ライフサイエンスコーパス: inhibitory concentration

1 ombination with ciprofloxacin (2.5 x minimum inhibitory concentration).

2 cern the molecular mechanism and the minimum inhibitory concentration.

3 se catalytic site, thus lowering the minimal-inhibitory concentration.

4 ociated with an increased vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.

5 well below the protein-binding-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration.

6 ructurally diverse antibiotics at a range of inhibitory concentrations.

7 where, and when, the drugs are found at sub-inhibitory concentrations.

8 roES overexpression did not increase minimum inhibitory concentrations.

9 he half maximal (IC50) and the minimal (MIC) inhibitory concentrations.

10 types, as well as metadata including minimum inhibitory concentrations.

11 valent to unencapsulated tobramycin (minimum inhibitory concentration 0.625mg/L).

12 n the MCL cell lines with lower half-maximal inhibitory concentration (0.1-0.5 muM), pevonedistat ind

13 DTG concentrations exceeded the in vitro 50% inhibitory concentration (0.21 ng/mL) by a median of 214

14 0.137 +/- 0.007 mM; LS vs. HS; half-maximal inhibitory concentration, 0.055 nM).

15 O4(-) uptake via hNIS in vitro (half-maximal inhibitory concentration, 0.55-0.56 muM (in comparison w

16 und to GRPR with high affinity (half maximal inhibitory concentration, 1-2 nM).

17 ve against C. parvum growth in vitro (median inhibitory concentration, 136 nmol/L).

18 At its half-maximal inhibitory concentration (15 nM), D5 strongly suppressed

19 dation and ferritin expression (half maximal inhibitory concentration = 19.8 +/- 4.6 nmol/L).

20 n (geometric mean titres of the half maximum inhibitory concentration: 2688 in the 10 mug group, 1775

21 AP-susceptible Enterococcus faecium (minimum inhibitory concentration, 3 microg/mL) harboring genetic

22 The inhibitory concentration 50% (IC50) of NSC319726 was 35-

23 9726 was 35-800-fold higher than the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration 50% (MIC50 values), which indic

24 MAb, IM-CKV063, was highly neutralizing (50% inhibitory concentration, 7.4 ng/ml), demonstrated high-

25 a novel high-affinity radioligand (human 50% inhibitory concentration = 9.6 nM) for the PAM site of m

26 presentation had a 2.01-fold-higher minimum inhibitory concentration (95% CI, 1.39-fold to 2.91-fold

27 bidity detection accuracy of 98.21%, minimum-inhibitory-concentration accuracy of 95.12%, and a drug-

28 ncentrations 100-fold lower than the minimal inhibitory concentration against bacteria.

29 that exhibited a marked increase in the 50% inhibitory concentrations against all tested NAIs (827-,

30 These inhibitors show potent minimum inhibitory concentrations against fluoroquinolone resist

31 P disruption corresponded with lower minimum inhibitory concentrations against the Gram-positive Stap

32 ions for various dosing regimens and minimal inhibitory concentration and calculated the probability

33 ain a vitreous level that exceeds its median inhibitory concentration and can significantly decrease

34 12 resulted in levels above the half-maximal inhibitory concentration and neutralization of VEGF in a

35 istant mutants increase the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration and the in vivo 99% effective d

36 ding and increased both the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration and the in vivo effective dose

37 (coarse and nano) was tested by the minimum inhibitory concentration and time kill assay.

38 Minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum microbicidal conce

39 e inhibitors (1) inhibit EBOV infection (50% inhibitory concentration, approximately 0.28 and approxi

40 ecame sensitive to lacosamide with IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration) around 70-80 microM.

41 resistant Staphylococcus aureus with minimum inhibitory concentration as low as 0.39 mug/mL.

42 ill be used, along with the existing minimum inhibitory concentration, as a standard for the in vitro

43 antibiotic against S. constellatus (minimum inhibitory concentration at 90% [MIC90] 0.25 mg/L), and

44 nable in vitro and urinary activity (minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint </=64 microg/mL) aga

45 and strains with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations, but clinicians should always

46 ther increased oseltamivir and peramivir 50% inhibitory concentrations by 790- and >5000-fold, respec

47 oncentrations exceeding 10 times the minimum inhibitory concentration completely inhibited the growth

48 t fecal concentrations greater than parasite inhibitory concentrations correlate best with effective

49 odels confirmed that a high triazole minimal inhibitory concentration corresponded with triazole trea

50 Microbial inhibitory concentration demonstrated platinum and gold

51 Mean half maximal inhibitory concentrations (EC50) for calcium, magnesium

52 at inhibiting FAAH, Cox-1, and Cox-2 (median inhibitory concentration: FAAH, 0.031 +/- 0.002 microM;

53 hour concentration-time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC/MIC) was found to be the

54 Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC) studies demonstrated that

55 by in vitro IC50 and IC80 values (50 and 80% inhibitory concentrations) figure prominently into the s

56 Given at concentrations above the inhibitory concentration, FIT-039 did not have a cytotox

57 Evaluation of the minimum inhibitory concentrations, followed by whole genome sequ

58 ation spent over 64 mg/L (4-fold the minimal inhibitory concentration for Pseudomonas aeruginosa) wer

59 ease of >3 doubling dilutions in the minimum inhibitory concentration for third-generation cephalospo

60 concentrations and exceeded the in vitro 50% inhibitory concentration for wild-type HIV (0.2 ng/mL),

61 SF was >0.51 ng/mL (proposed CSF 50% maximal inhibitory concentration for wild-type virus) in all sub

62 l derived from the clay exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations for E. coli under acidic condi

63 ng susceptibility tests to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations for M. genitalium.

64 t drug concentrations inside caseum and high inhibitory concentrations for this bacterial subpopulati

65 Minimum inhibitory concentrations for various antibiotic classes

66 istin susceptibility by reducing the minimum inhibitory concentration from 8 to 0.5 mug/ml, 4-fold be

67 ositive predictive value compared to minimum inhibitory concentrations generated by commercial method

68 igecycline therapy given tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentration greater than 2 mg/L compared wi

69 ine in the subgroup with tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentration greater than 2 mg/L compared wi

70 Isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentration >/= 1 microg/mL decreased (13%

71 re highly resistant to voriconazole (minimum inhibitory concentration >/=16 mg/L).

72 solates clinically resistant to AZM (minimum inhibitory concentration >/=16 microg/mL) was also signi

73 hogen or S. aureus with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration >1 microg/mL, however, had high

74 ortion of isolates with a penicillin minimal inhibitory concentration >2 microg/mL decreased signific

75 Isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations >/=2 microg/mL underwent ESBL

76 demonstrated ceftolozane-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentrations >/=8 mug/mL.

77 -susceptible E. faecium strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations >2 microg/mL.

78 sistance in MRSA and increase in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (>1 or 2 microg/mL); however,

79 with high but susceptible vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations have been associated with addi

80 The half-maximal inhibitory concentration IC[Formula: see text] is an imp

81 or estimating the potency [e.g. half-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC) known as IC50] of anti-can

82 ions and displayed significant shifts in 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)s), characteristic of r

83 se is inhibited by sulfide with half-maximal inhibitory concentration IC50 = 1.1 +/- 0.1 muM, under i

84 ent genotypes, and showed differences in 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50 ) correlating with clinic

85 the best bNAbs (geometric mean half-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) < 0.05 mug ml(-1)).

86 62% of 181 pseudoviruses with a half-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) <50 mug ml(-1).

87 viral entry process with a submicromolar 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) (IC50 = 0.61 +/- 0.23 mu

88 At a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) cutoff of 1 mug/ml per a

89 eukemia cell lines revealed the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for inhibiting FLT3 auto

90 Inhibitory concentration (IC50) for radical scavenging w

91 y (ORAC) assays with a measured half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for the best case of 1.5

92 oduced measurable cytotoxicity [half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) in MMP assay/IC50 in via

93 The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of (111)In-cetuximab-F(a

94 1 pseudotyped viruses tested with a mean 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.002 mug/mL.

95 was in good agreement with the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.018 nM determined f

96 eutralizing 97% of viruses with a median 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.055 mug/ml.

97 a dose-dependent manner, with a half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.087 +/- 0.012 mg of

98 Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of BA were calculated as

99 significantly greater fold increases in 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of EFV than viruses carr

100 The DPP-IV half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of H4, a potent sample,

101 an and rat P2X7R orthologs, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of JNJ-54173717 was 4.2

102 h isoeugenol showing the lowest half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of mycelium growt

103 on of 11, all complexes exhibited 50% growth inhibitory concentration (IC50) values that were less th

104 of kelch13 mutations, higher piperaquine 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values, and lower mefloq

105 ing antioxidant activities, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 215.86 mug/ml and Tr

106 avirin increased the error rate, and the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 27 muM.

107 highest increase in oseltamivir half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), and E119D conferred the

108 ation constant, time to protein-adjusted 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50), and week 5 nevirapine l

109 tives, were identified, and the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), inhibition constant (K(

110 h mitochondrial O2 consumption [half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50): 3.8muM] and ATP synthes

111 , although with relatively high half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50 > 50 muM).

112 For microfilariae, median inhibitory concentrations (IC50 values) on day 6 were 6.

113 des, LPVP and MPVQA, had DPP-IV half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 87.0+/-3.2 and 93.3+

114 ls significantly decreased the fifty percent inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of chemotherapeutic dru

115 Here, we present half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) results for 21 further

116 ld higher IFNbeta (P < 0.00001) half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) than did donor isolates

117 Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were obtained for each

118 ular isomer, with low nanomolar half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50).

119 ajority of circulating strains in vitro (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] > 5 mug/ml).

120 by SIV-infected macaque plasma samples (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] < 10(-5)) and monoclonal

121 The two compounds (i) are potent (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] of 0.3 to 5.9 muM); (ii)

122 und to GRPR with high affinity (range of 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] values, 0.3 nM [SARNC5]

123 issue-independent (maternal BBB half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50], 5.67 +/- 1.07 muM, vs.

124 azyl (DPPH) radical quenching potential (50% inhibitory concentration, IC50 approximately 0.59mg/mL)

125 The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) for S-1X, S-2X, S-3X,

126 anti-Plasmodium properties with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) of 2.9 +/- 2.4, 10.7 +

127 iations (CNVs) with in-vitro piperaquine 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s), and tested whether th

128 10-50% of HIV-1 isolates inefficiently (80% inhibitory concentration (IC80) > 5 mug ml(-1)), suggest

129 mosomes were associated with piperaquine 90% inhibitory concentrations (IC90) in a genome-wide analys

130 ciation (P < .05) with either cytarabine 50% inhibitory concentration in leukemia cells or clinical r

131 ified by a luminometric assay and as minimal inhibitory concentration in the liquid phase.

132 ic and drug-resistant bacteria, with minimal inhibitory concentrations in a sub-micromolar range.

133 potent compound displayed micromolar minimal inhibitory concentrations in different Gram-negative and

134 after gel application and remained above 95% inhibitory concentrations in rectal fluids at 24 hours.

135 complexes inhibited cell proliferation with inhibitory concentrations in the 0.5-120 muM range.

136 ides attached to an acyl chain, have minimal inhibitory concentrations in the micromolar range agains

137 and ethyl ester prodrug forms showed minimum inhibitory concentrations in the range of 21-43 mug/mL a

138 m ROS are greatly diminished and the minimum inhibitory concentration increases 20-fold.

139 ibited good activity as well as a fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) of 0.1 with methic

140 ntly synergizes with methicillin (fractional inhibitory concentration index = 0.25) and is protective

141 ivity is defined analogously to a fractional inhibitory concentration index of unity, and the extent

142 al isolates of R. oryzae (48-hour fractional inhibitory concentration index, 0.187-0.281).

143 NS-ZnNPs at sub-inhibitory concentrations inhibited the biofilm formatio

144 bility testing, and determination of minimum inhibitory concentration is conventionally performed by

145 copies per mL and a BMS-626529 half-maximum inhibitory concentration lower than 100 nmol/L were rand

146 susceptible breakpoint of cefepime (minimum inhibitory concentration </= 8 mug/mL), cefepime definit

147 All isolates had minimum inhibitory concentration </=0.50 microg/mL.

148 hereas 221-7 was borreliacidal (half maximal inhibitory concentration, < 1 nM) against B. burgdorferi

149 Effective inhibitory concentrations measured under planktonic cond

150 istance, which is measured using the minimum inhibitory concentration metric, tolerance and persisten

151 ates, there were 10 with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >/=0.06 mg/L and azithrom

152 nd 11.8% (group B) of patients had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >2 mug/mL to penicillin.

153 ore potent antimicrobial agents [VRE minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 0.01-0.005 mug/mL] with

154 The significant modulation of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against a Mtb strain over

155 fungal activity was studied, and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal fungicidal co

156 vity was determined by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal

157 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal

158 TEO reached minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal co

159 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal co

160 PPMOs were evaluated in vitro using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and viability assays, and

161 ow classic metrics like the IC50 and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) are dubious proxies for u

162 tibacterial activities, lowering the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by more than one order of

163 method for telavancin, resulting in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations that are m

164 rmore, sulphated PEPS had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for E. coli ATCC 25922, a

165 Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Gram-positive and Gra

166 resulted in a 2-fold increase in the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the hybrid, while mox

167 Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been shown to affect

168 cteremia (MRSAB) when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is >1 microg/mL.

169 is unclear whether higher-vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is associated with mortal

170 y for VGS isolates with a penicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >/= 2 microg/mL.

171 Compound 1f was most potent with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 12.5 mug/mL and an Mtb

172 athogen Gardnerella vaginalis with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 3.6 mg/ml.

173 osis; the most potent compound had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 52 nM and was not cyto

174 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of an antimicrobial drug

175 nd monthly for 3 months by change in minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of culture isolates was s

176 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of GEO was determined by

177 antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen at both 5

178 a antibiotic concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on days 3 and 4.

179 voriconazole at 1x, 10x, 25x, or 50x minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or amphotericin B at 0.25

180 ells in 60 min and susceptibility at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 6.25-12.5 mug/mL

181 fficacy was linked to the AUC0-24 to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio (r(2) = 0.98).

182 eve an area under the curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of >/=400.

183 nd correlated treatment outcome with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results and the presence

184 The lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value (0.13mg gallic acid

185 A remarkable 1000-fold decrease in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value is observed for uro

186 ested fungal strains, with excellent minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against non-albica

187 ng Mycobacterium tuberculosis , with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values lower than those o

188 This covers the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the most common

189 The daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 4 mg/L in 78 (69.6%)

190 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was much lower for Gram p

191 ctive against Staphylococcus aureus [minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)(90) approximately 0.25 mi

192 igma correlates not with a peptide's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), but rather its ability t

193 on between exposure and azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

194 ity, antimicrobial activity (AA) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

195 on between exposure and azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

196 sed on 735 literature data points of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of Plantae, Bacteria, an

197 Evaluation of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) quantified the potency o

198 ell Mtb activity varied greatly with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) ranging from 0.78 to >10

199 of zingerone (2b-2e) exhibited lower minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) values than zingerone (2

200 eference and wild bacterial strains, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were achieved in a conce

201 s were more likely to have meropenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >/=16 microg/mL, while

202 l demonstrated elevated azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >256 mug/mL and elevate

203 ever, we additionally found that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against fluoroquinolone

204 Although polyamine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) decreased 4-fold in a n

205 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) from some contemporary

206 -kill kinetic assay was performed at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in all planktonic strai

207 t E. faecium strains with daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in the higher end of su

208 ituted quinazoline-2,4-diamines with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in the low micromolar r

209 The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of four antimicrobial a

210 ns nontoxic to mammalian cells), the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem against cli

211 phyte, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, to minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of single-herbicide mod

212 ne in the presence or absence of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin.

213 o produce a wide range of ethambutol minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) that depended on mutati

214 Increased minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to cefixime have been i

215 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined on base

216 torvastatin, and simvastatin and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined.

217 s isolates with different antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).

218 The half maximal inhibitory concentration of (18)F-GP1 to GPIIb/IIIa was

219 xchange mediated by mouse pendrin with a 50% inhibitory concentration of 1-3 microM, without affectin

220 ith a KD of 76 nM against BioA and a minimum inhibitory concentration of 1.7 muM (0.6 mug/mL) against

221 teria monocytogenes: cIsf pool had a minimum inhibitory concentration of 10microg/ml prenylated compo

222 One of the T inkin isolates had a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 mg/L against amphotericin

223 ocyst development in the mosquito with a 50% inhibitory concentration of 30 nM (range: 23-39).

224 or blebbistatin, resulting in a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 36.3 +/- 4.1 microM.

225 this blocking agent revealed a half maximal inhibitory concentration of 40 nM which is comparable to

226 ilis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae at a minimal inhibitory concentration of 5.0microgmL(-1).

227 The inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50) values were deter

228 Their inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50) was determined us

229 Ga-HZ220 had a lower affinity for GRPr (inhibitory concentration of 50% [IC50], 21.4 +/- 7.4 nM)

230 Inhibitory concentration of 50% values (in nM) for GRPR

231 The inhibitory concentration of 50% values for binding GRPR

232 Minimum inhibitory concentration of AgNPs needed to inhibit the

233 Normally, the minimum inhibitory concentration of an antibiotic, the dosage at

234 st and second half of the study, the minimal inhibitory concentration of antibiotics required to inhi

235 to CS extract 0.2-0.75% with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of approximately 0.5%) led to i

236 The half-maximal inhibitory concentration of ATP-responsive nanovehicles

237 rary that is capable of lowering the minimum inhibitory concentration of beta-lactam antibiotics by u

238 uced cell proliferation and reduced the IC50 inhibitory concentration of chemotherapeutic drugs in vi

239 The 50% inhibitory concentration of compound 6 for MAO-B was 227

240 The median minimum inhibitory concentration of DSM265 in blood was estimate

241 The minimum inhibitory concentration of each plasma preparation was

242 ns of drug 100-fold greater than the minimal inhibitory concentration of most bacteria including MDRO

243 d alone or in combination changes in minimum inhibitory concentration of mutants.

244 rgeted nanospheres achieved the half maximal inhibitory concentration of PTX on SUM159 cells at a 5-1

245 The IC50 in vitro growth inhibitory concentration of these compounds ranged from

246 Minimum inhibitory concentration of voriconazole and natamycin i

247 pathogenic Aspergillus spp. revealed minimal inhibitory concentrations of </=0.06 microg/mL-greater p

248 Comparing the structures and minimum inhibitory concentrations of 1-4, the alpha,beta-unsatur

249 on centre photocurrents yielded half maximal inhibitory concentrations of 208nM and 2.1microM for ter

250 The inhibitory concentrations of 50% (IC50) for HYNIC-GGGNle

251 A enzyme preparations were used to determine inhibitory concentrations of 50%.

252 cterial susceptibility testing shows minimum inhibitory concentrations of 80 mg/mL against a model Es

253 The half maximum inhibitory concentrations of all the metalloconjugates a

254 o continue even in the presence of typically inhibitory concentrations of antibiotic.

255 Exposure to sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics has been shown

256 These compounds have half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of approximately 1 muM and sel

257 the concentration will persist above minimum inhibitory concentrations of Candida species for several

258 We show that at subminimal inhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin the bacterial

259 only occurs when cells are exposed to growth inhibitory concentrations of MG.

260 However, the inhibitory concentrations of NADH in these assays are fa

261 Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of native HNPs toward ADAMTS13

262 RT) factor 2 (HRT2) peaked concurrently with inhibitory concentrations of Notch1.

263 Minimum inhibitory concentrations of relevant antibiotics using

264 We also show that the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of the full-length EIIA(Glc) a

265 Inhibitory concentrations of thymol (4.53-22.2 ppm) were

266 hrough the estimation of amoxicillin minimum inhibitory concentration on a subset of 990 mutants carr

267 acillin underdosing when facing high minimal inhibitory concentration pathogens.

268 (131)I-RPS-027, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (PSMA) of 15 nM and a dissociat

269 132 and 1,782 h.mg/L, and AUC(0-24h)/minimum inhibitory concentration ratios of 528 and 7129, respect

270 010), with a bimodal distribution of minimum inhibitory concentration recorded between 2009 and 2010.

271 isolates from 1990 through 2001, the minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of isol

272 to vancomycin and linezolid, higher minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of isol

273 The minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of isol

274 culture-based antibiotic sensitivity minimum inhibitory concentration, sociodemographic and behaviora

275 e associated with a 3.48-fold-higher minimum inhibitory concentration than those isolates that were n

276 Minocycline (minimum inhibitory concentration that inhibits 50% and 90% of th

277 time that faropenem persisted above minimum inhibitory concentration (TMIC) on the moxifloxacin-line

278 .4-12]; p<0.0001) and higher piperaquine 50% inhibitory concentration (triple mutant 34 nM [28-41]; n

279 vels far exceeding the cellular half maximal inhibitory concentration values (>100,000-fold), and apt

280 ted strains of M. tuberculosis, with minimum inhibitory concentration values as low as 0.03 muM (0.01

281 d sensitivity to dasatinib with half maximal inhibitory concentration values below 20 nM was detected

282 ed with significantly higher PI half-maximum inhibitory concentration values compared with other mole

283 :blood penetration ratios were above the 50% inhibitory concentration values in almost 100% of cases.

284 The minimum inhibitory concentration values measured after 24h of an

285 The half-maximal inhibitory concentration values of our newly identified

286 ly (>24-fold to >130-fold differences in 50% inhibitory concentration values).

287 tively correlated (r = -0.52; P =018) to 50% inhibitory concentration values.

288 enzyme to drug, resulting in higher minimum inhibitory concentration values.

289 Treatment response and echinocandin minimum inhibitory concentrations varied among specific FKS muta

290 mong the viruses neutralized, the median 50% inhibitory concentration was 0.001 mug/ml.

291 ates with remarkable potency: the median 50% inhibitory concentration was 0.001 mug/ml.

292 e consistently infected, the average minimum inhibitory concentration was 0.26 microg/mL for azithrom

293 n method to accurately determine the minimum inhibitory concentration was developed herein.

294 he geometric mean titres of the half maximum inhibitory concentration were 8745 for the 10 mug group,

295 The half maximal inhibitory concentrations were </= 5 x 10(-7) mol/L, whe

296 The half-maximal inhibitory concentrations were independent of the phenot

297 Minimum inhibitory concentrations were interpreted as susceptibl

298 Higher antibiotic minimal inhibitory concentrations were required to inhibit 90% o

299 ncentrations divided by in vitro 50% and 95% inhibitory concentrations) were compared among different

300 inoglycosides as measured by reduced minimum inhibitory concentrations, whereas GroEL/GroES overexpre