ライフサイエンスコーパス: hyperopia

1 with refractive status (myopia, emmetropia, hyperopia).

2 reener in children with ametropia (myopia or hyperopia).

3 4.81 D [SD 0.35]) with the highest degree of hyperopia.

4 n isolation or in association with myopia or hyperopia.

5 of 41% and a specificity of 84% in detecting hyperopia.

6 for anisometropia development, especially in hyperopia.

7 o refraction and some evidence of linkage to hyperopia.

8 sm was associated with increasing myopia and hyperopia.

9 e cutoff of +0.75 D or less (versus more) of hyperopia.

10 myopia increased with the degree of central hyperopia.

11 e significantly more likely than men to have hyperopia.

12 n (SD = 4.5 D), including extreme myopia and hyperopia.

13 he FDA for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia.

14 5%) for myopia and 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%) for hyperopia.

15 e study of experimentally induced myopia and hyperopia.

16 67 D) and included both high myopia and high hyperopia.

17 ns of emmetropization resulting in myopia or hyperopia.

18 offer promise for the surgical correction of hyperopia.

19 aving thinner choroids than those developing hyperopia.

20 e, a linear function of the initial level of hyperopia.

21 ndividuals, and its presence correlates with hyperopia.

22 factors, age has an inverse association with hyperopia.

23 All patients had hyperopia.

24 curate, and predictable for the treatment of hyperopia.

25 amber depth, anteriorly positioned lens, and hyperopia.

26 were associated with a higher prevalence of hyperopia.

27 . white, respectively; P < 0.001) and higher hyperopia (+0.28 mum/D; P < 0.001).

28 . white, respectively; P < 0.001) and higher hyperopia (+0.4 mum/D; P < 0.001), but not for other var

29 equivalent was associated with age (towards hyperopia: 0.34 (< 0.001)), AL (-0.66 (< 0.001)), ACD (-

30 inant 5.47% followed by astigmatism 1.9% and hyperopia 1.4% in both sexes.

31 ies (OR high myopia 19.5, P < .0001; OR high hyperopia 10.7, P = .033; SE -3.10 D [SD 4.49]); rod dom

32 Ocular examination revealed high hyperopia (+13.5 OD and +14 OS diopters) with reduced ax

33 iciency (6 of 72), strabismus (2 of 72), and hyperopia (2 of 72).

34 f SE high myopia 239.7; odds ratio (OR) mild hyperopia 263.2, both P < .0001; SE -6.86 diopters (D) (

35 ophies (OR low myopia 2.7; P = .001; OR high hyperopia 5.8; P = .025; SE -0.10 D [SD 3.09]).

36 nic participants having the highest rates of hyperopia (50.2%) and clinically significant hyperopia (

37 hyperopia (50.2%) and clinically significant hyperopia (8.8%).

38 ies (OR high myopia 10.1, P < .0001; OR high hyperopia 9.7, P = .001; SE -2.27 D [SD 4.65]), and reti

39 fraction was 68.8 %, higher with myopia than hyperopia (90 % vs 54.5 %, p = 0.01).

40 ital stapes ankylosis syndrome that included hyperopia, a hemicylindrical nose, broad thumbs and grea

41 For the continuous spectrum of myopia/hyperopia, a model specifying additive genetic and uniqu

42 The links among hyperopia, accommodative convergence, and strabismus are

43 Although the degree of hyperopia achieved asymptote, of + 2 D, shortly after 1

44 pherical equivalent refractive error to less hyperopia after controlling for baseline refractive erro

45 ollected from nine healthy young adults with hyperopia, age range 18 to 25 years, in a sleep laborato

46 trated similar lags, while those with higher hyperopia, amblyopia, or strabismus had more variable la

47 lent refractive error from hyperopia to less hyperopia (amblyopic eye: -0.65 diopter, 95% CI -0.85, -

48 show great variability in the prevalence of hyperopia among children.

49 es, with the main complications being severe hyperopia and angle-closure glaucoma.

50 rapy in Mfrp (rd6) /Mfrp (rd6) mice suggests hyperopia and associated refractive errors may be amenab

51 But hyperopia and astigmatism are also being examined both i

52 Refractive errors, particularly significant hyperopia and astigmatism, in addition to anisometropia

53 eusis (LASIK) are also used to treat myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism.

54 ctive surgical procedures to correct myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism.

55 omising technique to correct low to moderate hyperopia and astigmatism.

56 use of the excimer laser to correct myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism.

57 tween nanophthalmos and less severe forms of hyperopia and between nanophthalmos and other conditions

58 s no consensus about the association between hyperopia and gender, family income and parental schooli

59 Hyperopia and high AC/A ratios are most clearly associat

60 ric ametropic and/or anisometropic myopia or hyperopia and in the event of nonadherence to traditiona

61 CI 0.96-2.64), but the associations between hyperopia and incident nuclear and cortical cataracts we

62 a whole, children who became myopic had less hyperopia and longer axial lengths than did emmetropes b

63 Hyperopia and myopia aggregate strongly in OOA families.

64 Ophthalmic manifestations noted were hyperopia and signs of ocular surface disease owing to n

65 should use standardized methods to classify hyperopia and sufficient sample size when evaluating age

66 Subjects with uncorrected hyperopia and uncorrected astigmatism reported more near

67 y-eight percent of these had myopia, 41% had hyperopia, and 11% had astigmatism.

68 Age, race/ethnicity, current smoking, hyperopia, and AMD-susceptibility genotypes Complement F

69 The prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in NHW children was 1.20% (95

70 In Asian children, the prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism was 3.98% (95% CI, 3.11%-5.09

71 en the most popular forms to correct myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism.

72 Younger age, esotropia, hyperopia, and botulinum injection were associated with

73 Esotropia, hyperopia, and botulinum injection were independently as

74 Older age, hyperopia, and east Asian ethnic origin are the main ris

75 smoking throughout pregnancy, anisometropia, hyperopia, and inheritance.

76 ications include increased age, preoperative hyperopia, and years of contact lens wear.

77 icipants underwent LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, and/or astigmatism.

78 Relative peripheral hyperopia appears to exert little consistent influence o

79 Myopia and hyperopia are at opposite ends of the continuum of refra

80 Refractive errors, myopia, and hyperopia are common conditions requiring corrective len

81 pia was defined as </=-0.50 diopters (D) and hyperopia as >/=+2.00 D right eye spherical equivalent r

82 cal equivalent of -1.0 diopters (D) or less, hyperopia as +1.0 D or more.

83 or less, emmetropia as -0.75 to +0.75 D and hyperopia as +1.00 D or more.

84 refractive error as myopia of at least 1DS, hyperopia as greater than +3.50DS and astigmatism as gre

85 n of myopia should target the child with low hyperopia as the child at risk.

86 Black persons had less myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia than did white

87 significant refractive errors, specifically hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia, varied by gro

88 de of significant refractive errors (myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia; P<0.00001 for

89 ictable, and safe to correct low to moderate hyperopia, astigmatism, and manage presbyopia.

90 the shape of the cornea and correct myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia.

91 Analyses compare myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and visual acuity between noncit

92 ic effects are of major importance in myopia/hyperopia; astigmatism appears to be dominantly inherite

93 ed in children with myopia beyond 10.0 D and hyperopia beyond 4.5 D.

94 e potential to eliminate not only myopia and hyperopia but also the loss of accommodation resulting f

95 CS had an early onset of night blindness and hyperopia but no nystagmus.

96 eal/axial aniso-astigmatism, associated with hyperopia, but whether these relations are causal is unc

97 its of spectacle correction for infants with hyperopia can be achieved without impairing the normal d

98 apical ciliary muscle fibers are thicker in hyperopia (CMTMAX and CMT1).

99 wer ACDs, thicker lenses, more NOP, and more hyperopia compared to younger individuals (P < 0.001).

100 The established treatments for hyperopia continue to accumulate evidence supporting the

101 Monkeys had +7 D (SD=2.3 D) of hyperopia, corneal power of 58 D (SD=1 D), and axial len

102 Although the first attempts at hyperopia correction were made more than 100 years ago,

103 Reduction in hyperopia correlated significantly with increases in axi

104 Hyperopia declined with increasing years of education, a

105 e, those with less than approximately 4 D of hyperopia demonstrated similar lags, while those with hi

106 tive error remained at a consistent level of hyperopia each year after onset, whereas axial length an

107 All subjects showed a relative peripheral hyperopia, especially in the nasal retina.

108 Hyperopia (farsightedness) is a common and significant c

109 of eye development characterized by extreme hyperopia (farsightedness), with refractive error in the

110 Children with hyperopia greater than +3.5 diopters (D) are at increase

111 The hyperopia group also presented a significant IOP elevati

112 ing and diurnal supine IOP was larger in the hyperopia group than in the myopia group.

113 Average diurnal sitting IOP was lower in the hyperopia group than in the other two groups.

114 Variations in 24-hour IOP in this hyperopia group were analyzed, together with previously

115 in habitual IOP was most significant in the hyperopia group.

116 malies, onset by 6 months of age, absence of hyperopia > 3 Diopters, operation before age 4.

117 fractive error (myopia >/= 0.5 diopters [D]; hyperopia >/= 3.0 D; astigmatism >/= 2.0 D or >/= 1.5 D

118 were defined as myopia </=-3.0 diopters (D), hyperopia >/= 4.5 D, astigmatism >/= 2.0 D, and anisomet

119 e common in 12- to 13-year-old children with hyperopia >/=+2 DS.

120 Uncorrected hyperopia >/=4.0 D or hyperopia >/=3.0 to </=6.0 D associated with reduced bin

121 Uncorrected hyperopia >/=4.0 D or hyperopia >/=3.0 to </=6.0 D assoc

122 Prevalence of hyperopia >3.25 diopter (D) varied (P=0.007), with the l

123 An ROC analysis designed to detect hyperopia >5 D in any meridian, amblyopia and/or strabis

124 rical equivalent) declined with age, whereas hyperopia (> +0.5 D), astigmatism (> 0.5 D of cylinder),

125 to -5.99 D), severe myopia (> -6.00 D), and hyperopia (> 1.00 D).

126 ter [D]), emmetropia (-0.50 to +0.50 D), and hyperopia (>/=+0.50 D).

127 rs (D) and further classified into 4 groups: hyperopia (>/=1.0 D), emmetropia (-0.99 D to 0.99 D), mi

128 Cycloplegic refraction was used to identify hyperopia (>/=3.0 to </=6.0 diopters [D] in most hyperop

129 Those with higher hyperopia (>/=4 D to </=6 D) were at greatest risk, alth

130 ung infants and children with low amounts of hyperopia have similar lags of accommodation from the fi

131 e, in-office procedure for the correction of hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and management of pres

132 ducation, and nuclear sclerosis), myopia and hyperopia in 834 sibling pairs within 486 extended pedig

133 Children identified as having significant hyperopia in a population screening program at age 8 to

134 error and familial aggregation of myopia and hyperopia in an elderly Old Order Amish (OOA) population

135 ss oblate, and exhibited relative peripheral hyperopia in both the nasal and the temporal hemifields.

136 igmatism associated with spherical myopia or hyperopia in chicks is similar to those reported in huma

137 shifts from mild myopia in neonates to mild hyperopia in infants.

138 a, varied by group, with the highest rate of hyperopia in non-Hispanic whites, and the highest rates

139 nalysis of spherical equivalent, myopia, and hyperopia in the Beaver Dam Eye Study was performed.

140 Myopic children had greater relative hyperopia in the periphery (+0.80 +/- 1.29 D), indicatin

141 For a cut point of less than +0.75 D hyperopia in the third grade, sensitivity was 86.7% and

142 monkeys exhibited small amounts of relative hyperopia in the treated field.

143 rogression, axial elongation, and peripheral hyperopia in the year prior to onset followed by relativ

144 logMAR) and overall, there was a bias toward hyperopia in their refractive errors (mean: + 1.07 D).

145 dictable, and an effective way of correcting hyperopia in this age group.

146 Corneal surgery for the correction of hyperopia includes older lamellar techniques such as aut

147 The prevalence of hyperopia increased from 29% at 40 to 49 years of age to

148 The prevalence of myopia (hyperopia) increased (decreased) after 60 years of age,

149 This may be the first evidence that hyperopia is associated with a thicker apical ciliary mu

150 Relative peripheral hyperopia is associated with myopia.

151 The frequency of hyperopia is higher among White children and those who l

152 reas positive lenses cause lens-compensation hyperopia (LCH).

153 n, myopia was relatively more prevalent, and hyperopia less prevalent, among Asian children.

154 .5 D, anisometropia </=1.0 D) or emmetropia (hyperopia </=1.0 D; astigmatism, anisometropia, and myop

155 If myopia and hyperopia (< or = -0.5 D and > or = 0.5 D, respectively)

156 Hyperopia may be related weakly to incident nuclear and

157 ia may help to determine which children with hyperopia may benefit from early spectacle correction or

158 ial, but low degrees of overcorrection (i.e. hyperopia) may not adversely affect eventual best-correc

159 cant cause of visual impairment, and extreme hyperopia (nanophthalmos) is a consequence of loss-of-fu

160 pproximately (mean +/- SEM) 0.7 +/- 0.3 D of hyperopia (noncycloplegic refraction, corrected for the

161 All patients (2-47 years of age) had high hyperopia, normal-appearing anterior segments, posterior

162 ornea and lens are normal in size and shape, hyperopia occurs because insufficient growth along the v

163 amblyopia was significantly associated with hyperopia (odds ratio [OR], 15.3; 95% confidence interva

164 y to have a significant shift in refraction (hyperopia: odds ratio [OR], 3.4 [95% CI, 1.2-9.8]; myopi

165 The protocol targeted postoperative hyperopia of +6.0 or +8.0 diopters (D).

166 usOptix A09 photoscreener underestimated the hyperopia of 0.73 D and slightly overestimated myopia of

167 Presence of strabismus, hyperopia of 2.0 diopters (D) or more, astigmatism of 1.

168 Bilateral hyperopia of 3.0 D or more or astigmatism of 1.0 D or mo

169 Suggestive evidence of linkage was found for hyperopia on chromosome 3, region q26 (empiric P = 5.34

170 R acuity can reliably detect myopia, but not hyperopia or astigmatism in school-age children.

171 performs acceptably in the presence of high hyperopia or high cylinder.

172 rently used refractive procedures to correct hyperopia or hyperopic astigmatism.

173 Hyperopia or myopia was induced by rearing 26 infant mon

174 gic retinoscopy, both devices underestimated hyperopia or overestimated myopia (-1.35 diopters [D] an

175 nd spherical equivalents, but underestimated hyperopia or overestimated myopia and overestimated asti

176 Subjects with greater than 4 D of hyperopia, or amblyopia or strabismus, have more variabl

177 atients undergoing LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism.

178 ociated with the presence of amblyopia, high hyperopia, or the total amount of millimeters of surgery

179 = 0.0002), but not for myopia (P = 0.82) or hyperopia (P = 0.31).

180 tude of astigmatism (P<0.0001) and bilateral hyperopia (P<0.0001) were associated independently with

181 The surgical treatments of hyperopia present a significant challenge and reward for

182 Treatment of hyperopia presents greater challenges than treatment of

183 d to synthesize the existing knowledge about hyperopia prevalence and its associated factors in schoo

184 stable prevalence across age groups, whereas hyperopia prevalence decreased after infancy and then in

185 Meta-analysis of hyperopia prevalence was performed following MOOSE guide

186 ive error than did white persons, except for hyperopia prevalence, which was comparable in black and

187 of 22 affected family members revealed high hyperopia (range +7.25-+13.00 diopters; mean +9.88 diopt

188 Hyperopia ranged from 11.8% among black men 40 to 49 yea

189 s) and lambda(s) for different thresholds of hyperopia ranged from 2.31 (95% CI: 1.56-3.42) to 2.94 (

190 The prevalence of hyperopia ranged from 8.4% at age six, 2-3% from 9 to 14

191 incidence was 12.0% for myopia and 29.5% for hyperopia; rates were 3.6% and 2.0% for moderate-high my

192 d nanophthalmos represent a spectrum of high hyperopia rather than distinct phenotypes.

193 e 3.6% and 2.0% for moderate-high myopia and hyperopia, respectively.

194 11.7%, in eyes with myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia, respectively.

195 Hyperopia risk decreased with older age, male gender, an

196 Mean hyperopia +/- SD was 3.67 +/- 1.28 diopters (D) before s

197 ye, as indicated by short axial length, high hyperopia (severe farsightedness), high lens/eye volume

198 By 36 months, this reduction of hyperopia showed no overall difference between children

199 Reports on the development of hyperopia showed that it is axial in nature, similar to

200 s: myopia, sphere -0.5 diopters (D) or less; hyperopia, sphere 1.0 D or more; or astigmatism, cylinde

201 f the 88% who underwent cycloplegia, 58% had hyperopia (spherical equivalent [SE] >/=+0.50 diopter [D

202 ues, surgeons have multiple options to treat hyperopia successfully.

203 ropia was found to accompany both myopia and hyperopia, suggesting that other mechanisms in addition

204 or multiple reasons, including the fact that hyperopia tends to progress with age and becomes more sy

205 d cycloplegic autorefraction was higher with hyperopia than myopia (0.73 [1.34] vs 0.05 [0.66], p = 0

206 linking is increasingly being applied to the hyperopia that follows radial keratotomy.

207 ing, shallowing of the anterior chamber, and hyperopia), the pineal gland does not appear to be neces

208 opulation- or school-based studies assessing hyperopia through cycloplegic autorefraction or cyclople

209 ia and 15.3% (standard error, 0.06) for high hyperopia to 33.7% (standard error, 0.08) for high myopi

210 n spherical equivalent refractive error from hyperopia to less hyperopia (amblyopic eye: -0.65 diopte

211 antly (P < 0.0001) protected the chicks from hyperopia under constant-light conditions.

212 RK with mitomycin C was performed to correct hyperopia using Bausch & Lomb 217z laser for 120 eyes of

213 with higher odds of prevalent AMD (pooled OR hyperopia vs. emmetropia: 1.16; 95% confidence interval

214 The prevalence of hyperopia was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.9-3.7; 88 subjects), and t

215 5 D, and the cutoff for moderate-high myopia/hyperopia was 3.0 D.

216 The overall prevalence of any hyperopia was 38.2% and clinically significant hyperopia

217 The prevalence of hyperopia was 46.9% and was higher in women (51.8%) than

218 peropia was 38.2% and clinically significant hyperopia was 6.1%, with Hispanic participants having th

219 rms of open-angle glaucoma and OHTN, whereas hyperopia was associated with a substantially increased

220 adjusting for age, sex, and race/ethnicity, hyperopia was associated with early AMD (odds ratio [OR]

221 of the 6 cross-sectional studies showed that hyperopia was associated with higher odds of prevalent A

222 Relative peripheral hyperopia was associated with myopic ocular component ch

223 Relative peripheral hyperopia was associated with thinner lenses between ref

224 pia was defined as SE of -5.0 D or less; any hyperopia was defined as SE of +1.0 D or more; clinicall

225 SE of +1.0 D or more; clinically significant hyperopia was defined as SE of +3.0 D or more.

226 The prevalence of hyperopia was higher in girls than boys (P = 0.0002), bu

227 Hyperopia was most common in Hispanic subjects.

228 Similarly, after controlling for age, hyperopia was not associated with incident early (RR 0.9

229 ll, myopia was present in 94 subjects (22%), hyperopia was present in 222 subjects (52%), and emmetro

230 Hyperopia was related to incident nuclear (OR 1.56; CI 1

231 Hyperopia was the most common refractive error in both A

232 Myopia and hyperopia were defined as a spherical equivalent <-0.5 d

233 Myopia/hyperopia were defined as spherical equivalent < -0.5 di

234 Myopia and hyperopia were defined with five different thresholds.

235 Incidence rates of myopia/hyperopia were estimated by the product-limit approach,

236 Associations with myopia and hyperopia were evaluated in logistic regression analyses

237 ype and causal gene; and risks of myopia and hyperopia were evaluated using logistic regression.

238 High prevalences of myopia and hyperopia were found in this large black adult populatio

239 Bilateral astigmatism and bilateral hyperopia were risk factors for bilateral amblyopia.

240 Subjects with myopia, astigmatism, and hyperopia were significantly more likely to report more

241 Factors associated with hyperopia were the same as for myopia, except for occupa

242 these tissues is a general feature of axial hyperopia, whereas the opposite occurs in myopia.

243 etropia, particularly those with significant hyperopia, which is considered to be a strabismogenic an

244 lar events that occurs in induced myopia and hyperopia with increasing precision.