コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 The setting was integrated institutionalized hospital care.
2 prove the quality of health care, especially hospital care.
3 ms consisting of antibiotic distribution and hospital care.
4 s, lower 30-day mortality, and lower cost of hospital care.
5 ied provides outcomes comparable to those of hospital care.
6 may permit targeted treatment of patients in hospital care.
7 a sophisticated and influential appraisal of hospital care.
8 uickly and cost-effectively than did routine hospital care.
9 taining treatments or the consequent cost of hospital care.
10 to patient SDH factors beyond the quality of hospital care.
11 of great concern, both for outpatient and in hospital care.
12 o developments in public health, primary and hospital care.
13 cy medicine are re-defining the scope of pre-hospital care.
14 mperature management during their postarrest hospital care.
15 bably is not a sufficient tool for improving hospital care.
16 tion is often expressed about the quality of hospital care.
17 rience long-term bowel dysfunction requiring hospital care.
18 ove patient outcomes and experience in acute hospital care.
19 outpatient care, leading to increased use of hospital care.
20 those with frequent exacerbations requiring hospital care.
21 standards at rates similar to those of acute hospital care.
22 g with the aim of shortening the duration of hospital care.
23 commended care for newer agents and early in-hospital care.
24 al agents to make judgments about quality of hospital care.
25 that provided relevant information on acute hospital care (25 LMICs; 232,550 patients) and 11 studie
26 wer for hospital-at-home care than for acute hospital care (5081 dollars vs. 7480 dollars) (P < 0.001
29 e mortality rates to evaluate the quality of hospital care, although the usefulness of this metric ha
30 become the means to exclude internists from hospital care and deprive them of an important source of
33 Acute care expenditures, principally for hospital care and physicians' services, increase at a re
35 table prehospital care, patient transfer, in-hospital care and rehabilitation systems for injured per
36 l rupture may be unrelated to the quality of hospital care, and rather associated with inadequate acc
37 n the enduring need for free or reduced-cost hospital care as a safety net for uninsured and underins
39 age with acute gastroenteritis who received hospital care at the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in
40 , AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of hospital care between January 1 and December 31, 2004, f
41 th neither increased mortality nor increased hospital care, but the clinical features suggesting resp
42 ses in the use of Medicare-reimbursed non-VA hospital care by veterans eligible for both VA care and
44 ther physicians, and the question of whether hospital care constitutes a new medical specialty has be
45 ropiprant on quality-adjusted life years and hospital care costs (2012 UK pound; converted into US $
48 014 was used to compare quality and costs of hospital care delivered by locum tenens and non-locum te
51 ; CathPCI enrolled 632,557 patients in 1,337 hospitals; CARE enrolled 4,934 patients in 130 hospitals
52 nd a public health concern, as they increase hospital care expenses and reduce patients' quality of l
53 quent, and the largest component of cost was hospital care for a small proportion of patients (5%).
54 ents for whom there were Medicare claims for hospital care for acute myocardial infarction in 1992.
55 Despite careful evaluation of changes in hospital care for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), li
57 o not improve outcomes or reduce costs of in-hospital care for general populations of medical and sur
59 talized within 72 hours or to receive active hospital care for more than 6 hours than those with unal
60 ts; challenges or barriers in the area of in-hospital care for patients; and challenges or barriers i
62 ange of approaches to quality improvement in hospital care for people at the end of their lives and f
65 g death from trauma, and the standard of pre-hospital care for those surviving the primary injury is
66 ad the same treatment effectiveness as acute hospital care for urban, poor, acutely ill voluntary pat
68 nfected patients in a large urban safety-net hospital caring for patients with limited access to medi
71 pital cardiac arrest is likely to vary among hospitals caring for children,validated methods to risk-
73 l characteristics (safety net [as defined by hospitals caring for more than double their Medicaid sha
79 e extent to which patients require follow-up hospital care, help inform patient choices, and assist i
80 though less procedurally oriented than acute hospital care, hospital-at-home care met quality standar
81 D PARTICIPANTS: An observational analysis of hospital care in 350 academic and nonacademic US centers
84 ed hospital-at-home care chose it over acute hospital care; in the third site, 29% of patients chose
86 e on the overall IM-ITE, the Dartmouth Atlas hospital care intensity (HCI) index of the program's pri
92 hat the availability of definitive pediatric hospital care is significantly more limited than adult c
93 ome and middle-income countries, barriers to hospital care lead to delayed, inadequate, or no treatme
95 There are lessons to be learned from out-of-hospital care, military medicine, humanitarian medicine,
97 program has occurred, since most psychiatric hospital care now takes place in community hospitals.
99 ortive care, specifically in relation to the hospital care of older people with frailty, to inform fu
100 ortive care, specifically in relation to the hospital care of older people with frailty, to inform fu
101 and invasive cardiologists may differ in the hospital care of patients with acute myocardial infarcti
102 her direct costs for linezolid, costs per in-hospital care of survivors, and posthospitalization cost
103 of the expenditure in the elderly for acute hospital care), of which $2.1 billion was incurred by ca
104 termine whether for-profit status influenced hospitals' care or outcomes among non-ST-segment elevati
111 Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting (ENDORSE) survey, conducted in 358
112 Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting) study is a multinational cross-se
113 sess the prevalence of VTE risk in the acute hospital care setting, and to determine the proportion o
114 Advances continue in the organization of pre-hospital care, the techniques of trauma surgery and crit
115 nely collected administrative statistics for hospital care: the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (data for
116 ce that home health care was substituted for hospital care; the metropolitan statistical areas with h
117 We then removed the effect of treatment and hospital care to estimate additional cases and deaths fr
118 h mortality rate; however, providing routine hospital care to low risk patients may not be time- or c
119 prove the potential of prehospital and early hospital care to pre-empt or more rapidly reverse hypoxa
120 The transfer of skills and procedures from hospital care to pre-hospital medicine enables early adv
123 olleagues that examined specialist-dominated hospital care versus community-based care in the United
124 he creation of surge capacity for supportive hospital care via expanded training of nonemergency care
132 e death, many discussions occur during acute hospital care, with providers other than oncologists, an
133 nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSIs) and hospital care workers (HCWs) in the surgical and neonata
134 e are intended to accelerate improvements in hospital care, yet little is known about the benefits of
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。