ライフサイエンスコーパス: guttatus

1 xisting with one of the parental species (M. guttatus).

2 l population of yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus).

3 ted populations of the monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.

4 e t and F in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus.

5 d compensatory nuclear coevolution within M. guttatus.

6 ing predators, X. gladius, T. obesus, and L. guttatus.

7 morphism for drive within a population of M. guttatus.

8 between two divergent populations of Mimulus guttatus.

9 time, and male fitness components of Mimulus guttatus.

10 aracters of the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.

11 primarily outcrossing population of Mimulus guttatus.

12 outcrossing population of the plant Mimulus guttatus.

13 monkeyflower (Mimulus) hybrids, a driving M. guttatus allele (D) exhibits a 98:2 transmission advanta

14 recombinants demonstrated that a dominant M. guttatus allele at each Rf locus was sufficient to resto

15 tically mapped this sterility effect: the M. guttatus allele at the hybrid male sterility 1 (hms1) lo

16 genome, 9 of which generate an excess of M. guttatus alleles and a deficit of M. nasutus alleles.

17 (M. peregrinus), and progenitor species (M. guttatus and M. luteus).

18 ely related species of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus.

19 an interspecific map constructed between M. guttatus and M. nasutus.

20 age map of an interspecific cross between M. guttatus and M. nasutus.

21 M. guttatus and M. nudatus differ in the pattern and timing

22 mechanism for the hybrid barrier between M. guttatus and M. nudatus.

23 rms a potent reproductive barrier between M. guttatus and M. nudatus.

24 at male sterility in hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus nasutus is due to interactions betw

25 ely related species of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus tilingii, to characterize the mecha

26 of yellow monkeyflowers, outcrossing Mimulus guttatus and selfing M. nasutus.

27 g from hybridisation between diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus, two species that

28 endosperm and embryo development in Mimulus guttatus and the closely related, serpentine endemic Mim

29 actions between a mitochondrial gene from M. guttatus and two tightly linked nuclear restorer alleles

30 hree nested ecological scales within Mimulus guttatus: annual vs perennial life history races, perenn

31 h one that differentiates ecotypes within M. guttatus, but the larger effect QTL appears unique to M.

32 Leaf trichome density in Mimulus guttatus can be altered by the parental environment.

33 resistance, and tolerance traits in Mimulus guttatus challenged with a generalist pathogen, Cucumber

34 r of 8 is ancestral, reconstruction of 14 M. guttatus chromosomes requires at least eight fission eve

35 g time within natural populations of Mimulus guttatus, collecting the early- and late-flowering plant

36 Katsuwonus pelamis, Xiphias gladius, Lampris guttatus, Coryphaena hippurus, Taractichthys steindachne

37 at most songs of the hermit thrush (Catharus guttatus) favor simple frequency ratios derived from the

38 thocyanin-activating MYB expressed in the M. guttatus flowers.

39 tifying and targeting regions of the Mimulus guttatus genome containing large numbers of candidate pe

40 e and create a framework for transferring M. guttatus genome resources across the entire genus.

41 hat selection would likely favor the same M. guttatus genotypes whether CMV is present or not.

42 Mimulus guttatus harbors extensive variation in critical photope

43 copper mine soils in the wildflower Mimulus guttatus identified a locus that appeared to cause coppe

44 * Mimulus guttatus in adjacent contrasting plant community situati

45 d in colonized roots of thermal soil Mimulus guttatus in both isolated plants supporting AMF for only

46 population of yellow monkey flowers, Mimulus guttatus, in Copperopolis, California, which recently ev

47 The corn snake (Pantherophis guttatus) is a new model species particularly appropriat

48 segmental synteny between M. lewisii and M. guttatus maps, with essentially 1-to-1 correspondence ac

49 Cornsnakes (Pantherophis guttatus or Pantherophis slowinskii) and ratsnakes (Pant

50 viduals, corresponding to either diploid (M. guttatus) or polyploid (M. luteus and M. x robertsii) sa

51 owering between yellow monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimulus nasu

52 owering between yellow monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimulus nasu

53 ion is not exceptional compared with what M. guttatus populations may typically experience when adapt

54 traits for 52 annual populations of Mimulus guttatus sampled from 10 altitudinal transects.

55 s to build integrated genetic maps of the M. guttatus species complex (section Simiolus, n=14) and th

56 etween closely related species within the M. guttatus species complex, an important ecological model

57 ral adaptation and speciation in the Mimulus guttatus species complex, we constructed a genetic linka

58 ons of annuals and perennials in the Mimulus guttatus species complex.

59 rosatellite data for a population of Mimulus guttatus that has an intermediate selfing rate.

60 m of endothermy in a fish, the opah (Lampris guttatus), that produces heat through the constant "flap

61 wild population of the monkeyflower Mimulus guttatus to precisely locate over 400,000 boundaries of

62 g (Philaenus spumarius) herbivory in Mimulus guttatus using a diallel cross-grown in a greenhouse.

63 ing this method to two datasets from Mimulus guttatus, we infer a strong signal of adaptive divergenc