1 scans are at low risk for cancer but should,
in our opinion, be followed up at short-term intervals w
2 hed (22 studies) or published in a way that,
in our opinion, conveyed a positive outcome (11 studies)
3 In our opinion, CVIC should be considered a particular f
4 In our opinion, evidence of the effectiveness of these a
5 ncentrating on some of those compounds that,
in our opinion, have the greatest potential and rational
6 In our opinion, however, practical issues and the absenc
7 convert chemicals derived from biomass, and,
in our opinion, it has an important role to play in the
8 In our opinion, it is more intuitively appealing than co
9 de range of biochemical processes including,
in our opinion, killing of bacteria by protozoa.
10 euronal activation over deactivation, which,
in our opinion, limits the scope and utility of their co
11 In our opinion, many published results might be explaine
12 In our opinion, modern CT imaging with the use of dose r
13 mizing them into a lead compound makes them,
in our opinion, poor scaffolds for fragment libraries.
14 In our opinion, such devices, employing electroencephalo
15 n or rodent systems appear to be subtle, and
in our opinion, the current experimental evidence base d
16 Although,
in our opinion, the data on balance warrant the continue
17 In our opinion, the developing of this non-destructive m
18 In our opinion, the future use of functional MRI will su
19 In our opinion, the major effort for effective HIV vacci
20 In our opinion, the most minimally invasive approach is
21 In our opinion, the need to develop a unified object mod
22 In our opinion, the proposed causal relationship between
23 In our opinion, the reasons for this have been predomina
24 In our opinion, there is a strong need for a consensus o
25 In our opinion, there is low probability that the net ae
26 In our opinion, this information is relevant to improve
27 In our opinion, this model provides a conceptual framewo
28 In our opinion, we highlight that, without new diagnosti