ライフサイエンスコーパス: hemodynamically

1 PHP is a hemodynamically active nitric oxide scavenger.

2 8-fold increased deletion frequency and the hemodynamically affected (worse affected) PAD limb had a

3 PAD but in a distribution not limited to the hemodynamically affected limb.

4 cantly from their never-affected peers, both hemodynamically and electrophysiologically.

5 ion, and approximately 10% will decompensate hemodynamically and suffer high mortality, though identi

6 perflubron administration was well tolerated hemodynamically and was not associated with deterioratio

7 Development of chronic PH was confirmed hemodynamically, and animals were randomized to intratra

8 renal, and echocardiographic evaluations and hemodynamically assessed at euthanization.

9 ovascular coupling after stroke can confound hemodynamically based measurements of functional connect

10 Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is hemodynamically classified as pre-capillary (as seen in

11 overall transplant population, p < 0.05) and hemodynamically comprising rejection episodes (1.3 +/- 1

12 ent surgery continues to be the standard for hemodynamically compromised patients with blunt hepatic

13 Hemodynamically compromised patients with pelvic fractur

14 he first diagnosis of SBP, the proportion of hemodynamically compromised patients with systolic arter

15 d SBP, NSBBs increase the proportion who are hemodynamically compromised, time of hospitalization, an

16 helpful in detecting the human fetus that is hemodynamically compromised.

17 an ameliorative influence of pravastatin on hemodynamically compromising rejection after heart trans

18 Despite an increased number of early and hemodynamically compromising rejections, the long-term g

19 nsplant) frequency (p = 0.025) and severity (hemodynamically compromising) (p < 0.01) were independen

20 The demonstration that hemodynamically derived stimuli can be strong modulators

21 , young children may remain well compensated hemodynamically, despite significant blood loss.

22 For patients with recurrent hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular tachycardia an

23 However, epinephrine bolus seems to be hemodynamically detrimental in circumstances of single-v

24 Twenty-nine hemodynamically different states were obtained pharmacol

25 sheep with surgically induced chronic AR, 18 hemodynamically different states were studied.

26 sheep with surgically induced chronic AR, 20 hemodynamically different states were studied.

27 to 20 weeks after surgically induced AR, 22 hemodynamically different states were studied.

28 k is a high-acuity, potentially complex, and hemodynamically diverse state of end-organ hypoperfusion

29 ffers a tool for investigating mechanisms of hemodynamically driven intimal hyperplasia and arterial

30 We speculate that TCPC may result in a more hemodynamically efficient circulation than APA because o

31 In contrast, the administration of AS at a hemodynamically equieffective dose not only failed to at

32 ered robust and elastic artery using a novel hemodynamically-equivalent pulsatile bioreactor.

33 S in restenosis and thrombosis might dictate hemodynamically favorable stent designs and deployment c

34 ation, the animal was permitted to stabilize hemodynamically for 4 mins.

35 d clinical trial testing the hypothesis that hemodynamically guided HF management decreases decompens

36 red SCUF because of congestion refractory to hemodynamically guided intensive medical therapy.

37 Hemodynamically guided management of patients with HF wi

38 4 patients with advanced HF before and after hemodynamically guided therapy with vasodilators and diu

39 othelial nitric oxide synthase was tolerated hemodynamically in patients with PAH.

40 Since a relatively brief treatment with hemodynamically inactive doses of NO donors can induce l

41 s small and may have, in part, been due to a hemodynamically-induced deficit in energy substrates.

42 There was no procedural mortality and only 1 hemodynamically insignificant pericardial effusion was o

43 nic myocardial infarction (MI) is frequently hemodynamically intolerable and associated with multiple

44 niques have been described for unmappable or hemodynamically intolerable VT.

45 0.0009) at the same flow rate in the resting hemodynamically isolated skeletal muscle microcirculatio

46 (RVHF) in which the right ventricle (RV) is hemodynamically loaded, the left ventricle (LV) is hemod

47 eys with prior renal mass reduction triggers hemodynamically mediated processes that damage glomeruli

48 and pentobarbital, mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically monitored, and then challenged with Esch

49 as induced in conscious, fluid-resuscitated, hemodynamically-monitored rats.

50 s those who failed to improve clinically and hemodynamically on calcium channel blockers, were treate

51 cross the conducting system while ensuring a hemodynamically optimal atrioventricular activation sequ

52 ntricular pacing at separately preidentified hemodynamically optimal AV delay (BiV-Opt) enhanced coro

53 40 ms, 120 ms, and separately preidentified hemodynamically optimal AV delay.

54 ing method could serve as an alternative and hemodynamically preferable approach for antibradycardia

55 al coherence tomography (OCT) in identifying hemodynamically severe coronary stenoses as determined b

56 oderate diagnostic efficiency in identifying hemodynamically severe coronary stenoses.

57 Of 546 arterial segments, 148 (27.1%) had a hemodynamically significant (>/= 50%) stenosis.

58 Hemodynamically significant (>50%) stenoses were identif

59 nd decreased an average of 6.3% +/- 2.1 when hemodynamically significant (>70%) stenosis of the super

60 Thirty-eight (41%) vessels were deemed hemodynamically significant (>90% stenosis or FFR</=0.80

61 y (CT) coronary angiography for detection of hemodynamically significant (>or=50%) stenoses by using

62 cm2/m2<indexed EOA< or =0.85 cm2/m2), or not hemodynamically significant (indexed EOA >0.85 cm2/m2).

63 ies were 97% and 89%, respectively, and, for hemodynamically significant abnormalities, 92% and 77%.

64 owed correct diagnosis of 22 (92%) of the 24 hemodynamically significant abnormalities.

65 in either kidney; this patient had bilateral hemodynamically significant accessory artery stenoses.

66 s, and challenges in determining if a PDA is hemodynamically significant and clinically relevant.

67 ome of a large, asymptomatic population with hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis (AS).

68 Most patients with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant AS will develop symptoms wit

69 plaque rupture accelerate the progression of hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic lesions.

70 Hemodynamically significant CAD was diagnosed in 116 (41

71 crimination vs CT alone for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant CAD when FFR determined at t

72 liable stenosis-specific method to determine hemodynamically significant CAD.

73 ccuracy of SPECT, PET, and CCTA in detecting hemodynamically significant CAD.

74 are no uniformly accepted cutoff values for hemodynamically significant CAD.

75 ld standard in the management of symptomatic hemodynamically significant carotid stenoses.

76 Nineteen women (38%) were known to have hemodynamically significant coarctation during pregnancy

77 during their pregnancy, 11 of whom (73%) had hemodynamically significant coarctation during that time

78 emission tomography can accurately rule out hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease and

79 Hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease is a

80 fractional flow reserve for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

81 asive fractional flow reserve for evaluating hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

82 te of moderate or severe cellular rejection, hemodynamically significant graft dysfunction, a second

83 present the case of a 50-year-old woman with hemodynamically significant humoral rejection resistant

84 tients (17%), moderate in 168 (43%), and not hemodynamically significant in 154 (40%).

85 kidneys and the percentage of patients with hemodynamically significant isolated stenoses of accesso

86 serve, and RFR were lower for vessels with a hemodynamically significant lesion (2.01+/-0.78 versus 2

87 Development of a hemodynamically significant lesion following renal arter

88 ated on for mitral regurgitation as a single hemodynamically significant lesion were studied.

89 While FFR identifies hemodynamically significant lesions likely to produce is

90 ed to avoid the development of what may be a hemodynamically significant level of auto-PEEP.

91 ismatch (80+/-3% and 65+/-5%; P=0.026) or no hemodynamically significant mismatch (85+/-3% and 74+/-5

92 (P=0.0008) than patients with moderate or no hemodynamically significant mismatch.

93 idence interval 1.3 to 7.4; P=0.009) than no hemodynamically significant mismatch.

94 op an easily measured screening variable for hemodynamically significant MR.

95 surgical) (6 [8.0%] of 75) device closure of hemodynamically significant muscular VSDs.

96 yocardial infarction, even in the absence of hemodynamically significant obstruction of left ventricu

97 in right ventricular hypertrophy, confirming hemodynamically significant PAH.

98 Of 754 infants with hemodynamically significant PDA (mean [standard deviatio

99 h clinical and echocardiography diagnoses of hemodynamically significant PDA was conducted at 3 terti

100 -alpha) levels are elevated in patients with hemodynamically significant pressure and volume overload

101 In patients with hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism, physiolo

102 Fifteen pigs after 6 weeks of hemodynamically significant RAS were studied before and

103 bility from using poststenotic PSV to detect hemodynamically significant renal arterial stenoses, but

104 eater than 20% was present in 36 (59%) of 52 hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses, and s

105 Eighty-seven kidneys in 68 patients had hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses.

106 scularization, which indicated that they had hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses.

107 y improving sensitivity for and depiction of hemodynamically significant shunts and valvular regurgit

108 s was present in nine (75%) of 12 unilateral hemodynamically significant stenoses but in only one con

109 Electron-beam CT angiography can depict hemodynamically significant stenoses in the LAD and LCX

110 Identification of hemodynamically significant stenoses may be confounded b

111 interventions, which are indicated whenever hemodynamically significant stenoses occur.

112 Two patients had coexistent hemodynamically significant stenoses of accessory and ma

113 gioplasty (CAS) is increasingly utilized for hemodynamically significant stenoses of the extracranial

114 overall sensitivity of electron-beam CT for hemodynamically significant stenoses was 88%, and specif

115 our accessory arteries in three patients had hemodynamically significant stenoses.

116 nsitive test in predicting the presence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis and that shunt stat

117 Hemodynamically significant stenosis in at least 1 coron

118 The prevalence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis isolated to an acce

119 rtension and (b) angiographically documented hemodynamically significant stenosis of any renal artery

120 In patients with unilateral hemodynamically significant stenosis or occlusion, mean

121 Hemodynamically significant stenosis was confirmed in 19

122 present in 71 of 72 (99%) cases in which no hemodynamically significant stenosis was seen.

123 sufficiency was eliminated without producing hemodynamically significant stenosis.

124 sfactory image quality and excellent NPV for hemodynamically significant stenosis.

125 symptoms occur in only 50% of patients with hemodynamically significant SVC obstruction.

126 tients treated with surgical reconstruction, hemodynamically significant TRAS occurred at or within 1

127 demonstrating whether a coronary stenosis is hemodynamically significant.

128 rity stenosis and an FFR <0.75 considered as hemodynamically significant.

129 ients, specifically examining the effects on hemodynamically significant/fatal graft rejection, coron

130 Statins also decreased the odds of hemodynamically significant/fatal rejection (odds ratio,

131 tory support (FM) and the remaining 132 were hemodynamically stable (NFM).

132 l variables that trigger RBC transfusions in hemodynamically stable adults and children.

133 Consecutive patients who were hemodynamically stable after pulmonary endarterectomy we

134 Adrenaline use in hemodynamically stable anaphylaxis patient was independe

135 Adrenaline use in hemodynamically stable anaphylaxis patients was associat

136 Among these, 21 (37.5%) were hemodynamically stable and allowed mapping of the circui

137 patients with saddle pulmonary embolism are hemodynamically stable and do not require thrombolytic t

138 Patients who were hemodynamically stable and had no signs of peritonitis w

139 Nine hemodynamically stable and optimally hydrated infants we

140 ring a 15-month period, 78 patients who were hemodynamically stable and required no immediate surgery

141 on among hospitalized adult patients who are hemodynamically stable and the length of time RBCs shoul

142 On postoperative day two the patient was hemodynamically stable and weaning off mechanical ventil

143 dels produce acute hypoxemia in an otherwise hemodynamically stable animal.

144 In situ splitting of selected livers from hemodynamically stable cadaveric donors was performed at

145 rial (April 2012-May 2015) that involved 975 hemodynamically stable children and adolescents younger

146 Among hemodynamically stable children treated in an ED followi

147 ements of Li-CCO and Li-PCO were made during hemodynamically stable conditions.

148 venous lactate concentrations are similar in hemodynamically stable critically ill patients, b) Even

149 Dogs in the 10 nm group remained hemodynamically stable during all BAL treatments, wherea

150 -linked immunosorbent assay.All animals were hemodynamically stable during the experimental procedure

151 tensive after blunt abdominal trauma and not hemodynamically stable enough to undergo diagnostic CT,

152 hylactic IABP strategy after primary PTCA in hemodynamically stable high risk patients with AMI does

153 In 14 consecutive patients with hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycard

154 em blockers to improve long-term survival in hemodynamically stable myocardial infarction patients wi

155 n in the United States for older adults with hemodynamically stable NSTEMI and outcomes associated wi

156 maps that are a useful guide for ablation of hemodynamically stable or unstable VT.

157 ment, we found measurements of PPG in awake, hemodynamically stable patients at least 24 hours after

158 Twenty hemodynamically stable patients undergoing mechanical ve

159 ica, on performing a mandatory sternotomy in hemodynamically stable patients was that a sternotomy wa

160 evaluation and decision-making algorithm for hemodynamically stable patients who sustained abdominal

161 Hemodynamically stable patients with a grade IV or V BRI

162 All hemodynamically stable patients with a hemopericardium c

163 pressures but not increase cardiac output in hemodynamically stable patients with a variety of causes

164 ought to assess whether use of adrenaline in hemodynamically stable patients with anaphylaxis could p

165 rative management could safely be applied to hemodynamically stable patients with blunt hepatic injur

166 Between January 2009 and July 2011, 171 hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injur

167 ents with intrinsic splenic pathology, and 6 hemodynamically stable patients with isolated stab wound

168 tabolic status may be particularly useful in hemodynamically stable patients with mild-to-moderate lu

169 spiral CT plays a valuable role in selecting hemodynamically stable patients with splenic vascular in

170 tive transfusion threshold for hospitalized, hemodynamically stable patients with the acute coronary

171 d as a single combined procedure in 13 (93%) hemodynamically stable patients, and there was no periop

172 erial (triple-contrast) was performed in 200 hemodynamically stable patients, including 169 men (age

173 rocedure artificial nutrition was started in hemodynamically stable patients, stimulating oral intake

174 least 24 hours after placement to TIPS into hemodynamically stable patients, without sedation (early

175 s been a paradigm shift in the management of hemodynamically stable patients.

176 ombolytics or catheter thrombectomy even for hemodynamically stable patients.

177 ot result in significant cortical hypoxia in hemodynamically stable piglets.

178 ipopolysaccharide-induced hyperlactatemia in hemodynamically stable rats is caused by a net decrease

179 isk of sudden cardiac death in patients with hemodynamically stable sustained ventricular tachycardia

180 e post-angiography follow-up the patient was hemodynamically stable the entire time and was treated c

181 support whereas those in Group III remained hemodynamically stable throughout experimentation withou

182 s the sole screening tool to rule out IAI in hemodynamically stable trauma patients, it may be used i

183 ed electrophysiologically guided therapy for hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia after rem

184 y in postinfarction patients presenting with hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia treated w

185 The use of computed tomography (CT) for hemodynamically stable victims of penetrating torso trau

186 Patients were hemodynamically stable with no need for cardiopulmonary

187 pulmonary embolism, including those who were hemodynamically stable with right ventricular dysfunctio

188 to patients with pulmonary embolism who are hemodynamically stable without right ventricular dysfunc

189 lactated Ringer's solution in normal adults (hemodynamically stable) does not falsely increase circul

190 donors (16-40 yr, body mass index >27 kg/m, hemodynamically stable) or "standard" donors (as traditi

191 ent a computed tomography scan (if they were hemodynamically stable) or immediate celiotomy (if they

192 When patients were hemodynamically stable, a TED probe was placed into the

193 patients who did not have peritonitis, were hemodynamically stable, and had a reliable clinical exam

194 ved entrainment/activation mapping if VT was hemodynamically stable, and voltage mapping with electro

195 All patients were hemodynamically stable, had no indication for emergency

196 nded for hospitalized adult patients who are hemodynamically stable, including critically ill patient

197 ire exchanges of central venous catheters in hemodynamically stable, monitored patients.

198 ons; (2) do not transfuse red blood cells in hemodynamically stable, nonbleeding ICU patients with an

199 Intubated, anesthetized, hemodynamically stable, spontaneously breathing piglets

200 rwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of 15 hemodynamically stable, sustained VTs and in whom an IDP

201 without significant medical history and were hemodynamically stable, with normal liver function and s

202 The patient was hemodynamically stable.

203 t was then performed if the patient remained hemodynamically stable.

204 Group 1 was the most hemodynamically stable; the incidence of PRS in group 1

205 ure and is increased in hearts that are more hemodynamically stressed.

206 It was hemodynamically superior to AVN ablation with either r-R

207 the foot and calf together [IPCfoot+calf] is hemodynamically superior to IPC of the foot, its clinica

208 umed that stentless aortic bioprostheses are hemodynamically superior to stented bioprostheses.

209 Hemodynamically, the mean transvalvular gradient signifi

210 Hemodynamically, the rate of pressure change (dP/dt) max

211 acute systemic application of W-7 and H-8 is hemodynamically tolerated and indicate that kinase inhib

212 Ablation of all hemodynamically tolerated arrhythmias should be attempte

213 e after the diagnosis (HR: 2.98; p = 0.028), hemodynamically tolerated sustained monomorphic ventricu

214 enuous exercise after the diagnosis of ARVC, hemodynamically tolerated sustained monomorphic ventricu

215 a primary cure in patients who present with hemodynamically tolerated VT.

216 revious myocardial infarction and recurrent, hemodynamically tolerated VT.

217 A total of 21 VTs, 12 of which were hemodynamically-tolerated and 9 of which were not, were

218 Muscle from the hemodynamically unaffected (less affected) PAD limb show

219 namically loaded, the left ventricle (LV) is hemodynamically unloaded, while both are exposed to the

220 of tests to predict fluid responsiveness in hemodynamically unstable adult patients who were defined

221 test for predicting fluid responsiveness in hemodynamically unstable adults.

222 ge and from donors who were identified to be hemodynamically unstable at the time of organ retrieval.

223 Most of the patients were hemodynamically unstable at the time of pericardiocentes

224 rospective study of T4 in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable children appears warranted.

225 esuscitation may adversely affect outcome in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients.

226 Fifty-one grafts were removed from hemodynamically unstable donors on high-dose vasopressor

227 fits patients with renal failure who are too hemodynamically unstable for intermittent hemodialysis.

228 mixed venous oxygen saturation (S(MV)O2) in hemodynamically unstable intensive care patients and, ad

229 in the management of patients with multiple hemodynamically unstable monomorphic VTs.

230 For patients who are hemodynamically unstable or highly symptomatic or who ha

231 s was that the proportion of donors who were hemodynamically unstable or marginal in other ways was t

232 Hemodynamically unstable organ donors without clinically

233 In the hemodynamically unstable patient healthcare providers sh

234 g gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly in hemodynamically unstable patients and in cases with susp

235 Hemodynamically unstable patients followed similar patte

236 hypothermia could be a therapeutic option in hemodynamically unstable patients independent of cardiac

237 ere have been concerns that early feeding in hemodynamically unstable patients might cause bowel infa

238 The response to iNO in hemodynamically unstable patients with acute right heart

239 In hemodynamically unstable patients with new onset AF, con

240 , be used with caution when extrapolating to hemodynamically unstable patients.

241 c, n = 11) with structural heart disease and hemodynamically unstable VT were performed with either p

242 -organ perfusion despite extended periods of hemodynamically unstable VT.

243 ry interventions, were sedated, unconscious, hemodynamically unstable, developmentally delayed for th

244 Patients who were hemodynamically unstable, unevaluable, peritonitic, or e

245 stable) or immediate celiotomy (if they were hemodynamically unstable- blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg)

246 fter AMI, and were excluded if patients were hemodynamically unstable.

247 y challenging, particularly when they become hemodynamically unstable.

248 te control of hemorrhage, the patient became hemodynamically unstable.

249 present in 21.8% of patients, and 40.2% were hemodynamically unstable.

250 icular ejection fraction < 0.45 were studied hemodynamically using echocardiography and blood pressur

251 ntilation with perfiubron was well tolerated hemodynamically, was not associated with deterioration o