ライフサイエンスコーパス: hemianopia

1 All participants had homonymous hemianopia.

2 ing the efficacy of prismatic treatments for hemianopia.

3 e could be visualized at longer durations of hemianopia.

4 neuritis, and residual vision in homonymous hemianopia.

5 w pointed to the side contralateral to their hemianopia.

6 ive mobility rehabilitation intervention for hemianopia.

7 ere shifted contralaterally in patients with hemianopia alone and ipsilaterally in patients with hemi

8 6 patients with adult-acquired or congenital hemianopia and 12 age-matched controls.

9 point were also shifted contralaterally with hemianopia and ipsilaterally with hemi-neglect.

10 how the degeneration varies with duration of hemianopia and location of insult.

11 training, shown to improve visual fields in hemianopia and optic nerve damage, might comprise such a

12 ological disorders like hemispatial neglect, hemianopia and other deficits after stroke.

13 maging, with particular reference to work on hemianopia and the controversial suggestion of cortical

14 Thirty-three patients with homonymous hemianopias and 50 normal subjects were tested with SAP

15 ients' test times were 40 seconds longer for hemianopias and 90 seconds longer for optic neuropathies

16 n the first SITA standard test by 0.82 dB in hemianopias and by 0.71 dB in optic neuropathy patients.

17 patients with an incomplete right homonymous hemianopia, but no reading deficit, viewed single words

18 ted in patients with severe right homonymous hemianopia, commensurate with their inability to perform

19 Hemianopia commonly complicates stroke and, less frequen

20 eaders and have shown how a right homonymous hemianopia disrupts the motor preparation of reading sac

21 Patients with stable, homonymous hemianopia due to unilateral occipital infarcts and cont

22 e 18 years or older with complete homonymous hemianopia for at least 3 months and without visual negl

23 ficantly greater in the controls than in the hemianopia groups (P < 0.001).

24 Patients with hemianopias had lesions of the retrochiasmal visual syst

25 The mean RNT in the eyes with temporal hemianopia (here called the 'crossing-fibre defect' eyes

26 The mean RNT in eyes with nasal hemianopia (here called the 'non-crossing-fibre defect'

27 in a group of seven patients with homonymous hemianopia; here a negative straight line relationship w

28 designed to examine the effect of homonymous hemianopia (HH) on detection of pedestrian figures in mu

29 The hypothesis that drivers with homonymous hemianopia (HH) would take a lane position that increase

30 al nerve fibre loss in congenital homonymous hemianopia in humans is well recognized from clinical ob

31 Homonymous hemianopia is the commonest form of acquired homonymous

32 of the OT occurs in acquired and congenital hemianopia, is correlated with visual field loss, and is

33 age to the primary visual cortex (V1) causes hemianopia, many patients retain some residual vision; k

34 However, defects in patients with hemianopias may be missed because of the presence of sca

35 ith left hemianopia, two patients with right hemianopia, nine patients with left hemi-neglect and nin

36 age >18 years at time of testing; homonymous hemianopia; no other ophthalmic or neurological disorder

37 Patients with an acquired homonymous hemianopia often adapt over a period of a few months to

38 0 volunteers (100%) successfully simulated a hemianopia on the first and second fields.

39 Nine study participants (15%) demonstrated hemianopia or quadrantanopia, and an additional 36% had

40 Sensitivities were higher in patients with hemianopias or optic neuropathies using SITA standard co

41 No patient had isolated gaze paresis, hemianopia, or neglect.

42 t for the optic neuropathy patients; for the hemianopia patients the difference in values were betwee

43 direct future rehabilitation strategies for hemianopia patients.

44 Dyslexia, incomplete homonymous hemianopia, preserved color identification with abnormal

45 seen with FDT testing in some patients with hemianopia, probably due to light scatter across the ver

46 ed, resulting in a complete right homonymous hemianopia, rightward saccades during text reading are d

47 In the patients with hemianopia, scattered abnormal test locations with FDT t

48 row pointed to the side ipsilateral to their hemianopia than they did when the arrow pointed to the s

49 tween the Matrix and SAP in the detection of hemianopias, the sensitivity of SAP was higher, probably

50 ng line bisection in five patients with left hemianopia, two patients with right hemianopia, nine pat

51 nts with a relative homonymous or bitemporal hemianopia were tested with both conventional perimetry

52 Two people with homonymous right hemianopias were tested on a number of measures of non-c

53 re alexia ("alexia without agraphia") and no hemianopia, who read words slowly using a letter-by-lett