ライフサイエンスコーパス: healthy eating

1 he C group (n = 56) were given a brochure on healthy eating.

2 ted adherence to dietary recommendations for healthy eating.

3 low-glycemic index (GI) dietary advice with healthy eating advice on selected pregnancy outcomes.

4 a control group given a standard brochure on healthy eating and assigned to follow their usual diet.

5 across 6 sites participating in the HEALTH (Healthy Eating and Lifestyle for Total Health) Study.

6 new breast cancer events within the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study.

7 n = 397) of women recruited into the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study between 1996 and 1998, a

8 and participated in the prospective Women's Healthy Eating and Living study between March 1, 1995, a

9 ived baseline blood samples from the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study were used to measure hem

10 000 and followed through 2006 in the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study, a randomized interventi

11 00 to the nonintervention arm of the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study, a randomized trial asse

12 survivors in the HF- subgroup of the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study.

13 d will be used for other programs to promote healthy eating and physical activity of children in the

14 sus processed grains form the basis of heart-healthy eating and should supersede a focus on macronutr

15 he standard arm uses the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating and the Australian National Heart Foundat

16 tervention targeted gestational weight gain, healthy eating, and exercise and was discontinued at del

17 ls that promoted an appropriate weight gain, healthy eating, and exercise; individual graphs of weigh

18 d 3 components of health: physical activity, healthy eating, and self-esteem and body image.

19 luated the impact of a treatment that framed healthy eating as consistent with the adolescent values

20 ol, this treatment led eighth graders to see healthy eating as more autonomy-assertive and social jus

21 ts have gained popularity in contributing to healthy eating behavior because of their antioxidant pro

22 disease (CVD), can gain health benefits from healthy eating behaviors and appropriate physical activi

23 ajor food groups is advocated as critical to healthy eating, but the association of diversity across

24 Highlighting the importance of healthy eating by health professionals would substantial

25 es from the INTERMAP UK cohort (n=225) and a healthy-eating Danish cohort (n=66).

26 The Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life trial was a randomized controlle

27 The Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life trial was registered at Current

28 tepwise variance in concordance with the WHO healthy eating guidelines that aim to prevent non-commun

29 related to increasing physical activity and healthy eating habits among CYSHCN.

30 edly show a favorable relationship between a healthy eating habits and regular physical activity leve

31 blishment of long-term physical activity and healthy eating habits.

32 This may be because of barriers to healthy eating hampering adherence, but whether these ba

33 ght, birth percentile, and PI than providing healthy eating (HE) advice.

34 the prevalence of self-reported barriers to healthy eating in Switzerland overall and according to s

35 ty as assessed with the use of the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) 2 y later.

36 ify major dietary patterns and the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and the alternate Mediterran

37 A priori diet scores such as the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and the food-based a priori

38 nate measures of diet quality, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and the Recommended Food Sco

39 Mediterranean diet (aMED), and the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHEI) diet-quality scores with car

40 s to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHEI) dietary patterns with risk o

41 High scores on the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) have been associated with lo

42 ats" (FPM) dietary pattern and the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)) and three complementary mea

43 on the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), Diet Quality Index Revised

44 althy dietary pattern, such as the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), is associated with a lower

45 hy diet, as defined by using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), was prospectively associate

46 ng Index (HEI)-2005, HEI-2010, and Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)-2010-in relation to ovarian

47 mine whether a conventional index [Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)] or a novel index [Women's H

48 e correlation of 4 diet quality indexes [the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2010, the Alternate Mediterra

49 The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a 100-point analytic scori

50 The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a measure of diet quality

51 The healthy eating index (HEI) measures the concordance of d

52 sociations between alcohol and diet quality (Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores) using cross-sectional

53 P cycle and their macronutrient consumption, Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores, and fruit and vegetab

54 the diet quality of LMD adults by using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) to 1) identify potential and

55 ogic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scores, 2005 Healthy Eating Index (HEI) values, and dual-energy X-ray

56 Adherence to the DGA was measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), 2010 and 2005 editions (HEI-

57 Diet-quality scores on the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Alternate Healthy Eating Ind

58 erformance was repeatedly tested against the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), an independent measure of a

59 Overall diet quality indices, such as the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), are preferred for epidemiolo

60 The healthy eating index (HEI), developed at the US Departme

61 nship of dietary quality, as measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), to the prevalence of ECC in

62 asured with the US Department of Agriculture Healthy Eating Index (HEI), was associated with only a s

63 Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2005 values were estimated wi

64 udy evaluated 3 index-based dietary patterns-Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2005, HEI-2010, and Alternate

65 ding supplementary calcium (DQI-Ca), and the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)] and biomarkers of inflammati

66 Food Certification Program criteria and 2005 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2005) scores, food-group intak

67 idence interval (CI): 0.62, 0.83); Alternate Healthy Eating Index (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.81); Me

68 system was significantly associated with the Healthy Eating Index 2005 (P < 0.0001).

69 thy Eating Index 2010 (HEI), the Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 (AHEI), the Alternate Mediterr

70 sess prepregnancy adherence to the alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010 (aHEI-2010), alternate Mediter

71 on 4 commonly used diet quality indices-the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI), the Alternative Healthy

72 s study examined the association between the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010) and body fatness on

73 Diet quality index scores on Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010), Alternative HEI-20

74 ary quality was measured with the use of the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010).

75 ating Index 2010 [HEI-2010], the Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 [AHEI-2010], the alternate Med

76 d the associations between 4 DQI scores (the Healthy Eating Index 2010 [HEI-2010], the Alternative He

77 ces--the Alternate Mediterranean Diet Index, Healthy Eating Index 2010, Alternate Healthy Eating Inde

78 Index, Healthy Eating Index 2010, Alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010, and the Dietary Approaches to

79 st vs lowest tertile of modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index [mAHEI]; 23.2%, 18.2-28.9 for lowes

80 idual nutrients, dietary patterns (Alternate Healthy Eating Index and Alternate Mediterranean Diet Sc

81 nificantly lower indicators of diet quality (Healthy Eating Index and Mean Adequacy Ratio) and intake

82 2 dietary indexes: the modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index and the Diet Risk Score.

83 scoring in the top quintile of the Alternate Healthy Eating Index or bottom quintile of a Western-typ

84 In addition, the Healthy Eating Index provides a single summary measure o

85 ealthy Eating Index-2005, although Alternate Healthy Eating Index results were similar.

86 healthier quintiles of modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index scores had a significantly lower ri

87 e scores (0-6 points) were assigned based on Healthy Eating Index scores, physical activity (metaboli

88 lifestyles (smoking, physical activity, and Healthy Eating Index).

89 rsus lowest quintile of modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index).

90 Health guidelines, diet quality by using the Healthy Eating Index, and weight-loss intention and phys

91 xes-the Healthy Eating Index-2005, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, Mediterranean Diet Score, and Reco

92 lthy criterion met: high-scoring Alternative Healthy Eating Index, physically active, healthy body ma

93 ween 2 index-based dietary patterns [ie, the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) and alternate Medit

94 to a Mediterranean dietary pattern or to the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) is associated with

95 sociation between 3 diet quality indices-the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005), Alternate Healthy

96 omparing the highest scores with the lowest: Healthy Eating Index-2005 (relative risk (RR) = 0.72, 95

97 In women, reduced risk was found with the Healthy Eating Index-2005 and increased risk with the me

98 The authors compared how four indexes-the Healthy Eating Index-2005, Alternate Healthy Eating Inde

99 nificantly decreased risk was found with the Healthy Eating Index-2005, although Alternate Healthy Ea

100 >/=1 CGM variable was associated with higher Healthy Eating Index-2005, whole plant food density, fib

101 idlife was ascertained using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010) and Alternate Medi

102 lthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005), Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010), and alternate Med

103 ranean Diet Score (aMED) and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010).

104 ned association of 3 diet-quality indicators-Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI), Whole Plant Foods Densi

105 ents and micronutrients, 2) dietary quality [Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI)], and 3) beverage catego

106 the association of two dietary indices, the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) and the alternate M

107 of the following 4 diet-quality indexes [the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010), the Alternative HE

108 Healthy Eating Index-2010 score, which we used to assess

109 d refined grain intake contributed to higher Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores among HIP participants

110 week, diet in the top 40% of the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010, and 0.1 to 14.9 g/day of alco

111 cipants, as measured by a modified Alternate Healthy Eating Index.

112 t risk have focused on specific nutrients or healthy eating indexes but not on identifiable dietary g

113 ard beta [std. beta] = 0.250, p = 0.005) and healthy eating intentions (std. beta = 0.178, p = 0.041)

114 We assessed whether healthy eating lowers the risk of CVD and all-cause mort

115 y shows that promoting the MDP as a model of healthy eating may help to prevent weight gain and the d

116 A healthy eating pattern geared for promotion of optimal c

117 The healthy eating pattern reduced risks of diabetes and maj

118 to increase physical activity and encourage healthy eating patterns among children.

119 limited evidence for an association between healthy eating patterns and greater lymphocyte prolifera

120 BACKGROUND & AIMS: Healthy eating patterns assessed by diet quality indexes

121 Our results provide limited evidence that healthy eating patterns contribute to enhanced immune fu

122 Given the importance of developing healthy eating patterns during early childhood, policies

123 rovide participants with educational advice, healthy eating recipes and other materials.

124 Diet quality estimated adherence to healthy eating recommendations and was assessed by using

125 nd income.Between 1997 and 2012, barriers to healthy eating remained highly prevalent (>/=20%) in the

126 York and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Healthy Eating Research program.

127 Self-efficacy for healthy eating (standard beta [std. beta] = 0.250, p = 0

128 assess trends in prevalence of 6 barriers to healthy eating (taste, price, daily habits, time, lack o

129 Beyond state-of-the-art drug treatment, healthy eating was associated with a lower risk of CVD a

130 Healthy eating was suggested as a way to take a stand ag

131 on labeling is a prominent policy to promote healthy eating.We aimed to evaluate the effects of 2 int

132 experiences involving physical activity and healthy eating were equally used.

133 girls may try to convey a good impression of healthy eating when eating with same-sex friends, but th

134 d flavors may go a long way toward promoting healthy eating, which could have a significant impact in

135 It was hypothesized that aligning healthy eating with important and widely shared adolesce