ライフサイエンスコーパス: hiatal hernia

1 position to GERD (eg, central obesity, large hiatal hernia).

2 sence of endoscopic erosive esophagitis, and hiatal hernia).

3 ients with a body mass index <35 kg/m and no hiatal hernia.

4 duces comparable results for repair of large hiatal hernias.

5 ant PEH accounts for approximately 5% of all hiatal hernias.

6 ting, other diaphragm "stressors," and large hiatal hernias.

7 ods for elective surgical treatment of large hiatal hernias.

8 of dysphagia (3.7% vs. 3.3%), postoperative hiatal hernia (1.9% vs. 1.4%), need for esophageal dilat

9 tes (23.5% vs 11.4% vs 10.1%, P = 0.001) and hiatal hernia (28.3% vs 14.8% vs 20.3%, P = 0.01) for ob

10 ncter relaxations and their association with hiatal hernias; (3) the role of Helicobacter pylori in G

11 e findings showed wrap breakdown (42%), wrap-hiatal hernia (30%), or both (21%).

12 r in Barrett esophagus include chronic GERD, hiatal hernia, advanced age, male sex, white race, cigar

13 Length of BE and size of hiatal hernia also were associated with persistent intes

14 ta were obtained, including age, gender, and hiatal hernia and Helicobacter pylori status.

15 paring 2 methods of hiatal closure for large hiatal hernia and to evaluate their strengths and flaws.

16 ntrast phase optimizes the ability to detect hiatal hernias and lower esophageal rings or strictures.

17 ho underwent recumbent imaging, 10 (77%) had hiatal hernias and nine (69%) had reflux.

18 re likely to have EGJ disruption (leading to hiatal hernia) and an augmented GEPG providing a perfect

19 U tests revealed that length of BE, size of hiatal hernia, and frequency of reflux, but not acid ref

20 ssociated with technical shortcomings, large hiatal hernias, and early postoperative vomiting.

21 copic antireflux surgery and repair of small hiatal hernias are now routinely performed.

22 of prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia cannot be endorsed routinely and the decis

23 nal risk factors (nocturnal reflux symptoms, hiatal hernia, elevated body mass index, tobacco use, an

24 In the LF group, 41% had large hiatal hernias (>2 cm), 8 patients required Collis gastr

25 t lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and hiatal hernias have emerged as major and interacting fac

26 review addresses the historical evolution of hiatal hernia (HH) repair and reports in a chronological

27 0-74 years (HR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.2, 3.6), and hiatal hernia (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.7), while Black

28 gnoses in the 38 cases were gastritis in 19, hiatal hernia in four, benign ulcer in three, benign (n

29 This study aimed to determine if hiatal hernia influences vulnerability to reflux and tra

30 they had documented GERD and did not have a hiatal hernia larger than 2 cm, LES pressure less than 8

31 th either Stretta or LF according to size of hiatal hernia, LES pressure, Barrett's esophagus, and si

32 Patients with larger hiatal hernias, LES pressure less than 8 mmHg, or Barret

33 therapy or surgery according to the size of hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, Barr

34 n seven United States centers, patients with hiatal hernia </= 2 cm and abnormal esophageal acid expo

35 ophageal pH study (body mass index <35 kg/m, hiatal hernia <3 cm, and absence of endoscopic Barrett d

36 Patients with GERD and hiatal hernias </=2 cm were randomly assigned to groups

37 or incidence of recurrent reflux, dysphagia, hiatal hernia, need for esophageal dilation, revision of

38 logic gastroesophageal reflux and those with hiatal hernia or disordered esophageal peristalsis, alth

39 as undertaken for a patulous hiatus or large hiatal hernia or to buttress the repair of an esophagoto

40 for both groups which included recurrence of hiatal hernia or wrap migration (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.92, 4

41 operating time, complications, recurrence of hiatal hernia or wrap migration, and reoperation.

42 g that the perturbed anatomy associated with hiatal hernia predisposed to eliciting tLESRs in patient

43 orectal surgery (colectomy, proctectomy), or hiatal hernia surgery (paraesophageal hernia repair, Nis

44 Hiatal hernia surgery has evolved from anatomic repair t

45 idity between HSHs and LSHs for bariatric or hiatal hernia surgery.

46 LES pressures and a decreased prevalence of hiatal hernia than non-diabetics, which may be related t

47 /- 5.2 vs. 27.7 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2); p < 0.001), hiatal hernia was less frequent in T2D patients compared

48 us prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia were selected by searching PubMed, Medline

49 including band slippage, pouch dilation, and hiatal hernia were studied.

50 Recurrent hiatal hernias were detected in 17 of 79 patients studie

51 phragmatic crura were closed only when large hiatal hernias were present.

52 ric pneumatosis secondary to an incarcerated hiatal hernia with resultant portal venous gas involving

53 ases of band erosion, port/tube dysfunction, hiatal hernia, wound infection, and pouch dilation.