ライフサイエンスコーパス: hygiene

1 ttencies, and limited water availability for hygiene.

2 urs mainly related to water, sanitation, and hygiene.

3 method for biofilm removal and improved oral hygiene.

4 e to the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

5 mance might help to explain deficits in oral hygiene.

6 ged learning effect, including improved oral hygiene.

7 simply be explained by the change in public hygiene.

8 occus faecalis, which are relevant for water hygiene.

9 mmediately after patients had performed oral hygiene.

10 between diarrheal disease and sanitation and hygiene.

11 animal facility using stricter standards of hygiene.

12 opulations varying in age, weight, diet, and hygiene.

13 que; 2) smoking; 3) adverse loading; 4) oral hygiene; 5) use of antimicrobial gel/mouthrinse; 6) non-

14 immunoassay was 96% sensitive for poor oral hygiene, 95% sensitive for chronic periodontitis (define

15 of this study was to describe sanitation and hygiene access across the Global Enteric Multicenter Stu

16 ncluded messages about infant feeding, sleep hygiene, active social play, emotion regulation, and gro

17 The odds of having poor oral hygiene (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.26; 95% confidence

18 the most commonly recommended means of oral hygiene after periodontal surgery.

19 er hand hygiene (group A) or care after hand hygiene alone (group B) before all patient and intraveno

20 Hand hygiene alone does not always achieve the desired clean

21 e focused on sanitation, access to water and hygiene also appear to significantly reduce odds of infe

22 These 6 American Journal of Hygiene /American Journal of Epidemiology papers attest

23 and the optimal strategy for improving sleep hygiene and associated effect on patient-centered outcom

24 a sustained high level of compliance to hand hygiene and chlorhexidine bathings, screening and isolat

25 Saliva composition influences oral hygiene and disease states.

26 Personal hygiene and education measures, including once-weekly us

27 rm was 27.2% [-0.46%, 52.3%] (increased hand hygiene and face masks).

28 t SES was also important for predicting oral hygiene and gingival bleeding.

29 did not increase chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis.

30 cantly increased chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis.

31 domly assigned to receive education on sleep hygiene and healthy lifestyle alone (the control group)

32 d effects of improved water, sanitation, and hygiene and improved infant feeding on child stunting an

33 hay fever at that time is the combination of hygiene and increased pollen secondary to changes in agr

34 In the Sanitation Hygiene and Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) Trial, we

35 s among patients who maintain excellent oral hygiene and low gingival bleeding scores.

36 %) children aged 6 to 12 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis, respectively.

37 0%) children aged 1 to 5 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis, respectively.

38 ngivitis was conducted using simplified oral hygiene and modified Community Periodontal Indices, resp

39 e participants received instructions on oral hygiene and one session of dental prophylaxis at baselin

40 Hygiene and other early childhood influences impact the

41 aluate the influence of the devices on sleep hygiene and outcomes.

42 safety regulations have focused on rules of hygiene and prevention of infections.

43 educate communities on proper sanitation and hygiene and provide safe water and timely treatment.

44 pidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health (now the Bloomberg School of P

45 d, by extension, the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health established and transmitted a

46 gy at the Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health from 1956 to 2007 and served a

47 School of Public Health (then the School of Hygiene and Public Health).

48 -Rose Report and the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, now the Johns Hopkins Bloombe

49 It has been proposed that improved hygiene and reduced experience of infections in childhoo

50 der conditions driven by improved sanitation/hygiene and reduced fecal-oral transmission; and (3) the

51 tant determinants of behavioral responses to hygiene and sanitation interventions.

52 behaviors, such as clean-water use and good hygiene and sanitation practices.

53 found in infants and children born into poor hygiene and sanitation.

54 from a meeting held at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, on April 11-12, 2013, to

55 At day 21, participants reinstituted oral hygiene and were followed for 4 weeks.

56 Groups were matched for sex, oral hygiene, and implant distribution, and patients were sub

57 nal bone loss around the implants, poor oral hygiene, and low compliance.

58 nal bone loss around the implants, poor oral hygiene, and low compliance.

59 cross-border movements of camels, poor hand hygiene, and overnight hospital stays with respiratory c

60 noassay with bleeding on probing (BOP), oral hygiene, and periodontal probing depth.

61 , stimulus control, sleep restriction, sleep hygiene, and relaxation.

62 Sanitation, hygiene, and social cohesion did not modify the relation

63 n improvement of vaccination coverage, birth hygiene, and surveillance, with specific approaches in h

64 unhealthful dietary fat, obesity, increased hygiene, and the timing of exposure to foods, but geneti

65 , education status, household sanitation and hygiene, and urban or rural residence) in nonpregnant WR

66 s rather than improvements in sanitation and hygiene; and (4) the absence of clinical disease is not

67 00 million travelers visit regions with poor hygiene annually.

68 co usage, alcohol consumption, and poor oral hygiene are established risk factors.

69 nents in house dust not affected by personal hygiene are likely to play a role.

70 ndard preventive measures, such as increased hygiene, are not sufficiently efficacious.

71 provements in water quality, sanitation, and hygiene, as well as in the clinical treatment of cholera

72 awing test score indicates the need for oral hygiene assistance, but it is not suitable as a single t

73 sment tool for determining the need for oral hygiene assistance.

74 e measured the following variables: (a) oral hygiene, (b) gingival inflammation, (c) caries status, (

75 s with incrementally increased education and hygiene-based interventions: standard (S), enhanced stan

76 ctive was to evaluate the effect of personal hygiene-based strategies on rates of overall SSTI and MR

77 of an individual by highlighting the type of hygiene/beauty products the person uses, diet, medical s

78 Hand-hygiene behavior varies according to gender.

79 ims to identify predictors of performed oral hygiene behaviors (OHBs) based on the Theory of Planned

80 Attitudes toward disgust and hygiene behaviors were assessed using questionnaire meas

81 focus on water and sanitation, coupled with hygiene behaviour, should be emphasised to sustain the c

82 ng in families with lower SES had worse oral hygiene (beta = -0.101; P = 0.01) and gingival bleeding

83 d by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene between 13 March 2013 and 30 June 2013.

84 and water installations as the focus of our hygiene bundle.

85 nd American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene/Burroughs Wellcome Fund.

86 lcohol-based hand sanitiser, a national hand-hygiene campaign, national auditing and inspections of h

87 uinolones) and macrolide antibiotics; a hand hygiene campaign; hospital environment inspections; and

88 However, parents who exercise good smoking hygiene can lessen their child's risk of developing plaq

89 ren younger than 2 years to support feeding, hygiene, care, and stimulation, as well as monthly women

90 grouped into "good," "fair," and "poor" oral hygiene categories based on a simplified oral hygiene in

91 The Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene challenged Wisconsin laboratories to examine the

92 e evaluated for their water, sanitation, and hygiene characteristics.

93 for personalized genetics usage in personal hygiene choices, with consequent reduction of inappropri

94 dle, which was associated with improved hand hygiene compliance (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% co

95 Mean hand hygiene compliance improved from 52% in phase 1 to 69% i

96 ontrol measures, such as increasing the hand hygiene compliance of HCWs and disinfection rate of envi

97 e in an adult ICU setting, and reported hand hygiene compliance rates collected via observation, were

98 all studies on interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance to evaluate existing bundles and iden

99 frequency of health care worker visits, hand hygiene compliance, health care-associated infections, a

100 luated bundled interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance.

101 Poor water, sanitation, and hygiene conditions are the primary routes of exposure an

102 the applicability of the traceable molecular hygiene control method (TMHCM) was tested in 60 food sam

103 mized informational interventions, including hygiene data-sharing and peer-based exposure to latrine

104 gingival enlargement, gingivitis, poor oral hygiene, dental hypoplasia, and caries.

105 ontext of sustainable water, sanitation, and hygiene development and consider appropriate technologie

106 ew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) were deterministically cross-matched.

107 ived the same general nutrition, health, and hygiene education (NHHE) at enrollment and throughout th

108 eanliness behaviors that are suspects in the hygiene effect.

109 ct precautions, private room/cohorting, hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and antibiotic stewards

110 Control measures included isolation, hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and rapid diagnostic te

111 siderations such as passive smoke, noise and hygiene exposure are also explored.

112 plore the association between sanitation and hygiene exposures and MSD.

113 and South Asia and to assess sanitation and hygiene exposures, including shared sanitation access, a

114 nities with inadequate water, sanitation, or hygiene facilities including those with intermittent wat

115 We also evaluated the role of hygiene factors (e.g., house cleaning, shoe removal).

116 Other hygiene factors found to be significantly associated wit

117 Hygiene factors were not consistently linked to exposure

118 on, participants individually performed oral hygiene for 6 weeks (T2) with the provided oral hygiene

119 ventive measures (8/8); (5) appropriate hand hygiene for everyone (7/8); (6) environmental cleaning (

120 liva and urine and to determine whether oral hygiene, gingival inflammation, and tooth loss are corre

121 ceive care with nonsterile gloves after hand hygiene (group A) or care after hand hygiene alone (grou

122 ed, from the modulation of immune priming by hygiene, gut microbiota diversity, and exposure to endot

123 Oral hygiene habits were recorded using a self-administered q

124 trolling for age, sex, education level, oral hygiene habits, and hyperlipidemia (P = 0.049).

125 s regarding background characteristics, oral hygiene habits, and recent dental procedures, but not cu

126 We aimed to compare oral hygiene habits, orodental status, and dental procedures

127 uestionnaire (n = 259; 26.6%) had worse oral hygiene habits, periodontal disease risk factors, and cl

128 onclusion, FA patients that showed poor oral hygiene harbored higher proportions of the genera of bac

129 drinking water and improving sanitation and hygiene has proven remarkably insufficient to contain ou

130 Improved hygiene has reduced the risk of traveler's diarrhea from

131 Although improved hygiene has reduced the risk of traveler's diarrhea in m

132 ession defects in individuals with good oral hygiene have a high probability of progressing during lo

133 rials that interventions, which improve oral hygiene have positive effects on the prevention of nosoc

134 velopment of these conditions, including the hygiene hypothesis and the microbiota hypothesis.

135 The hygiene hypothesis attempts to link the increased excess

136 The hygiene hypothesis has been formulated to explain the in

137 The hygiene hypothesis implicates childhood microbial exposu

138 These findings lend support to the hygiene hypothesis in that the odds of having asthma amo

139 These results support a model of the hygiene hypothesis in which certain individuals are gene

140 The hygiene hypothesis is the leading concept to explain the

141 anding of the immune mechanisms by which the hygiene hypothesis operates in urban Latin America.

142 The hygiene hypothesis postulates that decreased microbial e

143 The hygiene hypothesis proposes that the transition from rur

144 The hygiene hypothesis suggests that high hygiene standards

145 The hygiene hypothesis suggests that higher exposure to infe

146 The hygiene hypothesis supports an inverse relationship betw

147 The "hygiene hypothesis" theorizes that decreased exposure to

148 r siblings (observations which prompted the 'hygiene hypothesis' for allergic disease) are mainly a p

149 and allergic diseases led to the so-called 'hygiene hypothesis'.

150 According to the hygiene hypothesis, the increasing incidence of autoimmu

151 microbiota may be a pivotal component in the hygiene hypothesis, we studied whether perinatal exposur

152 The hygiene hypothesis, which describes the protective influ

153 rther strength to the role of B cells in the hygiene hypothesis.

154 a potential mechanistic explanation for the hygiene hypothesis.

155 This finding extends the original hygiene hypothesis.

156 maternal immune modulation into the expanded hygiene hypothesis.

157 seem to provide new evidence supporting the hygiene hypothesis.

158 sting and bringing a new perspective to the "hygiene hypothesis."

159 hlorhexidine body-washing combined with hand hygiene improvement for 6 months (phase 2), followed by

160 in isolation or as part of a bundle of sleep hygiene improvement, is associated with a significant re

161 y, which appeared in the American Journal of Hygiene in 1938, was outstanding for its clear and tidy

162 at evaluated an intervention to improve hand hygiene in an adult ICU setting, and reported hand hygie

163 trates that best practice for improving hand hygiene in ICUs remains unestablished.

164 ure describing interventions to improve hand hygiene in ICUs, to evaluate the quality of the extant r

165 ortant to remember that the major changes in hygiene in Northern Europe and the United States were co

166 in infectious agents as a result of improved hygiene, increased antibiotic use and vaccination, and c

167 adjustment for: 1) age; 2) sex; and 3) oral hygiene index (OHI).

168 rity of gingivitis using the simplified oral hygiene index and the gingival index, respectively.

169 ices and clinical parameters, including oral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S) score, gingival index (

170 index (PI); 2) gingival index (GI); 3) oral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S); and 4) microbiologic c

171 he periodontal parameters assessed were oral hygiene index-simplified, gingival index, mean probing d

172 ygiene categories based on a simplified oral hygiene index.

173 atistically related to the dental or denture hygiene index.

174 e abilities and related to tooth and denture hygiene indices, which were assessed using the approxima

175 qually, it is clear that the consequences of hygiene, indoor entertainment, and changes in diet or ph

176 , electronics, environmental, cosmetics, and hygiene industries.

177 The Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial in Zimba

178 The Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial is desig

179 The Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial is motiv

180 In the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial, we util

181 children aged 0-18 months in the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial.

182 d randomized interventions of the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy trial in Zimbabwe.

183 The two physicians, when working at the Hygiene Institute at the University of Breslau, Germany

184 self-regulation manual, and individual oral hygiene instruction.

185 ved individual lifestyle counseling and oral hygiene instruction.

186 received scaling and root planing plus oral hygiene instruction.

187 All patients received sleep hygiene instructions.

188 rol group was treated with MI and given oral hygiene instructions.

189 in hazard of infection in the increased hand hygiene intervention arm was 37.0% [8.3%, 57.8%], wherea

190 system and enhancing water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions and sensitization should be consid

191 Sanitation and hygiene interventions are estimated to generate a 36% an

192 infant feeding and/or water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions on stunting and anemia.

193 ty providers), holistic care (n = 4; patient hygiene, kindness and respect, family access to patient,

194 iene for 6 weeks (T2) with the provided oral hygiene kits.

195 We observed hand hygiene lapses, inadequate infection documentation, and

196 quintiles among individuals with a good oral hygiene level.

197 cian from four functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position, and pain).

198 ted that under almost ideal conditions (good hygiene, maintenance of universally high IPV coverage, a

199 less, concerning patients with DM, poor oral hygiene, male sex, and PON-1 phenotype were found to be

200 Differing approaches to menstrual hygiene management (MHM) have been associated with a wid

201 cturing and legislative changes to workplace hygiene, many BCs still arise through occupational carci

202 We hypothesize that glove use after hand hygiene may further decrease these infections.

203 t characteristics, experimental design, hand hygiene measurement, intervention characteristics, and o

204 against biofilms on tooth surfaces, and oral hygiene measures such as brushing and flossing are requi

205 After 36 hours (T1), without mechanical oral hygiene measures, plaque and gingival indices were recor

206 Even with good oral hygiene, microbial communities accumulate on teeth in ar

207 microbiology, decolonization, and augmented hygiene might prevent dissemination of invasive bacteria

208 que could be implemented for routine surface hygiene monitoring for targeted cleaning interventions a

209 e diseases (n=8), and water, sanitation, and hygiene (n=6).

210 that these mechanisms were developed through hygiene norms, which were piggybacking on pathogen disgu

211 oups, probably due to the worse home control hygiene of patients with DG.

212 ons focused on water without also addressing hygiene often see little to no effect on reported incide

213 ys 7, 14, and 21, during stent-mediated oral hygiene (OH) abstention; and at day 42, after resumption

214 The mechanisms by which the hygiene operates are not well established but are underp

215 ves were sampled at room exit (prior to hand hygiene or glove removal) and then evaluated for the pre

216 lved but well-identified causes such as hand hygiene, overuse of catheters, and to a lesser extent, t

217 One hygiene patient and 106 dental patients were recruited.

218 The hygiene patient did not score positively on the M-SASQ f

219 Improved hand hygiene plus unit-wide chlorhexidine body-washing reduce

220 iling water access, sanitation availability, hygiene practice, socio-economic status, education level

221 duce direct skin absorption and standardized hygiene practices implemented at different regional fire

222 BDEs and that good housekeeping and personal hygiene practices may reduce exposure to these compounds

223 stimates indicated that: (a) proper personal hygiene practices significantly promote proper filter op

224 Television viewing, parental stress, and hygiene practices were inversely associated with the ser

225 st compared maternal oral symptoms/problems, hygiene practices, and dental service use between female

226 self-report of oral symptoms/problems, oral hygiene practices, and/or dental service use before or d

227 reported oral health symptoms/problems, oral hygiene practices, or dental service use before or durin

228 Oral hygiene practices, socioeconomic and education status, d

229 nating disease prevention information, e.g., hygiene practices, vaccination campaign notices and othe

230 structions for an intensive daily regimen of hygiene practices.

231 matory parameters after refraining from oral hygiene practices.

232 Glove use after hand hygiene prior to patient and line contact is associated

233 g attention to adherence to appropriate hand hygiene procedures; and attention to the details of envi

234 Oral hygiene products were provided, together with instructio

235 o plastic, PBs-diethyl phthalate to personal hygiene products, and OPs to food.

236 daily routines, including the application of hygiene products.

237 d in an iterative fashion, including 1) hand hygiene program with refresher education campaign, 2) ch

238 er education campaign, 2) chlorhexidine oral hygiene program, 3) chlorhexidine bathing, 4) catheter-a

239 ing trials, and ICU early mobility and sleep hygiene programs in order to achieve synergistic benefit

240 eathing trials, and early mobility and sleep hygiene programs is associated with significant improvem

241 , ICU early mobility programs, and ICU sleep hygiene programs, in order to improve ICU patient outcom

242 child spaces, improving veterinary care, and hygiene promotion.

243 er gram of feces, even optimally implemented hygiene protocols often fail.

244 otten publication in the American Journal of Hygiene published in 1929, which both upsets the convent

245 ed on the potential effect of intensive oral hygiene regimens and periodontal therapy during pregnanc

246 ntal caries and thus require aggressive oral hygiene regimens and routine dental surveillance.

247 etermine if these approaches augment current hygiene regimens, especially when these are optimally im

248 During oral hygiene restriction (OHR), lysine decarboxylase (LDC) in

249 ed on risk-based culling decisions and three hygiene scenarios.

250 Our Meat Hygiene Service model estimated that cattle classified a

251 hildren of smoking parents with poor smoking hygiene (smoking parents whose children had detectable s

252 ildren whose parents exercised good "smoking hygiene" (smoking parents whose children had nondetectab

253 odontal disease to provide education on oral hygiene, smoking, and DM.

254 The hygiene hypothesis suggests that high hygiene standards have led to an immune dysfunction and

255 ptoms in Western Siberia, with lifestyle and hygiene standards of a developed country.

256 ing practices) had a negative effect on oral hygiene status (beta = 0.044; P = 0.07), and also had an

257 atus, presence of digit-sucking habits, oral hygiene status (OHS), and gingivitis among a group of Ni

258 Clinical examination of oral hygiene status and gingivitis was conducted using simpli

259 extent of gingival bleeding via a worse oral hygiene status of children, but SES was also important f

260 Oral hygiene status was positively associated with the extent

261 es of oral health-related behaviors and oral hygiene status.

262 ssessing the efficacy of earplugs as a sleep hygiene strategy in patients admitted to a critical care

263 l practitioners, dental students, and dental hygiene students.

264 tment sensitivity to a treatment of proximal hygiene (study 1) or toothbrushing (study 2), respective

265 isk factors for pneumonia (ie, impaired oral hygiene, swallowing difficulty) were enrolled.

266 on of chemical warfare agents, environmental hygiene technology, preliminary toxicology tests, mutage

267 the spatial relationships of human skin with hygiene, the microbiota, and environment, with potential

268 at have furthered the substance and shape of hygiene theory, primarily as it relates to allergic airw

269 A visual screen by hygiene-therapists acted as the index test, and the gene

270 The results suggest that hygiene-therapists could be used to screen for dental ca

271 s to compare the diagnostic test accuracy of hygiene-therapists when screening for dental caries and

272 lly possible to delegate a range of tasks to hygiene-therapists.

273 fter patients had been asked to perform oral hygiene to the best of their abilities.

274 ealth, has been to "cultivate the science of hygiene" to bring about exponential growth in the eviden

275 oral microbiome were observed with poor oral hygiene, tobacco smoking, and oral cancer.

276 uence of factors, such as smoking, poor oral hygiene, tooth mobility, and defect morphology, on regen

277 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Pfizer, UK Department of He

278 born Lives programme to The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

279 Research Consortium at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

280 titute of Public Health and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

281 ividual patient characteristics, and a sleep hygiene video (control).

282 dontal health, superior effect of MI on oral hygiene was found in five trials and was absent in two t

283 duration and treatment of diabetes, and oral hygiene was recorded using a questionnaire.

284 tegration between the water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and maternal and newborn health sectors.

285 20 Global Strategy on water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) en

286 components, of which water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) are critical elements.

287 e sought to develop a water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) intervention to minimize fecal-oral trans

288 protective effect of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions without presenting ethical

289 s (STHs) suggest that water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) might reduce their transmission.

290 feces transmitted via water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH)-related pathways in low- and middle-incom

291 in conditions of poor water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH).

292 quire improvements in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH).

293 ealth and nutritional education and improved hygiene, water, and sanitation.

294 tors of presence of gingivitis and poor oral hygiene were determined using multivariate logistic regr

295 pable of maintaining a high standard of oral hygiene were randomly allocated to one of four treatment

296 hods to adjust for confounders, such as hand hygiene, when examining the effect of disinfecting metho

297 ccurs in resource-poor areas with inadequate hygiene, where children with unclean faces share infecte

298 is 6 publications in the American Journal of Hygiene, which later became the American Journal of Epid

299 interface [BGI] groups) abstained from oral hygiene while using an acrylic stent.

300 odifying factors such as fluoride and dental hygiene would not be needed if we tackled the single cau