戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  various grades of tumor, including low- and high-grade tumors.
2 ry for malignant progression of low-grade to high-grade tumors.
3 emonstrated a decrease in CHK2 expression in high-grade tumors.
4 y the levels of HOIL-1L were associated with high-grade tumors.
5 h PMLS518 phosphorylation, PML turnover, and high-grade tumors.
6 oes, one would expect a similar reduction in high-grade tumors.
7 ened the association of E-cadherin loss with high-grade tumors.
8  of 0.91 for discriminating low-grade versus high-grade tumors.
9 activated in a substantial fraction of human high-grade tumors.
10 rimary or adjuvant therapy for localized but high-grade tumors.
11  prominent among PEGA genes overexpressed in high-grade tumors.
12 nd to monitor anaplastic transformation into high-grade tumors.
13 T2 by serine phosphorylation associates with high-grade tumors.
14 sting a novel function for AQP expression in high-grade tumors.
15 immunohistochemistry and FISH studies in 111 high-grade tumors.
16 hypoxic cells is relatively low, even in the high-grade tumors.
17  the disease but increases the proportion of high-grade tumors.
18 ereas deletion of ink4a/arf is found only in high-grade tumors.
19  heterozygous for ink4a/arf or p53 developed high-grade tumors.
20 /g/min; P < 0.02), and K(FLT) was higher for high-grade tumors (0.018 +/- 0.008 mL/g/min, n = 9) than
21 %, respectively), and patients who had fewer high-grade tumors (13% v 64%, respectively) or right-sid
22 02) and tended to be higher in patients with high-grade tumors (18.8 versus 8.5; P = 0.090).
23 sk, 2.71 [95% CI, 2.26-3.24]; P < .001), and high-grade tumor (45.1% vs 18.2%; relative risk, 3.01 [9
24                       A larger proportion of high-grade tumors (53.8% vs. 44.3%) and lesions over 10
25 women presenting with large (4.4 +/- 2.0 cm) high-grade tumors (83%) in advanced stages (72% node pos
26 ors (median, 12 v 8 cm), more frequently had high-grade tumors (90% v 64%), and were younger (median
27 , (18)F-FDG was positive in all intermediate/high-grade tumors (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.3%-1
28 sed expression of p27Kip1 is associated with high grade tumors and an unfavorable prognosis in severa
29 F3 gene has been shown to be up-regulated in high-grade tumors and its down-regulation leads to loss
30 calization may be an additional indicator of high-grade tumors and poor prognosis in cancer.
31 , colon, and breast cancer cell lines and in high-grade tumors and that their expression correlates w
32                                Patients with high-grade tumors and/or LVI may have 10-year RFS rates
33 esh astrocytoma operative specimens (low and high grade tumors) and seven primary human astrocytoma c
34 oss of chromosome 4 occurs preferentially in high-grade tumors, and that gains of 3q26-qter, 8q24-qte
35 e molecular pathogenesis of low-grade versus high-grade tumors appears to be largely distinct.
36 itial resection, age less than 50 years, and high-grade tumors are candidates for investigational adj
37                                              High-grade tumors are currently treated with hormone the
38 tients who develop local recurrence and have high-grade tumors as being at high risk for systemic dis
39 atio may be a novel indicator of aggressive, high-grade tumor behavior, and control of JAB1 could be
40         Seven patients showed progression to high-grade tumors between 6 and 36 months (mean, 22.3 mo
41                                           In high-grade tumors, both tumor cells and tumor-associated
42 pressed in tumor tissue, and associated with high-grade tumor cells and poor patient prognosis.
43 aporin (AQP) water channels are expressed in high-grade tumor cells of different tissue origins.
44 e, resulted in rapid apoptotic cell death in high-grade tumor cells resistant to the chemotherapeutic
45  expression was significantly more common in high grade tumors compared with low grade ones.
46  sensitive than (18)F-FDG to image recurrent high-grade tumors, correlated better with Ki-67 values,
47 EN-NHERF1-PHLPP1 tumor suppressor network in high-grade tumors, correlating with Akt activation and p
48 ition of ImmSig, spontaneously immortalizing high-grade tumor cultures displayed similar molecular ch
49 nked to outcome, with patients who developed high-grade tumors doing poorly and those who developed l
50     Finally, liver cancer organoid-generated high-grade tumors exhibited significantly increased extr
51  therapy for margins positive for tumor, for high-grade tumors, for improvement in local control, for
52 se of chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma, for high-grade tumors, for tumors larger than 10 cm, for pat
53 53ser246 mutation increases the incidence of high-grade tumors from 0% to 14% in HBsAg-negative, p53+
54 on volume and could separate newly diagnosed high-grade tumors from low-grade tumors.
55 and 93%, respectively, at the VOI level) and high-grade tumors from other tissue (AUCs of 85%, 79%, a
56 ue (BPH, prostatitis, or healthy tissue) and high-grade tumors from other tissue (low-grade tumors or
57 had low-grade tumors (G1 and G2) and 279 had high-grade tumors (G3 and G4).
58 carcinomas and tended to be more frequent in high grade tumors (Gleason grade 8 to 10; 41%) and nodal
59 disease progression [DP], 13%) versus 33% of high-grade tumors (grade 3 or 4) (complete response, 0%;
60 or sites, stage, sex, and age, patients with high-grade tumors had a significantly higher risk of VTE
61                      After an early maximum, high-grade tumors had a steep descending branch, whereas
62                                Patients with high-grade tumors had higher D-dimer levels (P = .008) a
63                                              High-grade tumors had significantly higher transport rat
64 ns and NNL, between HGG and LGG, and between high-grade tumor (HGG or lymphoma) and LGG or NNL.
65                 Best differentiation between high-grade tumors (HGG or lymphoma) and both NNL and LGG
66 n nude mice led to growth of intermediate to high-grade tumors in 60-70% of mice.
67 lating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) to regress high-grade tumors in animal models of this cancer.
68 nsgenic murine models and is associated with high-grade tumors in patients.
69                                              High-grade tumors in the brain are among the deadliest o
70 in perfusion and metabolism between low- and high-grade tumors in the transgenic adenocarcinoma of mo
71 s in anaplastic large cell lymphoma and most high-grade tumors, including immunoblastic lymphomas, ex
72 d significantly improved survival at HVC for high-grade tumors (median 30 months vs. 24 months, P = 0
73 ated with at least one risk factor including high-grade tumor (n=4), prior surgery (n=5), radiation t
74 with 15 demonstrating risk factors including high-grade tumor (n=9) and prior surgery (n=10).
75                                              High-grade tumors (n = 85; 79%), age > 60 years (n = 61;
76 ephalic location (OR = 12.2, p = 0.013), and high-grade tumors (OR = 5.67, p = 0.013) were significan
77 ge (P = .01; HR, 1.04; 95% CI: 1.008, 1.08), high-grade tumor (P = .01; HR, 6.75; 95% CI: 1.44, 120.5
78 se (P < .001), pCR in the breast (P < .001), high-grade tumors (P < .001), and lower clinical and pat
79              High TR numbers were present in high-grade tumors (P < or = .001), in patients with lymp
80 F-FDOPA scans was seen between low-grade and high-grade tumors (P = 0.40) or between contrast-enhanci
81 cally significant prostate cancer, including high-grade tumors, primarily due to its effects on impro
82                                              High-grade tumors relapsed more frequently early during
83                                              High-grade tumors require multidisciplinary treatment co
84            In addition to advanced stage and high-grade tumors, several histopathological subtypes of
85 tly DCC positive (15 of 16, or 94%), whereas high-grade tumors significantly less often expressed the
86 esectable disease, incomplete resection, and high-grade tumors significantly reduced survival time.
87 traepithelial neoplasia and reappears in the high-grade tumors, suggesting a complex regulation of An
88 Kepsilon were associated with late-stage and high-grade tumors, suggesting a role of IKKepsilon in ov
89 E after 6 months was higher in patients with high-grade tumors than in those with low-grade tumors (8
90   African-American women had higher rates of high-grade tumors than white women regardless of screeni
91                        Synovial sarcoma is a high-grade tumor that is associated with poor prognosis.
92  was a significant reduction in perfusion in high-grade tumors that associated with increased hypoxia
93 rvival rates (32% v 18%, P = .039) higher in high-grade tumors that did not express P-gp.
94  to tumor location and could not distinguish high-grade tumors that presented de novo from those that
95 -1 expression in both cell types was seen in high-grade tumors (tumor cells, P = 0.012; fibroblasts,
96 n the absence of the following risk factors: high-grade tumors, ventriculoperitoneal or ventriculoatr
97    The average fractional allele loss in the high-grade tumors was around 35%.
98          Average maximal lengths of low- and high-grade tumors were 7.7 and 15.0 cm, respectively.
99  survival rates for low-, intermediate-, and high-grade tumors were 75%, 62%, and 7%, respectively (P
100 40 +/- standard deviation, 7,703), all other high-grade tumors were hypermutant (mean, 1,589 +/- stan
101                      Age < or = 50 years and high-grade tumors were significant factors (P = .003 and
102 eived finasteride had a greater incidence of high-grade tumors, which prohibited acceptance of finast
103 (18)F-FET uptake (TBR(max) < 2.5) excludes a high-grade tumor with high probability.
104  versus lesional tissue and low-grade versus high-grade tumors with 100% accuracy.
105 -grade characteristics, because treatment of high-grade tumors with a small molecule inhibitor of PDG
106 low differentiation of low-grade tumors from high-grade tumors with high metastatic potential.
107 derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B) resulted in high-grade tumors with MES features in a murine model of
108 eshold of 2.72 differentiated low-grade from high-grade tumors, with a sensitivity and specificity of
109  metabolic programs differentiating low- and high-grade tumors, with the metabolic signature of gliob
110  Nestin(Cre)Bax(fl/fl)Bak(-/-) mice harbored high-grade tumors within the testis, a peripheral site o

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top