ライフサイエンスコーパス: hydration layer

1 tions through the action of a strongly bound hydration layer.

2 ssible to probe surface-water motions in the hydration layer.

3 idered along with a Kelvin-Voigt link with a hydration layer.

4 adhesive to spontaneously penetrate surface hydration layers.

5 by a common, cooperative dehydration of both hydration layers.

6 g of the hydrogen-bonding network of the two hydration layers adjacent to the hydrophilic surfaces.

7 n solution and highlights the fact that both hydration layer and anion-protein binding effects are cr

8 stance is caused by the strongly bound water hydration layer and characterized by the simultaneous ga

9 the new method we investigated the effect of hydration layer and protein surface topography on the ro

10 2+) are positioned by electronegative atoms, hydration layers, and a preference for the major groove.

11 Hydration layers are defined from radial distribution fu

12 matic global mapping of water motions in the hydration layer around a model protein of apomyoglobin i

13 entionally introduced, which restructure the hydration layer around the HbS molecules and thus lower

14 t in the active state water molecules in the hydration layer around the site have a high degree of mo

15 explicit treatment of water molecules in the hydration layer at the surface of the protein, and an en

16 om the barrier provided by the tightly bound hydration layer at their surface, as well as from the ne

17 obes is utilized to explore the evolution of hydration layers at electrode surfaces with the unpreced

18 rize the heterogeneous nature of crystalline hydration layers at the membrane-fluid interface.

19 The removal of the surface hydration layers causes coarsening of the nanoparticles.

20 omolecules, including proteins, constitute a hydration layer characterized by physicochemical propert

21 we observe that the dynamics of water in the hydration layers close to the protein is dramatically sl

22 We found that a hydration layer constructed of approximately one monolay

23 an ELP can be tuned to exhibit either of the hydration layer coupling modes.

24 or dark current, and, within a narrow range, hydration layer density, superior fits between experimen

25 and unambiguously validates the slowdown of hydration layer dynamics as shown here again in two muta

26 to determine the activation energy of their hydration layer dynamics.

27 We also observed that the dynamic hydration layer extends to more than 10 A.

28 st that protein clusters, with a distinctive hydration layer, form a protein-rich phase that separate

29 We observe the hydration layer formed over the particle aggregates and

30 are tested in their ability to reproduce the hydration layer from the simulations for that protein, a

31 e found to have different abilities to evict hydration layers from surfaces-a necessary step for adso

32 s may also provide insights into the role of hydration layers in governing the structure-function rel

33 A major improvement in predicting the hydration layer is found when the protein is held immobi

34 ntact and one for hydrophobes separated by a hydration layer, leads to a marked improvement in protei

35 The hydration layer model was also compared with a SAXS prof

36 Lattice structure depends on an adaptable hydration layer modulating interactions among CA molecul

37 for characterizing the dynamics of different hydration layers near a prototypical hydrophobic side ch

38 Surface hydration layers not only stabilize the SnO2 nanoparticl

39 sumed to increase the water molecules in the hydration layer of Hb and enhance the autoxidation by pr

40 rfacial diffusion coefficient of the surface hydration layer of lipid vesicles in dilute solutions ar

41 water molecules per nucleotide in the first hydration layer of PS and PO respectively.

42 ic distances and implicitly models the first hydration layer of the molecule.

43 reviewed include proton transport along the hydration layer of various membranes and through channel

44 specific complex retain approximately a full hydration layer of water.

45 ilic (backbone) and hydrophobic (side chain) hydration layers of elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs), a

46 rminus gradually threads through the surface hydration layers of lipid membranes, with the beginning

47 The release of bound water from the hydration layers of macromolecules and its conversion to

48 d two robust, distinct water dynamics in the hydration layer on a few ( approximately 1-8 ps) and ten

49 Formation of so-called hydration layer on alumina nanoparticles in water was hy

50 the formation of a 7-angstrom-thick stagnant hydration layer on the hydrophilic surfaces.

51 Inherent structural plasticity, hydration layer rearrangement, and effector binding affe

52 of physicochemical surface properties on the hydration layer remains controversial, and systematic ex

53 solvent molecules are found to form a second hydration layer, resulting in a water-water network boun

54 low friction would then be due to the fluid hydration layers surrounding the polar head groups attac

55 tate consists of hydrophobic and hydrophilic hydration layers that respond independently to temperatu

56 At separations of approximately one hydration layer, the attraction is strongly dependent on

57 lysozyme, we first determine that 80% of the hydration layer waters experience a moderate slowdown fa

58 For assessing the accuracy of the modeled hydration layer, we performed contrast variation experim

59 linear function of the overlap volume of the hydration layers, we find that the contact value of the

60 ging to a reasonable value when four or more hydration layers were included explicitly.

61 uling by steric repulsion and formation of a hydration layer which acts as both a physical and energe

62 vealed that gammaII-crystallins have a thick hydration layer, which is possibly due to the special ar

63 e used to develop a model for predicting the hydration layer with sub-1-Angstrom resolution without t

64 nt and reveal various water behaviors in the hydration layer with wide heterogeneity.

65 The association of crystalline hydration layers with raft membranes would significantly

66 protein solvation and thereby predicting the hydration layer without additional simulations.