ライフサイエンスコーパス: granisetron

1 nd binding affinity was measured using [(3)H]granisetron.

2 ) by the selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist granisetron.

3 d, however, was unaffected by treatment with granisetron (0.5 mg kg-1) indicating that endogenous 5-H

4 abolished by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, granisetron (0.5 mg kg-1).

5 nalyses were as follows: palonosetron versus granisetron: -0.01 (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.20; P = .72); add

6 The 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist granisetron (1 microM) and the 5-HT(4) receptor antagoni

7 All patients received granisetron 10 microg/kg and dexamethasone 20 mg intrave

8 ceiving cisplatin, all the patients received granisetron (10 microg per kilogram of body weight intra

9 ) (n = number randomized; number evaluable): granisetron (10 microg/kg intravenously) pre-cisplatin f

10 All patients received granisetron (10 mug/kg intravenously) and dexamethasone

11 y on day 1 and 80 mg orally on days 2 to 4), granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethas

12 orally on days 2 to 3) or matching placebo, granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethas

13 All patients also received granisetron (2 mg orally) and dexamethasone (20 mg orall

14 thasone according to the package insert) and granisetron (2 mg orally) on days 2-3.

15 Single-dose oral granisetron (2 mg) and I.V. ondansetron (32 mg) resulted

16 A single oral dose of granisetron (2 mg) resulted in equivalent levels of anti

17 were normal levels of specific surface [(3)H]granisetron ([(3)H]BRL-43694) binding sites.

18 These effects were blocked by granisetron (5-HT3 antagonist) and were absent from TPH1

19 cisplatin chemotherapy for single-dose oral granisetron (54.7%) and i.v. ondansetron (58.3%) (95% co

20 was used to re-evaluate the interactions of granisetron, a 5-HT(3A)R antagonist.

21 ropisetron (ICS 205-930) or 5-HT3 antagonist granisetron abolished luminal stimuli-evoked nodose neur

22 Oral granisetron, administered as a single 2-mg dose, provide

23 On the other hand, granisetron affinity is reduced by substitutions at Trp-

24 -other-residue periodicity of the effects on granisetron affinity strongly suggests that this region

25 Y143F and Y153F decreased granisetron affinity to the same extent as Y143A and Y15

26 ed to one of three treatments in addition to granisetron and dexamethasone: 400 mg of an oral trisubs

27 acebo on days 2 to 5 (group I) (n = 90; 90); granisetron and MK-869 (400 mg PO [by mouth]) pre-cispla

28 The 5-HT(3) antagonists, granisetron and ondansetron, are useful in combating the

29 both these and other substitutions, no [(3)H]granisetron binding could be detected, indicating a role

30 Nimodipine neither displaced [3H]granisetron binding nor affected its displacement by dil

31 etween verapamil and either [3H]mCPBG or [3H]granisetron binding was not competitive.

32 Mutation H185A resulted in no detectable granisetron binding, while D189A resulted in a 22-fold r

33 of the 5HT3R for the antagonists curare and granisetron but has little effect on the affinity for th

34 lowed the identification of positions on the granisetron core that might be used as attachment points

35 Some of these substituted granisetron derivatives showed low nanomolar binding aff

36 sis and biological characterization of novel granisetron derivatives that are antagonists of the huma

37 h prochlorperazine on days 2 and 3; group 2: granisetron + dexamethasone on day 1 with prochlorperazi

38 creened for 5-HT(3) R affinity using a [(3)H]granisetron displacement assay.

39 ions of patients remained nausea-free in the granisetron group (55.4%) and the ondansetron group (59%

40 complete control of emesis was 61.2% in the granisetron group and 67.1% in the ondansetron group (95

41 Palonosetron and granisetron have similar effects on DN.

42 Premedication with the antiemetic Kytril (granisetron hydrochloride; SmithKline Beecham, Philadelp

43 Docking of granisetron identified two possible binding modes, inclu

44 Two energetically similar conformations of granisetron in the binding site were obtained from the d

45 with the model in which the indazole ring of granisetron interacts with Arg92 and the tropane ring in

46 In one model, the indazole ring of granisetron is near Trp90 and the tropane ring is near A

47 5-HT receptor antagonists (SDZ205-557, granisetron, methysergide) failed to inhibit serotonin-i

48 rapy, were randomized to receive either oral granisetron (n = 542) or I.V. ondansetron (n = 543).

49 uld be improved by using palonosetron versus granisetron on day 1 (group 1 v group 2); by adding dexa

50 Dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron, palonosetron, and tropisetron

51 Modeling and mutation studies suggest that granisetron plays its antagonist role by hindering the c

52 Moreover, combining L-754,030 with granisetron plus dexamethasone improves the prevention o

53 More patients who received ondonsetron than granisetron reported dizziness (9.6% v 5.4%, respectivel

54 nd cardiopulmonary afferent stimulation, and granisetron significantly attenuated this cardiopulmonar

55 re randomized to receive either 2 mg of oral granisetron tablets 1 hour before chemotherapy (n = 534)

56 Docking of the antagonist granisetron was carried out using a Lamarckian genetic a

57 hen an antagonist of the 5-HT3 receptor, [3H]granisetron, was used as the radioligand.

58 effectiveness and safety of single-dose oral granisetron were compared with intravenous (I.V.) ondans

59 5-HT3 receptor As subunit, [3H]mCPBG and [3H]granisetron were displaced by (+)-verapamil, (-)-verapam