ライフサイエンスコーパス: ground glass

1 th a solid component 5 mm or larger, or pure ground glass.

2 On high-resolution computed tomography scan, ground-glass and poorly defined nodules, with patchy are

3 mining the optimal duration of follow-up for ground-glass and semisolid opacities; establishing the r

4 bsolid nodules, including the extent of both ground-glass and solid components, as well as accurate a

5 An abdominal radiograph revealed a ground glass appearance with radiolucency outlining the

6 ed as no apparent tissue-level perfusion (no ground-glass appearance of blush or opacification of the

7 cted, dyspnea on exertion, and presence of a ground-glass appearance on high-resolution computed tomo

8 ntent of the assay was to test nonhemolytic, ground-glass-appearing bacterial B. anthracis-like colon

9 A larger MAE was noted for nodules with ground-glass attenuation (2.3 mm(3)) versus those with s

10 nchymal lung disease took the form of either ground-glass attenuation (n = 1) or nodules following pe

11 bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) (n = 9), ground-glass attenuation (n = 6, 67%) and smooth (n = 3,

12 Forty synthetic nodules (20 with ground-glass attenuation and 20 with solid attenuation)

13 were evaluated for nodules, masses, areas of ground-glass attenuation or of hazy increased attenuatio

14 of compression was greater for nodules with ground-glass attenuation than for those with higher atte

15 ate: the K(W) for nodules, septal lines, and ground-glass attenuation were 0.53, 0.44, and 0.53, resp

16 Interlobular septal thickening and ground-glass attenuation were present on CT scans in two

17 0 nodules with solid attenuation and 20 with ground-glass attenuation) of known volume.

18 ncalcified, and 15 subsolid nodules (13 with ground-glass attenuation).

19 level of 20:1 was 34.9 mm3 for nodules with ground-glass attenuation, compared with 8.3 mm3 for high

20 mpressed images, especially for nodules with ground-glass attenuation.

21 e patterns characterized were: honeycombing, ground glass, bronchovascular, nodular, emphysemalike, a

22 e contributing factor in the pathogenesis of ground-glass cells, which are hepatocytes containing non

23 ysema, airway abnormality, the percentage of ground glass component and the type of tumor margin.

24 pe status for EGFR while the presence of any ground glass component indicates EGFR mutations.

25 ndependently scored by four radiologists for ground glass (CT-alv) and linear opacity (CT-fib) on a s

26 Computed tomography scan showed patchy ground glass density, thickened bronchial walls, and bil

27 Ground-glass (GG) inclusions within hepatocytes are an i

28 Proportion of lung occupied by ground glass, ground glass-reticular (GGR), honeycombing

29 Ground-glass hepatocellular inclusions (positive with pe

30 diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, and ground glass infiltrate and fibrosis on high resolution

31 city for carbon monoxide, and an increase in ground glass infiltrates (p < or = 0.08) compared with p

32 ined to the tip of the outer capillary via a ground-glass joint.

33 ) and define abnormal low (n = 15) and high (ground-glass) (n = 8) lung attenuation.

34 (peribronchial markings, consolidation, and ground-glass, nodular, and reticular opacity), distribut

35 Of 141 SSNs, there were 57 pure ground-glass nodules (GGNs), 22 heterogeneous GGNs, and

36 stimated by differentiating CT follow-up for ground-glass nodules, solid nodules 8 mm or smaller, and

37 contrast CT demonstrated nonspecific diffuse ground glass opacification, most prominent within the up

38 In ARDSP, ground-glass opacification and consolidation were equall

39 scans were evaluated in a blinded manner for ground-glass opacification and fibrosis in the lavaged l

40 ingula there was excellent agreement between ground-glass opacification and the finding of alveolitis

41 The proportion of ground-glass opacification at CT was similar in patients

42 Similarly, while ground-glass opacification on HRCT accurately predicted

43 and characterized by a greater proportion of ground-glass opacification than that in patients with IP

44 n were equally prevalent, whereas in ARDSEXP ground-glass opacification was dominant.

45 Ground-glass opacification was evenly distributed, where

46 On CT, neovascularity, lobular ground-glass opacification, and hilar and intercostal sy

47 ry vessels, termed "neovascularity," lobular ground-glass opacification, and systemic perihilar and i

48 The extent of interstitial lung disease, ground-glass opacification, emphysema, and the coarsenes

49 asymmetric, with a mix of consolidation and ground-glass opacification, whereas ARDSEXP has predomin

50 solidation, whereas ARDSEXP caused symmetric ground-glass opacification.

51 whereas ARDSEXP has predominantly symmetric ground-glass opacification.

52 terlobular septal thickening (ILST;100%) and ground glass opacities (GGOs; 91.7%), resulting in crazy

53 st computed tomography on admission revealed ground glass opacities in the right upper and lower lung

54 c PAP was interlobular septal thickening and ground glass opacities, resulting in crazy-paving patter

55 ed diffuse 1- to 2-mm pulmonary nodules with ground-glass opacities ( Fig 1 ).

56 Pulmonary focal Ground-glass Opacities (fGGOs) would frequently be ident

57 The most common findings in FWL were ground-glass opacities and micronodules.

58 I]; 1.03-2.20; P = .033) and the presence of ground-glass opacities at chest high-resolution computed

59 opacities (thickened interlobular septa and ground-glass opacities at CT), cysts or cavities, and fi

60 a, focal consolidation, reticular opacities, ground-glass opacities, and cysts or cavities.

61 reas of consolidation, often associated with ground-glass opacities, are the predominant radiographic

62 CT features recorded included ground-glass opacities, consolidation, micronodules, ret

63 While ground-glass opacities, micronodules, or both were found

64 comparison to CT, MR imaging depicted 75% of ground-glass opacities.

65 reas of consolidation, often associated with ground-glass opacities.

66 nchiectasis (48%), pleural thickening (40%), ground glass opacity (32%), mass-like consolidation (20%

67 with severe lymphocytopenia or an extent of ground glass opacity (GGO) >50% on chest computed tomogr

68 Extent of ground glass opacity and lung fibrosis were assessed vis

69 of CT features (including reticular pattern, ground glass opacity, and thin-walled cystic air spaces)

70 subglottic airway fluid (92%), and pulmonary ground-glass opacity (100%) but did not have evidence of

71 error group, the percentages of nodules with ground-glass opacity (91%) or judged to be subtle (91%)

72 The most common HRCT presentation of COP was ground-glass opacity (GGO) in 83.9% of cases, followed b

73 lities that included airspace consolidation, ground-glass opacity (GGO), reticulation, honeycombing,

74 oking-related lung diseases characterized by ground-glass opacity and centrilobular nodules.

75 ignificantly correlated with the presence of ground-glass opacity and irregular nodules or nodules wi

76 Chest computed tomography showed ground-glass opacity and some centrilobular nodules.

77 NSIP is characterized by predominantly basal ground-glass opacity and/or reticular pattern, often wit

78 omogeneous attenuation was classified as (a) ground-glass opacity due to infiltrative disease, (b) mo

79 uencies of developing lung adenocarcinoma or ground-glass opacity lung lesions than those who do not

80 thy fluid in the airways, pulmonary opacity (ground-glass opacity or airspace consolidation), interlo

81 LIP is associated with a CT pattern of ground-glass opacity sometimes associated with perivascu

82 (89%) of the drowning subjects had pulmonary ground-glass opacity with septal lines, which was mild w

83 subglottic tracheal and bronchial fluid, and ground-glass opacity within the lung at multidetector CT

84 anasal sinuses and mastoid air cells and had ground-glass opacity within the lungs.

85 ed that stepwise progression of lesions with ground-glass opacity, manifested as an increase in size

86 construct validity of HRCT-reported nodules, ground-glass opacity, or other typical findings.

87 nspicuity scores (a) improved in group 2 for ground-glass opacity, reticulation, and bronchiectasis a

88 manifests as diffuse lung consolidation and ground-glass opacity.

89 cavitating nodules to lobar consolidation to ground-glass opacity.

90 circulation, resolution of the parenchymal "ground glass" opacity and absence of further episodes of

91 walls of numerous bronchial branches and a "ground glass" opacity in the anterior segment of the rig

92 Proportion of lung occupied by ground glass, ground glass-reticular (GGR), honeycombing, emphysema, a