ライフサイエンスコーパス: hiatal

1 trolled trials (RCTs) comparing 2 methods of hiatal closure for large hiatal hernia and to evaluate t

2 n seven United States centers, patients with hiatal hernia </= 2 cm and abnormal esophageal acid expo

3 ophageal pH study (body mass index <35 kg/m, hiatal hernia <3 cm, and absence of endoscopic Barrett d

4 of dysphagia (3.7% vs. 3.3%), postoperative hiatal hernia (1.9% vs. 1.4%), need for esophageal dilat

5 tes (23.5% vs 11.4% vs 10.1%, P = 0.001) and hiatal hernia (28.3% vs 14.8% vs 20.3%, P = 0.01) for ob

6 e findings showed wrap breakdown (42%), wrap-hiatal hernia (30%), or both (21%).

7 review addresses the historical evolution of hiatal hernia (HH) repair and reports in a chronological

8 0-74 years (HR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.2, 3.6), and hiatal hernia (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.7), while Black

9 Length of BE and size of hiatal hernia also were associated with persistent intes

10 ta were obtained, including age, gender, and hiatal hernia and Helicobacter pylori status.

11 paring 2 methods of hiatal closure for large hiatal hernia and to evaluate their strengths and flaws.

12 of prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia cannot be endorsed routinely and the decis

13 gnoses in the 38 cases were gastritis in 19, hiatal hernia in four, benign ulcer in three, benign (n

14 This study aimed to determine if hiatal hernia influences vulnerability to reflux and tra

15 they had documented GERD and did not have a hiatal hernia larger than 2 cm, LES pressure less than 8

16 logic gastroesophageal reflux and those with hiatal hernia or disordered esophageal peristalsis, alth

17 as undertaken for a patulous hiatus or large hiatal hernia or to buttress the repair of an esophagoto

18 for both groups which included recurrence of hiatal hernia or wrap migration (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.92, 4

19 operating time, complications, recurrence of hiatal hernia or wrap migration, and reoperation.

20 g that the perturbed anatomy associated with hiatal hernia predisposed to eliciting tLESRs in patient

21 orectal surgery (colectomy, proctectomy), or hiatal hernia surgery (paraesophageal hernia repair, Nis

22 Hiatal hernia surgery has evolved from anatomic repair t

23 idity between HSHs and LSHs for bariatric or hiatal hernia surgery.

24 LES pressures and a decreased prevalence of hiatal hernia than non-diabetics, which may be related t

25 /- 5.2 vs. 27.7 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2); p < 0.001), hiatal hernia was less frequent in T2D patients compared

26 us prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia were selected by searching PubMed, Medline

27 including band slippage, pouch dilation, and hiatal hernia were studied.

28 ric pneumatosis secondary to an incarcerated hiatal hernia with resultant portal venous gas involving

29 re likely to have EGJ disruption (leading to hiatal hernia) and an augmented GEPG providing a perfect

30 position to GERD (eg, central obesity, large hiatal hernia).

31 sence of endoscopic erosive esophagitis, and hiatal hernia).

32 r in Barrett esophagus include chronic GERD, hiatal hernia, advanced age, male sex, white race, cigar

33 U tests revealed that length of BE, size of hiatal hernia, and frequency of reflux, but not acid ref

34 nal risk factors (nocturnal reflux symptoms, hiatal hernia, elevated body mass index, tobacco use, an

35 th either Stretta or LF according to size of hiatal hernia, LES pressure, Barrett's esophagus, and si

36 therapy or surgery according to the size of hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, Barr

37 or incidence of recurrent reflux, dysphagia, hiatal hernia, need for esophageal dilation, revision of

38 ases of band erosion, port/tube dysfunction, hiatal hernia, wound infection, and pouch dilation.

39 ients with a body mass index <35 kg/m and no hiatal hernia.

40 Patients with GERD and hiatal hernias </=2 cm were randomly assigned to groups

41 In the LF group, 41% had large hiatal hernias (>2 cm), 8 patients required Collis gastr

42 ntrast phase optimizes the ability to detect hiatal hernias and lower esophageal rings or strictures.

43 ho underwent recumbent imaging, 10 (77%) had hiatal hernias and nine (69%) had reflux.

44 copic antireflux surgery and repair of small hiatal hernias are now routinely performed.

45 t lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and hiatal hernias have emerged as major and interacting fac

46 Recurrent hiatal hernias were detected in 17 of 79 patients studie

47 phragmatic crura were closed only when large hiatal hernias were present.

48 ssociated with technical shortcomings, large hiatal hernias, and early postoperative vomiting.

49 Patients with larger hiatal hernias, LES pressure less than 8 mmHg, or Barret

50 duces comparable results for repair of large hiatal hernias.

51 ant PEH accounts for approximately 5% of all hiatal hernias.

52 ting, other diaphragm "stressors," and large hiatal hernias.

53 ods for elective surgical treatment of large hiatal hernias.

54 ncter relaxations and their association with hiatal hernias; (3) the role of Helicobacter pylori in G

55 limitations, we believe that the prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy and suture cruroplasty produces com

56 Presently, the use of prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia cannot be e

57 mparing suture cruroplasty versus prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia were select

58 ), the pooled effect size favored prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy over suture cruroplasty.

59 ng filamentous cyanobacteria, alternate with hiatal intervals.

60 During prolonged hiatal periods, climax communities develop, which includ