ライフサイエンスコーパス: imaging finding

1 so to obviate biopsy in cases with classical imaging findings.

2 and KSHV loads were assessed in relation to imaging findings.

3 ate both common and infrequent but important imaging findings.

4 and histopathology were used to validate the imaging findings.

5 e on lymphoma and the associated spectrum of imaging findings.

6 content (P = 0.006), further supporting the imaging findings.

7 ed for 42-60 mo for evaluation of discrepant imaging findings.

8 and characteristic brain magnetic resonance imaging findings.

9 and disability data, and magnetic resonance imaging findings.

10 g loss, spasticity, and characteristic brain imaging findings.

11 ribution of bound and unbound radioiodine to imaging findings.

12 osis in explanted tumors was correlated with imaging findings.

13 fant with grossly abnormal clinical or brain imaging findings.

14 sis of osteoid osteoma based on clinical and imaging findings.

15 cal and histopathologic analyses to validate imaging findings.

16 s seen in nearly 40%, with little overlap in imaging findings.

17 ed, a rate similar to patients with positive imaging findings.

18 analyses for MPO and myeloid cells confirmed imaging findings.

19 ic regression controlling for severity of MR imaging findings.

20 nal pathology depends on the child's age and imaging findings.

21 rescence of MGd in CBD walls, confirming the imaging findings.

22 ty decline rate, and electroretinography and imaging findings.

23 n nomogram data; the other also incorporated imaging findings.

24 correlated with histologic and/or follow-up imaging findings.

25 tent TB infection (LTBI) and the spectrum of imaging findings.

26 mbination of clinical, histopathological and imaging findings.

27 ix patients (5.7%) on the basis of follow-up imaging findings.

28 ia, and 41 (30%) of them had normal bolus PW imaging findings.

29 which accounts for the observed symptoms and imaging findings.

30 6%) of these 41 patients also had normal ASL imaging findings.

31 ompared with the patients who had normal ASL imaging findings.

32 structures were evaluated and compared with imaging findings.

33 OLT was considered based on follow-up imaging findings.

34 all other clinical, histopathologic, and MR imaging findings.

35 jury (group 2) on the basis of delayed-phase imaging findings.

36 logic analysis was used for correlation with imaging findings.

37 ere analyzed on the basis of preoperative MR imaging findings.

38 inical symptoms with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings.

39 mutation and by demonstrating it's specific imaging findings.

40 All patients had typical clinical and imaging findings.

41 to direct the pathological correlation with imaging findings.

42 e how they communicate and manage incidental imaging findings.

43 ers (PCPs) communicate and manage incidental imaging findings.

44 r disease, based on clinical, laboratory, or imaging findings.

45 inography B-wave amplitudes, and qualitative imaging findings.

46 be enhanced by integrating both clinical and imaging findings.

47 0 PCPs on receiving and acting on incidental imaging findings.

48 slowly enlarging VT independent of any other imaging findings.

49 ormed in 54 hips on the basis of clinical or imaging findings (24% of hips were completely asymptomat

50 of two cohorts on the basis of clinical and imaging findings; 76.3% of the patients were included in

51 l-designed prospective studies have verified imaging findings against the gold standard of histopatho

52 The relationships among imaging findings, age, and sex were assessed with the t

53 and combined MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging findings (all correlation coefficients >0.5).

54 Imaging findings alone usually provide the only surrogat

55 ublished showing favorable outcomes based on imaging findings alone, albeit with much shorter follow-

56 The imaging findings and clinical data of the children who w

57 The relationship between imaging findings and clinical management was assessed wi

58 Comparisons of magnetic resonance imaging findings and clinical variables were made betwee

59 er, there is significant discrepancy between imaging findings and clinically overt symptoms, raising

60 Imaging findings and complications were recorded.

61 ogic reports were reviewed to confirm the MR imaging findings and for hormone receptors (estrogen and

62 Imaging findings and medical records were reviewed.

63 ous, hindering meaningful inferences between imaging findings and metrics of learning, behavior or co

64 Associations between imaging findings and overall survival were determined by

65 s to present the surgical anatomy and normal imaging findings and postoperative complications for the

66 eceive inappropriate follow-up of incidental imaging findings and present an opportunity for radiolog

67 Associations between MR imaging findings and surgery type were tested.

68 emonstrate excellent correlation between MEG imaging findings and the IAP for language lateralization

69 nally, we discuss the implications of recent imaging findings and their impact on future biomarker an

70 s between patients with false-negative MP MR imaging findings and those with correct prospective iden

71 Patient demographics, US and MR imaging findings, and clinical and histopathologic outco

72 ter adjustment for traditional risk factors, imaging findings, and early revascularization (adjusted

73 th FCD2, in six (46%) of 13 with negative MR imaging findings, and in only one control subject.

74 ions made by using other tested clinical and imaging findings, and is most predictive when combined w

75 ale for imaging, approach to interpretation, imaging findings, and pitfalls.

76 maging studies, the clinical implications of imaging findings, and the appropriate use of US-guided t

77 ers and dementia in patients with CKD, brain imaging findings, and traditional and nontraditional ris

78 MR imaging findings are a stronger predictor of pathologic

79 Muscle magnetic resonance imaging findings are characteristic and should be consid

80 ose clinical symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging findings are consistent with PML.The Laboratory

81 DT imaging findings are consistent with the known predomina

82 The baseline imaging findings are consistent with those found in pati

83 RCC in our case and the consequent atypical imaging findings are distinctly unusual.

84 hout imaging abnormalities, and propose that imaging findings are included in criteria for diagnosis.

85 Understanding how imaging findings are incorporated into surgeons' decisio

86 al symptoms, time course of the disease, and imaging findings are multifaceted.

87 When characteristic imaging findings are present, the diagnosis is rarely du

88 However, the imaging findings are variable and may occur in other loc

89 gnitive impairment was associated with these imaging findings as well.

90 ions will be described and compared with the imaging findings associated with congenital Zika virus i

91 Purpose To document the imaging findings associated with congenital Zika virus i

92 in 45 HIV- and 11 HIV+ patients to identify imaging findings associated with refractory disease.

93 Imaging findings associated with these disorders, such a

94 spectrum should be included to assess brain imaging findings associated with typical aging.

95 erature review of its clinical presentation, imaging findings, associated conditions and treatment op

96 ch between perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging findings at baseline who experienced early recan

97 uent lack of complete reporting of pertinent imaging findings at radiologic examinations, adoption of

98 There was a disagreement regarding imaging findings between CT and MRI in 21 of 74 (28%) pa

99 ions; moderately probable cases had specific imaging findings but other infections could not be ruled

100 ot be ruled out; somewhat probable cases had imaging findings, but these were not reported in detail

101 4 male patients) was used to validate the MR imaging findings by assessing the amount of cell death.

102 Ultrasound and MR imaging findings can collectively delineate uterine morp

103 Although his presentation, imaging findings, cerebrospinal fluid investigation resu

104 l imaging was required and determined if the imaging findings changed the patient's risk category.

105 Imaging findings, clinical management and outcome were e

106 ysis, if available; concurrent or subsequent imaging findings (contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhance

107 MR imaging findings corresponding to the 2009 revised Inter

108 These imaging findings, coupled with clinical features consist

109 Relative incidence of postoperative imaging findings, demographics, and initial imaging find

110 This imaging finding demonstrates strong association with MAC

111 Imaging findings depend on numerous factors and range fr

112 This study aimed to report lymphatic imaging findings, determine the mechanism of chylothorax

113 e agents may be associated with clinical and imaging findings during treatment suggestive of progress

114 BEST1 mutations, imaging findings, electroretinography amplitudes, and im

115 thod to relate pathology to diffusion tensor imaging findings, elucidates the underlying mechanisms o

116 Imaging findings, epidemiological data, coexisting risk

117 Common imaging findings following surgery included kidney displ

118 ic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging findings for future cardiovascular events in pat

119 stems) were compared with multiparametric MR imaging findings for predicting AS candidates.

120 Recently we published the initial subset of imaging findings for specific regions in a cohort of ind

121 Moderate to high agreement between CT and MR imaging findings for synovitis and tenosynovitis was dem

122 Clinical and multimodal imaging findings from 8 patients with paracentral acute

123 this study, we describe the functional brain imaging findings from a group of 41 patients with disord

124 ly half of the patients with normal bolus PW imaging findings had abnormal ASL findings-most commonly

125 Previous diffusion tensor imaging findings have supported suggestions that bipolar

126 x) of (68)Ga-DOTATATE was correlated with MR imaging findings, histology, and semiquantitative SSTR2

127 dividuals showed variable magnetic resonance imaging findings; however, relative to healthy controls,

128 Architectural distortion was the imaging finding identified in all 36 abnormalities (100%

129 Human functional imaging findings implicate the left posterior superior t

130 Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) is a rare imaging finding in children.

131 Tenosynovitis is an imaging finding in early RA, and its inclusion as a scor

132 The most striking imaging finding in that case was destruction of the sple

133 e diagnostic performance of CTPA vs other CT imaging findings in 100 patients with hematological mali

134 normal myocardial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings in 26 of 44 patients (59%) undergoing c

135 thus conducted a detailed analysis of the MR imaging findings in 45 HIV- and 11 HIV+ patients to iden

136 In this report, we present the imaging findings in a 3-month-old infant that presented

137 We report the initial and follow-up MR imaging findings in a 5year-old with refractory epilepsy

138 CASE REPORT: We present imaging findings in a case of portal annular pancreas in

139 We then correlated the imaging findings in a subset of HIV- subjects (n = 17) t

140 Our previous brain imaging findings in adult offspring in these high-risk f

141 To describe initial and serial multimodal imaging findings in AMN, with attention to choroidal vas

142 nation findings for all 141 patients, and MR imaging findings in an asymptomatic control group of 25

143 is review will describe the pathological and imaging findings in culprit lesions of patients with acu

144 -domain OCT is useful in identifying various imaging findings in DME.

145 reconstructed FMT signal correlated with MR imaging findings in intensity and spatial, transverse pr

146 retrospectively review clinical features and imaging findings in intraoperatively confirmed cases of

147 Radiologists should raise their awareness of imaging findings in intussusception and keep in their mi

148 idespread cognitive impairment and different imaging findings in lvPPA.

149 In this review, the imaging findings in multiple causes of large-bowel obstr

150 ents with suspected breast cancer and normal imaging findings in one breast (BI-RADS 1), whose cases

151 ctors in the design and interpretation of MR imaging findings in psychiatry.

152 e functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging findings in relation to cerebrospinal fluid biom

153 The imaging findings in such newborns are similar to those i

154 The imaging findings in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

155 , will be discussed, while emphasizing their imaging findings in the clinical context and illustratin

156 B) and both IPF and the presence of abnormal imaging findings in the general population.

157 clinical interpretation of diffusion tensor imaging findings in the injured brain.

158 giography, which provided required excellent imaging findings in the terms of the number, size and lo

159 Based on brain magnetic resonance imaging findings in these patients, we selected addition

160 This review focuses on the imaging findings in three distinct clinical scenarios: a

161 be used to identify patients with suspicious imaging findings in whom follow-up diagnostic evaluation

162 Other abnormal imaging findings included anterolisthesis, osteophytic s

163 The imaging findings included gross enlargement of the left

164 We also report novel brain imaging findings including delayed myelination with whit

165 ographic images for the presence of abnormal imaging findings, including capsular adhesions at the fe

166 s computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings, including diffusion weighted images al

167 relevance, and a discussion of known related imaging findings, including existing radiogenomics data

168 Multimodal imaging findings, including fundus photography, fluoresc

169 ous complex (PEVAC) by describing multimodal imaging findings, including optical coherence tomography

170 These imaging findings indicate reduced structural integrity o

171 of cancer by extending whole-body diagnostic imaging findings into the surgical suite.

172 Assessment of MR imaging findings led to a correct diagnosis of no breast

173 Overall, the addition of imaging findings led to an improvement in risk classific

174 eclinical and mild AD, suggesting that an MR imaging finding may be a more practical clinical biomark

175 Among patients who demonstrate imaging findings meeting RANO criteria for progressive d

176 he rest of the patients had either normal MR imaging findings (n = 4) or lateral epicondylitis (n = 2

177 Clinical characteristics, MR imaging findings (obtained 6 hours after IRE and before

178 TARP (CHOP-ROP alarm initiates imaging, and imaging finding of severe ROP initiates diagnostic exami

179 MR imaging findings of 29 patients with 43 HCAs were assess

180 CASE REPORT: We are presenting multimodal imaging findings of 4 cases of caudal regression syndrom

181 We present the imaging findings of a giant congenital pelvic AVM that w

182 This unique case presents unusual imaging findings of a rare dual abdominal emergency cond

183 pathology on explant or necrosis along with imaging findings of ablation after transarterial chemoem

184 is unique report adds, precious clinical and imaging findings of acute appendicitis coexisting with m

185 This study retrospectively reviewed the MR imaging findings of all patients seen from 1993 to 2007

186 imaging findings, demographics, and initial imaging findings of both groups were statistically asses

187 To retrospectively evaluate the imaging findings of breast lymphomas in patients who had

188 considerable overlap in the cross-sectional imaging findings of cystic pancreatic lesions, and becau

189 Radiologists should be aware of imaging findings of interventricular septal aneurysm, be

190 Radiologists should be aware of imaging findings of interventricular septal aneurysm, be

191 The imaging findings of leiomyomatosis peritonealis dissemin

192 ed to pursue costly follow-up for incidental imaging findings of limited clinical importance.

193 embles the characteristic magnetic resonance imaging findings of linear perivascular enhancement in p

194 Imaging findings of MR lymphangiography and lymphoscinti

195 Unfamiliarity with imaging findings of paratesticular fibrous pseudotumor m

196 l deviation in Parkinson's disease (PD), the imaging findings of Pisa syndrome in PD have not been pr

197 Post-radioembolization imaging findings of response by EASL and WHO criteria ar

198 two-sample t tests were used to correlate MR imaging findings of subchondral bone marrow edema with t

199 angiographic procedure are reflected in the imaging findings of the (99m)Tc-MAA hepatic perfusion st

200 stmenopausal women with breast cancer and MR imaging findings of the contralateral unaffected breast,

201 In this imaging review, we highlight the imaging findings of this intriguing entity.

202 E REPORTS: We present ultrasonography and MR imaging findings of this rare anomaly in two cases.

203 uses, clinical presentation and particularly imaging findings of toxic leukoencephalopathy is critica

204 g lower limb weakness without any history or imaging findings of trauma or spinal canal abnormalities

205 Endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging findings of tumor apparency or inapparency in pr

206 rticle presents clinical data and diagnostic imaging findings of two newborn babies with chondrodyspl

207 hese behavioural measures were compared with imaging findings on diffusion tensor magnetic resonance

208 This study sought to relate imaging findings on positron emission tomography (PET) t

209 on the basis of clinical or conventional MR imaging findings only.

210 d to have grossly abnormal clinical or brain imaging findings or both, including 4 infants with micro

211 e study had a histologic correlation with MR imaging findings or they were excluded.

212 but without clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings outside the optic nerves and 142 contro

213 is to illustrate and discuss the spectrum of imaging findings, particularly computed tomography (CT),

214 Two independent readers masked to other imaging findings performed a qualitative analysis on OCT

215 on of performance showed that the model with imaging findings performed significantly better than did

216 Each imaging finding, progesterone receptor (PR) and human ep

217 nderstanding of tumor pathology and biology, imaging findings, prognosis, and response to molecular t

218 guing overlaps in biochemical, clinical, and imaging findings question the concept of distinct entiti

219 The imaging findings, radiation dose estimates, and image qu

220 Parallel human imaging findings relative to ELS also reveal enhanced am

221 The imaging findings reported in this study should alert the

222 ostic 4-dimensional computerized tomographic imaging findings, resolution of imaging abnormalities, a

223 The patient's clinical symptoms and imaging findings responded to treatment with a high dose

224 Our functional magnetic resonance imaging findings reveal that postchoice changes in prefe

225 nd CD31 supported SPECT and autoradiographic imaging findings, revealing the corresponding depletion

226 logy categories A-D) and normal conventional imaging findings (screening mammography with or without

227 Here we describe imaging findings secondary to a supralevator perianal ab

228 Sixty patients with normal cardiac MR imaging findings served as control subjects.

229 Correlation of the histologic and MR imaging findings showed that MR imaging could correctly

230 Imaging findings showed that of the 101 patients, 29 (29

231 MR imaging findings significantly associated with whiplash

232 n specific enolase (NSE) measurements, brain imaging findings, somatosensory evoked potentials, and e

233 Conventional MR imaging findings, spectroscopically measured absolute NA

234 MRI findings were evaluated considering the imaging findings such as mass effect, swelling, contrast

235 Our quantitative imaging findings suggest impairment in functional cerebr

236 Patients with symptoms or conventional imaging findings suggestive of distant metastases or wit

237 Discussed here are converging imaging findings that established a rationale for testin

238 Of the 403 patients, 67 had MR imaging findings that were positive for acute appendicit

239 hlighting particular or specific clinical or imaging findings that will enable residents to expand th

240 Because of the imaging findings, the patient was referred for surgery.

241 By comparing cognitive assessments to imaging findings, the presence of any imaging feature as

242 ent with prior functional magnetic resonance imaging findings, these results further intimate neurome

243 We used connectivity imaging findings to guide TMS targeting and compared the

244 ccount patient age, clinical parameters, and imaging findings to identify the likely etiology of a cy

245 data exist to definitively connect abnormal imaging findings to IPF, and genetic studies assessing e

246 of this approach to link magnetic resonance imaging findings to their histopathological origins.

247 n in patients requiring biopsy of suggestive imaging findings, to further evaluate its ability to dis

248 Cerebellar dysplasia with cysts (CDC) is an imaging finding typically seen in combination with cobbl

249 ed prostate cancer and negative conventional imaging findings underwent PET/CT with (11)C-acetate.

250 roduce atomic-resolution tunneling-asymmetry imaging, finding virtually identical phenomena in two li

251 rospective HIPAA-compliant study of 1.5-T MR imaging findings was institutional review board approved

252 on between clinical, serological markers and imaging findings was undertaken.

253 Stability of diffusion tensor imaging findings was verified by repeat scans 1-3 years

254 Relying on these imaging findings, we then profiled gene expression level

255 Guided by these imaging findings, we undertook a focused postmortem inve

256 ative scoring of FMT correlated well with MR imaging findings (weighted kappa coefficient = 0.90).

257 ttan nomogram and the model incorporating MR imaging findings were 61.1% (95% confidence interval: 58

258 rticularly useful in those cases in which MR imaging findings were abnormal but no epileptogenic lesi

259 Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings were abnormal in 10 of 22 patients (45%

260 characteristic TTD clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings were absent.

261 ce similarity coefficients (DSC) between the imaging findings were calculated.

262 Positive imaging findings were classified into 3 categories: loca

263 MR imaging findings were compared with clinical and laborat

264 Imaging findings were compared with endoscopic findings,

265 Imaging findings were compared with surgical and patholo

266 MR imaging findings were compared with surgical findings fo

267 Biomicroscopic and multimodal imaging findings were compared with the histopathology o

268 The initial diagnostic imaging findings were concordant with the biopsy results

269 Consenting patients underwent surgery and imaging findings were confirmed histologically.

270 Imaging findings were correlated to histology with marke

271 Imaging findings were correlated with clinical data.

272 Interobserver agreement was determined; imaging findings were correlated with intraoperative fin

273 assessment was performed with MR imaging; MR imaging findings were correlated with radiographs.

274 Diffusion-tensor imaging findings were correlated with symptom severity,

275 MR imaging findings were corroborated with intravital fluor

276 The imaging findings were found to be specific for bilateral

277 The imaging findings were found to be specific for Kimura di

278 The imaging findings were found to be specific for leiomyoma

279 Almost half of the abnormal imaging findings were missed on STIR-hiBW compared with

280 ging-guided biopsy (no standard biopsy if MR imaging findings were negative) led to the highest NHB g

281 y guided MR biopsy (no standard biopsy if MR imaging findings were negative) was the most cost-effect

282 sy, with a standard biopsy performed when MR imaging findings were negative.

283 geted biopsy, with no biopsy performed if MR imaging findings were negative; and (c) diagnostic MR im

284 Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings were normal.

285 All imaging findings were rated blinded to clinical details.

286 Abnormal imaging findings were recorded.

287 Patients with normal bolus PW imaging findings were retrospectively identified, and tw

288 ntent and cellularity that might explain the imaging findings were studied at histologic evaluation.

289 Anatomic correlates for multimodal imaging findings were then defined.

290 scularization, while magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings were used to quantify left ventricular

291 optimize the imaging protocols and important imaging findings will be discussed.

292 MRI or MRI/magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging findings with clinical and biopsy data have been

293 ladder, further work is planned to correlate imaging findings with histopathology in patients with hi

294 ubjects and to correlated magnetic resonance imaging findings with histopathology.

295 d in matching gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MR imaging findings with pathologic findings.

296 e clinical variables including serum LDH and imaging findings with progression-free and overall survi

297 eptual framework for matching the functional imaging findings with the specific role(s) played by thi

298 hod of communicating nonurgent but important imaging findings with use of e-mail technology.

299 ARIA consist of a spectrum of imaging findings with variable clinical correlates, and

300 ) images in 37 patients (13 with negative MR imaging findings) with histologically proven FCD2 of the