ライフサイエンスコーパス: incisional hernia

1 oing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) for incisional hernia.

2 as been proposed in patients at high risk of incisional hernia.

3 or higher have an increased risk to develop incisional hernia.

4 ransverse and craniocaudal dimensions of the incisional hernia.

5 rnia (DASH) is accurate for the diagnosis of incisional hernia.

6 l anastomotic stenosis, marginal ulceration, incisional hernia.

7 ll patients undergoing laparotomy develop an incisional hernia.

8 e an independent factor for recurrence of an incisional hernia.

9 tric bypass was the reduction in the rate of incisional hernia.

10 ed to reinforce the repair of abdominal wall incisional hernias.

11 midline laparotomy incisions developed into incisional hernias.

12 of management apply equally to inguinal and incisional hernias.

13 ove outcomes in the repair of abdominal wall incisional hernias.

14 latation, late small bowel obstructions, and incisional hernias.

15 A majority of the defects (68%) were incisional hernias.

16 cations such as infection (10.5 vs 1.3%) and incisional hernia (7.9 vs 0%) were more common after ope

17 Patients suffering from an incisional hernia after abdominal surgery have an impair

18 The incidence of incisional hernias after abdominal aortic aneurysm repai

19 There were two donor complications: one incisional hernia and one ileus.

20 has rare but relevant complications, namely incisional hernias and neuralgia at the trocar sites, wh

21 lymer significantly lowered the incidence of incisional hernias and the recurrence rate after repair.

22 steroids, the incidence of wound infections, incisional hernias, and fascial dehiscence is low in kid

23 10, including three internal hernias, three incisional hernias, and four nonincisional ventral herni

24 While adhesions and incisional hernias are common and well recognized, other

25 The cumulative incidence of incisional hernias at 2-year follow-up after conventiona

26 The primary endpoint was the incidence of incisional hernias at 2-year follow-up.

27 Patients with incisional hernia benefit substantially from surgery con

28 terventions; colonic ischemia, bleeding, and incisional hernias caused 30%, 22%, and 22% of OSR reint

29 -LDN was associated with a higher rate of an incisional hernia compared with all other modalities (P

30 Incisional hernias complicate 11% of abdominal wall clos

31 r CNF (18% vs 45%; P = 0.002), mainly due to incisional hernia corrections (3% vs 14%; P = 0.047).

32 sk of surgical reintervention, mainly due to incisional hernia corrections.

33 The estimated "freedom of incisional hernia" curves (Kaplan-Meier estimate) were s

34 he "hernia-treatment" experiments, recurrent incisional hernias developed in 86% of control-rod incis

35 In the "hernia-prevention" experiments, incisional hernias developed in 90% of untreated incisio

36 recovery at 3 weeks after repair of midline incisional hernias does not differ between LR and OR, bu

37 and effectively prevents the development of incisional hernia during 2 years, with an additional mea

38 toperative day (POD) 7, and the incidence of incisional hernia formation was determined on POD 28.

39 A rat model of chronic incisional hernia formation was used.

40 induce early biomechanical wound failure and incisional hernia formation.

41 Incisional hernia (IH) remains a common, highly morbid,

42 tion for a complication or open conversion), incisional hernia in 5 patients (1.8%), and anastomotic

43 the abdominal wall is strengthened to reduce incisional hernia incidence.

44 Incisional hernia is one of the most frequent postoperat

45 on abdominal wall function in patients with incisional hernia is sparse.

46 Incisional hernia is the most frequent surgical complica

47 e usefulness of DASH for characterization of incisional hernia is unknown.

48 Patients with an incisional hernia larger than 3 cm and smaller than 15 c

49 36, 9%), bacterial infections (n = 49, 12%), incisional hernia (n = 22, 6%), pleural effusion requiri

50 5 stomal stenoses, 3 bowel obstructions, 26 incisional hernias (nonlaparoscopic), and 1 pulmonary em

51 One mucosal perforation and one incisional hernia occurred in the open group.

52 : Patients from 7 centers with a midline incisional hernia of a maximum width of 10 cm were rando

53 was not lower in recipients who developed an incisional hernia or facial dehiscence (vs. those who di

54 espectively), wound complications (abdominal incisional hernia or infusion port dehiscence/inflammati

55 ormed on a second group of rats with chronic incisional hernias or acute anterior abdominal wall myof

56 Postoperative incisional hernia rates were expectedly higher in open (

57 ts in highly favorable outcomes with reduced incisional hernia rates.

58 f 10,822 Washington state patients underwent incisional hernia repair (mean age 58.7 +/- 15.6, 64% fe

59 However, rates of emergent incisional hernia repair among older men rose significan

60 : Laparoscopic and open techniques for incisional hernia repair are recognized treatment option

61 These increasing rates of emergent incisional hernia repair are troublesome owing to the si

62 re primary umbilical/epigastric (umb/epi) or incisional hernia repair from a regional area of 2 milli

63 Incisional hernia repair is associated with high cumulat

64 months after primary umbilical/epigastric or incisional hernia repair underestimated overall risk of

65 Incidence of incisional hernia repair was higher after open AAA repai

66 Rates of emergent incisional hernia repair were high but relatively stable

67 residents assigned ICD9 procedure codes for incisional hernia repair with or without synthetic mater

68 nderwent at least one subsequent reoperative incisional hernia repair within the first 5 years after

69 Of patients undergoing incisional hernia repair, 12.3% underwent at least one s

70 stay, 1-year readmission, repeat AAA repair, incisional hernia repair, and lower extremity amputation

71 ) and major surgical procedures (ie, ventral incisional hernia repair, colectomy, reflux surgery, bar

72 outcome measure was the rate of reoperative incisional hernia repair, length of hospitalization, and

73 After umb/epi and incisional hernia repair, the cumulative risks of reoper

74 assessing surgical outcome in patients after incisional hernia repair.

75 Laparoscopic or open ventral incisional hernia repair.

76 patients with umb/epi and 256 patients with incisional hernia repair.

77 rotomy wound failure rate observed following incisional hernia repair.

78 ed an additional surgical procedure: midline incisional hernia, repair ureteral fistula, and repair e

79 tionwide cohort study including all elective incisional hernia repairs in Denmark from January 1, 200

80 bdominal wall closures, resulting in 200,000 incisional hernia repairs in the United States each year

81 The use of synthetic mesh in incisional hernia repairs increased from 34.2% in 1987 t

82 ring incisional herniation and its effect on incisional hernia repairs.

83 AWR for incisional hernia specifically improved long-term abdomi

84 rgical risk (pulmonary embolus, leak, death, incisional hernia) than in other patients who underwent

85 study of 18 consecutive patients with large incisional hernia undergoing AWR with linea alba restora

86 reduce the high incidence of abdominal wall incisional hernias using sustained release growth factor

87 A rat model of chronic incisional hernia was used.

88 A total of 109 adults with incisional hernia were enrolled between July 1, 2010, an

89 In a second group, incisional hernias were repaired with either bFGF or con

90 imilar between groups except for the rate of incisional hernia, which was significantly greater after

91 ven patients underwent repair of inguinal or incisional hernias with no mortality.

92 ehiscence, impaired healing, lymphocele, and incisional hernia) with the use of these agents.