ライフサイエンスコーパス: hostility

1 ith reduced risk of anxiety, depression, and hostility.

2 es of interest were depression, anxiety, and hostility.

3 roup bias and more corrosive forms of social hostility.

4 ency may be trait like and may be related to hostility.

5 rganization as well as more severe suspicion-hostility.

6 rian hallucinations-delusions, and suspicion-hostility.

7 as not correlated with severity of suspicion-hostility.

8 g 30 cases of nonfatal myocardial infarction hostility.

9 ay of tackling resulting forms of intergroup hostility.

10 such relation was found for patient-reported hostility.

11 gdala activity and absence of infant-related hostility.

12 ly and less consistently linked to anger and hostility.

13 monia, deep vein thrombosis, depression, and hostility.

14 otenoids and tocopherols across quartiles of hostility.

15 rritability," depression, anxiety, and anger-hostility.

16 ccurring endemic or epidemic diseases during hostilities.

17 ), depressive symptoms=1.19 (0.76-1.85), and hostility=0.95 (0.62-1.42).

18 motions like anxiety, anger, depression, and hostility; (2) reduced levels of social support; and (3)

19 g/dl) was associated with 14% higher odds of hostility (95% confidence interval of the odds ratio: 1.

20 ndent relationship between baseline observed hostility and 10-year incident IHD in 1,749 adults of th

21 Type A behaviour and, more specifically, hostility and anger have been associated with increased

22 o study has reported the association between hostility and antioxidants, which may be mediators for a

23 which may help to explain the association of hostility and cardiovascular risk observed in other epid

24 The relation between hostility and CHD events was not mediated or confounded

25 chological symptoms, depression, anxiety, or hostility and child height, weight, or body mass index a

26 o evaluate the association between anger and hostility and coronary heart disease (CHD) in prospectiv

27 The relationship between hostility and disease is stronger in men than in women,

28 , reboxetine decreased subjective ratings of hostility and elevated energy.

29 owever, did not correlate with self-reported hostility and impulsivity.

30 is study was to examine the relation between hostility and incident ischemic heart disease (IHD) and

31 splantation, and most of all condemnation of hostility and its replacement by peaceful resolution of

32 rce monitoring errors may be associated with hostility and lower IQ.

33 the BPRS subscales of anxiety/depression and hostility and the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale akathisia i

34 We tested the relationship between cynical hostility and two known markers of cellular aging, leuko

35 epression, positive affect, patient-reported hostility, and anger) risk factors.

36 Questionnaires monitoring mood, hostility, and anxiety were given before and after treat

37 ysical maltreatment, high levels of maternal hostility, and exposure to domestic violence.

38 l distress (symptoms of depression, anxiety, hostility, and family stress) was obtained by questionna

39 d ventral prefrontal cortex when rating face hostility, and greater activation in the left amygdala a

40 duced social support, lower optimism, higher hostility, and greater early life adversity.

41 individual cognitive tests, anger, anxiety, hostility, and heavy use of alcohol.

42 with a major depressive episode, aggression, hostility, and history of substance misuse increase risk

43 index, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, hostility, and neuroticism (rate ratio=0.76, p=0.002).

44 adverse side effects that include agitation, hostility, and overt acts of pathological aggression and

45 Measures of type A behavior, anger, hostility, and risk factors for CHD and AF were collecte

46 Our data suggest that depression, anxiety, hostility, and stress are not related to coronary-artery

47 essed for depression, anxiety, somatization, hostility, and stress.

48 Measures of anxiety symptoms, hostility, anger experience, and anger expression were e

49 ssess depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, hostility, anger experience, and anger expression.

50 ogic variables (depression, type A behavior, hostility, anger, and negative emotion).

51 Negative emotions such as depression and hostility/anger are important risk factors for cardiovas

52 Although depression, anxiety, and hostility/anger have each been associated with an increa

53 f depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and hostility/anger in predicting subclinical atheroscleroti

54 s of depression, but perhaps not anxiety and hostility/anger, may play an important role in the earli

55 osocial factors like job strain, depression, hostility, anxiety, and social isolation tend to cluster

56 The current review suggests that anger and hostility are associated with CHD outcomes both in healt

57 Results show that high levels of hostility are associated with increased risk of all-caus

58 in most countries, and political and social hostility are endemic.

59 Optimism and cynical hostility are independently associated with important he

60 Higher levels of negative symptoms and hostility are specifically associated with the lack of f

61 uated prospectively to determine the role of hostility as a risk factor for secondary CHD events (non

62 Cook-Medley hostility assessment data were collected at baseline fro

63 However, no studies have compared methods of hostility assessment or considered important psychosocia

64 ty were assessed by use of the Interpersonal Hostility Assessment Technique.

65 The presence of any observed hostility at baseline was associated with a 2-fold incre

66 he Life Orientation Test-Revised and cynical hostility by the cynicism subscale of the Cook Medley Qu

67 re, it is unknown whether all expressions of hostility carry equal risk or whether certain manifestat

68 Poor sensitivity, hostility, criticism, or disinterest characterize matern

69 ach of the psychosocial factors of TUI, ASC, hostility, depression, and anxiety in 5 separate logisti

70 CAD are addressed: acute and chronic stress, hostility, depression, social support, and socioeconomic

71 rary to prediction, relatives' criticism and hostility did not predict how well patients did in the y

72 of depression, anxiety, somatization, anger-hostility, dissociation and 'limbic irritability' were a

73 r verbal abuse on anxiety, depression, anger-hostility, dissociation, "limbic irritability," and drug

74 erventions individually to address anger and hostility effectively and to develop theoretically sophi

75 ed hostility is superior to patient-reported hostility for the prediction of IHD in a large, prospect

76 changes were produced only by ketamine, and hostility, grandiosity, and somatic concern were stimula

77 Participants with any observed hostility had a greater risk of incident IHD than those

78 Those with any observed hostility had a significantly greater risk of incident I

79 Cynical hostility has been associated with increased cardiovascu

80 Since Darwin, intergroup hostilities have figured prominently in explanations of

81 nificantly higher on self-report measures of hostility, impulsiveness, and sensation seeking.

82 nts treated at the USAISR from the outset of hostilities in Iraq in April 2003 to May 2005.

83 rature regarding combat ocular trauma during hostilities in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Fre

84 y variables empirically related to anger and hostility in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

85 t has been treated with ambivalence and even hostility in medicine.

86 ed with controls, patients perceived greater hostility in neutral faces and reported more fear when v

87 fective treatments for negative symptoms and hostility in order to improve the probability of patient

88 ychological management focusing on anger and hostility in the prevention and treatment of CHD.

89 participants and to explore the influence of hostility in the subset that had a nonfatal CVD event du

90 has been associated with elevated anger and hostility in veterans from previous conflicts.

91 nd aggression score and with the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory assault score in patients with perso

92 and the assault subscale of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory, and the total score and motor impul

93 Hostility is a personality trait associated with increas

94 red with patient-reported measures, observed hostility is a superior predictor of IHD.

95 Hostility is associated with a significantly increased r

96 Hostility is associated with incident coronary disease i

97 by showing for the first time that out-group hostility is dramatically reduced by mobility.

98 ease (IHD) and to determine whether observed hostility is superior to patient-reported hostility for

99 These results suggest that a high hostility level may predispose young adults to coronary

100 Hostility may be a risk factor for CVD mortality among h

101 ed to type A behavior, measures of anger and hostility may be more productive avenues for research in

102 Mediators of interest were caregiver support/hostility measured observationally during the preschool

103 iated with the different facets of anger and hostility measured.

104 This study examined the association between hostility, measured by the eight-item Cynical Distrust S

105 Here we investigated the hypothesis that hostility might impact health by promoting cellular agin

106 s labeled psychological health, psychopathy, hostility, narcissism, emotional dysregulation, dysphori

107 wardness (positive predictors) and NEO Angry Hostility (negative predictor) scales accounted for 25%

108 ow and may be a therapeutic target to induce hostility of the niche to leukemia blasts.

109 ntriguingly, the harmful effect of anger and hostility on CHD events in the healthy populations was g

110 The harmful effect of anger and hostility on CHD has been widely asserted, but previous

111 chanism mediating the detrimental effects of hostility on men's health.

112 l volume were mediated by caregiving support/hostility on the left and right, as well as stressful li

113 anxiety (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.99), and hostility (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.93) after adjustmen

114 in the depression-dejection (P<.001), anger-hostility (P<.001), and fatigue-inertia (P<.001) scales,

115 High hostility predicted future low levels of some serum caro

116 Whether hostility predicts recurrent coronary events is unknown.

117 = -0.07, P=0.08), anxiety (r=-0.07, P=0.10), hostility (r=-0.07, P=0.10), or stress (r=-0.002, P=0.96

118 r (RR=1.2; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.4; P=0.008), and hostility (RR=1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5; P=0.003) were pre

119 ear 7 of the lowest and highest quartiles of hostility score at year 0 were 3.9 and 3.3 microg/liter

120 0 carotenoids nor tocopherols predicted the hostility score at year 5.

121 Compared with women in the lowest hostility score quartile, women in the highest quartile

122 POMS testing showed that the anger-hostility score was significantly higher during the HPA

123 ewhat weaker than for those using the global hostility score.

124 race, and field center comparing those with hostility scores above and below the median of the distr

125 onal attainment, current employment, cynical hostility scores and depressive symptoms.

126 Hostility scores at year 0 were unrelated to year 7 lyco

127 year follow-up, while the patients with high hostility scores had almost twice as many readmissions.

128 Men with hostility scores in the top quartile were at more than t

129 High Cook-Medley hostility scores were associated with greater body mass

130 of having abnormal depression, anxiety, and hostility scores.

131 G, and as a trend, negatively with NEO Angry Hostility scores.

132 ry markers, alcohol consumption, depression, hostility, self-reported medical conditions) were measur

133 icidal ideation, lethality of past attempts, hostility, subjective depressive symptoms, fewer reasons

134 was directed to emotional aspects of faces (hostility, subjects' fearfulness) vs. nonemotional aspec

135 evere target symptom (aggression, agitation, hostility, suspiciousness, hallucinations, or delusions)

136 nalyses of the disorganization and suspicion-hostility symptom scales.

137 idential mobility indeed have less out-group hostility than those with low mobility.

138 ns male at birth) rose during and just after hostilities: then, a year or so later, they declined to

139 SSRI administration reduced focal indices of hostility through a more general decrease in negative af

140 Energy subsidies, hostility to foreign investment, and inefficiencies of i

141 of type A behavior, expressions of anger, or hostility to predict incident coronary heart disease (CH

142 ctive relation between measures of anger and hostility to the development of AF in men.

143 s, concern about "supplies," depression, and hostility toward the therapist.

144 e lowest quartile group, the adjusted OR for hostility was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.76-1.47) for quartile 2; 1

145 In this study, hostility was found to be an independent risk factor for

146 opherols were measured at years 0 and 7, and hostility was measured at years 0 and 5.

147 ubmissiveness trait, which is independent of hostility, was related to future risk of CHD in the gene

148 Signs of hostility were assessed by use of the Interpersonal Host

149 Among young adults, TUI and hostility were associated with a dose-response increase

150 Anger and hostility were associated with increased CHD events in t

151 Effects of optimism and cynical hostility were independent.

152 ty, chronic stress, depressive symptoms, and hostility were measured using validated scales, and phys

153 f the measures of anger, type A behavior, or hostility were related to incident CHD; however, trait-a

154 Low levels of negative symptoms and hostility were significantly associated with having a cl

155 e logistic regression models, higher TUI and hostility were significantly associated with risk of dev

156 this study was to assess the association of hostility with CVD mortality in the subsequent 16 years

157 and treatment, the association of anger and hostility with poor prognosis persisted.