grading of endomyocardial biopsies according to Internat

55 tween monographic measurement and endoscopic grading of esophageal varices.

56 the PEP clinical management pathway and the Grading of Evidence, Assessment, Development and Evaluat

57 Concordance between external and internal grading of external studies was improved when diagnostic

58 robserver and intraobserver agreement in the grading of extrapancreatic necrosis was assessed by usin

59 At 73 borders, grading of eye-tracked follow-up SD OCT line scans showe

60 In group 2, the median clinical grading of eyes in the experimental group was significan

61 To determine the symmetry on retinal image grading of fellow eyes for retinopathy of prematurity (R

62 Masked retrospective grading of fluorescein angiograms showed an 11% decrease

63 ness measurements (r = 0.97, P < 0.0001) and grading of foci morphology (r = 0.97, P < 0.0001).

64 for the subjective and morphologic clinical grading of Fuchs' dystrophy is only moderate.

65 Interobserver agreement for clinical grading of Fuchs' dystrophy was moderate (kappa = 0.32;

66 ar pseudodrusen (RPD) was assessed by masked grading of fundus images and was confirmed with optical

67 Semi-automated grading of fundus photographs (1 eye/participant) determ

68 on changes in retinal thickening measured by grading of fundus photographs and optical coherence tomo

69 Grading of fundus photographs showed a statistically sig

70 ed by an ophthalmologist and had independent grading of fundus photographs to confirm their disease s

71 The AMD status was assessed by standardized grading of fundus photographs, and stored fasting blood

72 acular degeneration status was determined by grading of fundus photographs.

73 origenesis and a parameter used in pathology grading of glandular tumors.

74 The preoperative grading of gliomas, which is critical for guiding therap

75 VIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the grading of gliomas.

76 differentiation of cerebral lesions and the grading of gliomas.

77 slowed the progression of OA, as measured by grading of gross changes in the unstable knee at arthros

78 nd late autopsy findings and histopathologic grading of healing and inflammatory response were simila

79 ive, accurate estimation of the presence and grading of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD.

80 r images are primarily used in diagnosis and grading of ICA stenosis; two additional parameters, ICA-

81 ual acuity, digital retinal photography, and grading of images at Moorfields Eye Hospital Reading Cen

82 We assessed AMD using side-by-side grading of images from all visits.

83 Remote grading of images of an eye at a single session had sens

84 The reproducibility of the grading of index AMD lesion components and for the AREDS

85 ng results were compared with the pathologic grading of inflammation and predominant histopathologic

86 Endoscopic and histological grading of inflammation could allow better risk stratifi

87 ance on the endoscopic recognition of BE and grading of its extent.

88 The masked grading of IVCM images reliably distinguished normal con

89 was accurate and reliable for detection and grading of knee articular cartilage defects.

90 performance of semi-quantitative ultrasound grading of knee femoral articular cartilage, osteophytes

91 f the dimensions of the zeroth levels in the gradings of L and B(L).

92 ubcapsular (PSC) cataract, from standardized grading of lens photographs or previous cataract surgery

93 as starting at the first clinician-reported grading of lesion inactivity.

94 t agreement between MR and histopathology in grading of lesion shape and type (slope=0.97, r=0.91 for

95 Manual grading of lesions in retinal images is relevant to clin

96 atrophy and acini appearance, and slit-lamp grading of lid debris and telangiectasias were conducted

97 ure is just in its beginning, which made the grading of literature difficult, and so it was not attem

98 tinal lesions was determined by standardized grading of macular SD OCT scans and photographs of 3 sta

99 Meibography grading of meibomian gland atrophy and acini appearance,

100 Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor

101 could be not be differentiated based on the grading of necrosis and inflammation on hematoxylin-eosi

102 uman disease and allowing identification and grading of neovascularization in vivo.

103 software OCTOR, which allows accurate manual grading of OCT B-scans.

104 The CATT readers performed standardized grading of OCT images.

105 s a cross-sectional agreement study in which grading of OCT line scans from patients with nAMD was co

106 Anterior chamber temperature during PPC and grading of ocular inflammation, corneal endothelial dama

107 Concordant grading of OMR severity with both techniques was observe

108 nd optic nerve (ON) damage was determined by grading of ON sections.

109 Glaucoma was diagnosed based on a masked grading of optic disc stereophotographs.

110 This validation study compared the grading of optic nerves from smartphone images with thos

111 grader reproducibility for computer-assisted grading of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images in

112 rameters, rather than on computed tomography grading of organ injury, was highly successful, with few

113 Grading of other characteristics on optical coherence to

114 of this study may not be relevant to mosaic grading of other retinal vascular conditions.

115 n above a reference plane and also to expert grading of papilledema from digital fundus photographs u

116 bly with that from OCT scans and with expert grading of papilledema severity.

117 f luminal water imaging in the detection and grading of PCa.

118 ssed as a histological score (which included grading of portal inflammation, lobular activity, fibros

119 risk assessment, pressure ulcer prevention, grading of pressure ulcers and treatment decisions.

120 eneous tissues, thus facilitating histologic grading of primary glial brain tumors.

121 Grading of prophylaxis was done using strength of recomm

122 MR) imaging technique, for the detection and grading of prostate cancer (PCa).

123 al was to evaluate this method for potential grading of prostate tumors.

124 en years of subject reporting and photograph grading of PRP and FP were compared in EDIC subjects.

125 nder, diagnosis, baseline immunosuppression, grading of PTLD, and association with Epstein-Barr virus

126 all recent molecular progress, architectural grading of pulmonary ADCs according to the novel IASLC/A

127 ry function tests, arterial blood gases, and grading of pulmonary symptoms.

128 recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Ev

129 The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Ev

130 ngth of recommendations were rated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Ev

131 recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Ev

132 recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and E

133 ngth of recommendations were rated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and E

134 of AR and asthma comorbidities based on the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and E

135 developed using the system developed by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and

136 grading system, which is based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

137 The overall Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

138 and rated the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

139 The task force used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

140 valuated, and quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

141 data and developed recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

142 f the evidence was rated with the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

143 k meta-analysis for all treatments, and used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

144 of a systematic literature review using the 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

145 of a systematic literature review using the 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

146 ation of treatment recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

147 quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

148 ysis and assessed evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

149 of evidence for primary outcomes by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

150 oping relevant clinical questions, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

151 of evidence was then graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

152 review was developed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

153 Analysis of the body of evidence as per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

154 The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

155 their quality was determined by using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

156 were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

157 of this approach included the use of: 1) the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

158 The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

159 with a random-effects model, and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

160 Recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

161 Evidence was graded according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

162 s assessed evidence quality using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

163 ut initial treatment approaches by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

164 y of evidence were assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

165 nd rated recommendations by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

166 ades the recommendations by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

167 ality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

168 he quality of the studies was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

169 ished by the BTS, the guideline has used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

170 uality of evidence was rated based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

171 grading system, which is based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

172 The results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

173 endations was based on the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

174 rom Bayesian network meta-analysis, and used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and E

175 vidence and recommendations using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

176 of evidence was assessed in duplicate using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

177 The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

178 ated each of 26 recommendations by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

179 Quality of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

180 The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

181 high-quality evidence as examined using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and

182 Recommendations were generated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

183 ommendations were developed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

184 The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

185 ality of evidence) was assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

186 death, and bleeding was summarized by using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

187 es new tuberculosis diagnostics by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

188 The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

189 of evidence was assigned by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

190 tic review published in 2006 and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

191 essed the strength of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

192 m 2008 to 2017 and were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

193 rength of evidence was adjudicated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

194 reak of Ebola virus disease, we employed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

195 appraised the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

196 According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

197 was developed in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

198 The committee followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

199 The evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

200 Subcommittee members completed their Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

201 ew of the literature ranked according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

202 ssessed confidence in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

203 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

204 body of evidence was evaluated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

205 CDC used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

206 Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

207 ent, Development, and Evaluation system, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

208 Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

209 lity-of-evidence assessment according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

210 ssessed confidence in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and

211 The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

212 The evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

213 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

214 e Studies, and graded for evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

215 then conducted a systematic review using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

216 tified and critically appraised by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

217 GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

218 urther introduces the recommendations of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

219 According to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

220 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

221 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

222 sion by an expert committee according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and

223 ce (i.e., the quality of evidence) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

224 Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

225 nd recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

226 c systematic reviews were performed, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

227 ce (i.e., the quality of evidence) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

228 sk factor by using a modified version of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

229 They synthesized the evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

230 mary of the science and its quality based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

231 determined the strength of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

232 A modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

233 nalyses of the relevant research and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

234 matic evidence syntheses, which followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

235 uality of each study was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

236 ulated, written, and graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

237 en formulated, written, and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and

238 we developed an innovative adaptation of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development and

239 Using Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development and

240 eses were used to inform the formulation and grading of recommendations.

241 vided reasonably accurate identification and grading of regional myocardial dysfunction.

242 ermodality spatial coregistration for masked grading of regions selected on CFP and SDOCT.

243 Histologic grading of rejection and immunohistochemical staining fo

244 terobserver variability was assessed for the grading of renal artery stenosis as well as regional ves

245 ability and offers reliable and reproducible grading of renal artery stenosis based on stenosis morph

246 server and intermodality variability for the grading of renal artery stenosis is assessed.

247 or diabetic retinopathy (DR) by expert human grading of retinal images is challenging.

248 A hierarchical grading of rotamer states based on the conformational fr

249 r (OSL) width, photoreceptor cell count, and grading of schisis cavity severity.

250 However, current evaluation of DR relies on grading of secondary vascular effects, such as microaneu

251 Grading of serial photographs confirmed the clinical ass

252 nterview, venous blood specimens, and masked grading of seven standard field retinal photographs were

253 ighly correlated with the clinician's global grading of severity and highly correlated to patient's s

254 algorithm was based on the Cameron clinical grading of shield ulcers.

255 algorithm was based on the Cameron clinical grading of shield ulcers.

256 ted moderate to substantial agreement in the grading of signal intensity changes after exercise (kapp

257 y (BCVA), visual evoked potential (VEP), and grading of skin and hair pigmentation were used to quant

258 iagnosed when identified by 2 investigators' grading of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

259 ns and interobserver agreement in the visual grading of splenic switch-off was excellent (kappa = 0.9

260 PDFF, but not CAP, enabled the grading of steatosis (P < .0001).

261 ubstantial interobserver variability for the grading of stenosis (mean kappa kappa 0.64).

262 Correlation coefficients for detection and grading of stenosis were r=0.65 on a per-segment, r=0.83

263 calized RNFL defects were detected by masked grading of stereophotographs.

264 presence and severity were defined based on grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs accordi

265 incidence of any ARM were assessed by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs in 1,70

266 iabetic retinopathy was determined by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs using t

267 elated maculopathy were determined by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs using t

268 ol), retinopathy level (determined by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs), and N

269 everity of AMD were determined by systematic grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs.

270 er inferior, and inner and outer temporal by grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs.

271 AMD presence and severity were assessed from grading of stereoscopic fundus photographs taken in 2001

272 d eye diseases were assigned on the basis of gradings of study photographs.

273 The poorest agreement was found for grading of subretinal tissue.

274 Semi-quantitative grading of tau-positive cellular lesions and neuronal lo

275 indings were correlated with histopathologic grading of the cartilage.

276 Semiautomated grading of the digitized images can be used to process t

277 may be substantially mitigated by controlled grading of the elastic modulus at the ceramic surface.

278 lts, previous gradings of both eyes, current grading of the fellow eye, and demographic data.

279 t a standard that enabled independent remote grading of the images comparable to those acquired using

280 f the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) band, grading of the inner-segment ellipsoid (ISe) band integr

281 aser capture microdissection were grouped by grading of the nerve injury (<25% axon degeneration for

282 Precise tissue morphometry and grading of the plane of surgery were performed before co

283 eeks after surgery, and performed histologic grading of the repaired tissues.

284 rveillance data, proposed a clinically based grading of the severity of local AEs caused by SLIT.

285 Therefore grading of the severity of local side effects was percei

286 Grading of the severity of OH and its effect on the pati

287 Grading of the truth, discrimination, and feasibility of

288 Comparison of the 2 masked gradings of the generated en face images of patients wit

289 degree of inter-examiner reliability between grading of these clinical variables in real-time examina

290 cteristic can help in the classification and grading of these distinctive neoplasms.

291 assist in the diagnostic classification and grading of these distinctive neoplasms.Deep penetrating

292 Standardized histological grading of transplant kidney biopsies has become a prima

293 n of lymph nodes alone was compared with the grading of tumor characteristics.

294 G is increasingly used for the diagnosis and grading of tumors.

295 is surpassed), e-ROP IMAGING (trained reader grading of type 1 or 2 ROP initiates diagnostic examinat

296 Vitreal aspirations and grading of vitreal inflammatory reaction were done regul

297 Grading of written descriptions for observational and de