ライフサイエンスコーパス: helix axis

1 outward from histone octamers along the DNA helix axis.

2 p, the conserved crevice faces away from the helix axis.

3 an anisotropic, directional bend in the DNA helix axis.

4 atic potential gradient perpendicular to the helix axis.

5 about 35 degrees and displaced 3 A from the helix axis.

6 an exposed continuous strip parallel to the helix axis.

7 ely free of any assumptions about an overall helix axis.

8 ibiting the largest, and consequently a bent helix axis.

9 e minor groove with its face parallel to the helix axis.

10 pairs, narrowed minor groove, and a straight helix axis.

11 ix and contains a channel that runs down the helix axis.

12 and a translation of 8.6 angstroms along the helix axis.

13 n angles differing by 180 degrees around the helix axis.

14 om the plane perpendicular to the fiber (DNA helix) axis.

15 When the helix axis achieved a approximately 50 degrees angle wit

16 aintaining a constant oblique angle with the helix axis and experiencing twist and bend.

17 e duplexes are translated by 3.4 A along the helix axis and rotated by 10.8 degrees relative to each

18 Tyr 15 and Tyr 39 project along the subunit helix axis, and one phenoxyl engages in hydrogen-bonding

19 the distribution of polar residues about the helix axis are discussed.

20 near base-pairs 3-5, and an overall bend in helix axis, as has long been noted.

21 Mg(2+) leads to a significant bending of the helix axis at the base of the Specifier Loop domain, but

22 e bulges while causing profound kinks in the helix axis at the bulges.

23 The structure shows an overall helix axis bend of 19 degrees in a geometry consistent w

24 n the major groove becomes narrower, the DNA helix axis bends around the major groove.

25 A bend in the helix axis between the SL1 stems on either side of the i

26 al, but vary in the rotation angle about the helix axis by approximately 5 degrees.

27 The helix axis containing His(46), the site of guanylylation

28 s approach allows simultaneous estimation of helix axis deflection magnitude and direction when a tes

29 terocomplex formation with minimal change in helix axis direction at the polymer joint.

30 However, although the helix axis displacement is approximately 4.6 A into the

31 ual boxes cause a substantial kinking of the helix axis, estimated to be 90 (+/- 10) degrees.

32 s presented that quantifies and projects the helix axis evolution over time, with the choice of unifo

33 ees and the rotational pitch angle about the helix axis for residue Ala29 omegaAla29=-59.8(+/-9.9) de

34 a hydrophobic surface that winds around the helix axis in a right-handed fashion.

35 s nearly equatorially from the subunit alpha-helix axis, in contrast to the more axial orientations f

36 The length along the helix axis is about 30 A and the inner pore diameter var

37 d phospholipid bilayer samples show that the helix axis is parallel to the plane of the bilayers.

38 acing between the nucleotide pairs along the helix axis is shorter, suggesting a mixed B/A structure.

39 with DNA lead to substantial bending of the helix axis may facilitate such distortions through solva

40 The helix axis of the bound DNA oligomer is bent by about 30

41 strategic positions about the putative alpha-helix axis of the extracellular juxtamembrane region.

42 channel 29 nm in diameter running along the helix axis of the right-handed PC.

43 idealized A-form helices (iH1 and iH2) with helix axis oriented along the molecular Z-direction runn

44 parate DNA binding clefts with a modeled DNA helix axis positioned across the CR helices.

45 he interaction surfaces are smoother and the helix axis separations are closer in the amino-terminal

46 ively charged bacterial phospholipids with a helix axis that is aligned flat on a lipid bilayer surfa

47 helicoid and remaining perpendicular to the helix axis; the structure is called a chiral nematic.

48 r populations assume an orientation with the helix axis tilted by approximately 23 degrees with respe

49 es are flipped out and away from the octamer helix axis to form base-pairing interactions with a seco

50 ckbone carbonyl groups tilting away from the helix axis toward the ions located in the central lumen.

51 groove along with a >18 degrees bend in the helix axis toward the major groove.

52 ementary strands are displaced away from the helix axis toward the minor groove of the heteroduplex,

53 Furthermore, the orientation about the helix axis was also determined within an error of +/- 30

54 degrees, thus reversing the direction of the helix axis within a very short distance.

55 The base pairs were situated directly on the helix axis (X-displacement = -0.2 A).

56 l base pairs are all displaced away from the helix axis, yielding significant changes in local backbo