ライフサイエンスコーパス: illusion

1 ual system (i.e., cause a motion aftereffect illusion).

2 increases the perceived flicker rate (visual illusions).

3 evel of GABA and the magnitude of contextual illusion.

4 those following the first-person perspective illusion.

5 k and the size of the temporal window of the illusion.

6 nsistent with the perception of the Thatcher illusion.

7 showed normal sensitivity to a haptic shape illusion.

8 sual periphery, and the well-known curveball illusion.

9 ay, did not show response enhancement to the illusion.

10 l and visible rubber hand in the rubber hand illusion.

11 blished study, did elicit a negative calorie illusion.

12 istance information contribute to the Taylor illusion.

13 ies failed to replicate the negative calorie illusion.

14 tic hand if perceived as one's own during an illusion.

15 a metasurface device to generate an optical illusion.

16 r the illusory motion in the Rotating Snakes illusion.

17 experiments fashioned after the Rubber Hand Illusion.

18 n is adjusted to control for the irradiation illusion.

19 n can nevertheless generate a shape contrast illusion.

20 ant visual input underlies the ventriloquist illusion.

21 otion, consistent with the apparent position illusion.

22 ion, can be exploited to create a continuity illusion.

23 sociated with perception of the double-flash illusion.

24 nce rules is the underlying mechanism of the illusion.

25 sions as well as a non-geometrical, contrast illusion.

26 ion of self-representation during the Taylor illusion.

27 ical illusions and non-geometrical, contrast illusion.

28 racking whilst presenting an apparent motion illusion.

29 hat this effect is mediated by the ownership illusion.

30 real (disembodied) hand are affected by the illusion.

31 us (IPS), and the degree of the crossed-hand illusion.

32 self-consciousness induced by the full-body illusion.

33 presentations should also produce brightness illusions.

34 There are many other sources of slope illusions.

35 attempting to find common mechanisms across illusions.

36 e afterimages, fading, and many other visual illusions.

37 risingly prone to measurable distortions and illusions.

38 tanding of the mechanisms behind geometrical illusions.

39 tween Ebbinghaus and Muller-Lyer geometrical illusions.

40 n, providing a new method to realize optical illusions.

41 nusual configuration of body parts can cause illusions.

42 perceptual processing observed during these illusions.

43 , stationary objects appear to move (Filehne illusion [3]), the perceived direction of moving objects

44 gures [1], faces [2], and a number of visual illusions [3-6].

45 rs away from its true path (e.g., the slalom illusion [5]).

46 In the "flash-beep illusion," a single light flash is perceived as multiple

47 -an effect known as the "auditory continuity illusion." A widespread view is that the illusion can on

48 It's just an illusion: Above a critical chain length, where oligomers

49 of context (large or small inducers) in this illusion affected size perception by comparing each to a

50 positions of targets, and measured how this illusion affects saccadic eye movements during FEF micro

51 nd that differences in the quality of visual illusion among males were consistent within and between

52 ersa, thereby giving rise to perfect optical illusion and cloaking devices, respectively.

53 effect has been called the negative calorie illusion and has been attributed to averaging the unheal

54 n implicit prejudice and magnitude of the RH illusion and proprioceptive drift.

55 also respond behaviorally to the reverse-phi illusion and that the illusion is present in dendritic c

56 that S1 and M1 contribute to the rubber hand illusion and that, by taking advantage of plasticity in

57 tinct psychophysical tasks, captures several illusions and biases, and explains core aspects of human

58 Visual hallucinations, illusions and extrapyramidal tract signs were more frequ

59 The findings suggest early onset illusions and formed hallucinations are linked to amyloi

60 e underlying pathophysiological mechanism of illusions and formed hallucinations, with implications f

61 Visual illusions and hallucinations are hallmarks of serotonerg

62 rties of interval tuning as well as temporal illusions and intersensory timing.

63 rical illusions, but not between geometrical illusions and non-geometrical, contrast illusion.

64 pheral nervous system to induce multisensory illusions and ownership of artificial body parts, which

65 cts in the environment can evoke self-motion illusions and postural adjustments.

66 discrimination, proprioceptive and body part illusions and self/non-self differentiation).

67 Differential brain responses for reported illusions and suppressions (incorrect flash counts) vs.

68 vide evidence that both sound-induced visual illusions and suppressions are mediated by an interplay

69 lts using paradigms such as the "rubber hand illusion" and "enfacement" [1-11].

70 motion of the 1-D features (the barber-pole illusion) and the direction of tracking eye movements.

71 n to be reproduced by its flat analogue (for illusions) and vice versa for cloaks.

72 urthermore, the magnitude of all geometrical illusions, and particularly the Ebbinghaus and Muller-Ly

73 We further found that this softness illusion appeared selectively when the touch activated a

74 The negative calorie illusion appears to be a function of the contrast betwee

75 ter-individual differences in perceiving the illusion are based at least in part on differences in vi

76 Geometrical visual illusions are an intriguing phenomenon, in which subject

77 The dominant accounts of many visual illusions are based on experience-driven development of

78 Visual hallucinations and illusions are thought to be caused by specific cognitive

79 Perceptual illusions are usually thought to arise from the way sens

80 Accounts of this illusion argue that temporal auditory information interf

81 ing the hypothesis that the negative calorie illusion arises from the use of a reference-dependent an

82 sound, and argues against the view that the illusion arises in the auditory periphery.

83 We used visual contextual illusion as a perceptual assay since the illusion dissoc

84 d analyzed vividness and authenticity of the illusion as well as brain activation patterns.

85 , Ponzo, and vertical-horizontal geometrical illusions as well as a non-geometrical, contrast illusio

86 visual /ba/ and acoustic /fa/ and hear /ba/ (illusion-ba), the visual input weakens the weighting of

87 ory evoked potential when subjects perceived illusion-ba, and a reduced N1 when they perceived illusi

88 Four original illusions {based on Gaetano Kanisza's and Akiyoshi Kitao

89 e tactile domain, we developed a new tactile illusion, based on the visual apparent-motion quartet [2

90 l guidelines for engineering electromagnetic illusions but can be extended to shape the near and far-

91 ffect is not merely an intriguing perceptual illusion, but rather a reflection of rapid neural and pe

92 stent with patterns observed in other bodily illusions, but less robust.

93 ot only for the likely explanations of these illusions, but more generally, for the nature-nurture ar

94 havioral judgments of all tested geometrical illusions, but not between geometrical illusions and non

95 l 16 participants extinguished the ownership illusion by using visuomotor asynchrony, with all else e

96 This classic illusion, called reverse-phi motion, has been well-chara

97 However, this illusion can be easily dispelled by trying to identify o

98 This illusion can be generated when the inducer and test stim

99 This illusion can be influenced by preceding sentential conte

100 ity illusion." A widespread view is that the illusion can only occur when peripheral neural responses

101 Acoustic illusion cloaks that create illusion effects by changing

102 ion was compared with a well-matched in-body illusion condition, in which the sense of bodily self wa

103 left sensorimotor cortex, whereas the Taylor illusion correlated with higher beta/gamma power over fr

104 particularly the Ebbinghaus and Muller-Lyer illusions, correlated with local gray matter density in

105 Measurements provide evidence that the illusion created is vivid.

106 Brightness illusions demonstrate that an object's perceived brightn

107 Each illusion demonstrates that eye speed is underestimated w

108 evidence indicates that the Rotating Snakes illusion depends critically on eye movements, yet the sp

109 we show that the strength of the embodiment illusion depends on the child-like voice feedback being

110 agical thinking, overvalued ideas, recurrent illusions, depersonalization, derealization, undue suspi

111 nstance, subjects experiencing a rubber hand illusion develop a sense of ownership of a mannequin han

112 rication and experimental verification of an illusion device working at microwave frequencies.

113 triguing application of TO is the idea of an illusion device.

114 in two visual phenomena called double-flash illusion (DFI) and fusion effect (FE), both consisting o

115 Because such illusions dissociate conscious perception from physical

116 ual illusion as a perceptual assay since the illusion dissociates perceptual content from stimulus co

117 ta show that afterimage drifts in the Taylor illusion do not only depend on the physical hand positio

118 ence illusion effectiveness, even though the illusion does not involve actual limb movement.

119 Here, we assessed whether the Taylor illusion does not just depend on the physical hand posit

120 the scattered field to generate the desired illusion effect near curved boundaries.

121 ation were performed, allowing us to map the illusion effect.

122 se biomechanical constraints would influence illusion effectiveness, even though the illusion does no

123 Acoustic illusion cloaks that create illusion effects by changing the scattered wave have man

124 his finding was a version of the line motion illusion entailing reverse-phi motion in which opposing

125 The result was a strong body-ownership illusion equally for C and A.

126 This well-known illusion exemplifies a basic principle of how auditory a

127 visual /fa/ and acoustic /ba/ and hear /fa/ (illusion-fa), the visual input strengthens the weighting

128 ion-ba, and a reduced N1 when they perceived illusion-fa, mirroring the N1 behavior for /ba/ and /fa/

129 ase (PD) psychosis refers to the spectrum of illusions, formed hallucinations and delusions that occu

130 t empirically testing the similarity between illusions has been notoriously difficult because illusio

131 Among them, the "Rotating Snakes Illusion" has generated a large amount of interest in th

132 neural mechanisms underlying this continuity illusion have been studied mostly with schematic stimuli

133 sions has been notoriously difficult because illusions have very different visual appearances.

134 ople can experience in-the-moment perceptual illusions, however, they can also be deceived about how

135 der comes from studies of the "Thatcher face illusion": humans and monkeys notice changes in the orie

136 Human experiments on the rubber hand illusion implicate similar regions, but since such exper

137 This study investigated a potential auditory illusion in duration perception induced by rhythmic temp

138 s gyrus predicted the strength of the visual illusion in the deaf adults in line with the interpretat

139 sensory integration is the McGurk effect, an illusion in which an auditory syllable is perceived diff

140 I report an illusion in which individuals experience that they are l

141 We describe and explore a novel illusion in which the center of a static wheel stimulus

142 Optical illusions in the curtain eruptions resulting from a comb

143 t temporal Gestalt induces auditory duration illusions in typical listeners, but that musical experts

144 A correlate of the continuity illusion, in which sounds are perceived to continue desp

145 e (tens of milliseconds) did not abolish the illusion, indicating that knowledge of instantaneous whi

146 ey were susceptible to a double-flash visual illusion induced by two touches to the face.

147 lus is not misperceived, suggesting that the illusion is a direct consequence of the decoding strateg

148 lts in line with the interpretation that the illusion is a functional consequence of the altered cros

149 We conclude that this new flickering illusion is a unique way to experience the alpha rhythms

150 s display over the court, and the quality of illusion is associated with mating success.

151 We conclude that the Thatcher face illusion is correlated with a pattern of activity in the

152 A new haptic illusion is described, in which the location of the mobi

153 This finding indicates that the continuity illusion is determined by the global features, rather th

154 This illusion is known as thermal referral (TR).

155 hands are stimulated while crossed, and the illusion is known to be acquired in early childhood.

156 y to determine whether susceptibility to the illusion is present immediately after birth; however, el

157 lly to the reverse-phi illusion and that the illusion is present in dendritic calcium signals of moti

158 le out the hypothesis that the origin of the illusion is purely cortical.

159 at perceptual interference in the flash-beep illusion is similar to within-modality interference from

160 is prediction, we found that the Rubber Hand Illusion is stronger in CD patients as compared to healt

161 The key feature of this illusion is that the stimulus fluctuations are experienc

162 ion beyond what was physically presented, an illusion known as boundary extension.

163 s (Ptilonorhynchus nuchalis) induce a visual illusion known as forced perspective for the female view

164 orporate the black RH and presented lower RH illusion magnitude and a smaller proprioceptive drift fo

165 tudy that included measurement of individual illusion magnitude and structural MRI scanning.

166 ly, parietal GABA level correlated with size illusion magnitude but not with orientation or brightnes

167 pital GABA level correlated with orientation illusion magnitude but not with size or brightness illus

168 on magnitude but not with size or brightness illusion magnitude.

169 itude but not with orientation or brightness illusion magnitude; in contrast, occipital GABA level co

170 is less able to move one of our hands if an illusion makes us feel like the hand does not belong to

171 But perceptual illusions might also result from the way the brain decod

172 n only two are presented (the "triple-flash" illusion) most often when the interflash delay matches t

173 We used the "triple-flash" illusion: Occasional perception of three flashes when on

174 rate exceeded the flicker rate (i.e. visual illusions occurred); and lower flutter rate was below th

175 t clearly succeeded in giving the mantis the illusion of 3D depth.

176 a linearly polarized light beam, the optical illusion of a 'vase' is perceived.

177 cortex that could be directly linked to the illusion of a shifted auditory percept.

178 Here we show that participants can have the illusion of agency over the walking of a virtual body ev

179 c conditions resulted in a strong subjective illusion of body ownership and agency over the VB, but n

180 Much of our visual experience is an 'illusion of completeness', without true conscious access

181 late that this process may contribute to the illusion of high resolution across the field of vision.

182 n produced a tactile motion aftereffect, the illusion of motion in the opponent direction across the

183 ay out of the egg to break the ill-conceived illusion of nanomedicine.

184 tuting the real body, was used to induce the illusion of ownership over the VB.

185 showed the positive emotional impact of the illusion of owning a child's body, opening up possibilit

186 istance task, before and after eliciting the illusion of owning an invisible body.

187 Face pareidolia is the compelling illusion of perceiving facial features on inanimate obje

188 sed in the initial selection and provide the illusion of progress.

189 enerated visual motion signals can cause the illusion of self-motion in space (vection) and correspon

190 quement syndrome (MdDS) experience a chronic illusion of self-motion triggered by prolonged exposure

191 selection on non-social traits can give the illusion of social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyos

192 ts, the haptic display induced the realistic illusion of walking on three different types of floor su

193 than the suppression accompanying continuity illusions of a simple tone.

194 error detection by skilled typists and found illusions of authorship that provide evidence for two er

195 The results show strong illusions of body ownership, agency and walking, in the

196 ress in identifying and quantifying temporal illusions of duration, temporal order, and simultaneity.

197 s of participants while they observed visual illusions of lightness or brightness.

198 ng, together determine the occurrence of the illusion on a trial-by-trial basis.

199 resentations increases the influence of this illusion on saccades.

200 Here, we explore the impact of ownership illusions on the temporal dimension of multisensory inte

201 magnitude of illusion through onset time to illusion only for the black RH.

202 etween geometric metasurface and the optical illusion opens a pathway for new applications related to

203 as associated with the occurrence of sensory illusions or hallucinations (odds ratio: 8.68, P < 0.001

204 factor data in patients who go on to develop illusions or hallucinations within 3-4 years of follow-u

205 loring rules of perspective or color, visual illusions, or iconography, and conversely, scientists wh

206 scientists have debated whether this type of illusion originates in the eye or in the brain.

207 The current study used the enfacement illusion paradigm to investigate the role of affective t

208 The confederacy of recently discovered illusions points to the underlying neural mechanisms of

209 ibility to two well-known geometrical visual illusions, Ponzo [1] and Muller-Lyer [2], immediately af

210 of their experience, but unlike other bodily illusions, positive changes in subjective experience wer

211 ividual differences in the magnitudes of the illusion produced by either type of context were correla

212 sometimes rhythmic spiking responses for the illusion-promoting configurations compared with controls

213 inal theoretical account of the triple-flash illusion proposed by Bowen in 1989.

214 This illusion raises two fundamental questions: first, given

215 om stimulus content and the magnitude of the illusion reflects the effect of visual inhibition.

216 oral and neural responses to the reverse-phi illusion reveal unexpected interactions between motion a

217 Brain imaging and a novel 'body-swop' illusion reveals distinct parietal-premotor and parietal

218 rtical," as illustrated in the Rod and Frame Illusion (RFI): an upright rod appears slanted in the op

219 ship sensation as induced by the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) with dark rubber hands.

220 During the rubber hand illusion (RHI), subjects experience an artificial hand a

221 ms in body representation is the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI).

222 The results reveal that the illusion seems to depend more on the overall specific lo

223 Experimental work on body ownership illusions showed how simple multisensory manipulation ca

224 A new illusion shows these changes are much stronger when seen

225 the temporally-dependent sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI).

226 hat macaque monkeys perceive a size-distance illusion similarly to humans.

227 heir typing rate showed no evidence of these illusions, slowing down after corrected errors but not a

228 This illusion-specific activation suggests that the brain mai

229 ects presented in isolation was unrelated to illusion strength and did not correlate with V1 area.

230 e eye drift contributes to well known motion illusions such as autokinesis and induced movement.

231 ic stimuli known to produce spatial auditory illusions such as summing localization confirmed that th

232 An optical illusion, such as "Rubin's vase", is caused by the infor

233 , enlarged and shrunk the temporal window of illusion, suggesting that alpha oscillations might repre

234 The saliency of the illusion suggests that supportive context can affect rel

235 This illusion suggests that the topographic pattern of neural

236 suppressions (incorrect flash counts) vs. no-illusions/suppressions (correct flash counts) were found

237 nts performed the sound-induced double-flash illusion task and found positive correlation between ind

238 and in fifteen young adults, using a mirror illusion task.

239 e combined self-touch with the thermal grill illusion (TGI) [6].

240 In the thermal grill illusion (TGI), alternating non-noxious warm and cold te

241 tual interpretations over time, creating the illusion that a constant stimulus is changing.

242 The ventriloquist creates the illusion that his or her voice emerges from the visibly

243 We used a novel bistable motion illusion that induced alternating and mutually exclusive

244 ulvinar of 2 macaque monkeys during a visual illusion that induced the intermittent perceptual suppre

245 The device creates the illusion that light propagates through empty flat space,

246 ts away increased stimuli size producing the illusion that stimuli moved away from or approached part

247 lection of their own left hand (creating the illusion that they were looking directly at their own ri

248 We enjoy the illusion that visual resolution is high across the entir

249 mplementary to the sound-induced extra flash illusion that we analyzed previously.

250 entations on this map are affected by visual illusions that alter perceived size.

251 ably behavioral correlates of body-ownership illusions that occur as a function of the type of body i

252 In the Ebbinghaus illusion, the context surrounding an object modulates it

253 A well-known illusion, the McGurk Effect, consists of incongruent aud

254 In the Taylor illusion, the perceived afterimage that is projected on

255 In the Taylor illusion, the size of an afterimage projected on one's h

256 ion is influenced by the body: in the Taylor illusion, the size of an afterimage projected on one's h

257 We show that, during the illusion, the temporal window for integrating touch on t

258 the retina is not necessary to perceive the illusion: the flicker can also be perceived on the after

259 h OIS as neural correlates of the "funneling illusion." These data demonstrate that at high field, hi

260 ias on proprioceptive drift and magnitude of illusion through onset time to illusion only for the bla

261 A classic example of this is the tilt illusion (TI) whereby the presence of a surround shifts

262 ous study has directly correlated the Enigma illusion to any specific physiological mechanism, and so

263 We developed a novel mirror box illusion to investigate whether motoric, but not spatial

264 y: The optimal stimulus onset asynchrony for illusion to occur was correlated, across human subjects

265 d tested our ability to deliver stereoscopic illusions to praying mantises.

266 f generating three-dimensional (3D) acoustic illusions under detection of broadband signals still rem

267 We conclude that this sensory illusion underlies a novel, bodily mechanism of socio-af

268 hat male great bowerbirds construct a visual illusion, using display object gradients, that affects m

269 As in the original flash-beep illusion, visual streams weakly influence auditory judgm

270 ng around 500 ms had an inverse polarity for illusions vs. suppressions.

271 This imagery-induced ventriloquist illusion was also associated with increased effective co

272 lved in a social interaction, an out-of-body illusion was elicited, in which the sense of bodily self

273 The rate change illusion was instead linked to changes in neural phase p

274 We report a study in which a crossed-hands illusion was investigated in autistic children.

275 Importantly, the illusion was not elicited when the electrical stimulatio

276 The illusion was proposed to result from superposition of tw

277 Interestingly, the illusion was reported to disappear when the middle digit

278 as an otherwise robust orientation repulsion illusion was weakened after rTMS.

279 ic change in space perception consequent the illusion, we also assessed peripersonal space, e.g., PPS

280 tablished protocol to induce the rubber hand illusion, we demonstrate that skin temperature of the re

281 adapted version of a well known multisensory illusion, we investigated the neural basis of mental ima

282 Relying on the rubber hand illusion, we manipulated hand ownership, so that partici

283 Relying on the somatic rubber hand illusion, we manipulated hand ownership, such that parti

284 Using the McGurk illusion, we show that visual context primes phonetic re

285 We found that vowel continuity illusions were accompanied by a suppression of the 4 Hz

286 The illusions were induced only during bouts of directed whi

287 eries of experiments, multisensory full-body illusions were used to modulate feelings of ownership ov

288 r example, in the sound-induced double-flash illusion, when two beeps are presented within approximat

289 d a time course compatible with the reported illusion: when alpha amplitude was strong, the probabili

290 eural mechanisms can be studied by using the illusion where a person is made to feel that a rubber ha

291 rt this hypothesis and report a novel visual illusion where stationary objects in the visual peripher

292 The flash-lag illusion, where a briefly presented flash in the vicinit

293 ated with the magnitude of two common visual illusions, where two physically identical objects appear

294 type of fixational eye movement--drives the illusion, whereas microsaccades produced during attempte

295 ress this issue, we combined the rubber hand illusion, which allows experimental manipulation of body

296 tal results from the quartet apparent motion illusion, which is a prototypical intermittent rivalry s

297 econciled with existing research on positive illusions, which finds that positive appraisals of stres

298 ce of rotation during the observation of the illusion while we simultaneously recorded their eye move

299 perception: some children never perceive the illusion, while others always do.

300 with PD, n=115 (27%) reported predominantly illusions with the median time of onset at 19.5 months f