コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ically inaccessible to the non-computational immunologist.
2 ell lymphopenia were evaluated by a clinical immunologist.
3 ses remain one of the mysteries that perplex immunologists.
4 st material was sent to 1,017 allergists and immunologists.
5 educators to enhance the training of future immunologists.
6 mmune response has long been a focus of many immunologists.
7 linical use has become an important goal for immunologists.
8 has more recently attracted the attention of immunologists.
9 id (polySia), has been largely overlooked by immunologists.
10 euroscientists, developmental biologists and immunologists.
11 dentified previously in turf grass pollen by immunologists.
12 was originally a problem of concern only to immunologists.
15 mune cells in cancer, a chasm exists between immunologists and biologists: although sharing a common
17 combined efforts of clinicians, geneticists, immunologists and cell biologists are producing rapid pr
18 of how concepts that grew out of efforts by immunologists and dermatologists to understand immune re
19 ppreciated, this duality continues to puzzle immunologists and has implications for the development o
20 rogram is forging new collaborations between immunologists and infectious disease experts and is rein
22 ding how this is accomplished has fascinated immunologists and microbiologists for many years, but th
23 By providing answers to these questions, immunologists and neurobiologists increasingly expose th
24 f 'neuroimmunology' has--for both mainstream immunologists and neuroscientists alike--often seemed mo
37 ling is a useful addition to the tool set of immunologists, as it has extra features that allow for s
39 the time, it revolutionized the thinking of immunologists because it provided a simple explanation f
41 so known as NFIL3) was of little interest to immunologists, being best known for its role in regulati
43 r (EAI) prescription or visited an allergist/immunologist, but more likely to have had an ED visit/ho
48 d the study of antimicrobial agents can help immunologists discover targets and mechanisms of host im
49 layed by key molecules already well known to immunologists (e.g., complement and components of the ma
51 utine tool used by clinical pathologists and immunologists for diagnosis and monitoring of patients w
52 ents the basis of a dilemma that has stumped immunologists for many years, how are self-specific T ce
54 hroughs have brought IPC to the attention of immunologists for their role in innate immunity and in s
55 by neuroscientists and the immune system by immunologists, fuelling the notion that these systems re
71 cians, including a board-certified allergist/immunologist, independently reviewed each potential case
75 any cases, which suggests that the allergist/immunologist is the appropriate specialist for these pat
79 gens exist, the central dilemma facing tumor immunologists is why the host immune response is so inef
80 osphorylation have been intensely studied by immunologists, less attention has been paid to the impac
81 empt to address two questions often asked by immunologists not familiar with the field: what do scaff
82 s longstanding fact, it may be surprising to immunologists of a younger vintage, particularly those w
83 l host immunity are challenges that clinical immunologists often face in their quest to establish a s
84 Although discussions to improve training for immunologists often focus on graduate programs, there ar
85 95% CI, 0.53-0.78) or visiting an allergist/immunologist (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95) before the in
86 oma antigens has been a major focus of tumor immunologists over the past two decades, and a broad arr
87 of the T(H)17 pathway illuminates a shift in immunologists' perspectives regarding the basis of tissu
88 ildren with JIA-associated uveitis to ocular immunologists prepared to move on to systemic immunomodu
90 navia has 1000 different words for reindeer, immunologists recognize the range of fates available for
92 ass I multimers are staple components of the immunologist's toolbox, enabling reliable quantification
93 y now familiar and trusted components of the immunologist's toolbox, their application to models of m
100 hallenges represents a call to arms of basic immunologists to advance our knowledge of malaria immuni
101 w molecular and genetic tools are empowering immunologists to answer longstanding unresolved question
102 Technological advances are now allowing immunologists to correlate data obtained in vitro with i
104 obic microbial lipid antigens has challenged immunologists to explain, in molecular terms, the nature
105 ists generated tools for microbiologists and immunologists to explore whether autophagy contributes t
106 ened a workshop of malaria investigators and immunologists to foster collaborations and attract more
110 s mechanisms of lymphatic contraction (which immunologists traditionally do not take into account), a
112 are (ie, EAI prescription fill and allergist/immunologist visit) was associated with a significantly
115 obiologists, have important implications for immunologists who wish to understand how indigenous micr
116 ermingle the perspectives and work of cancer immunologists with cancer biologists and pharmacologists
117 " levels of the normal eye surface have left immunologists wondering whether a true microbiome exists
118 ainst a specific immunogen in many vaccines, immunologists would agree that immune responses are subo
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。