ライフサイエンスコーパス: habitat

1 al distributions of the aphid and its steppe habitat.

2 indicate adaptation to conditions in forest habitat.

3 vannahs, relates to its foraging ecology and habitat.

4 to molar levels) in many types of microbial habitat.

5 an important, but often overlooked, foraging habitat.

6 laboratory arena and in the animal's natural habitat.

7 on trends and relationships to phylogeny and habitat.

8 careous soils that are core bristlecone pine habitat.

9 es comprise a network of discrete patches of habitat.

10 stant subpopulations when seeking an optimum habitat.

11 ferences between replicate sites of the same habitat.

12 ects on the geographic locations of suitable habitat.

13 itions was near (<7 km) the closest suitable habitat.

14 ly crustaceans) within a highly oligotrophic habitat.

15 ltural areas previously not considered moose habitat.

16 viors in response to changes in the colonial habitat.

17 ly reflecting more diverse food webs in this habitat.

18 locally extinct species to recolonize former habitats.

19 imicking day/night cycles in certain natural habitats.

20 nelles that allow them to move to favourable habitats.

21 different carbon processing patterns between habitats.

22 r significantly among tundra, fen and forest habitats.

23 lly for extended periods of time in offshore habitats.

24 arge genetic divergence among well-connected habitats.

25 ed no significant difference between the two habitats.

26 o ecosystem structure and function of marine habitats.

27 nded summer season in agricultural and urban habitats.

28 id not differ between mangrove and saltmarsh habitats.

29 ow latitude range edges across many taxa and habitats.

30 in resilience and recovery of these coastal habitats.

31 hy unrelated to colonization of subterranean habitats.

32 differential imaging characteristics, called habitats.

33 account for 26.7% of its predicted breeding habitats.

34 key ecological processes, within and across habitats.

35 uses distinct resources in different natural habitats.

36 ast patterns and locations of the associated habitats.

37 bial methanogenesis can only occur in anoxic habitats.

38 n (alpha), between (beta) and across (gamma) habitats.

39 ressure, and temperature relative to lowland habitats.

40 spatial heterogeneity across the giant panda habitats.

41 ects of anthropogenic climate change on tuna habitats.

42 o understand its effects on deep-sea benthic habitats.

43 f biodiversity between time and space across habitats.

44 temperature increase than S. pulchra in dry habitats.

45 re being not much lower than that in natural habitats.

46 butors to the structure and function of reef habitats.

47 to analyze the black-necked crane's breeding habitats.

48 environment, which is in turn dependent upon habitat [1, 3, 5, 6].

49 the extent of light-dependent marine benthic habitats across decadal timescales.

50 , can broaden the identification of keystone habitats across ecosystems and further operationalize th

51 nstrate that local adaptation to contrasting habitats affected chlorophyll-carotenoid ratios, pool si

52 e area of southern California, and sensitive habitat already threatened by eustatic sea level rise.

53 minimal ecological requirements within these habitats also need to be understood and considered if lo

54 s, lake trout had reduced access to littoral habitat and assimilated less littoral energy, resulting

55 a cold-water stenotherm, adjusted its use of habitat and energy sources in response to annual variati

56 with poor recruitment, but local changes in habitat and fishing pressure may have played a role in d

57 enic pressures continue to squeeze available habitat and force animals into degraded and disturbed ar

58 on and extinction rates, and evaluated biome/habitat and geographic shifts in Detarioideae.

59 early Palaeocene, after which several biome/habitat and geographic shifts occurred.

60 ely related Zetaproteobacteria while showing habitat and geographic specificity.

61 In the natural habitat and low-pH environment of toxin-secreting killer

62 trout greatly reduced their use of littoral habitat and occupied deep pelagic waters during the summ

63 rrotfish in maintaining coral-dominated reef habitat and the urgent need for restoration of parrotfis

64 radients, with distance from shore and among habitat and vegetation types.

65 ed species were collected from their natural habitats and analysed.

66 orals is different across thermally variable habitats and changes over time when corals are reciproca

67 nmental variation is widely lacking for many habitats and communities.

68 ical 3D structure of previously inaccessible habitats and demonstrates the complexity and importance

69 all currently known phage genomes in marine habitats and include members of previously uncharacteriz

70 size, the knowledge of the MP proportion in habitats and organisms is of gaining importance.

71 al initiatives aimed at restoring pollinator habitats and populations have been developed.

72 the functioning and structure of sedimentary habitats and show that such effects may depend on the do

73 ture, urbanization, climate change) degrades habitats and threatens biodiversity.

74 namely anthropogenic destruction of natural habitats and wildfire frequency estimated from long-term

75 , flood buffering, soil health, biodiversity habitat, and enhanced climate resilience.

76 cularly vulnerable to the oiling of spawning habitats, and crude oil causes severe abnormalities in e

77 ) are a critical component of these impacted habitats, and population declines following oil spills,

78 er to determine the number of the underlying habitats; and (2) an unsupervised pattern recognition te

79 parasite loads of hosts in a square meter of habitat approximate observations much better than two mo

80 Because only fragments of its habitat are accessible to humans, this endangered salama

81 iduals within each host in a square meter of habitat are independent or perfectly correlated among ho

82 Thus these shallow fore-reef habitats are now in a phase of net erosion.

83 that direct hypoxia-mediated survival in GBM habitats are unclear.

84 in relative abundance, especially in the fen habitat at 5 cm depth.

85 lst foraging, and disruption to the acoustic habitat at these times could lead to adverse consequence

86 rove storm protection, but cause declines in habitat availability for fauna requiring open vegetation

87 uarine consumers over 5 months to changes in habitat availability in situ by comparing densities and

88 e response of mobile consumers to changes in habitat availability is essential for determining the de

89 r constructed or natural reefs to manipulate habitat availability, we documented threefold density de

90 that species within these clades use similar habitats, because such similarity may increase the degre

91 ts were consistent with predictions based on habitat breadth and historic range limit.

92 ge of factors such as geographic range size, habitat breadth, life history, and phylogeny.

93 but also human populations around great ape habitats, bringing health benefits to both humans and wi

94 on a greater concern for the composition of habitat-building species and prioritization of particula

95 rosses are highly faithful in their foraging habitat but it is rather site fidelity that is more clea

96 served not only as a stepping stone between habitats but also as a bridge between heterotrophic and

97 y associated with adaptation to subterranean habitats, but in isopods it appeared to be a symplesiomo

98 e organic matter subsidies to glacier-marine habitats by developing a multi-trophic level Bayesian th

99 The utilization of similar habitats by different species provides an ideal opportun

100 ese results suggest that changes in stopover habitat can severely limit migratory populations.

101 Rapid evolution during colonization of novel habitats can generate major changes to characteristics s

102 ation among watersheds in potential spawning habitat change was explained by predicted increases in m

103 ate, allowing investigations into how unique habitat characteristics and intraspecific phenotypic var

104 icting metapopulation dynamics, variation in habitat characteristics should be considered not only fo

105 Estuaries are transitional habitats characterized by complex biogeochemical and eco

106 e fidelity may also emerge as an artefact of habitat choice, but both drivers and fitness consequence

107 disproportionately impacted by these linear habitat clearings.

108 imation techniques to describe the effect of habitat clustering.

109 lts demonstrate that gene fitness depends on habitat composition, and suggest that this generalist us

110 enically driven climate change, resulting in habitat compression for pelagic animals.

111 explicit colonization dynamics can result in habitat compression, wherein more colonists occupy a pat

112 e shifts in response to changing climate and habitat conditions.

113 o date practically little is known about how habitat configurational fragmentation influences multi-t

114 The anthropogenic disruption of hydrological habitat connectivity by dams is the major factor reducin

115 equestration, and explore the co-benefits of habitat conservation and climate change mitigation.

116 These findings suggest that habitat conversion and anticipated climate drying will a

117 Second, does habitat conversion eliminate beta-diversity across clima

118 ially concurrent with Holocene anthropogenic habitat conversion for agriculture.

119 In particular, understanding how local habitat conversion interacts with regional climate chang

120 Habitat degradation and distribution gaps correlated wit

121 tiger sharks is therefore both context- and habitat-dependent, consistent with a generalist, opportu

122 It is widely expected that habitat destruction in the tropics will cause a mass ext

123 Consequently, species' responses to habitat destruction vary as other species become extinct

124 e in competition, cooperation, and long-term habitat destruction.

125 survival of this population, these disparate habitats differ considerably in their food availability,

126 Ecosystems with long histories of habitat disturbance, however, could be resilient to low-

127 lants; and (c) degraded overwintering forest habitats due to commercially motivated deforestation and

128 these effects: diet breadth, feeding guild, habitat/environment, type of bottom-up effects, type of

129 e consequences of urbanization on freshwater habitats, especially small lentic systems.

130 ted ancestral states for geography and biome/habitat, estimated diversification and extinction rates,

131 with species ecologies, life histories, and habitats explained little of the variation in phylogeogr

132 e were determined among lakes, water depths, habitat features (i.e., brackish vs. freshwaters), and n

133 ve level reveals a clear association between habitat features and the emergent structure of the group

134 we examine an individual metric of site and habitat fidelity, using tracking data collected over 11

135 site occupancy, larger seed mass, and higher habitat fidelity.

136 quantified the effects of spatial structure, habitat filtering and host community components on symbi

137 cteristic of ecosystem disturbance affecting habitat filtering.

138 mponent of ecosystem functioning by offering habitat for numerous wildlife species and influencing st

139 landed on Mars to assess its potential as a habitat for past life and investigate the paleoclimate r

140 on storage suggest that safeguarding natural habitats for biodiversity protection and carbon storage

141 ered at least 7% of streams, which influence habitats for over 60% of North America's fish, mussel, a

142 veal the extent to which physical effects of habitat-formers can overwhelm broad-scale thermal trends

143 onies of tabular Acropora spp., the dominant habitat-forming corals in shallow exposed reefs across t

144 manipulated the abundance of the nonnative, habitat-forming seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla in la

145 Declines in the abundance of long-lived and habitat-forming species on continental shelves have attr

146 will be especially important when affecting habitat-forming species such as seagrasses, as the conse

147 To explore how habitat fragmentation affects species persistence in foo

148 of invasive plants and natural enemies; (f) habitat fragmentation and coalescence that promote homog

149 ear infrastructure development and resulting habitat fragmentation are expanding in Neotropical fores

150 Similarly, habitat fragmentation has almost no influence on the sit

151 Habitat fragmentation is generally considered to have ne

152 alyze its population structure and find that habitat fragmentation owing to a natural barrier has res

153 nthesis were probably present in terrestrial habitats from c. 3.0 billion yr ago (Ga) onwards, creati

154 automatic procedure for delineation of tumor habitats from DCE-MRI was developed as a two-part proces

155 a breeding grounds to coastal and freshwater habitats from North Africa to Scandinavia [6, 7].

156 Recent decline of sea ice habitat has coincided with increased use of land by pola

157 of the group, highlighting the importance of habitat heterogeneity in shaping group coordination.

158 habitat modifications, biotic interactions, habitat heterogeneity, novel disturbances, and social in

159 Results suggest that both focal and source habitat history can influence recolonization of recently

160 stone crabs as habitat increased (i.e. weak habitat imitation).

161 onnectivity of these small benthic fishes if habitat in between them is extirpated.

162 s well as the importance of fish ecology and habitat in modulating the relationships between biogeoch

163 color pattern features likely related to the habitat in which it lived.

164 ds were considerably more specialised in the habitat in which they forage than the exact location the

165 Differences between habitats in climate, competition or natural enemies may

166 y with the proportion of high-value foraging habitat, including spring floral resources, within 250-1

167 sity decreases among juvenile stone crabs as habitat increased (i.e. weak habitat imitation).

168 ial food, and as the availability of sea ice habitat increased.

169 ruction of 154 barriers that fragment stream habitats, increased depth to groundwater and loss of 558

170 ilability and/or an expansion of right whale habitat into unprotected waters.

171 causal link between food web connectance and habitat invasibility, the promising findings beg for fur

172 of adaptive shell shape differences between habitats involves environmentally induced epigenetic dif

173 Habitat is shown to influence movement over multiple spa

174 Human mediated transportation into novel habitats is a prerequisite for the establishment of non-

175 e concentration of phosphate in most natural habitats is low enough to limit microbial growth.

176 wever, strictly protecting 20%-30% of fished habitats is unlikely to diminish catch even if overfishi

177 shallower waters and across a wider range of habitats, is also applied.

178 normalized across its climatic range by the habitat it occupies or by the physiology of the species

179 e isolated regions will have little suitable habitat left, implying a future decrease in local popula

180 stable across treatments, demonstrating that habitat limitation presents a bottleneck in this species

181 ese findings of significant, community-level habitat limitation provide insight into how global decli

182 suggested that some mobile fishes experience habitat limitation, or, potentially in one case, strong

183 ee to which population-level productivity is habitat limited rather than regulated by other, potentia

184 ful secondary 'cascading' effects on natural habitats located >1.3 km away.

185 lightest vertebrates are most threatened by habitat loss and modification stemming especially from p

186 r-intuitively, prey species may benefit from habitat loss due to a release in top-down control.

187 hey spend the majority of the year and where habitat loss has been associated with population decline

188 er, the activity models predicted 8-19% less habitat loss in response to annual temperature increases

189 bees (Apis mellifera) is under pressure from habitat loss, environmental stress, and pathogens, parti

190 -avoidance adaptations; patchy environments; habitat loss; and climate change.

191 tly exist to mitigate near-term non-breeding habitat losses.

192 Such long-lasting patterning of habitats makes them ideal to test the role of environmen

193 In common with the other 'blue carbon' habitats (mangroves and tidal marshes) seagrasses are th

194 We used a combination of habitat manipulation, land-use and habitat surveys, mole

195 ly in one case, strong limitation across our habitat manipulations.

196 l declines in structurally complex estuarine habitats may have reduced the fishery production of coas

197 ng results indicate that S. pulchra in mesic habitats may respond positively to a wider range of temp

198 Exceptions to these patterns based on habitats, mobility, and life history provide critical te

199 Bayesian state-space and habitat models show that penguins traversed thousands of

200 nges in weighted network structure following habitat modification are, in principle, predictable.

201 f five types of urban disturbances including habitat modifications, biotic interactions, habitat hete

202 Although the value of disturbed habitats needs to be recognized in conservation plans fo

203 rity ( approximately 75%) of snails in oiled habitats never reached standing unoiled vegetation after

204 ithin their range, and most high-suitability habitat occurred outside of protected areas, further ele

205 The ancestral habitat of Detarioideae is postulated to be a primary fo

206 Elevated noise was also found in critical habitats of endangered species, with 14% experiencing a

207 limitation and can be advantageous in native habitats of Synechocystis.

208 The breeding habitats of this species are poorly understood, which gr

209 s with four land cover classes: semi-natural habitat, olive groves, wheat fields and field margins.

210 of the Sumatran rhinoceros, as less suitable habitat on an emergent Sundaland corridor isolated Sumat

211 ith the protection or restoration of natural habitats on nonfarmed land-will have lower environmental

212 Thus far, studies in aquatic habitats on the utilization of methylamine, the simplest

213 ikaite, present a unique alkaline microbial habitat only found in Ikka Fjord (SW-Greenland).

214 unities for species to respond to changes in habitat or phenology that are likely to develop under cl

215 genomes or metagenomic contigs from the same habitat or samples as the query viruses.

216 reefs have transformed into algal-dominated habitats over recent decades, but the mechanisms of chan

217 nce diversity and productivity of intertidal habitats, over the past 40 years in the Gulf of Maine, U

218 l households provide a referential model for habitat partitioning among mice taxa in settlements of v

219 ected, interacting collections of juxtaposed habitat patches are examined) provides a scientific foun

220 ctor and distance-weighted fragmentation) of habitat patches can help design better-connected marine

221 hus seed beetles in a clever array of linked habitat patches to compare experimental invasions using

222 endent: (1) foraging search performance; (2) habitat preference; (3) home range utilization patterns;

223 The nitrogen limitation and habitat productivity hypotheses use the same logic to pr

224 In contrast, the nitrogen limitation and habitat productivity hypotheses, which predict more anim

225 it linkage of livestock yield increases with habitat protection or restoration, as well as a deeper u

226 ies in response to ontogeny, seasonality and habitat quality can emerge from a simple physiological h

227 idual bison sharing faulty information about habitat quality promoted the use of ecological traps.

228 rammetry quantified the following metrics of habitat quality: 1) visual exposure to predators and com

229 stock grazing can affect insects by altering habitat quality; however, the effects of grazing years a

230 have led to gaps in our understanding of the habitat range and subpopulation complexity of founding s

231 al warming is predicted to cause substantial habitat rearrangements, with the most severe effects exp

232 ecological patterns as terrestrial and lotic habitats (reduced taxonomic richness) in urban environme

233 rease scientific understanding of organismal-habitat relationships, maintain natural biodiversity, ad

234 otechnological processes, as well as natural habitats, represent a more dynamic system.

235 Spawning habitat responses varied widely across watersheds and am

236 se new landscapes to inform conservation and habitat restoration efforts.

237 bacterial metacommunity constituted of three habitats (sediment, water column and fish gut) in a coas

238 obscure the population-level consequences of habitat selection [8, 9].

239 ypotheses for the causes and consequences of habitat selection and dispersal across space and time.

240 Habitat selection by colonizing organisms is an importan

241 y aspects of animal ecology from foraging to habitat selection to predator avoidance.

242 ms associated with how complexity influences habitat selection.

243 ition of sharks sampled in reef and seagrass habitats (Shark Bay, GBR) reflected seagrass-based food-

244 Thus, in risky habitats, sharks can exert strong ecological impacts eve

245 ming that juveniles underwent an ontogenetic habitat shift from the oceanic central North Pacific (CN

246 ned by limited time for speciation in marine habitats, since all extant marine clades are relatively

247 model of bacterial evolution in overlapping habitat space.

248 , in clades for which species occupy similar habitats, species tend to exhibit increased co-occurrenc

249 (34)S, an indicator of sulfate reduction and habitat specific-foraging, was correlated with fish THg

250 ations for protection of maximal cross-scale habitat structural complexity.

251 systems, whereas little is known about other habitats such as dry tropical ecosystems.

252 d between biomass carbon density and panda's habitat suitability in 85% NRs and at the NR level.

253 tion between 1970 and 2000 on changes in the habitat suitability to P. alecto and P. conspicillatus f

254 rged vegetation to penetrate deeper, and the habitat suitable for fish and benthic fauna had expanded

255 Container aquatic habitats support a specialized community of macroinverte

256 nation of habitat manipulation, land-use and habitat surveys, molecular genetics and demographic and

257 s experienced a larger reduction in suitable habitat than other forest-core species.

258 large-scale manipulations of intact, natural habitat that is open to dispersal processes via exchange

259 egions and estuaries of the Gulf of Mexico - habitats that routinely experience pronounced hypoxic ev

260 h the 15-year period of development and used habitats that were an average of 913 m further from well

261 y be investigations into GAS in its 'normal' habitat, the nasopharynx, and its ability to either live

262 , they cannot comprise a permanent microbial habitat; thus, an age-old unanswered question concerns t

263 with a 3-dimensional reconstruction of their habitat to identify key drivers of baboon movement.

264 The capacity of a habitat to maintain growth will be crucial and here we u

265 h particular trait profiles in anthropogenic habitats to reduce infectious disease risks in provision

266 biological response of terrestrial taxa and habitats to urbanization.

267 a variety of associated metadata, including habitat type and geographic location of the samples, or

268 For example, if specific habitat types disproportionately increase biodiversity,

269 sets and functions associated with these two habitat types.

270 This suggests that habitat under a given condition is not necessarily a hab

271 under a given condition is not necessarily a habitat under alternative conditions.

272 o investigate the potential for differential habitat use among migratory marine vertebrates, we measu

273 tion and timing of ontogenetic shifts in the habitat use of highly migratory species, along with poss

274 And (ii) Do habitat use patterns of a mobile species influence their

275 might interact with temporal variability in habitat use to affect populations of a tropical, estuari

276 s of a diverse LMH community on small-mammal habitat use using 4 years of spatially explicit small-ma

277 Small-mammal habitat use was positively associated with tree density

278 ads compared with predevelopment patterns of habitat use.

279 as been linked to shifts in the behavior and habitat-use patterns of wildlife species, little is know

280 Increased flood size could alter stream habitats used by Pacific salmon for reproduction, with n

281 iversity of resources consumed, and hence of habitats used).

282 adaptation of populations colonising a novel habitat using experimental populations of Tribolium cast

283 ividuals can evolve adaptation to fine-scale habitat variation (for example, microhabitats) is not re

284 ascular permeability, since individual tumor habitats vary in the rate and magnitude of the contrast

285 No association with species thermal habitat was found for acclimation capacity.

286 Between these same habitats, we also found significant genome wide DNA meth

287 sidential and energy development within deer habitat were correlated with declining recruitment rates

288 ion range, specialized diet or dry grassland habitat were more likely than others to disappear from t

289 The differences between habitats were an order of magnitude greater than the dif

290 mpete and evolve in porous environments, the habitat where most bacteria live.

291 The indoor biome is a novel habitat which recent studies have shown exhibit not only

292 gate size classes support distinct microbial habitats which supports the colonisation of different mi

293 ulnerable scale (4 cm) varied the most among habitats, which could have inferences for as much as hal

294 threespine stickleback into lake and stream habitats, while manipulating the relative abundance of r

295 carbonate production by up to 58% in certain habitats, whilst also driving a deviation from natural p

296 trointestinal helminth parasites share their habitat with a myriad of other organisms, that is, the c

297 but not for heat-tolerant corals growing in habitats with natural high heat extremes.

298 deep-sea species, dependent on adaptation to habitats with similar environmental variability.

299 g distance from wildlife tourists in the two habitats, with a minimum distance of disturbance trigger

300 s and a lower proportion of high-suitability habitat within their range, and most high-suitability ha