コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ial ( approximately 3.040 V vs. the standard hydrogen electrode).
2 an onset potential of -0.2 V (vs reversible hydrogen electrode).
3 m 2.2% to 8.4% at 1.23 V vs. RHE (Reversible hydrogen electrode).
4 ied surface (0.19 +/- 0.13 V versus standard hydrogen electrode).
5 duction (E degrees = +3 to +154 mV vs normal hydrogen electrode).
6 ; pH 7.0) of 1095 +/- 4 mV versus the normal hydrogen electrode.
7 ode potential of -0.15 V versus the standard hydrogen electrode.
8 down to approximately -1.2 V vs the standard hydrogen electrode.
9 +/- 3 mV to 1200 +/- 3 mV versus the normal hydrogen electrode.
10 from a freshwater pond at +0.6 V vs standard hydrogen electrode.
11 3.05 A mgPt(-1) at 0.9 V versus a reversible hydrogen electrode.
12 tentials as low as -145 mV vs the reversible hydrogen electrode.
13 of either +2.2 V or +3.0 V versus the normal hydrogen electrode.
14 everal potentials above +1.9 V versus normal hydrogen electrode.
15 f about -1.7 (+/-0.2) V at 1 M versus normal hydrogen electrode.
16 ion potential of -344 mV versus the standard hydrogen electrode.
17 s of -486 mV and -644 mV versus the standard hydrogen electrode.
18 easured in acetone, and was 1.36 V vs normal hydrogen electrode.
19 uction potential of -2.37 V vs. the standard hydrogen electrode.
20 wide potential range (1.2 to 0.4 V vs normal hydrogen electrode), a range spanning potentials where P
21 talytic onset at 0.8 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode, a Tafel slope of 109 mV decade(-1),
22 n 15 h at -1 V applied potential vs standard hydrogen electrode, a time scale and efficiency suitable
23 s were compared directly to the conventional hydrogen electrode and silver-silver chloride electrode
24 low onset potential of 1.47 V (vs reversible hydrogen electrode) and a stable current density of 10.0
25 ntered at approximately 0 V (versus standard hydrogen electrode), and was altered in single (Deltaomc
26 lie within the range 1.9-2.1 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode, and k1(f) varies from 2 x 10(3) to 4
27 (red.) approximately = -0.08 V versus normal hydrogen electrode] and forms a long-lived pi-radical ca
31 process centered around +174 mV vs. standard hydrogen electrode at pH 7 to a Mo(V)-to-Mo(IV) conversi
32 ferrous/ferric couple (-134 mV versus normal hydrogen electrode at pH 7) is consistent with the perox
34 y low midpoint potential (-248 mV vs. normal hydrogen electrode at pH 9.0), which is strongly coupled
35 on of Fe protein was -430 mV versus standard hydrogen electrode, coinciding with the midpoint potenti
36 s show a redox signal at 40 mV versus normal hydrogen electrode, consistent with electron transfer to
37 about -0.8 (+/-0.2) V (at 1 M versus normal hydrogen electrode) for the reduction of nitric oxide (N
38 ls span a 400-mV range (+349 mV vs. standard hydrogen electrode, H19M; +252 mV, WT; -19 mV, M81A; -69
39 set potential (~1.07 volts versus reversible hydrogen electrode), high photocurrent density, and dura
41 ound potential of +200 mV versus NHE (normal hydrogen electrode) is found for SoxR isolated from Esch
42 f this variant (-96 +/- 7 mV versus standard hydrogen electrode) is similar to that of wild-type IsdI
43 from -89 to -551 mV (relative to the normal hydrogen electrode NHE) which supports the feasibility o
44 reduction starts from -0.1 V versus a normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) when a mixture of water and ion
45 ow between +15 and +489 mV versus the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE), were used to immobilize and "w
49 als (SAPs; -0.25, 0, and 0.25 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode) on the electrochemical performance,
50 a low reduction potential, 0.38 V (vs Normal Hydrogen Electrode, pH 7.8), for the MnxG type 1 Cu(2+),
52 cm(-2) and 87.7% at 1.23 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode, respectively, corresponding to 83% a
53 pplied potential of 1.40 V versus the normal hydrogen electrode resulted in the formation of dioxygen
54 of oxygen at ~1.50 V versus (vs) reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) electrochemically, and reach an
55 an overpotential of 152 mV versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) for the electrocatalytic curren
56 (2+)|GCE electrode at -1.33 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) in 0.5 M KHCO3, with 8 ppm adde
57 (catalytic onset > -0.2 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)), increase the Faraday efficien
58 to 35 mA cm(-2) at 0 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), onset photovoltages as high as
61 ent under a potential of -0.59 V [reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)] at pH 7 and compare with exper
62 h onset potential at -0.53 V (vs. reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE) and C2-C3 faradaic efficiency (
64 pH-dependent OER activity on the reversible hydrogen electrode scale, indicating non-concerted proto
65 duction potential of -370 mV vs the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) and is stable through redox cyc
66 a range from +970 mV to -954 mV vs. standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) by mutating only five residues
67 , epsilon(+/-), or equivalently the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) energy, functions as an absolut
68 dox potential of 0.19 eV versus the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) for FeMoco(oxidized) + e(-) -->
69 l values that are referenced to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), which is arbitrarily assigned
70 amic values that is anchored to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), which is assigned an arbitrary
72 surface charge (+0.24 V versus the standard hydrogen electrode [SHE]), Delta1501 mutant cells detach
73 -0.09, 0.21, 0.51, and 0.81 V vs a standard hydrogen electrode, SHE) in single-chamber microbial ele
74 ochrome c(4) are 240 and 340 mV (vs standard hydrogen electrode), similar to the electrochemical prop
75 potentials of < or =-0.25 V versus standard hydrogen electrode, the conductance of the SLM increases
76 A redox potential of -26 mV versus standard hydrogen electrode was measured by cyclic voltammetry on
78 nts up to 17.6 mA/cm(2) at 0 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode were achieved under simulated 1 sun i
79 20 mV, +0.052 mV, and +0.060 V versus normal hydrogen electrode, whereas the rates of dismutation (kc
80 m(2) and 490 mA/mgPt at 0.9 V (vs reversible hydrogen electrode), which are much higher than those of
81 itive redox potential (-103 mV versus normal hydrogen electrode), which is not significantly affected
82 dified from 0.0 to 1.0 V versus a reversible hydrogen electrode, while Fe-based moieties experience s
84 eter for ORR (at 0.9 volts versus reversible hydrogen electrode), yielding a mass activity of 13.6 am
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。