ライフサイエンスコーパス: hospital record

1 charge was ascertained through review of the hospital record.

2 essed by personal interview and/or review of hospital record.

3 York City (NYC) birth certificates linked to hospital records.

4 from collateral informants and by police and hospital records.

5 were obtained from a review of ambulance and hospital records.

6 means of interviews and verified with use of hospital records.

7 ital for idiopathic VTE were identified from hospital records.

8 a patient questionnaire and primary care and hospital records.

9 urce use from their general practitioner and hospital records.

10 thropometric measurements were obtained from hospital records.

11 nth observation period were identified using hospital records.

12 e not health care personnel, and we reviewed hospital records.

13 Clinical information was obtained from hospital records.

14 Clinical information was retrieved from hospital records.

15 ient phone calls, general practitioners, and hospital records.

16 vidual patient information was obtained from hospital records.

17 lied to data abstracted from community-based hospital records.

18 drugs, if prior to first PD diagnosis in the hospital records.

19 The incidence of stroke was ascertained from hospital records.

20 ined by the review of emergency services and hospital records.

21 Incident lung cancers were identified using hospital records.

22 acted from office, emergency department, and hospital records.

23 included the Harborview Trauma Registry and hospital records.

24 istory, and survival data were obtained from hospital records.

25 Additional clinical data were retrieved from hospital records.

26 ric, and neonatal factors were obtained from hospital records.

27 illation was determined by review of ICU and hospital records.

28 were identified from death certificates and hospital records.

29 infant characteristics were abstracted from hospital records.

30 d at presentation and by physician review of hospital records.

31 a were obtained retrospectively by review of hospital records.

32 plementary data were gathered by a review of hospital records and a telephone interview with a family

33 In an analysis of hospital records and adverse event reports, we found tha

34 Date of death was derived from hospital records and confirmed using an online Social Se

35 tion and death were assessed from electronic hospital records and confirmed with county death records

36 of IHD were identified through linkage with hospital records and death certificates.

37 Measures of incident CHD were obtained from hospital records and death certificates.

38 baseline and follow-up was ascertained from hospital records and death registries, supplemented by s

39 e early incidence of sinus node dysfunction, hospital records and perioperative ECGs were reviewed in

40 f these patients was determined by reviewing hospital records and querying the Social Security Death

41 n 1 hour of symptom onset) as ascertained by hospital records and reports of next of kin.

42 We reviewed the hospital records and slides prepared from the initial op

43 n characterized by retrospective analyses of hospital records and state data banks, with few prospect

44 e used Medicare Provider Analysis and Review hospital records and the appropriate International Class

45 practices and outcomes were determined from hospital records and the National Death Index.

46 -term survival was determined by a review of hospital records and the social security death index.

47 Vital status was determined from hospital records and the Social Security Death Index.

48 -2008 were retrieved from nationwide Swedish hospital records and their annual work disability days f

49 , written emergency medical services report, hospital record, and telephone survey.

50 of death was obtained from autopsy results, hospital records, and death certificates.

51 erage of 13.7 years from death certificates, hospital records, and ECG changes at 5-yearly follow-up

52 Structured diagnostic interviews, obstetric hospital records, and magnetic resonance imaging scans o

53 e collected via medical claims, primary care/hospital records, and national registries from the Unite

54 arily on information from published studies, hospital records, and surveys of women.

55 uding laboratory findings were recorded from hospital records, and the periodontal inflammatory burde

56 confirmed by Q-waves on electrocardiogram or hospital records, angiographic stenosis >50%, or revascu

57 nclude oral histories, government documents, hospital records, archival and personal manuscripts, and

58 on death certificates from California, using hospital records as the gold standard, and applied the r

59 cted by patient interview and examination of hospital records at 6 and 12 months.

60 e linked data of patient-level primary care, hospital records, death certification, and virological s

61 ent coronary heart disease was obtained from hospital records/death certificates over 22 years of fol

62 ns of the context of care; audits of patient hospital records; documentary analysis of artefacts; sem

63 We reviewed Magee-Womens Hospital records from 14 pregnancies in 13 women in whom

64 The authors reviewed hospital records from 1995 to 1997 for patients undergoi

65 Hospital records from 375 patients who underwent repair

66 tion Survey with data individually linked to hospital records from the Centers for Medicare and Medic

67 s events [corrected] were determined through hospital records from the United States Renal Data Syste

68 Hospital records, health utilization surveys, verbal aut

69 h a diagnosis code for trisomy 13 or 18 on a hospital record in the first year of life.

70 east 1 year after diagnosis, identified from hospital records in Massachusetts and New York during 19

71 isted of isolates from four CF patients, and hospital records indicate that this cluster began with a

72 Predictors abstracted from hospital record items pertaining to the admission day, i

73 A hospital record linkage database was used to create coho

74 Using a hospital record linkage database, hospitalization with a

75 Incident fractures were ascertained by hospital record linkage.

76 Among the 21 hospital records listing HZ as the underlying cause of d

77 ation phase of the study, among 40 available hospital records listing HZ as the underlying cause of d

78 Measures of incident CHD obtained from hospital records, medical history, physical examination,

79 The hospital records of 94 patients who underwent 101 proced

80 Hospital records of a systematic consecutive sample of p

81 retrospective analysis was performed of the hospital records of all patients undergoing distal pancr

82 The hospital records of all patients who were referred to Mo

83 990, and 1995, trained nurses abstracted the hospital records of patients 30 to 74 years old with a d

84 A retrospective review of hospital records of patients admitted with a CIED-relate

85 We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of patients with gastric cancer.

86 The hospital records of recipients from cadaveric donors wit

87 Extracorporeal Life Support Organization and hospital records of the subjects were retrospectively re

88 Hospital records, office charts, and autopsy records wer

89 30 incident hip fractures were identified by hospital records or by death certificates during the fol

90 ase Outcomes Study utilized trauma registry, hospital records or operative reports, and pathologist r

91 r 11, determined by dementia medication use, hospital records, or significant cognitive decline (>/=1

92 Hospital records, photographs, and tissue specimens of d

93 on insurance status (N=525) were pooled from hospital records, respondents, and significant others.

94 This retrospective study was based on hospital records, reviewing the records of patients who

95 he population level, with operative logs and hospital records serving as a proxy.

96 We reviewed EMS and hospital records, state death certificates, and the nati

97 osis surveillance system on BJ-tuberculosis, hospital records, the Danish Hospital and Civil Registra

98 semiquantitative roll tip culture as well as hospital records to determine clinical correlates of inf

99 They also reviewed hospital records to determine rotavirus hospitalizations

100 We studied the children's hospital records to establish the type of injury and int

101 We used nationwide Swedish hospital records to identify patients with urinary tract

102 Self-harm and we linked these with financial hospital records to quantify costs.

103 In a retrospective analysis of hospital records, we used a two-stage random sampling de

104 Prehospital and hospital records were abstracted for clinical characteri

105 ical and laboratory data from each patient's hospital records were abstracted retrospectively, includ

106 Hospital records were evaluated for patient and tumor ch

107 Hospital records were reviewed 6 months to 5 years after

108 Hospital records were reviewed 6 months to 5 years follo

109 Hospital records were reviewed and patient follow-up dat

110 Their hospital records were reviewed for clinical presentation

111 A registry and hospital records were reviewed to identify patients trea

112 ed to link offspring with their parents, and hospital records were used to ascertain parental fractur

113 A sample of 409 patients with available hospital records, with a minimum of a 2-year follow-up,