ライフサイエンスコーパス: higher-order aberration

1 rier and Zernike expansion might disagree in higher order aberrations.

2 minating chromatic aberration and correcting higher-order aberrations.

3 did not achieve the elimination of residual higher-order aberrations.

4 , patient questionnaires, and total residual higher-order aberrations.

5 treatments for those who have above average higher-order aberrations.

6 ed to treat spherical, cylindrical and other higher-order aberrations.

7 t sensitivity, glare acuity, pain score, and higher-order aberrations.

8 tudy was designed to evaluate the changes in higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided ablation

9 Higher-order aberrations and coma-like aberrations decre

10 tions can achieve a reduction in preexisting higher-order aberrations and less induction of new highe

11 f at the present time plus the correction of higher-order aberrations and restoration of accommodatio

12 values, optimized ablations still increased higher-order aberrations and wavefront-guided treatments

13 ean square of front and back corneal surface higher order aberrations, and thinnest corneal point wer

14 Peripheral defocus, higher-order aberrations, and accommodation interact wit

15 isual acuity, contrast sensitivity function, higher-order aberrations, and endothelial cell density w

16 ards to vision, induced astigmatism, induced higher-order aberrations, and enhancement rates are seen

17 stigate the effect of near-work on lower and higher-order aberrations, and its progression over a 9-m

18 Large vitreous length, higher-order aberrations, and surgical interface haze ma

19 er, if the lens decenters or tilts modestly, higher-order aberrations are created, and the lens may u

20 A significant induction of higher-order aberration attributable to increase of sphe

21 s undergoing ciliary nerve section have more higher-order aberrations but do not become myopic implie

22 Refractive errors and most higher-order aberrations decreased with development in b

23 Corneal higher-order aberrations did not change after the proced

24 e, the defocus term (Z2(0)), astigmatism, or higher-order aberrations did not change systematically w

25 However, no significant higher order aberration (HOA) compensation effects were

26 Serial measurements of ocular and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after blink were perform

27 Root mean square (RMS) of internal optical higher-order aberrations (HOAs) changed significantly to

28 To compare the higher-order aberrations (HOAs) due to the anterior and

29 We compared corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in eyes after Descemet's

30 ry to visual gain and posterior corneal (PC) higher-order aberrations (HOAs) may assist optimizing vi

31 tometry, central corneal thickness (CCT) and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) over a 6 mm pupil, were

32 udy (ETDRS) protocol; total anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were derived from cornea

33 examinations, serial measurements of corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and vision-related qual

34 cluding maximum curvature and first-surface, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), were compared to those

35 6 hyperopic-LASIK/PRK eyes, anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs, third to sixth order, 6-

36 s wavefront technology to detect and correct higher order aberrations in addition to spherocylindrica

37 ertical trefoil (Z3(-3)) was the predominant higher-order aberration in the Crystalens group and sign

38 Wavefront-guided ablations reduce higher-order aberrations in comparison with traditional

39 ess stromal regrowth, and lower nonspherical higher order aberration induction than in control eyes.

40 Induction of higher-order aberrations is still present in the correct

41 te the effects of decentration on lower- and higher-order aberrations (LOAs and HOAs) and optical qua

42 The benefit of full correction of all higher-order aberrations measured by wavefront analysis

43 r optical blur compensates for the impact of higher-order aberration on visual performance in keratoc

44 ces were identified in contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related qu

45 ferences were found in contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related qu

46 rration (P = .018), coma (P = .23) and total higher order aberrations (P = .31).

47 ls of residual astigmatism (P = 0.798) or in higher order aberrations (P = 0.869).

48 astigmatic correction but whether it induces higher-order aberrations remains controversial.

49 -order aberrations and less induction of new higher-order aberrations, resulting in improved outcomes

50 y offers better acuity and less induction of higher order aberrations than wavefront-guided laser in

51 ving enlarged pupils, were exposed to larger higher-order aberrations, their growth pattern was simil

52 uch as coma, spherical aberration, and other higher order aberrations to changes in optical quality.

53 on (SA), and total root mean square (RMS) of higher order aberrations (total HOA) were measured using

54 The root mean square of total higher order aberrations, trefoil, coma, tetrafoil, seco

55 ant difference between 2 groups in total and higher-order aberrations up to the fifth order (P>0.05 f

56 % contrast best-corrected visual acuity, and higher-order aberrations were collected preoperatively a

57 Significantly higher levels of higher-order aberrations were found in the DALK group (P

58 nformation may be obtained regarding induced higher-order aberrations with aberrometry.

59 f a period in which customized correction of higher-order aberrations with intraocular lenses may bec