ライフサイエンスコーパス: informed consent

1 After informed consent, all patients underwent antiviral therapy (A

2 us temperature monitoring were included in the study, after informed consent.

3 terials and Methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained.

4 spective study was approved by the ethics review board, and informed consent was obtained.

5 ethods Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent waived for this retrospective noninferiority

6 thods Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was waived in this HIPAA-compliant retrospec

7 Risk estimation is critical for appropriate informed consent and varies substantially across living kidne

8 y had institutional review board approval, and the need for informed consent was waived.

9 ived institutional review board approval, and patients gave informed consent.

10 In sum, 971 subjects granted informed consent and were enrolled resulting in 904 nonduplic

11 rate of indemnity payments, malpractice lawsuits, including informed consent allegations, still present a time, money, an

12 However, there is a paucity of literature investigating informed consent in spinal surgery malpractice.

13 tients (117 [50.4%] male and 116 [49.8%] female; 80 with no informed consent allegation and 153 who cited lack of informe

14 Failure to obtain informed consent and associated medical malpractice case verd

15 board approval was obtained, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

16 y the institutional review board; the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

17 After obtaining informed consent from the readers, 12 CT colonography fly-thr

18 -adherent centre, found to have inadequate documentation of informed consent, immediately withdrew consent, or randomly a

19 f animal models, selecting appropriate endpoints, ethics of informed consent, and regulatory issues.

20 Lack of informed consent is an important cause of medical malpractice

21 th no informed consent allegation and 153 who cited lack of informed consent) who underwent spinal surgery and filed a ma

22 Kidney transplant candidates (KTCs) must provide informed consent to accept kidneys from increased risk donors

23 iew board approval, and patients in the CLQ cohort provided informed consent.

24 ism, and their candidacy for surgical intervention provided informed consent.

25 essional football players (age range, 52-65 years) provided informed consent to participate in this cross-sectional study

26 ved this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, multicenter study; informed consent was waived.

27 9] years in the control group, and 47.9 [13.3] years in the informed consent group).

28 = .002) and have more permanent injuries compared with the informed consent group (46 [57.5%] vs 63 [42.0%], P = .03).

29 With informed consent, blood samples were obtained from 50 patient

30 Written informed consent was obtained from 67 consecutive patients (5

31 Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before en

32 Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

33 Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

34 Written informed consent was obtained from patients or their parents.

35 d, which was approved by the local ethics board and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

36 was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

37 dy was approved by the local ethics committees, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to enro

38 and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained for the Effect of Iso-osmolar

39 and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained from all subjects.

40 nal review board-approved, prospectively conducted (written informed consent acquired), cross-sectional study performed i

41 were diagnosed with paracetamol overdose, and gave written informed consent.

42 s Committee, and all patients or their parents gave written informed consent.

43 a research ethics committee, and participants gave written informed consent.

44 stitutional review board, and all participants gave written informed consent.

45 al review board approval, and all participants gave written informed consent.

46 Materials and Methods Written informed consent and institutional ethics committee approval

47 e tone, Materials and Methods All subjects provided written informed consent, and the protocol was approved by the univer

48 All subjects provided written informed consent.

49 oke English, and all participating parents provided written informed consent.

50 udy was approved by the institutional board review; written informed consent was obtained from healthy subjects and was w