ライフサイエンスコーパス: hernia repair

1 surgical techniques available for parastomal hernia repair.

2 e products for specific applications such as hernia repair.

3 ith umb/epi and 256 patients with incisional hernia repair.

4 rnight stays after laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair.

5 ntralateral inguinal ring during ipsilateral hernia repair.

6 d forces to the midline wound at the time of hernia repair.

7 d failure rate observed following incisional hernia repair.

8 ctors on proficiency in laparoscopic or open hernia repair.

9 A total of 1983 patients underwent hernia repair.

10 rence and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic hernia repair.

11 f complications and recurrence after ventral hernia repair.

12 fferences in patient recovery after LA or GA hernia repair.

13 oscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.

14 symptomatic cord lipomas after laparoscopic hernia repair.

15 ed with visceral complications or failure of hernia repair.

16 or hematoma, and 11 patients (2.7%) required hernia repair.

17 in traditional or laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair.

18 urgical outcome in patients after incisional hernia repair.

19 h materials used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repair.

20 All included studies performed Lichtenstein hernia repair.

21 pain and stiffness in open anterior inguinal hernia repair.

22 caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin hernia repair.

23 idity and mortality associated with emergent hernia repair.

24 72 in cholecystectomy, and 0.060 in inguinal hernia repair.

25 ive alternative to currently used meshes for hernia repair.

26 omposite approach performed best for ventral hernia repair.

27 se to polypropylene meshes commonly used for hernia repair.

28 Laparoscopic or open ventral incisional hernia repair.

29 toneal (TAPP), or modified Lichtenstein (ML) hernia repairs.

30 ins an appropriate solution for most ventral hernia repairs.

31 onal herniation and its effect on incisional hernia repairs.

32 25.5 (Southern sub-Saharan Africa) per 1000 hernia repairs.

33 ncreasingly used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repairs.

34 o 33.9 (central sub-Saharan Africa) per 1000 hernia repairs.

35 e use of sutures vs mesh for primary ventral hernia repairs.

36 tectomy (48.5%), appendectomy (16.2%), groin hernia repair (10.0%), abdominal exploration (nontrauma)

37 than PRA (16.1% vs 0%, P=0.022) and need for hernia repair (12.9% vs 0%, P=0.050), respectively.

38 Of patients undergoing incisional hernia repair, 12.3% underwent at least one subsequent r

39 mmonly in the analyzed hospitalizations were hernia repairs (15.7%), bariatric (10.5%), mastectomy (9

40 er colectomy or proctectomy (18.1%), ventral hernia repair (16.7%), and hysterectomy (13.4%).

41 er colectomy or proctectomy (25.8%), ventral hernia repair (26.5%), hysterectomy (28.8%), arthroplast

42 ty-nine patients were randomized to LA or GA hernia repair; 276 of these had an operation, with 138 p

43 access and 577,680 for non-critical access; hernia repair, 4291 for critical access and 300,410 for

44 orbidity than the standard approach: ventral hernia repair (58% for the composite vs 8% for the stand

45 ection, laparoscopic gastric bypass, ventral hernia repair, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and low

46 l procedures (2008-2009): colectomy, ventral hernia repair, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and low

47 sed to assess the hazard ratio (HR) of groin hernia repair according to age, tumor risk category, and

48 dicate an increase in the incidence of groin hernia repair after radical prostatectomy.

49 However, rates of emergent incisional hernia repair among older men rose significantly, with 7

50 %-6.9%) for patients who underwent open mesh hernia repair and 3.7% (95% CI, 2.8%-4.6%) for patients

51 dence concerning incidence rates of emergent hernia repair and changes with time are unknown.

52 in this study who underwent complex ventral hernia repair and may serve as a suitable target for scr

53 Techniques for hernia repair and mesh design should take into account a

54 ted to identify articles relating to ventral hernia repairs and the use of prosthetics in herniorrhap

55 lated for selected subcategories of emergent hernia repairs and time trends were evaluated.

56 r readmission, repeat AAA repair, incisional hernia repair, and lower extremity amputation.

57 omy, total hip or knee arthroplasty, ventral hernia repair, and lower extremity vascular bypass.

58 femoral hernia repair, appendectomy, ventral hernia repair, and partial colectomy), the proportion of

59 asily overlooked at the time of laparoscopic hernia repair, and this can lead to an unsatisfactory re

60 tacks, lack of prostate pathology, recurrent hernia repairs, and bilateral hernia repairs were signif

61 training (cholecystectomy, inguinal/femoral hernia repair, appendectomy, ventral hernia repair, and

62 and traditional preperitoneal approaches to hernia repair are analogous in principle and outcome and

63 aroscopic and open techniques for incisional hernia repair are recognized treatment options with pros

64 hese increasing rates of emergent incisional hernia repair are troublesome owing to the significantly

65 excluded were those who underwent umbilical hernia repair as a part of another major planned procedu

66 SSIs increased for both cholecystectomy and hernia repair as the quantile of total costs increased (

67 me (PHS) places patients undergoing elective hernia repair at increased risk for adverse postoperativ

68 secutive patients who underwent open ventral hernia repair at Penn State Milton S.

69 ten used as an outcome measure after ventral hernia repair, but it is unknown whether reoperation rat

70 pertension, cataract surgeries, and inguinal hernia repair, but the patient is otherwise healthy.

71 surgical procedures (ie, ventral incisional hernia repair, colectomy, reflux surgery, bariatric surg

72 go elective cholecystectomy (study group) or hernia repair (controls) at 2 hospitals.

73 GA hernia repair cost 4% more than the same operation under

74 my, pancreatectomy, cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair, craniotomy, hip replacement, or knee repl

75 tegies: elective laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (ELHR) or watchful waiting (WW).

76 .0 [33.0] procedures per year), and inguinal hernia repair for children younger than 6 months of age

77 One hundred patients who underwent ventral hernia repair from 2010-2011 at an academic health care

78 umbilical/epigastric (umb/epi) or incisional hernia repair from a regional area of 2 million inhabita

79 ased significantly after separation of parts hernia repair from an average of 7640 to 8166 mL (P=0.01

80 terior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and hernia repair from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 201

81 pinal fusion, appendectomy, eye enucleation, hernia repair, hand surgery, tonsillectomy and therapeut

82 Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has created a niche for both expanded poly

83 Rising rates of abdominal wall hernia repair have been described; however, population-b

84 ginal cholecystectomies, appendectomies, and hernia repairs, have been performed.

85 g, number of previous abdominal surgeries or hernia repairs, hernia defect size, and operative time.

86 uinal hernia repair (LIH), and open inguinal hernia repair (IH).

87 in 25 (16 after radiotherapy), mesh ventral hernia repair in 21, and other causes in 29.

88 plications following elective abdominal wall hernia repair in a population with complete follow-up.

89 ultrasonography-guided BRSB after umbilical hernia repair in children is associated with lower media

90 logic prosthetics are reasonable options for hernia repair in contaminated fields and for large abdom

91 The TEP procedure for primary inguinal hernia repair in men is associated with a low frequency

92 ure rates, obviating the need for subsequent hernia repair in most patients.

93 ment syndrome is a feared complication after hernia repair in patients with a "loss of abdominal doma

94 s, and biologic prosthetics used for ventral hernia repair in terms of mechanics, cost, and the ideal

95 hort study including all elective incisional hernia repairs in Denmark from January 1, 2007, to Decem

96 ll closures, resulting in 200,000 incisional hernia repairs in the United States each year.

97 techniques have been developed for inguinal hernia repair, including the transabdominal preperitonea

98 The use of synthetic mesh in incisional hernia repairs increased from 34.2% in 1987 to 65.5% in

99 Laparoscopic hernia repair involves the fixation of the prosthetic me

100 Inguinal hernia repair is a common operative procedure.

101 edominant factor in successful preperitoneal hernia repair is adequate dissection with complete expos

102 Incisional hernia repair is associated with high cumulative rates o

103 Laparoscopic hernia repair is infrequently used and associated with l

104 Umbilical hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed gene

105 Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed oper

106 Inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure in general su

107 LA hernia repair is thought to be safer for patients, cause

108 asure was the rate of reoperative incisional hernia repair, length of hospitalization, and hospital c

109 cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIH), and open inguinal hernia repair (IH

110 Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR), using a transabdominal preperitone

111 Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) is associated with a high recurren

112 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) performed by 4 surgeons using a sta

113 Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) using mesh is a well-established in

114 using the technique of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR).

115 er prosthetics and approaches to the ventral hernia repair, many surgeons do not fully understand the

116 mesh-based techniques dominate the inguinal hernia repair marketplace.

117 shington state patients underwent incisional hernia repair (mean age 58.7 +/- 15.6, 64% female).

118 st frequent in the chronic hernia model, and hernia repairs mechanically disrupted at a lower force c

119 umbilical hernia repair (n = 19), and hiatus hernia repair (n = 10).

120 olecystectomy (n = 22), ventral or umbilical hernia repair (n = 19), and hiatus hernia repair (n = 10

121 Patients who underwent elective hernia repair (N = 73,596) were identified from the Nati

122 y), or hiatal hernia surgery (paraesophageal hernia repair, Nissen fundoplication), were included.

123 an alternative to conventional open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR).

124 n-free polypropylene mesh repair (MR, n = 8) hernia repair on postoperative day (POD) 35.

125 This was a retrospective review of 280 hernia repairs on 217 patients performed by a single sur

126 sented for a inguinal, umbilical, or ventral hernia repair or were hospitalized primarily related to

127 res (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.43-1.63); recurrent hernia repair (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.27-1.52); femoral her

128 es of LVHR with the outcomes of open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) for PVHs.

129 years and older, with 71.3 and 42.0 emergent hernia repairs per 100,000 person-years for men and wome

130 nias was observed from 16.0 to 19.2 emergent hernia repairs per 100,000 person-years in 2001 and 2010

131 ient admission within 90 days of an elective hernia repair performed in an ambulatory surgery center.

132 e the presence of an attending surgeon, open hernia repairs performed by junior residents were associ

133 34.3), mastectomy (PFS, 16.5-35.0), inguinal hernia repair (PFS, 15.5-22.1), and abdominal wall herni

134 repair (PFS, 15.5-22.1), and abdominal wall hernia repair (PFS, 21.6-26.1).

135 Types of inguinal hernia repair previously performed were: open (10), lapa

136 e 12/146 (8%) patients who underwent ventral hernia repair: primary closure 7/109 (6%), ADA 3/30 (10%

137 Data on femoral hernia repairs registered in the Danish Hernia Database

138 e of best choice in open prosthetic inguinal hernia repair remains a subject of ongoing debate.

139 Meshes for hernia repair require optimal characteristics with regar

140 portant for the increased incidence of groin hernia repair seen after radical prostatectomy or radiat

141 The use of mesh in parastomal hernia repair significantly reduces recurrence rates and

142 cohort of 92,444 subjects with self-reported hernia repair surgeries (9,701 cases and 82,743 controls

143 reflux symptoms between cholecystectomy and hernia repair surgery patients.

144 Commercially available meshes used for hernia repair (Surgisis and Ultrapro) were compared with

145 g a bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP-IHR) (>24 hours).

146 ad a significantly higher incidence of groin hernia repair than the control cohort: HR: 3.95 (95% con

147 all abscess that developed after an inguinal hernia repair that utilized synthetic mesh.

148 ed at the time of laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair, the anatomy of the lipomas was studied bo

149 After umb/epi and incisional hernia repair, the cumulative risks of reoperation and o

150 ol/Tisseel for MEsh fixation in LIchtenstein hernia repair [TIMELI]; trial NCT00306839) was conducted

151 pendectomy, and groin (inguinal and femoral) hernia repair--to quantify the potential risks of expand

152 Patients undergoing hernia repairs under local anesthesia with intravenous s

153 r primary umbilical/epigastric or incisional hernia repair underestimated overall risk of recurrence

154 geons completed initial training programs in hernia repair, underwent interval proficiency assessment

155 ional surgical procedure: midline incisional hernia, repair ureteral fistula, and repair enterocutane

156 Exposures: Hernia repair using mesh performed by either open or lap

157 trospective analysis of adults with emergent hernia repair using National Center for Health Statistic

158 Ventral hernia repairs using mesh is one of the most common surg

159 were prospectively measured before and after hernia repair, using computer analysis of abdominal CT s

160 The presence of contamination during ventral hernia repair (VHR) poses a significant challenge.

161 Primary paraesophageal hernia repair was completed laparoscopically in 55 patie

162 ted adverse event rates after abdominal wall hernia repair was determined.

163 ality and selection of studies of parastomal hernia repair was done with a modified MINORS.

164 Incidence of incisional hernia repair was higher after open AAA repair (19 vs 23

165 An almost 4-fold increase in groin hernia repair was observed after radical prostatectomy c

166 ary veteran patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair was studied between January 1, 1998, and D

167 Rates of emergent incisional hernia repair were high but relatively stable among olde

168 054 patients who underwent an abdominal wall hernia repair were identified (17% laparoscopic, 83% ope

169 s older than 18 years who underwent elective hernia repair were included.

170 differences in recurrence at the site of the hernia repair were observed (11.4% vs 11.4%; P = .99).

171 A total of 3970 primary femoral hernia repairs were analyzed; 27.3% occurred in men.

172 All emergent hernia repairs were identified during the study period.

173 2086 patients who underwent 2499 inguinal hernia repairs were identified.

174 An estimated 2.3 million inpatient abdominal hernia repairs were performed from 2001 to 2010; of whic

175 inety-nine laparoscopic and 81 open inguinal hernia repairs were performed on 192 male patients and 2

176 Mesh hernia repairs were performed on a second group of rats

177 The TV appendectomies and ventral hernia repairs were pure NOTES, through a SILS port in t

178 ogy, recurrent hernia repairs, and bilateral hernia repairs were significant predictors of postoperat

179 mies, 24 TV appendectomies, and 6 TV ventral hernia repairs, were performed.

180 pair with low-cost mesh and those undergoing hernia repair with commercial mesh.

181 differ significantly between men undergoing hernia repair with low-cost mesh and those undergoing he

182 Elective umbilical hernia repair with mesh should be considered in patients

183 assigned ICD9 procedure codes for incisional hernia repair with or without synthetic material (mesh).

184 ly assigned to open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs with mesh.

185 All patients with primary umbilical hernia repair, with or without a concurrent unrelated pr

186 least one subsequent reoperative incisional hernia repair within the first 5 years after initial rep

187 hether an inguinal neurectomy at the time of hernia repair would reduce the risk of postoperative pai