戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ing patients vulnerable to cerebral hypo- or hyperperfusion.
2 xic edema, partial contrast enhancement, and hyperperfusion.
3 e interval 0.4% to 2.6%]) patients developed hyperperfusion.
4  and thalamus without cortical or cerebellar hyperperfusion.
5 n after donor nephrectomy is attributable to hyperperfusion and hypertrophy of the remaining glomerul
6 nce, etiology, and prevention strategies for hyperperfusion and ICH following CAS.
7 the ability of these endpoints to detect HCC hyperperfusion and, thereby, evaluated the suitability i
8  Although interictal hypoperfusion and ictal hyperperfusion are established localizing findings in pa
9 scular instability and cerebral ischemia and hyperperfusion are high, and anesthesia management shoul
10                           Regions with ictal hyperperfusion are suggested to reflect seizure onset an
11                  Identifying this pattern of hyperperfusion as typical for mesial temporal onset seiz
12 btractions were segmented to show regions of hyperperfusion at 1 SD above the mean.
13 ectomy (PH) in patients is leading to portal hyperperfusion but reduced hepatic arterial perfusion (H
14 the ictal studies, and three showed regional hyperperfusion corresponding to the hyperperfused region
15 usion" (CPP<CPPopt), severe disability with "hyperperfusion" (CPP>CPPopt), and favorable outcome was
16                                    Moreover, hyperperfusion did not correct the abnormal bioenergetic
17 ted as positive for osteomyelitis when focal hyperperfusion, focal hyperemia and focal bony uptake on
18 e same risk factors are involved in cerebral hyperperfusion following carotid endarterectomy.
19 Indeed, within 3 months after symptom onset, hyperperfusion had a positive predictive value of 88% fo
20 EG) monitored interictal SPECT (IISPECT) and hyperperfusion in immediate postictal or periictal SPECT
21 ly (P = 0.11) so; (b) the lower incidence of hyperperfusion in PISPECT in our series was due to the o
22 ess often concordant with the EEG focus than hyperperfusion in PISPECT, but not significantly (P = 0.
23 , AA showed increased grey matter volume and hyperperfusion in right posterior neocortical areas impl
24 ocalized MTLE most commonly show a region of hyperperfusion in the anterior temporal region, which of
25 uring typical gelastic seizures demonstrated hyperperfusion in the hamartomas, hypothalamic region, a
26 erfusion that corresponded to the regions of hyperperfusion in the ictal studies, and three showed re
27  emission computed tomography revealed focal hyperperfusion in the region of the cerebellar mass.
28 were measured under basal conditions, during hyperperfusion induced by pharmacological vasodilation w
29 sing HAP need to be evaluated to reverse the hyperperfusion-induced impairment of the spontaneous cou
30                                  Significant hyperperfusion is uncommon, even at a time when conventi
31 NF), air trapping/hypoperfusion (AT), normal/hyperperfusion (NOR), and bulla/cysts (BUL).
32  cardiac arrhythmic death and one death from hyperperfusion-related intracerebral hemorrhage.
33                                     Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is an important complicati
34                                              Hyperperfusion syndrome and ICH can complicate carotid r
35  The study defined the incidence of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH
36 epartment to identify patients who developed hyperperfusion syndrome and/or ICH.
37                                          The hyperperfusion syndrome occurs infrequently following CA
38 attern of interictal hypoperfusion and ictal hyperperfusion that has been observed in subjects with e
39 ean rCBV, mean leakage coefficient K(2), and hyperperfusion volume (HPV), which is the fraction of th
40                              The presence of hyperperfusion was inversely related to the occurrence o
41                     Contralateral cerebellar hyperperfusion was observed in all cases.
42                                         This hyperperfusion was quantified by measuring the fraction
43                  The most-contiguous area of hyperperfusion was the anterior temporal area extending
44 d quantitative FMT signal, denoting synovial hyperperfusion, was used to differentiate between synovi
45                          We observed intense hyperperfusion within and at the edge of progressive mul

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。