ライフサイエンスコーパス: imprecision

1 acteristics (eg, rate dependence, stability, imprecision).

2 is very low due to serious risk of bias and imprecision.

3 stimate of the level of relevant irreducible imprecision.

4 (SIL) internal standard was used to minimize imprecision.

5 n this generic sense while acknowledging our imprecision.

6 estimates for attenuation due to measurement imprecision.

7 ficient adjusted for attenuation due to test imprecision.

8 , bearing in mind the calculation's inherent imprecision.

9 plained by task heterogeneity and conceptual imprecision.

10 k meta-analyses have a substantial degree of imprecision.

11 ovascular hemodynamics in TM and measurement imprecision.

12 rm 'allergy' has significantly increased its imprecision.

13 re-treatment can enhance recovery and reduce imprecision.

14 t-hoc data sampling may be a factor reducing imprecision.

15 g and is not simply the result of biological imprecision.

16 er-assay accuracy (97.3-103.4%) and very low imprecision [0.5-3.6% (RSD)].

17 The imprecision also was significantly higher for RTVue meas

18 ed retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) bias and imprecision among three spectral-domain optical coherenc

19 d internal standard mass fractions mitigates imprecision and bias that can be caused by even subtle n

20 ument experimentally even in the presence of imprecision and errors.

21 The relative imprecision and inaccuracy of available tests limit the

22 etic heterogeneity, combined with phenotypic imprecision and poor marker coverage, has contributed to

23 control modulations that addressed stimulus imprecision and the possibility of stimulation of cones

24 The source of this imprecision and their implications for the use of Raman

25 idence is very low due to high risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency.

26 However, because imprecision around the findings in the modified intentio

27 Misclassification from method imprecision attenuated associations with creatinine clea

28 e we show a displacement measurement with an imprecision below the standard quantum limit scale.

29 We achieve this imprecision by measuring the motion of a nanomechanical

30 for the optimal and noise cases, 12 for the imprecision case, and 60 for the imprecision with noise

31 Still, the imprecision caused by unavoidable measurement errors is

32 stment at the plate level was used to reduce imprecision estimates and increase the number of usable

33 What is the biological explanation for the "imprecision?" First, Precision Oncology relies on indisc

34 fidence in estimates were decreased owing to imprecision for most outcomes (particularly myocardial i

35 rbed by its environment and when measurement imprecision from photon shot noise is balanced against d

36 RTVue imprecision (healthy eyes 7.83, 95% CI 6.43-9.58; glauco

37 eled clinical conditions by adding noise and imprecision, i.e. phenotypic terms unrelated to the dise

38 r each band are identical within measurement imprecision in all three SRMs; only minor differences ar

39 Delays and potential imprecision in cross-brain conduction times are especial

40 ck of information about gaps in care and the imprecision in epilepsy diagnosis coding.

41 They could also be limited by imprecision in estimating the direction of individual el

42 roduce false positives (erroneous calls) and imprecision in mapping.

43 ly incomplete coverage in HELP, and location imprecision in McrBC.

44 idemiologic descriptors are first, to lessen imprecision in measuring exposures, and second, to adjus

45 hat the prototype effect is compensatory for imprecision in memory.

46 t perform when summation is difficult due to imprecision in neural circuits or is suboptimal due to u

47 Finally, we found evidence of imprecision in ORN-->PN connections that can diminish ne

48 been quantified for many northern peatlands, imprecision in process-based approaches to predicting CH

49 re, we should expect a degree of irreducible imprecision in quantitative correspondences with nature,

50 ysfunction as an origin for auditory sensory imprecision in schizophrenia.

51 or estimators suffer to differing degrees of imprecision in small-sample settings, it is important to

52 has been suggested that there is irreducible imprecision in such climate models that manifests itself

53 Imprecision in the FC resulted in diagnostic discordance

54 This has produced some imprecision in the literature on what is meant by the te

55 In addition, a certain degree of imprecision in the localization of postsynaptic GABA(A)

56 Although imprecision in the measurement of diet places limits on

57 There is currently considerable imprecision in the nosology of biomarkers used in the st

58 pic contrast and was not easily explained by imprecision in the silencing of the cones.

59 Imprecision, inconsistency, and risk of bias also limite

60 of clinicians' cultural competence, and (5) imprecision inherent in the use of unstructured intervie

61 s with a significant new type of irreducible imprecision involving many fast, unstable modes.

62 his diagnosis will remain unknown until this imprecision is addressed.

63 matic approach to deal with this irreducible imprecision is advocated through algorithms based on the

64 ent phenotype characteristics, provided that imprecision is mitigated.

65 hown to be imprecise, yet the extent of this imprecision is unknown.

66 In general, this imprecision leads to substantial attenuation of disease-

67 say was precise and accurate with interbatch imprecision <16.5%, and interbatch inaccuracy <13.7% at

68 mean error=6%), precise (intra- and interday imprecision <8%), and sensitive (limit of detection=0.06

69 estimates were unbiased (<10%) and had good imprecision (<30%).

70 as >or=85.7% with intra-assay and interassay imprecision<or=13.9 and 12.4%, respectively.

71 ra-day bias, <10%), precise (inter/intra-day imprecision, <10%), and fast (6 min run time).

72 mu the bias becomes more important than the imprecision, making accuracy dependent on knowledge of t

73 The target article is plagued by imprecision, making it largely impossible to evaluate th

74 ] to 91% [95% CI, 88%-93%]); variability and imprecision may be due to differences in study designs o

75 count the clustering between eyes, to assess imprecision (measurement reproducibility).

76 Due to map imprecision, nearby stimulus locations produced intermin

77 xcept for one in which changes in FMI timing imprecision negatively correlated with changes in RAWM w

78 analytical recovery of 80.3-108.3% and total imprecision of 2.2-11.0% for all quantitative analytes.

79 mean inaccuracy of 9%, interday and intraday imprecision of 7.5% or lower, and a lower limit of quant

80 If the imprecision of a measurement of the displacement of an o

81 y 8.5 +/- 0.4 decibels (dB), and measurement imprecision of a single quadrature of motion 2.4 +/- 0.7

82 The imprecision of aspects of the joining reaction contribut

83 line of equivalence, taking into account the imprecision of both tests, was used to compare results.

84 It is increasingly accepted that the imprecision of categorical psychiatric diagnoses can be

85 generate Ab and TCR diversity is programmed imprecision of coding joint formation.

86 is artifactually enhanced by the measurement imprecision of current quantitative techniques.

87 tainty of evidence was downgraded because of imprecision of effect estimates and indirectness of the

88 The imprecision of estimates of aspirin consumption and the

89 must be interpreted in light of the profound imprecision of exposure assessment that characterizes nu

90 ted statistics of interest to illustrate the imprecision of FDR estimation.

91 he mixture, correlation between species, and imprecision of historical estimates.

92 ifferential biology of multiple mobile DNAs, imprecision of integrases and transposases, and differen

93 It succeeds in predicting the precision and imprecision of motor behavior using a suboptimal decodin

94 Pathologically, the imprecision of NHEJ contributes to genome mutations that

95 ouble-strand break processes make use of the imprecision of NHEJ in generating antigen receptor diver

96 Despite the relative imprecision of our estimates and possible residual bias,

97 sion of unpublished data can also reduce the imprecision of pooled effect estimates during meta-analy

98 procedure was fully validated; the bias and imprecision of quality controls (QCs) at three Hct level

99 The bias, intraday and interday imprecision of quality controls at three hematocrit leve

100 the outcomes, but no obvious indirectness or imprecision of results reporting.

101 Calibration equations, bias and imprecision of RNFL measurements were calculated using s

102 ogy, indirectness, and the heterogeneity and imprecision of some results temper inferences from this

103 lts reveal that cell sorting acts to correct imprecision of spatial patterning by noisy inductive sig

104 The inherent imprecision of the IA and reference ELISAs was sigma(del

105 The imprecision of the LPT was low (coefficient of variation

106 ual measurements is related to the intrinsic imprecision of the measurement process only.

107 uracy of the measurement and the greater the imprecision of the measurement.

108 ity of evidence is limited by heterogeneity, imprecision of the result estimates, and risk of bias.

109 Whereas the inherent imprecision of the SA and reference ELISAs was sigma(del

110 n to or deletion from the joining genes, and imprecision of the site of recombination.

111 We predict that, given the relative imprecision of vocal fold vibration in desiccated versus

112 Patients do not show the type of imprecision or delay-dependent amplification of impairme

113 RTVue-100 showed higher imprecision (or higher measurement variability) than Cir

114 lex arrays exhibit high levels of analytical imprecision, particularly at the batch level.

115 atients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), imprecision persists with such analyses.

116 Analytical imprecision ranged from 3.5% to 5.3%, which is enough to

117 r alcohol use, but the CIs are wide and some imprecision remains.

118 urement (310.38 mum) and the highest (worst) imprecision SD (3.13 mum; CV = 0.010), and the inferior

119 3.32 mum (CV = 0.011), and a device-related imprecision SD of 2.33 mum (CV = 0.008).

120 The quadrant with the lowest (best) imprecision SD was in the nasal one (2.06 mum; CV = 0.00

121 icates, but we observed significantly larger imprecision than expected under pure Poisson sampling er

122 ation because it adds only a small amount of imprecision to the code for target speed in MT, which is

123 or M2, M4, M5 and M6 had poor bias and large imprecision under static and dynamic conditions.

124 The interday imprecision was < or = 12.2% over a dynamic range extend

125 Interday and intraday imprecision was better than 8% for all metabolites, whil

126 ry, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and imprecision were determined for each analyte.

127 12 for the imprecision case, and 60 for the imprecision with noise case.

128 derstanding that an important factor causing imprecision with RT PCR is a change in the initial ratio

129 ptive bias (mean departure from optimum) and imprecision (within-population variance) to the phenotyp