ライフサイエンスコーパス: guided tissue regeneration

1 nces bone gain when used in conjunction with guided tissue regeneration.

2 wn results comparable to those obtained with guided tissue regeneration.

3 n studies where EGR was compared directly to guided tissue regeneration.

4 eatment technique based on the principles of guided tissue regeneration.

5 oroethylene (ePTFE) membrane as a barrier in guided tissue regeneration.

6 e procedure with either connective tissue or guided tissue regeneration.

7 fter the treatment of intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration.

8 pyogenic granuloma was found associated with guided tissue regeneration and the lingual alveolar muco

9 t regenerating bone within molar furcations (guided tissue regeneration) and had the membranes and as

10 tations, root resections, tunnel procedures, guided tissue regeneration, and restorations.

11 ing for root coverage should be preferred to guided tissue regeneration, and the use of epithelialize

12 es have centered on the use of membranes for guided tissue regeneration as well as surgical ingenuity

13 Addition of doxycycline to the guided tissue regeneration barrier did not enhance treat

14 long a chemotactic gradient over 3 different guided tissue regeneration barrier materials; i.e., poly

15 The goal of guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage (GTRC) is

16 Based on this meta-analysis, guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage can be us

17 ge procedures, gingivectomy, root resection, guided tissue regeneration, dental implant surgery, epit

18 Principles of guided tissue regeneration dictate that one of the goals

19 mulate regeneration, because the concepts of guided tissue regeneration emphasize the need for space

20 rticle reports a case of an LPC treated with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and bone allograft.

21 ral (BPBM), and a bioabsorbable membrane for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) as regenerative therapy

22 m (MPP) has been used as a rigid membrane in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for osseous defects.

23 , studies support the use of bone grafts and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for the correction of i

24 L gains at 1 year were 3.5 +/- 2.1 mm in the guided tissue regeneration (GTR) group and 2.6 +/- 1.8 m

25 The use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has become an effective

26 PRP), bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM), and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has been shown to be ef

27 The longevity of the clinical benefits of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has not been fully expl

28 esigned to explore the long-term efficacy of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in Class II furcation d

29 ing of bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in the treatment of int

30 Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is a clinical procedure

31 al colonization of barrier materials used in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is known to adversely a

32 case studies, use of a collagen barrier as a guided tissue regeneration (GTR) material has shown part

33 cluding placement of a coral biomaterial and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membranes, and were eva

34 er devices to treat interproximal defects by guided tissue regeneration (GTR) necessitates inclusion

35 barrier membranes have been widely used for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) of the human periodonta

36 inical trial was to evaluate the effect of a guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure in comparison

37 The use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedures in the treat

38 he periodontal tissues was studied following guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedures using both n

39 For guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedures, collagen me

40 available or under investigation for use in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedures.

41 Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) support substantial gai

42 Clinicians using guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques are also enj

43 Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques have been re

44 d study compared clinical outcomes following guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treating human Class II

45 Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) uses expanded polytetra

46 ch received one of the following treatments: guided tissue regeneration (GTR) using expanded polytetr

47 to assess the effect of PRGF associated with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) versus GTR only in the

48 egeneration with bone replacement grafts and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) were defined as state o

49 e of the study was to compare the effects of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with expanded polytetra

50 Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with resorbable (GTRr)

51 Guided tissue regeneration (GTR)-based root coverage has

52 s applied underneath the barrier membrane in guided tissue regeneration (GTR)-based root coverage pro

53 Studies utilizing collagen membranes for guided tissue regeneration (GTR)-based root coverage pro

54 In addition, guided tissue regeneration (GTR)-based root coverage usi

55 le with selected bone replacement grafts and guided tissue regeneration (GTR).

56 root surface compromises outcomes following guided tissue regeneration (GTR).

57 ze-dried, demineralized bone matrix (DBM) to guided tissue regeneration (GTR).

58 ects not easily managed through resection is guided tissue regeneration (GTR).

59 Similarly, in guided tissue regeneration (GTR)/enamel matrix derivativ

60 MBA with a bioabsorbable collagen membrane (guided tissue regeneration [GTR]+MBA) groups.

61 ations in the use of CADIA for evaluation of guided tissue regeneration in furcations.

62 The use of guided tissue regeneration in periodontal plastic surger

63 ium sulfate offers the greater potential for guided tissue regeneration in surgical sites where prima

64 ration of the hydrogel (e.g., drug delivery, guided tissue regeneration) is required.

65 d tissue, the success of procedures, such as guided tissue regeneration, is directly related to the a

66 treated with periodontal regeneration using guided tissue regeneration membranes.

67 urcation closure was an infrequent result of guided tissue regeneration, occurring in only 7% to 19%

68 tunneling, root amputation, root resection, guided tissue regeneration, osseous grafting, and combin

69 Vertical defects suitable for guided tissue regeneration procedures however, were foun

70 t may improve the amount of bone gain during guided tissue regeneration procedures.

71 mes when using novel MPMs compared to OMs in guided tissue regeneration procedures.

72 t coverage in connective tissue grafting and guided tissue regeneration (r = 0.909 and 0.714, respect

73 Guided tissue regeneration represents a viable treatment

74 ontamination of surgical wounds when used in guided tissue regeneration surgery.

75 hed studies investigating the application of guided tissue regeneration techniques in combination wit

76 c data of periodontal regeneration following guided tissue regeneration therapy (GTR) with a bioabsor

77 ts at regeneration of periodontal defects by guided tissue regeneration using bone grafts and membran

78 This study suggests that guided tissue regeneration using polytetrafluoroethylene

79 f 27 consecutively treated patients, in whom guided tissue regeneration with a polylactic acid barrie

80 advanced flap, connective tissue graft, and guided tissue regeneration with and without adjuncts.

81 istologic periodontal regeneration following guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable polylactic

82 Guided tissue regeneration with collagen (COLL) and coll

83 erative techniques using grafting materials, guided tissue regeneration with resorbable and nonresorb

84 study further supports the added benefits of guided tissue regeneration with respect to access flap a