ライフサイエンスコーパス: immunofluorescent microscopy

1 uten protein structure, using SEM, light and immunofluorescent microscopy.

2 tected in infected cells either by RT-PCR or immunofluorescent microscopy.

3 yuridine, and Hoechst 33342 as visualized by immunofluorescent microscopy.

4 transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and immunofluorescent microscopy.

5 f these proteins with caveolin-1 as shown by immunofluorescent microscopy.

6 ed macrophages using both immunoblotting and immunofluorescent microscopy.

7 at stained for Annexin V [CD146(AnnV+)]) and immunofluorescent microscopy.

8 transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescent microscopy.

9 ent of compound action potentials (CAPs) and immunofluorescent microscopy.

10 t analysis and either immunohistochemical or immunofluorescent microscopy.

11 by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and immunofluorescent microscopy.

12 timates of glomerular IgG deposition seen by immunofluorescent microscopy.

13 anslocation was determined by confocal laser immunofluorescent microscopy.

14 zed to the cytoplasm as detected by indirect immunofluorescent microscopy.

15 Immunofluorescent microscopy also indicated that PTP1(C/

16 calization was experimentally verified using immunofluorescent microscopy and a cell-surface biotinyl

17 Immunofluorescent microscopy and FACS analysis demonstra

18 CD14 expression was assessed by immunofluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry.

19 uscle was demonstrated using double labeling immunofluorescent microscopy and immunoelectron microsco

20 We have used confocal immunofluorescent microscopy and microinjection of affin

21 sessed in denervated mice versus controls by immunofluorescent microscopy and real-time PCR.

22 Studies using double immunofluorescent microscopy and ultrastructural analysi

23 Studies using double immunofluorescent microscopy and ultrastructural analysi

24 Immunofluorescent microscopy and Western blot analysis d

25 We found, using confocal immunofluorescent microscopy and Western blot analysis,

26 ion, surface protein biotinylation, confocal immunofluorescent microscopy, and functional measurement

27 Here, we combined immunofluorescent microscopy, biochemical assays, in sil

28 Immunofluorescent microscopy confirmed that MPO added to

29 Furthermore, immunofluorescent microscopy data showed that MacMARCKS

30 Immunofluorescent microscopy demonstrated basal expressi

31 Immunofluorescent microscopy demonstrated that both the

32 Immunohistochemical analysis and immunofluorescent microscopy demonstrated that KSHV infe

33 Consistently, confocal immunofluorescent microscopy demonstrated that WT RNase

34 Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent microscopy identified basolateral RhBG

35 ( approximately 8,500 dimers per cell), and immunofluorescent microscopy (IFM) located MreCD(Spn) to

36 Immunofluorescent microscopy (IFM) showed a change in th

37 We compared three different methods (immunofluorescent microscopy, IFM; flow cytometry, FCM;

38 ult rat CF to myofibroblasts, as assessed by immunofluorescent microscopy, immunoblotting, and collag

39 ogenous Aalpha and Galpha(12) colocalized by immunofluorescent microscopy in Caco-2 cells and in neur

40 t bacterial species was assessed by indirect immunofluorescent microscopy in each participant.

41 detected by immunoblot analysis and confocal immunofluorescent microscopy in fibrotic livers from mic

42 TRP120 was observed by immunofluorescent microscopy in the nucleus of E. chaffe

43 confirmed by Western blot analysis, confocal immunofluorescent microscopy in vitro, and on cultured o

44 Subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescent microscopy indicated that in mutant ce

45 Confocal immunofluorescent microscopy indicates that Drm is prese

46 Immunofluorescent microscopy localized PcsB mainly to th

47 Immunofluorescent microscopy localizes DMN in a stripe-l

48 Immunofluorescent microscopy of Chlamydomonas cells conf

49 Confocal immunofluorescent microscopy of cultured epidermal kerat

50 Immunofluorescent microscopy of interferon-stimulated CD

51 scence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and by immunofluorescent microscopy of tissue sections and isol

52 By immunofluorescent microscopy over-expressed PTP1(C/S) co

53 Confocal immunofluorescent microscopy revealed CD73 to be surface

54 Immunofluorescent microscopy revealed co-localization of

55 -immunoprecipitated with Cyp60, and confocal immunofluorescent microscopy revealed intracellular co-l

56 Dual channel confocal immunofluorescent microscopy revealed that the Mr 8,000

57 Immunofluorescent microscopy revealed that the treatment

58 Immunofluorescent microscopy revealed that VASP localize

59 Immunofluorescent microscopy showed that all four isofor

60 Immunofluorescent microscopy shows that anti-Rad51 antib

61 brains sectioned and prepared for dual label immunofluorescent microscopy, single label bright field

62 Using Western blot analysis and immunofluorescent microscopy, the authors determined the

63 By immunofluorescent microscopy, this antiserum localizes t

64 uginosa infection, and (iii) high-resolution immunofluorescent microscopy to monitor ExoS translocati

65 Immunofluorescent microscopy using a monoclonal antibody

66 existence of this mechanism was provided by immunofluorescent microscopy, using fluorescently labele

67 Immunofluorescent microscopy was used to determine nucle

68 iotinylation coupled with immunoblotting and immunofluorescent microscopy, we assessed the kinetics o

69 With immunofluorescent microscopy, we demonstrated evidence o

70 Using immunofluorescent microscopy, we were able to detect NP(

71 Immunohistochemical analysis and immunofluorescent microscopy were used to localize and i

72 Western immunoblotting and/or immunofluorescent microscopy were used to study beta-cat

73 pression of AP-2 and PAR-1 simultaneously by immunofluorescent microscopy with an automated quantific