ライフサイエンスコーパス: hearing-impaired

1 and Phex genes, were found to be profoundly hearing impaired.

2 both outer and middle ears, these mice were hearing impaired.

3 in noisy environments and especially for the hearing impaired.

4 tely deaf, whereas Ysb/Ysb mice are severely hearing impaired.

5 Homozygous mutant mice are severely hearing impaired.

6 wild-type mice, yet CaBP4(-/-) mice are not hearing-impaired.

7 ddressed issues of relevance to the lives of hearing-impaired adults, especially on the impact of a h

8 Mif knockout mice are hearing impaired and demonstrate altered innervation to

9 d hmw-knockout flies and found that they are hearing impaired and male sterile.

10 h one in every 1000 children born profoundly hearing impaired and many progressive forms diagnosed la

11 use of sound localization by normal hearing, hearing impaired, and blind individuals and the special

12 ifferences) and distance for normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and aided listeners.

13 irections in the treatment of the profoundly hearing impaired are discussed.

14 They were severely hearing-impaired, as shown by elevated auditory brainste

15 Primary neurons of hearing-impaired cats displayed structural abnormalities

16 Literature on psychopathology in hearing-impaired children and adolescents is scarce and

17 Literature consistently demonstrated that hearing-impaired children and adolescents were more pron

18 Yet, for hearing-impaired children and adolescents, the exact occ

19 ons of the model for predicting loudness for hearing-impaired ears have been developed and have been

20 The majority of the hearing-impaired family members did not display progress

21 In this kindred, the hearing-impaired family members have prelingual bilatera

22 h whole-exome sequencing of DNA samples from hearing-impaired family members, a nonsense mutation c.3

23 conductive component existed for 50% of the hearing-impaired family members.

24 tal findings in comparing the performance of hearing-impaired (HI) and normal-hearing (NH) listeners.

25 ce in speech-reception thresholds (SRTs) for hearing-impaired (HI) listeners fitted with individualiz

26 peripheral differences between NH and these hearing-impaired (HI) listeners so that central effects

27 mmunication for both normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners.

28 tial benefits of T-F masking methods for the hearing impaired in light of the processing constraints

29 Through whole-exome sequencing of a hearing-impaired individual from each family, missense m

30 ledge in the future to help and support each hearing-impaired individual.

31 st a need to evaluate vestibular function in hearing impaired individuals, especially those who exhib

32 All audiograms from hearing-impaired individuals displayed sloping curves, w

33 Hearing-impaired individuals experience difficulties in

34 The same clinical phenotype in hearing-impaired individuals, even those within the same

35 aided sentence recognition scores for the 27 hearing impaired listeners.

36 Potential implications for studying SRM in hearing-impaired listeners are discussed.

37 In general, hearing-impaired listeners do less well in experiments m

38 planation for why cochlear-implant users and hearing-impaired listeners exhibit reduced or absent mas

39 lties experienced by both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in reverberant spaces.

40 er frequency selectivity experienced by many hearing-impaired listeners leads to less access to indiv

41 lp to explain why perceptual difficulties in hearing-impaired listeners often emerge in noisy situati

42 ocessing deficits, and age on the ability of hearing-impaired listeners to understand speech in noisy

43 sity over time is particularly difficult for hearing-impaired listeners with a sensorineural hearing

44 oduced the absolute thresholds of individual hearing-impaired listeners with an average root-mean-squ

45 magnitude of the auditory bandwidths for the hearing-impaired listeners, which suggests the possibili

46 d the JND in SNR for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

47 speech communication for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

48 ons of modulated noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

49 g the auditory-filter characteristics of the hearing-impaired listeners.

50 A similar phenotype is observed in hearing-impaired members of Family 1070 with non-syndrom

51 For hearing-impaired participants listening via a simulated

52 inquency were elevated in some, but not all, hearing-impaired participants, for reasons related to se

53 ions have close parallels with those seen in hearing-impaired patients.

54 ts to assess gain, output, and audibility in hearing-impaired patients.

55 to improvement in therapeutic approaches for hearing-impaired patients.

56 us, 8 unaffected offspring, and 4 spouses of hearing-impaired pedigree members.

57 in background noise, the major complaint of hearing-impaired persons.

58 Elderly hearing-impaired subjects trained for 8 weeks on a CL ga

59 Twenty-two hearing-impaired subjects were tested, and the stimulate

60 ockout mice and airway epithelial cells from hearing-impaired subjects with pendrin loss of function