ライフサイエンスコーパス: immunoprecipitation experiment

1 dogenous rRNA genes as revealed by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

2 q, as assessed by ELISA, flow cytometry, and immunoprecipitation experiments.

3 ZnT-2 due to homodimerization observed upon immunoprecipitation experiments.

4 teract with UL52 primase as determined by co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

5 inding motifs from high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

6 ncreased after wounding, as determined by co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

7 antitative and nonquantitative pull-down and immunoprecipitation experiments.

8 by glutathione S-transferase pulldown and co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

9 on rate (58%) comparable with that of direct immunoprecipitation experiments.

10 confirmed using Western blot analysis and co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

11 9cre1 interactions are verified in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

12 nteraction between Pes1 and Mtap1b-LC1 by co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

13 luciferase assays and Chromatin crosslinking ImmunoPrecipitation experiments.

14 phoretic mobility shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

15 targets of P1, as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

16 rformed co-immunoprecipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

17 brain tissues was disrupted, as confirmed by immunoprecipitation experiments.

18 associates with both CaV3.1 and CaV3.2 in co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

19 say, surface plasmon resonance analysis, and immunoprecipitation experiments.

20 et of class II TGAs as revealed by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

21 cytoskeleton organization and binds actin in immunoprecipitation experiments.

22 re sophisticated version for ChIP (Chromatin immunoprecipitation) experiments.

23 Further, by co-immunoprecipitation experiments, a heterocomplex between

24 Immunoprecipitation experiments also showed that the SIM

25 In co-immunoprecipitation experiments, an anti-apoE antibody p

26 Using co-immunoprecipitation experiments and an in situ proximity

27 ith CRM1 is RanGTP-dependent, as shown in co-immunoprecipitation experiments and binding assays.

28 several Frizzled receptors was confirmed by immunoprecipitation experiments and by binding of myocil

29 Immunoprecipitation experiments and glutathione S-transf

30 Electromobility shift assays, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments and mutational studies c

31 oltage-gated sodium channels was shown by co-immunoprecipitation experiments and Na(+) current record

32 Immunoprecipitation experiments and overexpression of WT

33 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments and real-time monitoring

34 Immunoprecipitation experiments and reciprocal Western b

35 hione S-transferase-LAR pull-down and IGF-1R immunoprecipitation experiments and recombinant LAR deph

36 T-type channels associate with CaM using co-immunoprecipitation experiments and single particle cryo

37 Here we show, by co-immunoprecipitation experiments and yeast two-hybrid ana

38 DAPK-1 and PTRN-1 physically interact in co-immunoprecipitation experiments, and DAPK-1 itself under

39 Genome-wide expression analysis, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, and DNA methylation ana

40 ophoretic mobility shift analysis, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, and RNA interference ex

41 Formic acid hydrolysis, immunoprecipitation experiments, and subtilisin digestio

42 In protein pulldown and immunoprecipitation experiments, binding of RhoA and PKG

43 and, as revealed by mass spectrometry and co-immunoprecipitation experiments, binds to Cheerio, and t

44 at arrested replication forks, we performed immunoprecipitation experiments combined with mass spect

45 Results from co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirm a physical assoc

46 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed direct interac

47 Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed in vivo occupa

48 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed PARP-1 recruit

49 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed physical inter

50 Pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that MMRN2 bin

51 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the binding of

52 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the co-localiz

53 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the interactio

54 Immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the physical a

55 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the presence o

56 A co-immunoprecipitation experiment confirms this finding and

57 Using chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments coupled with massively p

58 When compared with chromatin immunoprecipitation experiment data, PAP's predictions a

59 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate a reduction

60 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that arresti

61 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that BRG1 bi

62 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that H1 is t

63 lyses, analytical ultracentrifugation and co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that Mga for

64 Consistently, immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that Mus81-M

65 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that Nuf and

66 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that the two

67 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that whereas

68 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated a complex c

69 AAH led to increased levels of Notch, and co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated a direct in

70 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated a physical

71 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated an interact

72 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated HGF-mediate

73 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated interaction

74 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that both n

75 Chromatin and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that CSC-me

76 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that Cx43-b

77 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that damagi

78 Rather, co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that dopami

79 In agreement, co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that FOXM1

80 RNA-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that HGF st

81 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that HNF4al

82 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that Irr oc

83 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that NFkapp

84 Transcriptional analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that PsmB6

85 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that the pr

86 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that Tip60

87 recovery after photobleaching and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated the Nurr1-m

88 Sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated the occurre

89 d p38 MAPK activation, which is in line with immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrating the intera

90 ynaptophysin, a synaptic vesicle marker, but immunoprecipitation experiments did not detect direct as

91 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments did not show that PR bin

92 Integration of omics data and RNA immunoprecipitation experiments established DGCR8 as a d

93 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments established that NHERF-1

94 The results of chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments established that nucleol

95 Results from chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments find that rad52-R70A ass

96 RNA immunoprecipitation experiments followed by next-generat

97 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments followed by sequencing (

98 zed publicly available genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments for 27 TFs in Arabidopsi

99 reds of annotated conditions, from chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments for tens of different DN

100 inding of hsc70 to the SRY.CaM complex, with immunoprecipitation experiments from cell extracts showi

101 This is validated by co-immunoprecipitation experiments from cells expressing th

102 sothermal titration calorimetry in vitro and immunoprecipitation experiments from cells.

103 GE fluorography showed labeling of GLP-1R in immunoprecipitation experiments from GLP-1R-expressing c

104 The results obtained from our immunoprecipitation experiment further demonstrated that

105 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments further demonstrated tha

106 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments further reveal that, in

107 PLAs and immunoprecipitation experiments further revealed that sy

108 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments further showed that Nrf2

109 Cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments further suggested that R

110 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments further supported a role

111 However, whereas chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments have demonstrated p107 a

112 Separately, systematic chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments have enabled the assembl

113 Immunoprecipitation experiments have revealed that Loc1p

114 In sharp contrast with previous reports, immunoprecipitation experiments here demonstrate that co

115 RNA-sequencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments identified several tumor

116 Pulldown and co-immunoprecipitation experiments identified the ArfGAP wi

117 tion factor-DNA-binding arrays and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments identified the formation

118 Cross-linking immunoprecipitation experiments identified the locus as

119 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments in bone marrow macrophag

120 and frataxin and GRP75 were confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation experiments in both directions.

121 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments in conditionally immorta

122 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments in COS7 cells demonstrat

123 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments in extracts from cells t

124 Transient transfection and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments in HCT116 cells were use

125 (4) Co-immunoprecipitation experiments in HEK-293 confirm that

126 KIIalpha-DAT interaction was supported by co-immunoprecipitation experiments in heterologous cells.

127 bcellular localization, fractionation and co-immunoprecipitation experiments in hiPSC-RPE and human p

128 performing size exclusion chromatography and immunoprecipitation experiments in human cell lines and

129 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments in mammalian cells confi

130 GST pulldown and, for native proteins, by co-immunoprecipitation experiments in prostate cancer cells

131 associates with survivin in vitro and in co-immunoprecipitation experiments in vivo.

132 Cell adhesion assay and co-immunoprecipitation experiments in wild-type and TACE kn

133 Consistent with this, co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicate direct interact

134 Also, immunoprecipitation experiments indicate specific intera

135 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that AGL15 bind

136 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that an activit

137 r co-localization of L1-ORF1p and A3C and co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that an RNA-dep

138 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that FOXP3 comp

139 recipitation, whereas immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that Mitf and B

140 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that more SREBP

141 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that Nkx2.2 and

142 Biochemical analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that Rph1 funct

143 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that these poly

144 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that these two

145 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that, unlike wi

146 Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated an interaction

147 Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated protein-protei

148 r fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that CERK1 phy

149 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that IGFBP-5 i

150 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that nerve gro

151 veratrol did not change KSRP expression, but immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that resveratr

152 Pulse-chase immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that S227P mut

153 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that Sp1 physi

154 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that Ssa1p was

155 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the lower

156 Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that UTP cause

157 aining receptors, a possibility supported by immunoprecipitation experiments indicating that most AMP

158 Immunoprecipitation experiments (IPs) carried out with w

159 In cell transfection and immunoprecipitation experiments, mouse alpha4(VI)N6-C2 c

160 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments not only demonstrated th

161 In the co-immunoprecipitation experiment, NRSF interacted with the

162 on between CAR and ERK1/2 was examined by co-immunoprecipitation experiments of ectopically expressed

163 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments of TcUBP1-containing rib

164 This was confirmed with chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments of the human c-Met promo

165 onents functionally co-operate and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments on mutant animals demons

166 The histone chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments on several other genes s

167 Immunoprecipitation experiments performed in transfected

168 In co-immunoprecipitation experiments performed on H2O2-treate

169 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments performed using cultured

170 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments provide evidence that PK

171 FLAG-immunoprecipitation experiments retrieve a ferrochelatas

172 o activate the Nodal response pathway and co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal differential rela

173 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal endogenous PITX2

174 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal increased binding

175 Consistent with this observation, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal increased MDC1 pr

176 Finally, immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that 1G2 can bind

177 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that beta-cat rec

178 Fluorescence microscopy and immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that both PHD fin

179 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that c-Myc direct

180 Microarray analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that DBC1 inhibit

181 Forster resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that each of the

182 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that LNCaP cells

183 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that mutation of

184 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that SpoIIQ resid

185 UV cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments revealed 2 ARE-binding p

186 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed a physical inte

187 To map Coy1 protein interactions, co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed an association

188 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed an interaction

189 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed binding of Bag1

190 Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed higher binding

191 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that a wide reg

192 In vitro and in vivo immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that ATBF1 inte

193 Reciprocal immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that CerS1, Cer

194 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that endogenous

195 Additional co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that FGF13 pote

196 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that full-lengt

197 Surprisingly, immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that FX and PTX

198 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Hetalpha1K

199 Moreover, co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that insulin st

200 DNA affinity precipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that insulin, C

201 Transcriptional analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Mesp1 and

202 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Mlp1 and S

203 Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that MUC1-CT an

204 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that NF-kappaB

205 nstructs, as well as gel-shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that NY-ESO-1 p

206 Two-way immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that ORF34 phys

207 Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that PGANT3 gly

208 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that PHF1 resid

209 pidly reverses this silencing, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that reactivati

210 urface plasmon resonance measurements and co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that recombinan

211 phoretic mobility shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that SND1 binds

212 Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Spry1 expr

213 Finally, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that T-bet can

214 Two-way immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the membra

215 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the NuRD c

216 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the Ssu72

217 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that XBP-1(S) b

218 Fluorescence complementation and immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that XIAP inter

219 Quantitative chromatin-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that yKu70 bind

220 Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed the formation o

221 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed the presence of

222 sions in gene-deletion mutants and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, revealing a more comple

223 Finally, in co-immunoprecipitation experiments, SGK1 interacted selecti

224 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show direct evidence of

225 Here, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that activation is

226 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that eliminating Rp

227 lpha (Hif1a)-dependent manner, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that Hif1a bound to

228 Finally, chromatin-immunoprecipitation experiments show that in an H3-L61W

229 Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that IRF-8 physical

230 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that MISO and 20E i

231 Full-genome chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that Mit1 binds to

232 Immunoprecipitation experiments show that ORC disassembl

233 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that Runx3 and Ets1

234 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that wild-type meck

235 Moreover, co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that Yb forms a com

236 Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiment showed that AICAR suppres

237 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed both EWS-FLI1 and

238 be highly dependent on c-Myc, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed differential occu

239 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that betaine regu

240 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that CRMP2 associ

241 Moreover, co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Galectin-1 i

242 Finally, our chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that GI binds to

243 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that glucose incr

244 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Hap1 binds t

245 Chromatin-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that HES1 and NR3

246 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that IE62 stimula

247 Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Ihh binds to

248 Cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Irr occupies

249 Whole-cell cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Irr occupies

250 Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that J20 and DXS

251 Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that NET forms st

252 on, gel mobility shift assays, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that PGE(2) induc

253 transcription levels of DWF4, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that TCP1 indeed

254 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the abundanc

255 ansiently expressed in HEK293T cells, and co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the delta-op

256 In all brain regions, co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that ~90% of GluA

257 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed the association o

258 The immunoprecipitation experiments showed the direct intera

259 reducing- and nonreducing conditions and co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed the presence of R

260 diac myocyte differentiation is suggested by immunoprecipitation experiments showing that Tip60alpha,

261 Immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that cytosolic p

262 Transient transfection and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that PARP-1 play

263 Data from immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that the ETEC fa

264 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that the regulat

265 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that these regul

266 Immunoprecipitation experiments suggested an interaction

267 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments suggested Notch-1 direct

268 Immunoprecipitation experiments suggested oligomerizatio

269 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggested physical inter

270 Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggested reduced alphaI

271 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggested that these ubi

272 tructs and truncated p75(NTR) variants by co-immunoprecipitation experiments, surface plasmon resonan

273 Here we show by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments that in vivo BPCs also b

274 Moreover, we show by co-immunoprecipitation experiments that LFG interacts with

275 d with 2xhemagglutinin allowed us to perform immunoprecipitation experiments that showed that MceA fo

276 nalyses, genetic interventions and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments that Stat1 directly coup

277 g or mutating these domains and performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments to analyze the interacti

278 th silencing complexes as demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation experiments using an AGO1-specific a

279 Immunoprecipitation experiments using anti-puromycin ant

280 Sedimentation and immunoprecipitation experiments using cell extracts reve

281 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments using cells transfected

282 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments using latently infected

283 Based on chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments using validated antibodi

284 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments verified that PKCalpha a

285 By co-immunoprecipitation experiments we found that PC1 trunca

286 From GST-pull-downs and co-immunoprecipitation experiments we show that Wt1a, Foxc1

287 In chromatin immunoprecipitation and co-immunoprecipitation experiments, we further demonstrate

288 Using chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that in embryon

289 By immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that LMP1 inter

290 In addition, by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that Nrf2 is a

291 oretic mobility shift analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that the hetero

292 protein interaction assays in yeast, and co-immunoprecipitation experiments were used to establish t

293 This was supported by co-immunoprecipitation experiments, where membrane-bound di

294 or the autoinhibition model, we performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments with combinations of ART

295 In addition, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments with deltaNp63-specific

296 IP-exo protocol called ChIP-nexus (chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments with nucleotide resoluti

297 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments with PLM and split excha

298 Results from immunoprecipitation experiments with polarized Madin-Dar

299 We used immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation experiments with serum from CUS pati

300 content of deep-sequenced RNA extracted from immunoprecipitation experiments with the Ago1 and Ago2 p