ライフサイエンスコーパス: hypnosis

1 04 (standard), -0.07 (attention), and -0.11 (hypnosis).

2 es an acute resistance to isoflurane-induced hypnosis.

3 , like those accompanying anesthetic-induced hypnosis.

4 de psychotherapy, relaxation techniques, and hypnosis.

5 resulted in a savings of $338 per case with hypnosis.

6 ation with the cost of sedation with adjunct hypnosis.

7 n turn shed new light on the neural bases of hypnosis.

8 duration of etomidate- and propofol-mediated hypnosis.

9 y, a pattern of neuronal activity reflecting hypnosis, analgesia, amnesia and reflex suppression seem

10 on, and ketamine produce analgesia, but weak hypnosis and amnesia, by inhibiting glutamate and nicoti

11 Cognitive science has not fully exploited hypnosis and hypnotic suggestion as experimental tools.

12 nce would provide insight into the nature of hypnosis and its underlying mechanisms.

13 omatology) also supports the assumption that hypnosis and pathological dissociation share an underlyi

14 ng techniques offer new opportunities to use hypnosis and posthypnotic suggestion as probes into brai

15 al synchronization during anesthetic-induced hypnosis and suggest that HCN1 channels might contribute

16 clinical profiles appear to induce amnesia, hypnosis, and immobility via different molecular targets

17 General anesthetics cause sedation, hypnosis, and immobilization via CNS mechanisms that rem

18 itive behavioral therapy, slow breathing and hypnosis, and medications such as venlafaxine and gabape

19 nd vomiting prophylaxis, multimodal sedation-hypnosis, and multimodal analgesia, along with avoiding

20 Hypnosis appears to reduce perceived hot flashes in brea

21 nctional networks change and interact during hypnosis are warranted.

22 reased 68% from baseline to end point in the hypnosis arm (P < .001).

23 cognitive neuroscience has scantily fostered hypnosis as a manipulation, neuroimaging techniques offe

24 , the recognition of analgesia, amnesia, and hypnosis as discrete elements comprising the sedated sta

25 In survivors post-treatment, yoga and hypnosis as well as exercise show promise for controllin

26 ure of the components of general anesthesia, hypnosis (bispectral index scale, entropy), immobility (

27 nd barbiturates produce profound amnesia and hypnosis, but weak immobility, by enhancing the activity

28 This study was designed to determine whether hypnosis can modulate color perception.

29 considerable evidence that controlled formal hypnosis can produce a variety of dissociations of aware

30 hypnosis training, recent work suggests that hypnosis can provide temporary pain relief to the majori

31 fficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy plus hypnosis (CBTH) to control fatigue in patients with brea

32 ude education (with coping skills training), hypnosis, cognitive behavioral approaches, and relaxatio

33 disease states that include reduced arousal, hypnosis, drug intoxication, delirium, and psychosis.

34 om randomised trials supporting the value of hypnosis for cancer pain and nausea; relaxation therapy,

35 dure times were significantly shorter in the hypnosis group (61 min) than in the standard group (78 m

36 /15 min; p=0.0425), but remained flat in the hypnosis group.

37 gnificantly higher than in the attention and hypnosis groups (0.8 and 0.9 units, respectively).

38 Hypnosis had more pronounced effects on pain and anxiety

39 Hypnosis has been used clinically for hundreds of years

40 inical settings, the checkered reputation of hypnosis has dimmed its promise as a research instrument

41 Hypnosis, imagery, support groups, acupuncture, and heal

42 vivo, potentiating baclofen-induced sedation/hypnosis in DBA mice when administered either intraperit

43 These results were obtained only during hypnosis in the left hemisphere, whereas blood flow chan

44 widespread and successful therapeutic use of hypnosis in the treatment of many dissociative symptoms

45 ommand' during imagination of exercise under hypnosis, in order to uncouple central command from peri

46 ot flashes were randomly assigned to receive hypnosis intervention (five weekly sessions) or no treat

47 were observed for patients who received the hypnosis intervention (P < .005) in comparison to the no

48 dy was developed to evaluate the effect of a hypnosis intervention for hot flashes.

49 These findings support the claim that hypnosis is a psychological state with distinct neural c

50 d, reciprocally, provide a means of studying hypnosis itself.

51 Here we show that inducing analgesia through hypnosis leads to decreased responses to both self and v

52 in assays of sedation (loss of movement) and hypnosis (loss-of-righting reflex), TASK knock-out mice

53 acupuncture (n = 1), support groups (n = 2), hypnosis (n = 1), relaxation/imagery (n = 2), and herbal

54 d sedation (n = 79) or sedation with adjunct hypnosis (n = 82).

55 One hypnosis patient became haemodynamically unstable compar

56 pect to the following variables: cost of the hypnosis provider, cost of room time for interventional

57 ough hypnosis was known to reduce room time, hypnosis remained more cost-effective even if it added a

58 Hypnosis, therapeutic touch, massage therapy, distractin

59 mptoms and conditions (and the potential for hypnosis to induce dissociative symptomatology) also sup

60 Self-hypnosis training may also be of benefit, although it ap

61 Regarding self-hypnosis training, recent work suggests that hypnosis ca

62 therapy, operant behavioral therapy and self-hypnosis training.

63 nitive function and for sedation, as well as hypnosis (unconsciousness) which is induced by general a

64 Treatment with hypnosis using a CD provides an attractive treatment opt

65 Although hypnosis was known to reduce room time, hypnosis remaine

66 f-righting reflex, a behavioral correlate of hypnosis, was strongly reduced in HCN1 knock-out mice.

67 ges in subjective experience achieved during hypnosis were reflected by changes in brain function sim

68 ncluding perineural analgesia), and sedation-hypnosis, which are all central to timely recovery using

69 compared with $300 for sedation with adjunct hypnosis, which resulted in a savings of $338 per case w

70 Use of adjunct hypnosis with sedation reduces cost during interventiona