ライフサイエンスコーパス: heterosexual

1 7% of the patients were female, and 41% were heterosexual.

2 se illicit drugs compared with girls who are heterosexual.

3 ences in 2007, >75% were pairs and >90% were heterosexual.

4 ide and circumcision efficacy on trials with heterosexuals.

5 determinants of HIV transmission among Swiss heterosexuals.

6 ks, Hispanics, persons who inject drugs, and heterosexuals.

7 eported by 108 HIV-negative MSM (33%) and 21 heterosexuals (4%).

8 transmission was more common in IDUs than in heterosexuals (60% versus 19%; odds ratio, 6.14; 95% con

9 s, 888 (mean age, 42 years [IQR, 35-48]; 548 heterosexual [61.7%] and 340 MSM [38.3%]) provided 1238

10 tive partners became HIV-positive (10 MSM; 1 heterosexual; 8 reported condomless sex with other partn

11 Nm cases were predominantly black (81%) and heterosexual (99%).

12 nstrated that male circumcision (MC) reduces heterosexual acquisition of HIV, herpes simplex virus ty

13 e was marginally associated with duration of heterosexual activity (P=.1) and was positively associat

14 ction and Transmission Among Couples Through Heterosexual Activity" (HITCH) Cohort Study of recently

15 re collected from a cohort of 379 (primarily heterosexual) adult males.

16 s prevented HIV infection in sexually active heterosexual adults.

17 mized placebo-controlled trial that enrolled heterosexual African adults who were seropositive for bo

18 mised placebo-controlled trial that enrolled heterosexual African adults who were seropositive for bo

19 We analyzed visit records for heterosexual African American men who underwent HIV test

20 Using prospective data from heterosexual African couples with HIV-1 serodiscordance,

21 Among HIV-serodiscordant heterosexual African couples, differences in pregnancy i

22 Within a PrEP clinical trial among high-risk heterosexual African men and women, we detected HIV-spec

23 as in the recent male circumcision trials of heterosexual African men, supports further investigation

24 ce is in contrast to a report from a general heterosexual African population but agrees with a study

25 uld be beneficial to track the prevalence of heterosexual anal and oral sex and associated condom use

26 Heterosexual anal and oral sex are related to the acquis

27 We examined the correlates of heterosexual anal and oral sex in the general population

28 erosexual groups were associated with "older heterosexual and gay people on welfare" (group 5).

29 differences, this study required 80 healthy heterosexual and homosexual adult men and women to provi

30 hors found no significant difference between heterosexual and homosexual men in hair whorl direction,

31 ere consistent with sexual orientation, with heterosexual and homosexual men showing female-favoring

32 d genital sexual arousal in monosexual (i.e. heterosexual and homosexual) men have repeatedly found t

33 ncreasing age, lower initial CD4 count, male heterosexual and injection drug use transmission, cART i

34 Among serodifferent heterosexual and MSM couples in which the HIV-positive p

35 emale genital tract with its central role in heterosexual and peripartum transmission, has important

36 PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial of heterosexual and same-sex couples (n = 40 couples; n = 8

37 ghlight the importance of HPV vaccination in heterosexual and sexual minority populations.

38 1862 HIV-infected MSM and 403(9.0%) of 4498 heterosexuals and injection drug users in Shenzhen, Chin

39 osexuals, but increased over time for female heterosexuals and male intravenous drug users (IDUs) fro

40 cted men who have sex with men, HIV-infected heterosexuals, and the general population of HBsAg-posit

41 approximately 22,000 condomless sex acts and heterosexuals approximately 36,000.

42 and bisexuals were more often infected with heterosexual-associated C. trachomatis strains.

43 MSM infected with heterosexual-associated strains were often younger (P =

44 (p=0.03) were noted between the 14 prevalent heterosexual-associated strains.

45 from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) on heterosexual behaviour in Zambia in 2001-02 and in Rwand

46 f responses to erotic pictures and videos in heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual men, ages 25-50.

47 lence of vaccine awareness was similar among heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian respondents.

48 pe among homosexual men, and male and female heterosexuals, but increased over time for female hetero

49 ca, where the epidemic is of a predominantly heterosexual character and is caused by different subtyp

50 her a rural indigenous community or in urban heterosexual communities.

51 use (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.5, 3.9, P < .001) or heterosexual contact (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.3, 2.8, P = .00

52 The percentage infected through heterosexual contact was 39.4% among persons born outsid

53 ency virus (HIV) is primarily transmitted by heterosexual contact, and approximately equal numbers of

54 bjects in the C cohort were infected through heterosexual contact, while five of the six subjects in

55 l contact, as well as for cases where it was heterosexual contact.

56 ikely to initiate HPV vaccination than their heterosexual counterparts.

57 ted vaccination compared with 28.4% of their heterosexual counterparts.

58 ndomized trial among 1785 HIV-serodiscordant heterosexual couples (the Partners PrEP Study) in which

59 e is modeled through formation/separation of heterosexual couples assuming that one infected individu

60 virus type 2 (HSV-2) in HSV-2-serodiscordant heterosexual couples by 48%.

61 s of Kenyan and Ugandan HIV-1 serodiscordant heterosexual couples enrolled in a randomised safety and

62 We find that heterosexual couples exhibit a drastically different loc

63 osure prophylaxis among HIV-1-serodiscordant heterosexual couples from Kenya and Uganda.

64 29 monogamous heterosexual couples having unprotected sex; and 15 wome

65 tion were estimated for HIV-1-serodiscordant heterosexual couples in Rakai, Uganda, by use of a robus

66 ectively identified cohort of serodiscordant heterosexual couples in Rakai, Uganda.

67 sed risk of sexual transmission of HCV among heterosexual couples in regular relationships.

68 ormation for counseling long-term monogamous heterosexual couples in which one partner has chronic HC

69 PV) viral load and incident HPV detection in heterosexual couples is unknown.

70 ned rates of concordance and transmission in heterosexual couples over short intervals.

71 EP Study, participants (4,747 serodiscordant heterosexual couples) were randomized to receipt of teno

72 consistent findings, drawing comparisons to heterosexual couples, and noting gaps in available resea

73 In heterosexual couples, the genotype-specific HPV load in

74 l changes in risk-taking sexual behaviour by heterosexual couples.

75 the risk for HCV infection among monogamous heterosexual couples.

76 sociated with concordance among asymptomatic heterosexual couples.

77 her evidence-based interventions that target heterosexual couples.

78 consistent findings across studies involving heterosexual couples.

79 nd (gb) mutant males showed no alteration in heterosexual courtship or copulation, but were attracted

80 tance, the UK was more clustered and MSM and heterosexual degree distributions differed significantly

81 to account for the clustering of HCV within heterosexual dyads.

82 more easily caught by women than men during heterosexual encounters; and for severe infectious disea

83 model simulation based on the South African heterosexual epidemic suggests that condom promotion and

84 nd some sexually transmitted infections from heterosexual exposure, and is essential for HIV preventi

85 her diminishing HIV transmission among Swiss heterosexuals far below the epidemic threshold.

86 ion was attracted to invisible female nudes, heterosexual females' attention was attracted to invisib

87 e male nudes, gay males behaved similarly to heterosexual females, and gay/bisexual females performed

88 elling androstadienone systematically biases heterosexual females, but not males, toward perceiving t

89 s exhibit a response pattern akin to that of heterosexual females, whereas bisexual or homosexual fem

90 LP increased in male IDUs and female heterosexuals from Southern Europe and IDUs in Eastern E

91 roups of gay men (groups 1-3) or between the heterosexual groups "heterosexual people of lower socioe

92 Clusters linking homosexual and heterosexual groups were associated with "older heterose

93 h men (MSM), injection drug users (IDU), and heterosexuals (HET).

94 We constructed a dynamic model of the heterosexual HIV epidemic in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

95 We created a mathematical model of a heterosexual HIV epidemic to investigate how the proport

96 Since most heterosexual HIV transmission for both men and women in

97 loped a deterministic compartmental model of heterosexual HIV transmission in South Africa and formed

98 iretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant c

99 The proportion of heterosexual HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa that

100 We developed a mathematical model of heterosexual HIV transmission to evaluate the independen

101 al partner, and then the proportion of total heterosexual HIV transmission which occurs within marrie

102 re included if they used dynamical models of heterosexual HIV transmission, incorporated behavioural

103 deterministic mathematical model describing heterosexual HIV transmission, informed by detailed beha

104 nce that an antibody-based vaccine may block heterosexual HIV transmission.

105 Foreskin is the principal site of heterosexual HIV-1 infection in men.

106 rate PrEP in HIV-1 uninfected individuals in heterosexual HIV-1 serodiscordant couples from Kenya and

107 We investigated the impact of KIR genes on heterosexual HIV-1 transmission among 566 discordant cou

108 n the female reproductive tract (FRT) during heterosexual HIV-1 transmission are poorly understood.

109 n-based studies to illuminate the biology of heterosexual HIV-1 transmission.

110 athogenesis and evolution but also influence heterosexual HIV-1 transmission.

111 uary 5, 2015, we enrolled and followed 1,013 heterosexual HIV-1-serodiscordant couples in Kenya and U

112 this prospective study, we followed up 3790 heterosexual HIV-1-serodiscordant couples participating

113 Heterosexual HIV-discordant couples from Lusaka, Zambia,

114 prophylaxis among HIV-uninfected partners of heterosexual HIV-serodiscordant couples (n=3163, >/=18 y

115 rature for studies on HIV transmission among heterosexual HIV-serodiscordant couples, where the infec

116 We aimed to quantify the contribution of heterosexual HRGs and the potential impact of focused in

117 risk of transmission of genital herpes among heterosexual, HSV-2-discordant couples.

118 ntrated in MSM in urban areas and Indigenous heterosexuals in remote areas, and we were able to confi

119 t-risk men who have sex with men and African heterosexuals, including serodiscordant couples.

120 diagnoses and prevalent infections are among heterosexual individuals and mainly involve non-B subtyp

121 activity differs between LGB individuals and heterosexual individuals in response to a well-validated

122 Heterosexual individuals with gonorrhea or chlamydial in

123 ay, in part, explain the current pandemic in heterosexual individuals.

124 of transmitted founder viruses initiate most heterosexual infections.

125 d or plasma transfusion (0.76, 0.59-0.99) or heterosexual intercourse (0.69, 0.56-0.84), but not amon

126 was also associated with reporting of first heterosexual intercourse before 16 years of age, same-se

127 tcome was unprotected (without condom) first heterosexual intercourse by age 16 years.

128 While reported number of occasions of heterosexual intercourse in the past 4 weeks had reduced

129 Although unprotected heterosexual intercourse is recognized as the primary me

130 mmunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection during heterosexual intercourse.

131 rical research on sexual prejudice, that is, heterosexuals' internalization of cultural stigma, manif

132 ow that the perceived hedonic value of human heterosexual interpersonal touch is facilitated by OXT i

133 ve sex with men; however, the efficacy among heterosexuals is uncertain.

134 Sexually active heterosexual male subjects aged 16-35 years were recruit

135 type-specific seroconversion in a cohort of heterosexual male university students who had an alpha9

136 LP was highest in heterosexual males (66.1%), Southern European countries

137 ssociated with lower odds of clustering than heterosexual males (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, .31-.77]).

138 l human papillomavirus (HPV) infection among heterosexual males aged 16-24 years.

139 sexual or homosexual females fall in between heterosexual males and females.

140 nd gay/bisexual females performed in-between heterosexual males and females.

141 Thus, 40 heterosexual males believed that they were touched by ei

142 ently of the sensory properties at the skin: heterosexual males believed they were sensually caressed

143 also benefit less from herd protection than heterosexual males in settings with female-only HPV vacc

144 f Nm urethritis have emerged primarily among heterosexual males in the United States.

145 nting' from reward-related 'liking' among 28 heterosexual males seeking treatment for PPU and 24 hete

146 exual males seeking treatment for PPU and 24 heterosexual males without PPU.

147 While unaware of the suppressed pictures, heterosexual males' attention was attracted to invisible

148 melling estratetraenol systematically biases heterosexual males, but not females, toward perceiving t

149 ]) for men who have sex with men compared to heterosexual males; recent, compared to long-standing, i

150 due to sex and handedness, in 48 Bangladeshi heterosexual married couples.

151 ess risk of AIDS-related death decreased for heterosexual men (adjusted HR 1.99, 0.75-5.25; p=0.163)

152 hazard of AIDS-related deaths was higher for heterosexual men (hazard ratio [HR] 3.52, 95% CI 1.30-9.

153 men (n = 21), gay/bisexual men (n = 26), and heterosexual men (n = 20).

154 ed gay or bisexual orientation compared with heterosexual men (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.15 to

155 rom an NGU treatment trial among symptomatic heterosexual men aged 16-45 years from STI clinics.

156 ad HHV-8 detected in saliva on > or = 1 day; heterosexual men also shed HHV-8.

157 phs of parietal surface hair whorls from 100 heterosexual men and 100 homosexual men who were predomi

158 ms of exclusively homosexual and exclusively heterosexual men and measured cerebral metabolic changes

159 th male-male and male-female relationships), heterosexual men and women in other risk groups (such as

160 Heterosexual men and women who were seronegative for HIV

161 nce in studies of men who have sex with men, heterosexual men and women, and injecting drug users.

162 high protection against HIV-1 acquisition in heterosexual men and women.

163 reduced the risk for HSV-2 acquisition among heterosexual men and women.

164 -FTC both protect against HIV-1 infection in heterosexual men and women.

165 ual men HIV prevalence was lower compared to heterosexual men between 25 and 49 years of age (0.3% vs

166 is, we show that contrary to the hypothesis, heterosexual men did not prefer redder female genitalia

167 Both homosexual and heterosexual men exhibited category-specific arousal in

168 Heterosexual men had lower incidence of anal HPV than me

169 In young heterosexual men HIV prevalence was lower compared to he

170 rrectly discriminates between homosexual and heterosexual men in 88% of cases, African Americans and

171 nct Nm clade occurred among primarily black, heterosexual men in Columbus, Ohio.

172 ting reduced HIV risk for circumcision among heterosexual men likely can be generalized to the US con

173 Sexual minority men were more likely than heterosexual men to report having skin cancer (2001-2005

174 try sample of 1,077 homosexual men and 1,231 heterosexual men using Affymetrix single nucleotide poly

175 men, increased risk of AIDS-related death in heterosexual men was partly mitigated by risk factors fo

176 The authors assessed 89 heterosexual men who lifted weights regularly-48 AAS use

177 We randomly assigned women and heterosexual men with gonorrhea or chlamydial infection

178 The study included 78487 heterosexual men, 3083 sexual minority men, 107976 heter

179 2224 individuals: 817 (37%) women, 554 (25%) heterosexual men, and 853 (38%) MSM.

180 ed to study mortality in HIV-infected women, heterosexual men, and men who have sex with men (MSM) in

181 ohort study, we included HIV-infected women, heterosexual men, and MSM (aged >/=18 years) from the In

182 had significantly lower BMD than older MSM, heterosexual men, and women.

183 osexual, gay, or bisexual) men compared with heterosexual men, whether rates of skin cancer vary by s

184 e a greater number of older brothers than do heterosexual men.

185 s from culturally normative social duties as heterosexual men.

186 related with counterclockwise hair whorls in heterosexual men.

187 est that anal HPV infection may be common in heterosexual men.

188 miology of anal HPV infection, especially in heterosexual men.

189 ns penis/coronal sulcus should be sampled in heterosexual men.

190 There are limited data on HPV infection in heterosexual men.

191 centrations throughout testing compared with heterosexual men.

192 and report higher rates of skin cancer than heterosexual men.

193 ptimal anatomic site(s) for HPV detection in heterosexual men.Methods.

194 n for reducing HIV infection among high-risk heterosexual men; however, few US studies have evaluated

195 mtricitabine) in a large cohort encompassing heterosexuals, men who have sex with men, and intravenou

196 in heterosexual partnerships" (group 6) and "heterosexual migrants on welfare" (group 7) shared non-B

197 We followed 1484 immunocompetent, heterosexual, monogamous couples: one with clinically sy

198 ted in the brains of homosexual (n = 11) and heterosexual (n = 11) men.

199 vidence of behavioural links between MSM and heterosexual networks have been reported.

200 were able to confirm a resurgent epidemic in heterosexual networks in urban areas.

201 ticle examines the role of social context in heterosexual networks that facilitate the spread of huma

202 en networks of men who have sex with men and heterosexual networks.

203 nd women 18 years or older who identified as heterosexual or a sexual minority.

204 No associations were found in heterosexual or homosexual women.

205 , pharmaco-functional MRI experiment with 20 heterosexual pair-bonded male volunteers.

206 tory systems in the two sexes that underlies heterosexual partner preferences.

207 iciency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants from a heterosexual partner, whereas the acquisition of multipl

208 heir epidemiologically linked HIV-1-infected heterosexual partner.

209 was to estimate genital HPV incidence among heterosexual partners from a broad age range and to inve

210 -negative index subjects and their long-term heterosexual partners were studied.

211 HPV genotyping was conducted for heterosexual partners, aged 18-70 years, from Tampa, Flo

212 partners may help explain concordance among heterosexual partners.

213 "Migrant women in heterosexual partnerships" (group 6) and "heterosexual m

214 ex with men (SMR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.58); 68 heterosexual people (2.94, 2.28-3.73); 203 injecting dru

215 ultiple-variant HIV infection in MSM than in heterosexual people in the same populations.

216 ups 1-3) or between the heterosexual groups "heterosexual people of lower socioeconomic position" (gr

217 tes in southern Africa and east Africa, 3381 heterosexual people who were dually infected with herpes

218 four risk groups--men who have sex with men, heterosexual people, injecting drug users, and those at

219 en; the remaining 14 were predominantly from heterosexual people.

220 etermine the rate of HIV superinfection in a heterosexual population by examining two regions of the

221 ions from men who have sex with men into the heterosexual population.

222 Efficacy trials are now planned in heterosexual populations in southern Africa and men who

223 rtially protective against HIV-1 in low-risk heterosexual populations or that the modest efficacy see

224 ophylaxis (PrEP) becomes more widely used in heterosexual populations, an important consideration is

225 deficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in heterosexual populations.

226 ve pharyngeal collections indicated strictly heterosexual preference.

227 nts (n = 89) raising their firstborn infant: heterosexual primary-caregiving mothers (PC-Mothers), he

228 d with women; putting on the appearance of a heterosexual relationship by marrying a lesbian; or fulf

229 Forty-eight females in a heterosexual relationship, selected on the basis of atta

230 e-to-severe premature ejaculation in stable, heterosexual relationships took placebo (n=870), 30 mg d

231 olence occurring in the context of long-term heterosexual relationships, such as sexual intimidation,

232 men (MSM), while all HESNs in Uganda were in heterosexual relationships.

233 since Natsal-2, we recorded an expansion of heterosexual repertoires--particularly in oral and anal

234 had completed the survey previously or were heterosexual reporting no anal intercourse in the past y

235 ual primary-caregiving mothers (PC-Mothers), heterosexual secondary-caregiving fathers (SC-Fathers),

236 acquisition by the HIV-uninfected partner in heterosexual serodiscordant couples.

237 volving men who have sex with men, high-risk heterosexuals, serodiscordant couples, and intravenous d

238 of exposure was homosexual sex 15,223 males, heterosexual sex 3,258 males and 5,384 females, injectin

239 of HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa is heterosexual sex between two partners.

240 blood donors and their stable (>or=6 months) heterosexual sex partners were followed biannually over

241 (HIV-1) continues to spread, principally by heterosexual sex, but no vaccine is available.

242 ugh injection drug use (vs infection through heterosexual sex; 1.60, 1.02-2.52), and initiation in ea

243 ntrol samples of women, including mothers of heterosexual sons.

244 de gel decreased HIV incidence among at-risk heterosexual South African women.

245 eness, using 2 PrEP-related strategies among heterosexual South African women: (1) women receiving no

246 Crossover of subtype C from heterosexuals to MSM has led to the expansion of this su

247 lude by discussing factors that may motivate heterosexuals to reduce their own sexual prejudice, incl

248 ne are sufficient to increase probability of heterosexual transmission by 8-10-fold between peak (day

249 ) infection that more closely emulates human heterosexual transmission by use of multiple exposures t

250 has been described as being associated with heterosexual transmission of HIV to women in India and e

251 We aimed to estimate the proportion of heterosexual transmission of HIV which occurs within mar

252 ole for the vaginal microbiome in modulating heterosexual transmission of HIV, uncovering a potential

253 l surfaces of the vagina are the portals for heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 and therefore play a

254 inal tissues, and might be able to block the heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 at the vaginal mucosa

255 netic and non-genetic risk factors seen with heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 in this cohort, shari

256 ual cycle, and they suggest that the risk of heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 may increase as mense

257 Heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 typically results in

258 vix is an important site to be considered in heterosexual transmission of HIV-1.

259 ex with men and among women at high risk for heterosexual transmission of HIV-1.

260 ated biomedical interventions for preventing heterosexual transmission of HIV.

261 ents that are aimed toward the prevention of heterosexual transmission of HIV.

262 1 (HIV-1) infection could explain efficient heterosexual transmission of HIV.

263 mended as an effective preventive method for heterosexual transmission of HSV-2.

264 le reproductive tract are the main routes of heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency viru

265 Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency viru

266 In contrast to reports of heterosexual transmission of subtype C HIV-1, in which t

267 lope (Env) glycoproteins are selected during heterosexual transmission of subtype C HIV-1.

268 newly (recipient) infected partners of four heterosexual transmission pairs in Zambia were cloned an

269 lope (Env) glycoproteins from five subtype C heterosexual transmission pairs to NAb in donor plasma b

270 Here we show, for eight heterosexual transmission pairs, that recipient viruses

271 In a cohort of 169 Zambian heterosexual transmission pairs, we found that almost on

272 ear the time of acute infection from Zambian heterosexual transmission pairs.

273 Most HIV infections result from heterosexual transmission to women.

274 No evidence was observed for heterosexual transmission to women.

275 gs suggest a mechanism of viral entry during heterosexual transmission where HIV is bound to intact g

276 e increase in non-B subtypes associated with heterosexual transmission, MSM and PWID are at risk for

277 Regarding heterosexual transmission, the weight of evidence is tha

278 The predominant mode of HIV-1 infection is heterosexual transmission, where a genetic bottleneck is

279 0 in mucosal barrier disruption during HIV-1 heterosexual transmission.

280 ronic infections in the context of subtype C heterosexual transmission.

281 e innate immune activation in the FRT during heterosexual transmission.

282 eterministic compartmental model focusing on heterosexual transmission.

283 a second mechanism whereby gp340 can promote heterosexual transmission.

284 infection, most of which is attributable to heterosexual transmission.

285 the design of effective HIV vaccines against heterosexual transmission.

286 Only heterosexuals varied based on the DDQC, due to UK male h

287 r), and acquisition of HIV infection through heterosexual (vs homosexual) contacts were associated wi

288 with men exclusively but self-identified as heterosexual were more likely than their gay-identified

289 als varied based on the DDQC, due to UK male heterosexuals who clustered exclusively with MSM.

290 Heterosexuals with strains not shared by others in the s

291 fulfilling family expectations by marrying a heterosexual woman.

292 rientation: lesbian/bisexual women (n = 20), heterosexual women (n = 21), gay/bisexual men (n = 26),

293 ce between lesbian or bisexual compared with heterosexual women (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.37; P =

294 years among sexual minorities compared with heterosexual women and men.

295 Sexual minority women were less likely than heterosexual women to report having had nonmelanoma skin

296 sexual men, 3083 sexual minority men, 107976 heterosexual women, and 3029 sexual minority women.

297 Relative to heterosexual women, lesbian/bisexual women showed higher

298 o examine the natural history of anal HPV in heterosexual women.

299 versus vehicle administration in 29 healthy heterosexual young men.

300 ransmission of HIV-1 infection in cohabiting heterosexual Zambian couples.