ライフサイエンスコーパス: host plant

1 soon after wild-type conidia contacted their host plants .

2 SOM and transfer N contained therein to its host plant.

3 r genetic manipulation of the fungus and its host plant.

4 ted leaf- and root-feeding insects sharing a host plant.

5 n into a form that can be assimilated by the host plant.

6 components of phytohormone signaling in the host plant.

7 ed ability to survive intracellularly in the host plant.

8 which are determined by the genetics of the host plant.

9 astically altering the growth pattern of the host plant.

10 izal fungi partly depending on cues from the host plant.

11 al, and elongated-branched, depending on the host plant.

12 h, asexual development, and infection of the host plant.

13 ant, it has a parasitic interaction with the host plant.

14 he specific resistance mechanisms as well as host plants.

15 ologously expressed in otherwise susceptible host plants.

16 g structures termed syncytia in the roots of host plants.

17 n successfully survive and reproduce on both host plants.

18 sses to promote the successful parasitism of host plants.

19 (LCO) signals to communicate with potential host plants.

20 d and less phosphorus (P) limited than their host plants.

21 y which cyst nematodes promote parasitism of host plants.

22 different pHs and for pathogenicity on four host plants.

23 gen which causes diseases on a wide range of host plants.

24 es from individuals specialized on different host plants.

25 ected effector, DspA/E, to induce disease in host plants.

26 ndicate the possibility of new influences on host plants.

27 y population trends of bee species and their host plants.

28 ro protein in manipulating the physiology of host plants.

29 ic endophytes impart growth promotion of the host plants.

30 protease targets unique to their respective host plants.

31 specialization and apparent niche overlap in host plants.

32 f complex-type N-glycan modifications in the host plants.

33 rfaces such as the walls of xylem vessels in host plants.

34 ng insects for transmission within and among host plants.

35 ion of these particular symbionts with their host plants.

36 ultimately cascade to decrease herbivory on host plants.

37 to manipulate the defense responses of their host plants.

38 ext dependent fitness benefits on particular host plants.

39 pathogenesis between agrobacteria and their host plants.

40 nce prey selection by predators on different host plants.

41 despite in many instances infecting the same host plants.

42 not cause disease symptoms on the surface of host plants.

43 ive divergence of populations onto different host plants.

44 er storage capacity of infected Brassicaceae host plants.

45 range of commercial and ornamental Rosaceae host plants.

46 rameters and initial patterns of susceptible host plants.

47 table to speciation involving shifts between host plants.

48 nt hosts, defense suppression differed among host plants.

49 logical interplay between cyst nematodes and host plants.

50 6, and mutants thereof, in both host and non-host plants.

51 acterial communities in CPB fed on different host plants.

52 press plant defenses might help CPB adapt to host plants.

53 at maintain a complex interaction with their host plants.

54 stance traits, were strongly affected by the host plants.

55 greatly driven by directional selection from host plants.

56 porthe species obtained from three different host plants.

57 variation in the experimental population of host plants.

58 the nutritive and defensive traits of their host plants.

59 erent resistance mechanisms and on different host plants.

60 recognize, detoxify and digest a variety of host-plants.

61 tile organic chemicals (VOCs) emitted by the host plant; (3) parasitoids avoid ovipositing in aphids

62 t monarchs migrate each year to locate these host plants across North American ecosystems now dominat

63 Using reciprocal transplants onto natural host plants across the UK range, we demonstrate reduced

64 behaviors often form the basis of studies on host plant adaptation and chemical ecology.

65 developed, showing that genetic variation in host plants affects male treehoppers' behavioural phenot

66 , highly heterozygous species that differ in host plant affiliations, and adult and larval colour pat

67 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protect host plants against diverse biotic and abiotic stresses,

68 eliloti is attracted to seed exudates of its host plant alfalfa (Medicago sativa).

69 ake across four light treatments between the host plant Allium vineale and two arbuscular mycorrhizal

70 Effects of host plant alpha- and beta-diversity often confound stud

71 Laccaria bicolor, we sought to determine if host plants also contain genes encoding effector-like pr

72 al nutrient exchange takes place between the host plant and fungus.

73 terminal differentiation is directed by the host plant and involves hundreds of nodule specific cyst

74 e conducted to examine the interplay between host plant and predation in complex agricultural mosaic

75 odynamic modules describing toxic effects on host plant and symbionts.

76 s conditioned upon the genotypes of both the host plant and the hrrP-expressing rhizobial strain, sug

77 the complex molecular interplay between the host plant and the invading virus.

78 f the vector by the virus while still in the host plant and the subsequent transition to a transmissi

79 Mycorrhizal fungi live in the roots of host plants and are crucial components of all forest eco

80 ations (functional and phylogenetic) between host plants and butterflies in 561 seminatural grassland

81 on reduced the phylogenetic congruence among host plants and butterflies indicating that closely rela

82 arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) host and non-AM host plants and carefully examined the ability of Medica

83 and these systems are involved in attacking host plants and competing bacteria.

84 ic microbes, such as fungi and oomycetes, to host plants and contribute to the establishment of succe

85 ansplanted stick insects to native and novel host plants and directly measured allele frequency chang

86 y a vascular-specific promoter in transgenic host plants and find that this silencing disrupts dodder

87 Analysis of possible co-evolution with host plants and in-planta up-regulation in particular, a

88 complexity of chemical cues it uses to find host plants and mates.

89 clude (d) climate change effects on milkweed host plants and the dynamics of breeding, overwintering,

90 y intimate mutualisms, such as those between host plants and their protective ants.

91 sistance alleles, abundant refuges of non-Bt host plants and two-toxin Bt crops deployed separately f

92 ct populations that are adapted to different host plants and undergoing parallel speciation.

93 ular interactions of tospoviruses with their host plants and vectors has expanded.

94 were detected, often from lineages of known host plants and with an increasing number of HGT events

95 Diet (host plant) and butterfly population had much more limit

96 he Netherlands can be explained by trends in host plants, and how this relates to other factors such

97 plants grow toward volatile cues from their host plants, and other plants have been shown to exhibit

98 asures are assessed: altering the spacing of host plants, and roguing symptomatic trees.

99 ironment while interacting with their insect hosts, plants, and each other.

100 ion of glucosinolates from the brassicaceous host plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) into paras

101 d potential effects of the microbiome on the host plants are completely unknown.

102 and transcription, and methylation-deficient host plants are hypersusceptible to geminivirus infectio

103 I use herbivorous insects and their host plants as a model, but the proposed ideas apply to

104 Host plant associations are evaluated graphically, showi

105 In this study we determined insect-host plant associations for an entire guild of insect he

106 ng angiosperm radiation, each defined by its host-plant associations (gymnosperm or angiosperm) and e

107 framework for understanding the evolution of host-plant associations and pollen specialization, the e

108 3/(E)-2-ratios provide information regarding host plant attack by conspecifics that ovipositing hawkm

109 the context of phenological coincidence and host plant availability.

110 Therefore, mechanisms of resistance and host plants available in the field are both important fa

111 When co-inoculated onto either the host plant bean or the non-host plant romaine lettuce, t

112 ce the phosphorous and nitrogen nutrition of host plants, but little is known about their role in pot

113 eted by filamentous fungi, are phytotoxic to host plants, but their functions have not been well defi

114 tant ecological role in interaction with the host plant by enhancing aerial growth.

115 Bacterial pathogens colonize a host plant by growing between the cells by utilizing the

116 indings identify a novel defence strategy of host plants by exporting specific miRNAs to induce cross

117 abundance in understanding the selection of host plants by invasive generalist herbivores in diverse

118 Choice of host plants by phytophagous insects is essential for the

119 he manipulation of developmental pathways in host plants by plant-parasitic nematodes.

120 wth potential of C. formicarius on these two host plants by using population projection.

121 lfaction and vision in response to cues from host plants can be distinguished.

122 of specialist Drosophila species to specific host plants can exhibit parallel changes in their adult

123 of RNA interference (RNAi)-inducing dsRNA in host plants can trigger specific fungal gene silencing a

124 au (Saturniidae) caterpillars feeding on the host plant Casearia nitida (Salicaceae) in two different

125 gae injects numerous bacterial proteins into host plant cells through a type 3 secretion system (T3SS

126 gen transfers "virulent" sRNA effectors into host plant cells to suppress host immunity and achieve i

127 se results suggest that, when delivered into host plant cells, Gr(Delta) (SP) UBCEP12 becomes two fun

128 rred DNA (T-DNA) and virulence proteins into host plant cells.

129 of a rice leaf, enabling the fungus entry to host plant cells.

130 ehoppers on potted replicates of a sample of host plant clone lines.

131 ae cell densities fluctuate regularly during host plant colonization.

132 rhizal communities do not merely reflect the host plant community.

133 are feeding in a nutrient-poor, yet suitable host plant compared to a tractable and nutrient-rich die

134 We detected the isomeric shift in the host plant Datura wrightii and performed functional imag

135 vary components are responsible for inducing host plant defenses.

136 oxidant stress responses that defend against host plant defenses.

137 dation of PAHs and improve the health of the host plants, demonstrating the potential wide benefit to

138 indicating that resistance to parasitism is host plant-dependent.

139 h colder microclimates in winter and greater host plant desiccation in summer.

140 tent to which heritable trait variation in a host plant determines the assembly of its associated ins

141 ver, the functional role(s) of occlusions in host plant disease resistance/susceptibility remains con

142 , can significantly modify the expression of host plant disease.

143 Here, while controlling host plant diversity, we examined variation in herbivore

144 the same fragmented southern refugia as its host plant during the last glaciation, and that little l

145 ved between populations adapted to different host plant environments, in part due to divergent select

146 a life cycle intimately tied to the same two host plant environments, Quercus geminata and Q. virgini

147 tion-dependent replication (RDR), which need host plant factors to be carried out.

148 Host plant family associations of yponomeutoid subfamili

149 Being dependent on finding a host plant for growth, parasitic plants penetrate their

150 cialized nitrogen source (i.e. insects) with host plants for photosynthate.

151 rous insects are to optimize their choice of host plants for their offspring.

152 n species of pasture grasses and protect the host plant from insect herbivory.

153 hether male mating signals are influenced by host plant genetic variation.

154 of trophic interactions associated with each host-plant genotype.

155 We found that trait variation among host-plant genotypes was associated with resistance to i

156 hricin acetyl transferase (PAT) that confers host plant glufosinate herbicide tolerance traffics and

157 ation of Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 in three host plants: Glycine max, Cajanus cajan and the IRLC leg

158 otential core microbiome members improve non-host plants growth and salt tolerance.

159 . fredii HH103 bacteroids, regardless of the host plant, had deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) contents, ce

160 he plant, supported by photosynthesis in the host plant, has as one of its key features the interfaci

161 is not recessive, abundant refuges of non-Bt host plants have substantially delayed resistance.

162 ively isolate Rhagoletis to their respective host plants (host-associated differences in the timing o

163 resulting in increased fitness benefits for host plants; however, the reasons are not yet known.

164 Our study demonstrates that host plant identifications at the species-level using DN

165 , location, sample type (faeces or leaf) and host plant identity all significantly explained the comm

166 e growers to the selection or eradication of host plants in an integrated control strategy for C. for

167 d identified isolation-by-environment (e.g., host plant) in Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais states, where

168 s to attenuate the defense response of their host plants, including convergent evolution of complex p

169 We sampled ECMs from 226 Pinaceae host plant individuals, both planted individuals and rec

170 Host plant infection is accompanied by increased express

171 stem for GlcNAc utilization expressed during host plant infection.

172 These results demonstrate that host plants influence herbivore gut bacterial communitie

173 icating that recognition of signals from the host plant initiates this response.

174 h the long history of coevolution with their host plants, insects have developed sophisticated mechan

175 yet least studied, aspects of the bacterium-host plant interaction is the role of the host ubiquitin

176 Our results provide insights into RKN-host plant interactions, creating new opportunities for

177 esting taxon-specific histories of herbivore-host plant interactions.

178 The symbiosis between rhizobial microbes and host plants involves the coordinated expression of multi

179 the interaction between H. schachtii and its host plant is important for developing a sustainable man

180 sensitivity of Striga to strigolactones from host plants is driven by receptor sensitivity.

181 e adaptation of herbivorous insects to their host plants is hypothesized to be intimately associated

182 association of insect herbivores with their host plants is influenced by behaviors governing accepta

183 xoR mutants, are defective in symbiosis with host plants, leading to the hypothesis that high levels

184 ation of aphid salivary proteins involved in host plant manipulation, and plant receptors involved in

185 We show, in contrast to this scenario, that host plant N enrichment and high-protein artificial diet

186 P. sojae race 25 successfully attacked a non-host plant, Nicotiana benthamiana as well as resistant s

187 eding to feeding on aboveground parts of the host plant occurs.

188 L. sayanuka is the host plant of a planthopper, Nilaparvata muiri.

189 ex, and this requires the recognition by the host plant of fungus-made mycorrhizal factors.

190 nly be effective if they target the specific host plants of declining species.

191 Recurrent specialization on similar host plants offers a unique opportunity to unravel the e

192 longed and intimate relationships with their host plants, often involving complex alterations in host

193 taxonomic composition, how this varies with host plant or location, nor whether snails selectively c

194 s of regulation in response to presence of a host plant or other environmental signals.

195 feeding or oviposition in relation to their host plants or specific chemistry.

196 behavioral assays of insect herbivores with host plants or the volatiles they emit, with special con

197 ion, either indirectly, through the infected host plant, or directly, after acquisition of the pathog

198 llus thuringiensis (Bt) relies on refuges of host plants other than cotton that do not make Bt toxins

199 Host plant penetration is the gateway to survival for ho

200 esence had little effect on aphid density or host plant phenology in this system, the OTC effects pro

201 ese hybrid symbionts may result in different host-plant phenotypes from those caused as a result of i

202 Furthermore, prolonged host plant phloem exposure to salivation by RSV-infected

203 -Pro) domain, was responsible for changes in host plant physiology and increased green peach aphid re

204 MF exported 4.9% of the litter (15) N to the host plant (Plantago lanceolata L.), and litter-derived

205 Host plants play an important role in shaping the gut ba

206 lar and parasitoid community structure among host plant populations.

207 The role of insects on host-plant populations can be elucidated via several met

208 The role of insects on host-plant populations can be elucidated via several sta

209 The host plant potato is not able to efficiently secrete cou

210 RI1043, was examined during infection of the host plant potato.

211 st pest Colorado potato beetle (CPB) and its host plant, potato, as a model system.

212 We determined host plant preference of bee species using pollen loads

213 plant use, as well as strong differences in host plant preference, a measure of habitat isolation am

214 f bee decline because accurate assessment of host plant preferences is difficult, particularly for sp

215 on aphid performance, or indirectly through host plant quality or the effects of predators.

216 le strains ("C" and "R") that have different host plant ranges.

217 discuss the potential fitness benefits that host plants receive from altering their primary metaboli

218 fe stages while minimising opportunities for host plant recognition.

219 ts mediated by warming-driven changes in its host plant, red alder (Alnus rubra): changes in resource

220 cts of DBM biology and ecology, particularly host plant relationships, tritrophic interactions, and m

221 rgent pathogens upon sensing the presence of host plants remain obscure.

222 d for efficient attachment to the roots of a host plant, resembling the biological role of cellulose

223 olanum lycopersicum) homolog is required for host plant resistance to a chewing insect herbivore.

224 ate promoted aphid dispersal and varied with host plant resistance.

225 rulence and genetically determined levels of host-plant resistance and tolerance.

226 soybean aphid biotypes capable of defeating host-plant resistance conferred by most single genes dem

227 Host-plant resistance is an effective method for control

228 ogenic and pathogenic endophytes in terms of host plant response, colonization strategy, and genome c

229 rovide some tolerance to K(+) deprivation to host plants, revealed that AM symbiosis modulates the ex

230 h a shift in female preference from its main host plant, rockrose (Cistaceae), onto Geraniaceae host

231 d onto either the host plant bean or the non-host plant romaine lettuce, the proportion of viable wil

232 Exposure of hydrated cysts to host plant root exudates resulted in different transcrip

233 entry of nitrogen-fixing bacteria within the host plant roots.

234 ultiple copies has enabled redundancy in the host plant's translational machinery, resulting in diver

235 bion calvulum, Aphididae), a woody perennial host plant (Salix polaris) and a selective vertebrate gr

236 specifics that ovipositing hawkmoths use for host plant selection.

237 sting host race of R. pomonella formed via a host plant shift from hawthorn-infesting flies within th

238 Host plant shifts of herbivorous insects may be a first

239 hogen Microbotryum lychnidis-dioicae and its host plant Silene latifolia.

240 ty, amino acid substitutions associated with host-plant specialization are highly clustered, with man

241 When it comes to host-plant specialization, insects are among the most ve

242 ces may contribute to the divergence between host plant specialized biotypes.

243 pest M. persicae is able to colonise diverse host plant species in the absence of genetic specialisat

244 assessed how one clonal lineage responds to host plant species of different families.

245 We show that decline of preferred host plant species was one of two main factors associate

246 ws, that survive only on a limited number of host plant species, it is a matter of vital importance t

247 Using Arabidopsis as a host plant species, we conducted a comparative analysis

248 al factors, including habitat patch size and host-plant species identity.

249 aging preferences of Bombus impatiens in (i) host-plant species, (ii) pollen isolated from these host

250 ant species, (ii) pollen isolated from these host-plant species, and (iii) nutritionally modified sin

251 lize on the same sex flowers of the same fly host-plant species-which suggests extreme niche overlap;

252 se nutrients in pollen can vary widely among host-plant species.

253 l carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling and host plant success.

254 ared between individuals adapted to the same host plant, suggesting that these sequences may contribu

255 Refuges of host plants that do not make Bt toxins can promote survi

256 AM fungi discriminated between host plants that shared a CMN and preferentially allocat

257 When infecting a host plant, the fungus Fusarium oxysporum secretes sever

258 ly shifting and ecologically adapting to new host plants, the most recent example being the apple-inf

259 In AM-host plants, the selection pressure on NSP1 is stronger

260 Depending on the host plants, the symbiotic fate of bacteria can be eithe

261 This nutrient has to be provided by the host plant through molybdate transporters.

262 lant, rockrose (Cistaceae), onto Geraniaceae host plants throughout its new distribution.

263 s tolerance, and may be reduced by enhancing host plant tissue antioxidant capacity though genetic im

264 ause of their intimate feeding contacts with host plant tissues, are especially prone to horizontal g

265 hich the nematode obtains nutrients from the host plant to support nematode development.

266 mefaciens pathogens genetically modify their host plants to drive the synthesis of opines in plant tu

267 The rbcL locus identified host plants to family (success/sequence = 58.8%) and gen

268 Heliconiaceae, ITS2 successfully identified host plants to genus (success/sequence = 67.1%) and spec

269 gues of alkalinizing peptides found in their host plants to increase their infectious potential and s

270 ted in the R strain are also induced by both host plant toxins and pesticide in a tissue-specific man

271 acterial taxa were correlated with suites of host plant traits related to major axes of plant trait v

272 ure) and indirectly (e.g. through changes in host plant traits).

273 spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, to host plant transfer and pesticides.

274 We found that the C supply of the host plant triggers the uptake and transport of N in the

275 that govern how specialist herbivores switch host plants upon introduction.

276 s among taxa highlight the important role of host plant use in promoting reproductive isolation and m

277 lutionary lability and genetic complexity of host plant use in the Lepidopteran subfamily Heliothinae

278 obial communities to constrain or facilitate host plant use in the Melissa blue butterfly (Lycaeides

279 ody size and gall morphology associated with host plant use, as well as strong differences in host pl

280 caterpillar diet breadth (phylodiversity of host plants used) and the strength of bird predation acr

281 size and diet breadth (i.e. the diversity of host plants used) for prey partitioning.

282 et, to identify genes putatively involved in host plant utilization.

283 o's ability to enhance aphid reproduction on host plants, vacuole localization disappears when aphids

284 osis is improved phosphorus nutrition of the host plant via the mycorrhizal pathway, i.e., the fungal

285 ehavior and may explain observed patterns of host-plant visitation across the landscape.

286 The non-host plant volatile terpenoids adversely affected the ca

287 al pathogens have been shown to affect their host plants' volatile and non-volatile metabolites, whic

288 ption of both male and female moths with non-host plant volatiles may be a promising alternative pest

289 is known, however, about the impacts of non-host plant volatiles on intersexual pheromonal communica

290 Host plants were grown across a factorial combination of

291 of germination and appressorium formation on host plants were similar between the non-pathogenic abpf

292 to have a gene-for-gene interaction with its host plant, wheat (Triticum spp.).

293 trategy is based on the idea that refuges of host plants where pests are not exposed to an insecticid

294 sponses to environmental cues throughout the host plant, which, in return, delivers carbohydrates to

295 However, in a host plant with an innate immune system involving analog

296 in the soil simultaneously provide multiple host plants with nutrients, but the mechanisms by which

297 fection on plants may affect interactions of host-plants with their herbivores, as well as the herbiv

298 s relating to the presence or absence of the host plant within the landscape, or patterns of the host

299 radication attempts often involve removal of host plants within a certain radius of detection, target

300 y which the nutrient transport to individual host plants within one CMN is controlled are unknown.