ライフサイエンスコーパス: grip

1 tributing to the ease with which AR 6 "loses grip".

2 the newly formed geminate radical ion pairs (GRIPs).

3 corticospinal output during human precision grip.

4 used to program and execute the appropriate grip.

5 ical inhibition, but not CMEPs, during power grip.

6 e grip, or in some cases for both object and grip.

7 on the rake task with that during precision grip.

8 t during index finger abduction or precision grip.

9 x finger abduction, precision grip and power grip.

10 of finger muscles during precision and power grip.

11 but not index finger abduction or precision grip.

12 ger abduction, a precision grip, and a power grip.

13 king individual objects to multiple possible grips.

14 alignment and coupling of ATP binding to DNA gripping.

15 hages is mediated by GR-interacting protein (GRIP)1, a transcriptional coregulator of the p160 family

16 corticoid receptor (GR)-interacting protein (GRIP)1-cooperates with GR to repress inflammatory genes.

17 d a central target object: using a precision grip, a power grip, or touching the object without hand

18 ctrical actuation, enabling novel designs of gripping actuators for soft robotics.

19 se region of RT, and the 428, RNase H Primer Grip Adjacent, and 507 sites, located in the RNase H reg

20 unctional deficits consisting of weaker hand grip (adjusted difference vs community controls -1.7 kg,

21 ubunits to constrict into a tight helix that grips an 80 A stretch of unfolded protein.

22 ar coherence was measured during a precision grip and an ankle dorsiflexion task, respectively.

23 affected by grip context (no contact, light grip and firm grip), as well as how they are co-ordinate

24 ed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction, suggesting a cortical o

25 ed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction.

26 During a subsequent test phase, we examined grip and load force coordination during corrective arm m

27 object with novel dynamics using a precision grip and moved it between two targets.

28 However, in natural actions, grip and object type are often confounded, and the few e

29 , frequently used as a benchmark quantity in grip and perceptual studies, is a poor reflection of the

30 cle during index finger abduction, precision grip and power grip.

31 rtical inhibition decreased during precision grip and spinal motoneuron excitability remained unchang

32 ct of PKC on the dissociation of AMPARs from GRIP and thus their availability for trafficking.

33 suggests a paradigm for soft adhesion-based gripping and transfer-printing systems that achieves are

34 uman-like (MHL) hand anatomy, its associated grips and the invention and use of stone tools by early

35 eins-glutamate receptor-interacting protein (GRIP) and protein interacting with C kinase 1 (PICK1)-re

36 xterity: index finger abduction, a precision grip, and a power grip.

37 was also associated with higher BMI, weaker grip, and more comorbid illnesses (p < 0.05 for all).

38 ized clinical evaluations of extremity, hand grip, and respiratory muscle strength; anthropometrics (

39 thogonally manipulated object properties and grip, and revealed the visual dimension (object elongati

40 /- 9, and 38 +/- 9 minutes in the glue, self-gripping, and suture groups, respectively (P < 0.001).

41 groups for "onset time," "time after maximum grip," and "time after maximum velocity," indicating tha

42 ession motor mechanism involving a transient grip-and-release structural change in B form DNA.

43 Two of them state that grip aperture and the movement of the hand are controlle

44 cating the horizontal size of each target by grip aperture and, in a further experiment, a verbal siz

45 fter maximum velocity and time after maximum grip aperture were also longer in subjects with VI.

46 on, time after maximum velocity, and maximum grip aperture.

47 lnerability to cocaine relapse and highlight GRIP as a novel target for the development of cocaine ad

48 rip context (no contact, light grip and firm grip), as well as how they are co-ordinated with the low

49 DTS) in terms of correct brushing motion and grip axis orientation in an at-home environment.

50 tem contribute to the control of a precision grip between the thumb and index finger.

51 reasingly modern anatomy prevented them from gripping branches with their feet.

52 ticulospinal tract, while performing a power grip but not during index finger abduction or precision

53 uring a startle cue while performing a power grip but not index finger abduction or precision grip.

54 on, such as grasping an object using a power grip, but also when the animal passively observes a simi

55 is modulated during observation of precision grip by a human experimenter.

56 Different grips can be used, and different objects require differe

57 slow gait, muscle weakness (defined as weak grip), cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms.

58 f ensemble patterns reflecting unique object-grip combinations.

59 ticospinal excitability present during power grip compared with fine finger manipulations are largely

60 ullary MEP size was reduced during precision grip compared with index finger abduction in uninjured h

61 timulation were more suppressed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduc

62 not CMEPs, was more suppressed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduc

63 cal inhibition was more reduced during power grip compared with the other tasks.

64 cal inhibition was more reduced during power grip compared with the other tasks.

65 These actuators are able to grip complex shapes and manipulate delicate objects.

66 ht to independently control either reach and grip components (a functional dissociation), or planning

67 erms of action type (whole-hand or precision grip), concurrent tactile stimulation (stimulation or no

68 14 PIP2 molecules through a unique 'cationic grip' configuration.

69 his study, we show that signals representing grip configurations can be reliably decoded from neural

70 s in corticospinal excitability during these gripping configurations.

71 termined how these responses are affected by grip context (no contact, light grip and firm grip), as

72 termined how these responses are affected by grip context, as well as how they are co-ordinated with

73 In addition, accumbal GRIP deletion was associated with blunted long-term depr

74 not compromise the kinetochore's ability to grip depolymerizing microtubules.

75 The design of such tissue gripping drug delivery devices offers an effective strat

76 underlying sand layer where they gained more grip during progression.

77 ed and homogenous while minimizing shear and grip effects.

78 the relationship between object encoding and grip encoding.

79 scharged during both object presentation and grip execution, displaying selectivity for either the ob

80 Following a bout of rhythmic hand grip exercise, post exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO

81 ate brainstem pathways (BS); (2) distal limb-grip exercises preferentially stimulating CST pathways (

82 no contact, light grip (< 1 N) (LG) and firm grip (FG).

83 8%), improved glucose tolerance, and reduced grip force (-14%) compared to wild-type females.

84 To reduce the risk of slip, grip force (GF) control includes a safety margin above t

85 larger map area correlated with weaker pinch grip force (r=-0.42, P=0.01).

86 We also found that the rate of grip force adaptation did not depend on whether the obje

87 errors are necessary for trajectory but not grip force adaptation, and that kinetic errors are suffi

88 ution of these errors to both trajectory and grip force adaptation.

89 ed, we found that the participants generated grip force adjustments tightly coupled, both spatially a

90 rticipants continued to effectively modulate grip force but exhibited substantial kinematic errors, e

91 , and that kinetic errors are sufficient for grip force but not trajectory adaptation.

92 in the control of the corrective responses, grip force changes would anticipate the unusual load for

93 is human study, we examined rapid, precision grip force contractions to determine whether feedforward

94 ng an inhibitory role of PMd in anticipatory grip force control during object lifting.

95 After each grip force exertion, participants had the opportunity to

96 targets either side of midline and a minimal grip force for midline movements.

97 he channel, participants learned to modulate grip force in synchrony with load force and this learnin

98 In the sham condition, grip force showed a consistent undershoot, if the S1 inc

99 PMd during the S1-S2 delay period predicted grip force undershoot but not overshoot.

100 Critically, on these trials the initial grip force was minimal, appropriate for the midline move

101 s in motivational responding, as measured by grip force, although subjective liking responses to the

102 nt of the object's dynamics, used to control grip force, based solely on kinetic errors.

103 top of inducing short latency disturbance of grip force, single-pulse TMS should also quickly disrupt

104 nticipatory downscaling but not upscaling of grip force, suggesting an inhibitory role of PMd in anti

105 al differences in socially-induced change in grip force.

106 vy weight produced a consistent overshoot in grip force.

107 TBS selectively abolished this undershoot in grip force.

108 t whose horizontal motion is driven by their grip force.

109 ed in the planning, execution and control of gripping force and movement vigour.

110 nglia control signal for force and to decode gripping force based on local field potential (LFP) acti

111 derstanding of how the basal ganglia control gripping force, and also suggest that deep brain LFPs co

112 13-30m Hz) bands were most informative about gripping force, and that a first order dynamic linear mo

113 an be used to decode the temporal profile of gripping force.

114 l elastic load to the object requiring large grip forces for reaches to targets either side of midlin

115 on, while measuring effort perception during grip forces of different intensities.

116 e movement, and not the average of the large grip forces required for movements to the individual tar

117 ined the adaptation of hand trajectories and grip forces when moving grasped objects with novel dynam

118 tracking task, we show that tracking errors, grip forces, and learning curves are consistent with pre

119 GRiP (gene regulation in prokaryotes) is a highly versat

120 When GVS was applied during firm grip, hand and ground reaction forces were generated.

121 ntly associated with waiting list mortality: grip (hazard ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.83-

122 ly, transcription of lncRNAs could serve as "grip holds" for nuclear proteins to pull the genome into

123 ice-core and the Greenland Ice-Core Project (GRIP) ice-core.

124 (DORC, Zuidland, The Netherlands) using end-gripping ILM forceps.

125 rst study to demonstrate a role for accumbal GRIP in behavior.

126 of finger muscles during precision and power grip in humans but the neural mechanisms involved remain

127 ts demonstrate that the control of precision grip in humans involves premotoneuronal subcortical mech

128 on correlated with MEP size during precision grip in SCI patients.

129 ed delay periods for object presentation and grip instruction.

130 These results show that a minimum level of grip is necessary before the upper limb plays an active

131 results demonstrate that a minimum level of grip is required before the upper limb becomes active in

132 y for forceful precision and power "squeeze" gripping is linked to two key evolutionary transitions i

133 Glutamate receptor-interacting protein (GRIP) is a neuronal scaffolding protein that stabilizes

134 ith an earth-fixed object: no contact, light grip (< 1 N) (LG) and firm grip (FG).

135 When GVS was applied during light grip (< 1 N), hand forces were secondary to body movemen

136 Taken together, these results indicate that GRIP may modulate addictive phenotypes through its regul

137 anoacrylate glue (Histoacryl, n = 216), self-gripping mesh (Parietex ProGrip, n = 202), or convention

138 To evaluate the effect of a self-gripping mesh (Progrip) on the incidence of chronic post

139 in fingers domain (V791Y), and the E primer grip motif (W930F).

140 lateral or contralateral "reach to precision grip" movements.

141 nputs to spinal motoneurons during precision grip of a small object.

142 size, these "hopping heads" use a vice-like grip of their jaws to restrain and immobilize prey.

143 hy) environmental stresses, have an integral grip on cell fate, and have shaped the ecological succes

144 ne is a transcription factor with a powerful grip on cellular growth and proliferation.

145 Ps on processivity are overcome by the extra grip on DNA provided by the lagging strand polymerases.

146 ole of the Ska complex in maintaining a firm grip on dynamic microtubules.

147 ence that they function by weakening gp120's grip on gp41 rather than by altering gp120 binding to sp

148 mechanism, the kinetochore can modulate its grip on microtubules over mitosis and yet retain its abi

149 strands and then closes to establish a tight grip on the DNA template.

150 eir unusually straight bill enables a stable grip on tools, and raises the tool tip into their visual

151 pull-ups with the body suspended by the arms gripped on a bar; 3) sit-ups in which the upper and lowe

152 32 degrees C allowing them to spontaneously grip onto tissue when introduced from a cold state into

153 d discrete adhesion sites which can be in a "gripping" or "slipping" mode and integrates the adhesion

154 ing selectivity for either the object or the grip, or in some cases for both object and grip.

155 rget object: using a precision grip, a power grip, or touching the object without hand preshaping.

156 keys through the process of passive viewing, grip planning, and grasping movement execution.

157 al inguinal hernia were randomized to a self-gripping polyester mesh or a sutured polyester mesh.

158 As grip progressed along this continuum, we observed an inc

159 The self-gripping Progrip mesh does not reduce CPIP rates.

160 subcortical pathways during human precision grip remains unclear.

161 erceptual object properties onto categorical grip representations.

162 both the different objects and the different grips required to grasp them.

163 In this study, 4486 adults had grip scores at baseline indicating adequate function (26

164 selectivity in single cells was as strong as grip selectivity, indicating that V6A cells were able to

165 This mechanisms' grip slips, however, when the feedback loop is intermitt

166 tion, lung function, physical capacity (hand grip, step test, and physical activity), and blood marke

167 We used objects affording multiple possible grip strategies.

168 ates information related to object shape and grip strategy as it becomes available, revealing a trans

169 >/=30) in the lowest tertile of sex-specific grip strength (<35.3 kg for men and <19.6 kg for women).

170 0.26 kg, P < 0.001; 11 studies, n = 308) and grip strength (5.3%, P < 0.050; 4 studies, n = 156), whi

171 The risk of developing weak grip strength (assessed as a binary yes or no outcome) o

172 Higher grip strength (GS) is associated with lower mortality ri

173 .21; 95% CI: 1.32, 3.71) and/or reduced hand grip strength (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 10.07, 2.17) than in th

174 nce intervals -16.786 to -4.482) decrease in grip strength (kg force) (P < 0.001) and -8.74 (95% conf

175 articipants viewing TV >/= 6 hrs/d had lower grip strength (Men, B = -1.20 kg, 95% CI, -2.26, -0.14;

176 ast, internet use was associated with higher grip strength (Men, B = 2.43 kg, 95% CI, 1.74, 3.12; Wom

177 Participants with CMT2A had the weakest grip strength (P < .05), while those with CMT2A and CMT4

178 (P = .03) and B (P = .05), right-sided Jamar grip strength (P = .02), Rapid Pace Walk (P = .03), Brak

179 viduals and identify 16 loci associated with grip strength (P<5 x 10(-8)) in combined analyses.

180 For example, greater grip strength (per 6 kg) had an odds ratio (95% CI) of 0

181 ss index (Spearman r=0.28, P<0.0001), weaker grip strength (Spearman r=-0.34, P<0.01), and slower wal

182 Ab levels were significantly correlated with grip strength (Spearman r=-0.57, P<0.005), walking speed

183 sed risk (95% CI, 1%-23%) of developing weak grip strength and a 14% decreased risk (95% CI, 8%-20%)

184 ulted in significant improvement in hindlimb grip strength and a 30% decrease in inflammation in the

185 idisciplinary expert team measured patients' grip strength and assessed their predicted mobilization

186 ligible patients had low performance on hand grip strength and chair rise tests, tested with the proc

187 decline in normalized forelimb and hindlimb grip strength and declines in in vitro EDL force after r

188 observed for cardiovascular mortality.Lower grip strength and excess adiposity are both independent

189 th performance; those in the lowest fifth of grip strength and highest fifth of BMI having particular

190 ured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; grip strength and information on lifestyle indicators, i

191 Grip strength and manual dexterity were not changed by r

192 In fact, grip strength and maximum isometric tetanic force are ev

193 havioral (Digiscan) and functional outcomes (grip strength and Rotarod) were assessed prior to sacrif

194 to reduce the likelihood of developing weak grip strength and slow walking speed because purpose has

195 ssociated with lower risk of developing weak grip strength and slow walking speed over time.

196 ted with a decreased risk of developing weak grip strength and slow walking speed, although the findi

197 nsight into the mechanistic underpinnings of grip strength and the causal role of muscular strength i

198 pressure and attenuation of decline in both grip strength and time to death.

199 icantly increased body weight, lean mass and grip strength by 60-80% over vehicle-treated mdx mice.

200 demonstrated improved downward climbing and grip strength compared with those given vehicle, though

201 9; 95% CI, 0.83-0.95), but associations with grip strength did not reach conventional levels of stati

202 Both BMI and grip strength exhibited non-linear relations with perfor

203 complex to calcium improves muscle force and grip strength immediately after administration of single

204 mouse or change gait, motor coordination, or grip strength in adult mice of both sexes.

205 s total intake, anthropometric measures, and grip strength in COPD.

206 Higher BMI was associated with stronger grip strength in men only.

207 TCS acutely depresses hemodynamics and grip strength in mice at doses >/=12.5 mg/kg i.p., and a

208 proving intake, anthropometric measures, and grip strength in stable COPD.

209 Hand grip strength is a widely used proxy of muscular fitness

210 ic knee extension, plantar flexion, and hand grip strength measures.

211 ded hindlimb and forelimb muscle strength by Grip Strength Meter and quantitative muscle fibrosis par

212 ausal effect of higher genetically predicted grip strength on lower fracture risk.

213 No significant changes occurred in grip strength or dexterity from preoperative baseline to

214 ere was no significant change of either hand grip strength or leg extension power.

215 the risk of all-cause mortality increased as grip strength reduced within each BMI category.

216 Both BMI and grip strength remained independently related with perfor

217 ced skeletal muscle function, as measured by grip strength tests 4 weeks after injection.

218 .03), appendicular skeletal muscle mass, and grip strength than did controls, but these differences w

219 ted more strongly with exercise capacity and grip strength than with lung function.

220 Grip strength was assessed using Smedley spring-type han

221 Stronger grip strength was associated with better performance on

222 Grip strength was improved significantly for both hands

223 We found that grip strength was repeatable and differed between the se

224 d motor coordination impairments and reduced grip strength were detected in En2 null mutants.

225 Unadjusted LBM and grip strength were similar in 2 groups.

226 er 3 months on the waiting list: -0.38 kg in grip strength, -0.05 meters/second in gait, 0.03 seconds

227 e we examine the morphological correlates of grip strength, a defensive combat trait involved in mate

228 ivation of the Col12a1 gene showed decreased grip strength, a delay in fiber-type transition and a de

229 We also collected lung capacity, grip strength, a series of balance tests, and a timed wa

230 ge, sex, race, cognition, comorbidities, and grip strength, AMD subjects showed an increased likeliho

231 basic behavioral activities, impaired muscle grip strength, and defects in motor coordination.

232 Pain score, grip strength, and dexterity were measured before surger

233 hy Impairment Score of the Lower Limbs, hand grip strength, and evaluation of vegetative dysfunction,

234 Treadmill exercise capacity, forelimb grip strength, and in vivo maximum tetanic force were al

235 -min walking distance, fast gait speed, hand grip strength, and isometric leg extension strength).

236 ipants were stratified by country, age, hand grip strength, and performance on the chair rise test, a

237 FE65 family KO mice show attenuated grip strength, and the nuclei of DKO muscle cells freque

238 otor functions, including breathing pattern, grip strength, balance beam and rotarod performance.

239 The final frailty index consisted of: grip strength, chair stands, and balance.

240 r adults in the home, body mass index (BMI), grip strength, cognitive ability, mood, or comorbid illn

241 walk, 5 chair stands, standing balance, and grip strength, each scored from 0 to 4 (0, unable to per

242 but other measurements of strength (forelimb grip strength, ex vivo measurements of contractile funct

243 ds ratio = 2.43; 95% CI, 1.17-5.03) and poor grip strength, exhaustion, and slowed walking speed (haz

244 ailty was measured on a scale from 0 to 5 by grip strength, gait speed, exhaustion, shrinkage, and ph

245 (HDL) cholesterol, forced expiratory volume, grip strength, HbA1c, longevity, obesity, self-rated hea

246 mmonia, increase in lean body mass, improved grip strength, higher skeletal muscle mass and diameter,

247 Truncal flexion and extension strength, hand grip strength, leg extension power, and quality of life

248 The most common pattern was poor grip strength, low physical activity, and slowed walk sp

249 -appearing brain was associated with: weaker grip strength, poorer lung function, slower walking spee

250 Frailty was measured by 4-m walk time, grip strength, self-reported weight loss, exhaustion, an

251 3 weeks after stroke on locomotor activity, grip strength, sensory neglect, gait impairment, motor c

252 ced vital capacity, resting heart rate, hand grip strength, sit and reach distance, and time standing

253 or more of the following 5 components: weak grip strength, slowed walking speed, poor appetite, phys

254 ures of physical capability at age 53 years: grip strength, standing balance, and chair-rise time.

255 ms and four measures of physical capability: grip strength, timed walk or get up and go, chair rises

256 Patients were clinically assessed on grip strength, vibration perception thresholds and postu

257 ate the genetic determinants of variation in grip strength, we perform a large-scale genetic discover

258 , 2.17) than in those with stable weight and grip strength, with the highest risk in those with both

259 , mechanical hypersensitivity, and decreased grip strength.

260 paired motor control, exercise capacity, and grip strength.

261 tands, 1.9 for standing balance, and 1.7 for grip strength.

262 -m walk, chair stands, standing balance) and grip strength.

263 in, hair, and eye color, blood pressure, and grip strength.

264 .52, p = .001) and left (r = 0.50, p = .002) grip strength.

265 tion of fibrosis and restoration of forelimb grip strength.

266 were more robust for walking speed than for grip strength.

267 uding robust hind limb elements modified for grip strength.

268 the best hope to curb the HIV-AIDS epidemic gripping sub-Saharan Africa, but it remains elusive.

269 on that elastomers are commonly used to coat grip surfaces.

270 d deformable gripper body, the proposed soft-gripping system controls the bonding strength by changin

271 e this trade-off with an adhesion-based soft-gripping system that exhibits enhanced fracture strength

272 oring of participants' performance of a fine grip task during functional magnetic resonance neuroimag

273 those with nontremor-dominant PD performed a grip task, and the results obtained were compared using

274 e was assessed during an auxotonic precision grip task; tremor was quantified using accelerometry dur

275 Muscle strength was assessed by a hand grip test and the time required to complete five chair r

276 and beta-chains as tweezers to surround and grip the glucose moiety of GMM, GEM TCRs create a highly

277 e of climbing and supporting their weight by gripping the cage bars with the contralesional hand.

278 lar system, suppressed MEP size during power grip to a lesser extent than during the other tasks and

279 lar system, suppressed MEP size during power grip to a lesser extent than during the other tasks at a

280 manipulating tools, (ii) a strong precision grip to hold tools securely, and (iii) enhanced visually

281 I patients reduced MEP size during precision grip to similar levels as uninjured humans.

282 n strength, locally switching adhesions from gripping to slipping and further accelerating actin flow

283 In addition to grip type information, gaze and target positions were re

284 Whereas the fraction of grip type tuned units increased toward movement executio

285 substantially larger when predicting the 20 grip types (planning, 74%; execution, 86%; chance level,

286 te for the first time that a large number of grip types can be decoded from higher cortical areas dur

287 decoding from individual arrays, objects and grip types could be predicted well during movement plann

288 Offline, we determined 20 grip types from the kinematic data and decoded these han

289 We investigated the decoding of many grip types using spiking activity from the anterior intr

290 yes classifier used for decoding objects and grip types.

291 across either different object locations or grip types.

292 ch restricts the dissociation of AMPARs from GRIP under basal conditions.

293 Although the incidence of neurons encoding grips was twofold that of neurons encoding objects, obje

294 aten) mice demonstrated decreased body size, grip weakness, abnormal gait, joint laxity, and early-on

295 ion strength, knee extension power, and hand grip were associated with increased mortality in these p

296 fingers extension-thumb interface and primer grip, which may contribute their stronger inhibition.

297 sion grip with two or five digits, or coarse grip with five digits) and used representational similar

298 gation) and task (passive viewing, precision grip with two or five digits, or coarse grip with five d

299 issue of Blood, Safeukui et al have come to grips with an important issue in red blood cell (RBC) bi

300 dy demonstrates that conditional deletion of GRIP within the nucleus accumbens potentiates cue-induce