ライフサイエンスコーパス: handoff

1 ientation of NmerA to the Core during Hg(2+) handoff.

2 ts do not agree about the value of attending handoffs.

3 ot negatively affect the quality of resident handoffs.

4 udy of distractions during surgical resident handoffs.

5 cal errors caused by miscommunication during handoffs.

6 r adopt a "shift" model, both with increased handoffs.

7 usly, with an additional 4 hrs permitted for handoffs.

8 death) attributable to inadequate attending handoffs.

9 and other clinical information, and several handoffs.

10 tintervention period in the duration of oral handoffs (2.4 and 2.5 minutes per patient, respectively;

11 n 54% of junior resident handoffs (mean, 1.4/handoff), 30% of moonlighter handoffs (mean, 0.5/handoff

12 tient-related factors (84 of 181 [46%]), and handoffs (36 of 181 [20%]).

13 Distractions were present in 102 resident handoffs (48%) (16% with 1 distraction; 15% with 2; 6% w

14 were more common during evening than morning handoffs (52% vs 36%; P = .045) and during team vs indiv

15 36%; P = .045) and during team vs individual handoffs (58% vs 44%; P < .10).

16 A majority report increased handoffs (78.2%) and a shift of junior-level responsibil

17 ic to standardize oral and written handoffs, handoff and communication training, a faculty developmen

18 junior residents more commonly performed the handoff and they increased the handoff length.

19 ave shown correlations between the number of handoffs and errors/patient harm.

20 Distractions are common during handoffs and may interfere with handoff quality and effe

21 in ICUs should focus both on the quality of handoffs and on strategies to decrease cognitive errors.

22 off), 30% of moonlighter handoffs (mean, 0.5/handoff), and 38% of senior resident handoffs (mean, 0.8

23 ith a loss of critical information with each handoff, and a decrease in the patient/doctor relationsh

24 onstraints and "forcing functions," reducing handoffs, and paying attention to human factors.

25 (87%) respondents reported participating in handoffs at the end of each ICU rotation.

26 us literature may overestimate the impact of handoffs because of hindsight bias.

27 emistry that may efficiently drive substrate handoff between polymerases during DNA replication.

28 Implementation of a handoff bundle was associated with a significant reducti

29 Resident handoff bundle, consisting of standardized communication

30 ndary outcomes were omissions in the printed handoff document and resident time-motion activity.

31 e assessed by means of evaluation of printed handoff documents and audio recordings.

32 omissions of key handoff elements on printed handoff documents, especially on the unit that received

33 There were fewer omissions of key handoff elements on printed handoff documents, especiall

34 rors, healthcare-acquired infections, falls, handoff errors, diagnostic errors, and surgical errors.

35 rotease reprogram specificity and coordinate handoff from the adaptor to the protease.

36 t diminished by distractions, as measured by handoff giver score (15.41 without vs 15.47 with distrac

37 d a mnemonic to standardize oral and written handoffs, handoff and communication training, a faculty

38 Handoffs have significantly increased in number followin

39 Studies comprehensively assessing handoff improvement programs are lacking.

40 prospective intervention study of a resident handoff-improvement program in nine hospitals, measuring

41 ent with prior findings indicating metabolic handoffs in simple consortia, we find that few organisms

42 ICU attending handoffs in the United States exhibit marked heterogenei

43 perceive a link between suboptimal attending handoffs, inappropriate treatment, and serious adverse e

44 cation methods were used for end-of-rotation handoffs, including in-person discussion (92.9%), teleph

45 ro, which occurs through a complex series of handoffs involving 10 proteins (Lhp1, Prp24, Usb1 and Ls

46 nal awareness, closed-loop systems, improved handoffs, just-in-time work, culture and practices of st

47 performed the handoff and they increased the handoff length.

48 offs (mean, 1.4/handoff), 30% of moonlighter handoffs (mean, 0.5/handoff), and 38% of senior resident

49 an, 0.5/handoff), and 38% of senior resident handoffs (mean, 0.89/handoff) (P = .01, junior vs moonli

50 tractions occurred in 54% of junior resident handoffs (mean, 1.4/handoff), 30% of moonlighter handoff

51 In so doing, the automatic handoff mechanism also improves the reproducibility of t

52 The system also uses a handoff mechanism that switches the immunocomplex from t

53 chanistic insight into how Mcm10 might use a handoff mechanism to load and stabilize pol alpha within

54 opherograms, and we demonstrate an automatic handoff mechanism to precisely control the signal intens

55 Similar handoff mechanisms will undoubtedly be used by many AAA+

56 Handoff miscommunications are a leading cause of medical

57 Our results suggest a handoff model for SAGA recruitment of TBP: instead of bi

58 A handoff model has been proposed to explain the egress fr

59 tten documents and oral communication during handoff (nine written and five oral elements; P<0.001 fo

60 nRNP in the alpha2 complex suggests that the handoff occurs during formation of this complex.

61 .ATPgammaS but not ClpX.ADP, suggesting that handoff occurs in the ATP bound enzyme.

62 ly recruits Sec2p, but subsequently allows a handoff of active Sec2p/Sec4p to Sec15p.

63 gleaned from these mutants suggest that the handoff of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB proceeds in a t

64 Association and handoff of DNA-editing enzymes, such as flap endonucleas

65 eins that mimic the system before and during handoff of Hg(2+) from NmerA to the Core.

66 udies assessing programs designed to improve handoff of information about patient care are lacking.

67 ted basis for PCNA to act in the coordinated handoff of intermediates from polymerase to FEN-1 to lig

68 Mediator proteins coordinate the handoff of single-stranded DNA from single-stranded DNA-

69 uppressor BRCA2 is thought to facilitate the handoff of ssDNA from replication protein A (RPA) to the

70 y the addition of APE, suggesting an orderly handoff of substrates from one enzyme to the next.

71 tion and delivery, and to ensure the orderly handoff of the substrate from the ubiquitylation machine

72 nt that appear suitable to coordinate rotary handoffs of kinked DNA intermediates among enzymes local

73 38% of senior resident handoffs (mean, 0.89/handoff) (P = .01, junior vs moonlighter/senior).

74 The average duration of verbal handoffs per patient did not change.

75 Mean satisfaction with current handoff process was rated as 68.4 on a scale from 0 to 1

76 nd improves communication during the patient handoff process.

77 Improvements in verbal and written handoff processes occurred, and resident workflow did no

78 Implementation of the handoff program was associated with reductions in medica

79 Handoff quality (both giver and receiver) was assessed u

80 ommon during handoffs and may interfere with handoff quality and effectiveness.

81 Handoff quality was not diminished by distractions, as m

82 2) of those participating in end-of-rotation handoffs reported using a standardized process.

83 onal study, a total of 214 surgical resident handoffs (residents = 184; Bay area residents [moonlight

84 Respondents (55.4%) said that attending handoffs should be standardized, but only 13.3% (76/572)

85 the complex and is followed by a slow primer handoff step.

86 training, a verbal mnemonic, and a new team handoff structure.

87 Distractions were very common during handoffs; they were more common in the evening when juni

88 We show that the handoff timing affects the data quality and repeatabilit

89 cer in pre-selection of effective siRNAs for handoff to Ago2.

90 of deoxynucleotides to the RNA primer before handoff to PolC.

91 tion of the incised duplex to facilitate the handoff to the downstream BER enzyme.

92 t on microtubules by kinesin with subsequent handoff to vertebrate myosin Va (myoVa) for local delive

93 However, no direct evidence links handoffs to outcomes, or explains the mechanisms leading

94 y on the unit that received the computerized handoff tool (significant reductions of omissions in 11

95 On one unit, a computerized handoff tool linked to the electronic medical record was

96 Specific handoff topics, including active clinical issues and res

97 consisting of standardized communication and handoff training, a verbal mnemonic, and a new team hand

98 Handoffs were assessed by means of evaluation of printed

99 Verbal handoffs were more likely to occur in a quiet location (

100 (11.5%) expressed skepticism that attending handoffs were necessary given the presence of residents

101 Handoffs without distractions were shorter in length (13